Keynes and the drunkard under the lamp post: Making sense of Palley

References

• Atesoglu, H. S., and J. Smithin. 2014. “Inflation Targeting in a Simple Macroeconomic Model.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 28 (4):673–688. doi: 10.2753/PKE0160-3477280408.
   Google Scholar
• Bibow, J. 2005. “Liquidity Preference Theory Revisited—To Ditch or to Build on It?” Levy Economics Institute Working Paper No. 427. Annandale-on-Hudson.
   Google Scholar
• Bibow, J. 2020. “The General Theory as “Depression Economics”? Financial Instability and Crises in Keynes’s Monetary Thought.” Levy Economics Institute Working Paper No.974, Annandale-on-Hudson
   Google Scholar
• Bortz, P. G. 2017. “The Road They Share: The Social Conflict Element in Marx, Keynes and Kalecki.” Review of Keynesian Economics 5 (4):563–575. doi: 10.4337/roke.2017.04.06.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charpe, M., S. Bridji, and P. McAdam. 2019. “Labor Share and Growth in the Long Run.” ECB Working Paper Series No. 2251, Frankfurt.
   Google Scholar
• Clower, R. W. 1965. “The Keynesian Counter-Revolution: A Theoretical Appraisal.” In The Theory of Interest Rates, edited by F. M. Hahn and F. P. R. Brechling, 103–125. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ciminelli, G., R. Duval, and D. Furceri. 2020. “Employment Protection Deregulation and Labor Shares in Advanced Economies.” Review of Economics and Statistics 104 (6):1174–1190.
   Google Scholar
• Coddington, A. 1976. “Keynesian Economics: The Search for First Principles.” Journal of Economic Literature 14 (1):1258–1273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, P. 1994. Post Keynesian Macroeconomic Theory. A Foundation for Successful Economic Policies for the Twenty-First Century. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, P. 2003/2004. “Setting the Record Straight on A History of Post Keynesian Economics.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 25 (2):245–272.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, P. 2005. “Responses to Lavoie, King, and Dow on What Post Keynesianism is and Who is a Post Keynesian.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 27 (3):393–408. doi: 10.1080/01603477.2005.11051447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Loecker, J., J. Eeckhout, and G. Unger. 2020. “The Rise of Market Power and the Macroeconomic Implications.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 135 (2):561–644. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjz041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galbraith, J. K. 1967. The New Industrial State. Harmondsworth: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, G. M., and E. Oberfield. 2022. “The Elusive Explanation for the Declining Labor Share.” Annual Review of Economics 14 (1):93–124. doi: 10.1146/annurev-economics-080921-103046.
   Google Scholar
• Heise, A. 1990. “Some Comments on the Investment Theory Debate.” Jahrbücher Für Nationalökonomie Und Statistik 207 (5):432– 447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heise, A. 2006. “Limitations of Keynesian Demand Management Through Monetary Policy – Wither Cartesian Policy Control.” In Complexity, Endogenous Money and Macroeconomic Theory: Essays in Honour of Basil J. Moore, edited by M. Setterfield, 438–460. Cheltenham: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heise, A. 2008. “Economic Governance and Employment.” Policy, Polity and Politics of Economic Rise and Decline. Münster: Lit Publ.
   Google Scholar
• Heise, A. 2009. “A Post Keynesian Theory of Economic Policy – Filling a Void.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 31 (3):383–401. doi: 10.2753/PKE0160-3477310302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heise, A. 2017. “Walra's Law in the Context of Pre-Analytic Visions: A Note.“ Economic Thought 6 (1):83–96.
   Google Scholar
• Heise, A. 2019. “Post Keynesianism - Challenging the Neo-Classical Mainstream.” Efil Journal of Economic Research 2 (8):8–29.
   Google Scholar
• Heise, A. 2020a. “Wage-Led and Profit-Led Regime Research – Promising Scientific Research Programme or Scientific Cul-De-Sac?” Economic Issues 25 (2):31–49.
   Google Scholar
• Heise, A. 2020b. “Comparing Economic Theories or: pluralism in Economics and the Need for a Comparative Approach to Scientific Research Programmes.” Journal of Philosophical Economics XIII (2):162–184. doi: 10.46298/jpe.10740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heise, A. 2021. “The Incommensurabiliy of Keynes’s and Walrasian Economic and the Unsuccessful Escape from Old Ideas.” Economic Thought 10 (2):12–19.
   Google Scholar
• Heise, A. 2023. “A Keynesian–Minskian Perspective on the Transformation of Industrial into Financial Capitalism.”Journal of Evolutionary Economics 33 (4):963–990. doi: 10.1007/s00191-023-00840-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herr, H. 2018. Karl Marx’s Thoughts on Functional Income Distribution – A Critical Analysis. Institute for International Political Economy working paper 101, Berlin School of Economics, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, J. R. 1937. “Mr. Keynes and the ‘Classics’: A Suggested Interpretation.” Econometrica 5 (2):147–159. doi: 10.2307/1907242.
