Embracing a Feminist Approach to Women’s Reproductive Health

References

• American Psychological Association Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls. (2007). Report of the APA task force on the sexualization of girls. Retrieved April 1, 2010. https://www.apa.org/pi/women/programs/girls
   Google Scholar
• Bobel, C., Winkler, I. T., Fahs, B., Hasson, K. A., Kissling, E. A., & Roberts, T.-A. (2020). The Palgrave handbook of critical menstruation studies. Springer Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., Gavey, N., & McPhillips, K. (2003). The ‘fair deal’? Unpacking accounts of reciprocity in heterosex. Sexualities, 6(2), 237–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460703006002005
   Google Scholar
• Calder-Dawe, O., & Gavey, N. (2019). Feminism, Foucault, and Freire: A dynamic approach to sociocultural research. Qualitative Psychology, 6(3), 216–231. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000106
   Google Scholar
• Chrisler, J. C. (2008). 2007 Presidential address: Fear of losing control: Power, perfectionalism and the psychology of women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00402.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chrisler, J. C., & Caplan, P. (2002). The strange case of Dr. Jekyll and Ms. Hyde: How PMS became a cultural phenomenon and a psychiatric disorder. Annual Review of Sex Research, 13, 274–306.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chrisler, J. C., Ussher, J. M., & Perz, J. (2020). Introduction. In J. M. Ussher, J. C. Chrisler & J. Perz (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of women’s sexual and reproductive health (pp. 1–9). NY Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, P. (1999). Moving beyond gender: Intersectionality and scientific knowledge. In M. F. Ferree (Ed.), Revisioning gender (pp. 261–284). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cosgrove, L., Krimsky, S., Vijayaraghavan, M., & Schneider, L. (2006). Financial ties between DSM-IV panel members and the pharmaceutical industry. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 75(3), 154–160. https://doi.org/10.1159/000091772
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosgrove, L., & McHugh, M. C. (2000). Speaking for ourselves: Feminist methods and community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28(6), 815–838. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005163817007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, (1), 139–167.
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
   Google Scholar
• Davis, K. (2008). Intersectionality as buzzword: A sociology of science perspective on what makes a feminist theory successful. Feminist Theory, 9(1), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700108086364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Else-Quest, N. M., & Hyde, J. S. (2016). Intersectionality in quantitative psychological research. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(2), 155–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684316629797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavey, N. (1989). Feminist poststructuralism and discourse analysis: Contributions to feminist psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13(1), 459–475. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1989.tb01014.x
   Google Scholar
• Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grady, K. E. (1981). Sex bias in research design. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 5(4), 628–635. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1981.tb00601.x
   Google Scholar
• Hankivsky, O., Cormier, R., & De Merich, D. (2009). Intersectionality: Moving women’s health research and policy forward. Women’s Health Research Network.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, N. (2018). Feminist methodologies. In C. Cassell, A. L. Cunliffe, & G. Grandy (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative business and management research methods: History and traditions (pp. 138–153). SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkey, A. J., & Ussher, J. M. (2022). Feminist research: Inequality, social change, and intersectionality. In U. Flick (Ed.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research design (Vol. 1, pp. 175–193). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Liebert, R., & Gavey, N. (2009). “There are always two sides to these things”: Managing the dilemma of serious side effects from SSRIs. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 68(10), 1882–1891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.02.047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malecki, J. S., Rhodes, P., Ussher, J. M., & Boydell, K. (2022). A feminist phenomenological approach to the analysis of body maps: Childhood trauma and anorexia nervosa. Health Care for Women International, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2022.2096026
   Google Scholar
• McClelland, S. I. (2017). Vulnerable listening: Possibilities and challenges of doing qualitative research. Qualitative Psychology, 4(3), 338–352.
   Google Scholar
• Merkatz, R. B. (1998). Inclusion of women in clinical trials: A historical overview of scientific ethical and legal issues. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing : JOGNN, 27(1), 78–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-6909.1998.tb02594.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mills, J., & Birks, M. (2014). Qualitative methodology: A practical guide. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Reinharz, S. (1979). On becoming a social scientist. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, S., Ussher, J. M., & Hawkey, A. (2022). Mapping the abject: Women’s embodied experiences of premenstrual body dissatisfaction through body-mapping. Feminism & Psychology, 32(2), 199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley, L., & Wise, S. (2013). Method, methodology and epistemology in feminist research processes. In Feminist praxis (RLE feminist theory): Research, theory and epistemology in feminist sociology (pp. 20–60). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. (2013). Feminisms. In Qualitative research in the health sciences: Methodologies, methods and processes (pp. 134–152). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Triandafilidis, Z., Ussher, J. M., Perz, J., & Huppatz, K. (2017). Doing and undoing femininities: An intersectional analysis of young women’s smoking. Feminism & Psychology, 27(4), 465–488. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353517693030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triandafilidis, Z., Ussher, J. M., Perz, J., & Huppatz, K. (2018). Young Australian women’s accounts of smoking and quitting: A qualitative study using visual methods. BMC Women’s Health, 18(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-017-0500-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tuana, N. (2004). Coming to understand: Orgasm and the epistemology of ignorance. Hypatia, 19(1), 194–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2004.tb01275.x
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Population Fund. (2019). Sexual and reproductive health. United Nations Population Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Ussher, J. M. (2006). Managing the monstrous feminine: Regulating the reproductive body. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ussher, J. M., Chrisler, J. C., & Perz, J. (2020). Routledge international handbook of women’s sexual and reproductive health. NY Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• WHO. (2014). Ensuring human rights in the provision of contraceptive information and services: guidance and recommendations. WHO. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/102539/1/9789241506748_eng.pdf
   Google Scholar