Commerce, Industry, and Security: Biomedicalization Theory and the Use of Metaphor to Describe Practitioner–Patient Communication Within Fertility, Inc.

References

• Angeli, E. L. (2012). Metaphors in the rhetoric of pandemic flu: Electronic media coverage of H1N1 and swine flu. Journal of Technical Writing & Communication, 3, 203–222.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, L. W. (2014). Conceiving masculinity: Male infertility, medicine, and identity. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beaurepaire, J., Jones, M., Thiering, P., Saunders, D., & Tennant, C. (1994). Psychosocial adjustment to infertility and its treatment: Male and female responses at different stages of IVF/ET treatment. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 38, 229–240. doi:10.1016/0022-3999(94)90118-X
   Google Scholar
• Becker, G. (1994). Metaphors in disrupted lives: Infertility and cultural constructions of continuity. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 8, 383–410. doi:10.1525/maq.1994.8.4.02a00040
   Google Scholar
• Bell, A. V. (2010). Beyond (financial) accessibility: Inequalities within the medicalization of infertility. Sociology of Health & Illness, 32, 631–646. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01235.x
   Google Scholar
• Boylstein, C., Rittman, M., & Hinojosa, R. (2007). Metaphor shifts in stroke recovery. Health Communication, 21, 279–287.
   Google Scholar
• Breitkopf, E., & Rubin, L. R. (2015). (Re)productive disorders: The expanding marketplace for infertility medicine. In M. C. McHugh & J. C. Chrisler (Eds.), The wrong prescription for women: How medicine and the media create a “need” for treatments, drugs, and surgery (pp. 37–59). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Bute, J., & Vik, T. (2010). Privacy management as unfinished business: Shifting boundaries in the context of infertility. Communication Studies, 61, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2014). Infertility: Preliminary data, 2014. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/art/reports/
   Google Scholar
• Chandra, A., Copen, C. E., & Stephen, E. H. (2014). Infertility service use in the United States: Data from the National Survey of Family Growth, 1982–2010. National Health Statistics Reports, 73, 1–21. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr073.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, A. E. (2014). Biomedicalization. In W. C. Cockerham, R. Dingwall, & S. R. Quah (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell encyclopedia of health, illness, behavior and society: Vol. 1. (pp. 137–142). West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, A. E., Shim, J. K., Mamo, L., Fosket, J. R., & Fishman, J. R. (2003). Biomedicalization: Theorizing techno-scientific transformations of health, illness, and U.S. biomedicine. American Sociological Review, 68, 161–194.
   Google Scholar
• deLacey, S. (2002). IVF as a lottery or investment: Contesting metaphors in discourses of infertility. Nursing Inquiry, 9, 43–51.
   Google Scholar
• Domar, A. A. (2004). Impact of psychological factors on dropout rates in insured infertility patients. Fertility & Sterility, 81, 1255–1261.
   Google Scholar
• Donchin, A. (1996). Feminist critiques of new fertility technologies: Implications for social policy. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 21, 475–498.
   Google Scholar
• FINRRAGE. (2016). Feminist International Network of Resistance to Reproductive and Genetic Engineering. Retrieved from http://www.finrrage.org/
   Google Scholar
• Friese, C., Becker, G., & Nachtigall, R. D. (2006). Rethinking the biological clock: Eleventh-hour moms, miracle moms, and meanings of age-related infertility. Social Science & Medicine, 63, 1550–1560. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.03.034
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, R. W., & Franks, H. (2002). Embodied metaphor in women's narratives about their experiences with cancer. Health Communication, 14, 139–165.
   Google Scholar
• Ginsberg, F., & Rapp, R. (1995). Conceiving a new world order: The global politics of reproduction. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Greil, A. L. (2002). Infertile bodies: Medicalization, metaphor, and agency. In M. C. Inhorn & F. Van Balen (Eds.), Infertility around the globe: New thinking on childlessness, gender, and reproductive technologies (pp. 101–118). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harwood, K. (2007). The infertility treadmill: Feminist ethics, personal choice, and the use of reproductive technologies. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Inhorn, M. C., & van Balen, F. (Eds.). (2002). Infertility around the globe: New thinking on childlessness, gender, and reproductive technologies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, R. E. (2016). Infertility: Tracing the history of a transformative term. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, R. E. (2015). From barren to sterile: The evolution of a mixed metaphor. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 45, 25–46.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. (2016). Personal, interpersonal, biomedical, textual: Vignettes on infertility and fertility privilege. Departures in Critical Qualitative Research, 5, 76–100. doi:10.1525/dcqr.2016.5.2.7.6
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, B., & Quinlan, M. M. (2016). Insiders and outsiders and insider(s) again in the (in)fertility world. Health Communication, 32(3). doi:10.1080/10410236.2016.1138384
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, S. (2000). Client empowerment in psychiatry and the professional abuse of clients: Where do we stand? International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine, 30, 61–70.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laurel Fertility Care. (2016). Concierge service. Retrieved from http://laurelfertility.com/concierge-service/BottomofForm
   Google Scholar
• Letherby, G. (2002). Challenging dominant discourses: Identity and change and the experience of “infertility” and “involuntary” childlessness. Journal of Gender Studies, 11, 277–288.