   Google Scholar
• Keynes, J. M. 1936. General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Keynes, J. M. 1979a. “A Fragment of the First Chapter of the Second 1933 Draft Table of Contents.” In Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, Vol. 29: The General Theory and After, A Supple-Ment, edited by D. Moggridge, 66–68. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Keynes, J. M. 1979b. “A Draft of Chapter 2 from the Last 1933 Table of Contents: 2. The Distinction between a Co-Operative Economy and an Entrepreneur Economy.” In Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, Vol. 29: The General Theory and After, A Supplement, edited by D. Moggridge, 76–87. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Keynes, J. M. 1979c. “A Draft of the Chapter 3 from the Last 1933 Table of Contents: 3. The Characteristics of an Entrepreneur Economy.” In Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, Vol. 29: The General Theory and After, A Supplement, edited by D. Moggridge, 87–102. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• King, J. E. 2012. “Post Keynesians and Others.” Review of Political Economy 24 (2):305–319. doi: 10.1080/09538259.2012.664353.
   Google Scholar
• Kolaja, J. 1968. “Antagonistic and Non-Antagonistic Conflicts: A Contribution to the Theory of the Temporal Dimension of Conflict.” Canadian Slavonic Papers 10 (3):376–384. doi: 10.1080/00085006.1968.11091123.
   Google Scholar
• Lavoie, M. 2005. “Changing Definitions: A Comment on Davidson’s Critique of King’s History of Post Keynesianism.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 27 (3):371–376. doi: 10.1080/01603477.2005.11051449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavoie, M. 2014. Post-Keynesian Economics. Cheltenham: New Foundations.
   Google Scholar
• Lindbeck, A., and D. Snowner. 1988. The Insider-Outsider Theory of Employment and Unemployment. Cambridge/Mass.: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mankiw, N. G. 1992. “The Reincarnation of Keynesian Economics.” European Economic Review 36 (2–3):559–565. doi: 10.1016/0014-2921(92)90113-B.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx, K. 1859/1977. A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy. Moscow: Academy Publ.
   Google Scholar
• Minsky, H. P. 1986. Stabilizing an Unstable Economy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nell, E. 1989. “The Rate of Profit in Kalecki’s Theory.” In Kalecki’s Relevance Today, edited by M. Sebastiani, 160–163. London: Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Palley, T. 1996. Post Keynesian Economics. London: Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Palley, T. I. 1997. “Aggregate Demand and Endogenous Growth: A Generalized Keynes-Kaldor Model of Economic Growth.” Metroeconomica 48 (2):161–176. doi: 10.1111/1467-999X.00025.
   Google Scholar
• Palley, T. I. 1998a. “Walras’ Law and Keynesian Macroeconomics.” Australian Economic Papers 37 (3):330–340. doi: 10.1111/1467-8454.00023.
   Google Scholar
• Palley, T. I. 1998b. Plenty of Nothing. The Downsizing of the American Dream and the Case for Structural Keynesianism. Princeton: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Palley, T. I. 2002. “Keynesian Macroeconomics and the Theory of Economic Growth: Putting Aggregate Demand Back in the Picture.” In The Economics of Demand-Led Growth, edited by M. Setterfield, 19–40. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Palley, T. 2023. “Keynes’ Denial of Conflict: Why The General Theory Is a Misleading Guide to Capitalism and Stagnation.” The Japanese Political Economy 49 (1):7–34. doi: 10.1080/2329194X.2023.2212008.
   Google Scholar
• Pernecky, M., and P. Wojick. 2019. “The Problematic Nature and Consequences of the Effort to Force Keynes into the Conceptual Cul-De-Sac of Walrasian Economics.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 43 (3):769– 783. doi: 10.1093/cje/bey039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer, M. 1985. “The Economics of Michal Kalecki.” Eastern European Economics 23 (3–4):vii–x. Nodoi: 10.1080/00128775.1985.11648308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schefold, B. 1976. “Nachworte.” In Warenproduktion Mittels Waren, edited by P. Sraffa, 129–226. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, C., and J. E. Stiglitz. 1984. “Equilibrium Unemployment as a Worker Discipline Device.” American Economic Review 74:433– 444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sraffa, P. 1960. Production of commodities by Means of Commodities. Prelude to a Critique of Economic Theory. Cambridge: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trigg, A. 2020. “Marx, Say’s Law and Commodity Money.” Contributions to Political Economy 39 (1):23–41. doi: 10.1093/cpe/bzaa005.
   Google Scholar