   Google Scholar
• Leyser-Whalen, O. (2014). “Crazy woman juice”: Making sense of women's clomiphene infertility treatments. Women's Reproductive Health, 1, 73–89. doi:10.1080/23293691.2014.966031
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (2006). Medicine as culture (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mamo, L. (2002). Sexuality, reproduction, and biomedical negotiations: An analysis of achieving pregnancy in the absence of heterosexuality. (Unpublished dissertation). University of California, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Mamo, L. (2007). Queering reproduction: Achieving pregnancy in an age of technoscience. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mamo, L. (2010). Fertility, Inc. Consumption and subjectification of lesbian reproductive practices. In A. E. Clarke, L. Mamo, J. R. Focscket, J. R. Fishman, & J. K. Shim (Eds.), Biomedicalization: Technoscience, health, and illness in the U.S. (pp. 173–196). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, M., & Ronner, W. (1996). The empty cradle: Infertility in America from colonial times to present. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, E. (1997). Medical metaphors of women's bodies: Menstruation and menopause. In K. Conboy, N. Medina, & S. Stanbury (Eds.), Writing on the body: Female embodiment and feminist theory (pp. 15–41). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meerabeau, L. (1998). Consumerism and health care: The example of fertility treatment. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 27, 721–729. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00613.x
   Google Scholar
• Ong, L. M. L., de Haes, J. C. J. M., & Lammes, F. B. (1995). Doctor–patient communication: A review of the literature. Social Science & Medicine, 40, 903–918.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer-Wackerly, A. L., & Krieger, J. L. (2014). Dancing around infertility: The use of metaphors in a complex medical situation. Health Communication, 3, 612–623.
   Google Scholar
• Petronio, S., & Sargent, J. (2011). Disclosure predicaments arising during the course of patient care: Nurses' privacy management. Health Communication, 26, 255–66.
   Google Scholar
• Redshaw, M., Hockley, C., & Davidson, L. L. (2007). A qualitative study of the experience of treatment for infertility among women who successfully became pregnant. Human Reproduction, 22, 295–304. doi:10.1093/humrep/del344
   Google Scholar
• RESOLVE: The National Infertility Organization. (2016). Retrieved from http://www.resolve.org/?referrer=https://www.google.com/
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, R. (2000). The world split open: How the modern women's movement changed America. New York, NY: Viking.
   Google Scholar
• Rycroft-Malone, J., Latter, S., Yerrell, P., & Shaw, D. (2001). Consumerism in health care: The case of medication education. Journal of Nursing Management, 9, 221–230.
   Google Scholar
• Sandelowski, M. (1993a). With child in mind: Studies of the personal encounter with infertility. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandelowski, M. (1993b). Rigor or rigor mortis: The probable of rigor in qualitiatve research revisted. Advances in Nursing Science, 16, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Sawicki, J. (1991). Disciplining Foucault: Feminism, power, and the body. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sontag, S. (1989). Illness as metaphor and AIDS and its metaphors. New York, NY: Picador.
   Google Scholar
• Spar, D. (2006). The baby business: How money, science, and politics drive the commerce of conception. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sterling, E. W. (2013). From no hope to fertile dreams: Procreative technologies, popular media, and the culture of infertility. (Unpublished dissertation). Atlanta, GA: Georgia State University.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, H. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. J., & Bogdan, R. (1998). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. (2005). Making parents: The ontological choreography of reproductive technologies. Boston, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Twenge, J. (2013, July/August). How long can you wait to have a baby? Atlantic. Retrieved from http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2013/07/how-long-can-you-wait-to-have-a-baby/309374/
   Google Scholar
• van Balen, F., & Bos, H. M. W. (2004). Infertility, culture, and psychology in worldwide perspective. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 22, 245–247.
   Google Scholar
• Willer, E. K. (2014). Healthcare-provider compassionate love and women's infertility stressors. Communication Monographs, 81, 407–438.
   Google Scholar
• Wirtberg, I., Moller, A., Hogstrom, L., Tronstad, S. E., & Lalos, A. (2007). Life 20 sources after unsuccessful infertility treatment. Human Reproduction, 22, 588–604.
   Google Scholar