Factors that Underpin the Delivery of Effective Decision-making Support for People with Cognitive Disability

References

• Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2013). Australia's welfare 2013. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Law Reform Commission. (2014). Equality, capacity and disability in Commonwealth laws (DP 81). Sydney: Australian Law Reform Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Antaki, C., Finlay, W., & Walton, C. (2009). Choices for people with intellectual disabilities: Official discourse and everyday pPractice. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 6, 260–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beadle-Brown, J., Hutchinson, A., & Whelton, B. (2012). Person-centred active support - Increased choice, promoting independence and reducing challenging behaviour. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 24(5), 291–307
   Google Scholar
• Bigby, C., Bowers, B., & Webber, R. (2011). Planning and decision-making about the future care of older group home residents and transition to residential aged care. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 55(8), 777–789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigby, C., Frawley, P., & Phillips, L. (2014). “Well hang on, that's sort of not right”: Family and staff perspectives on “Cultures of Respect” in supported accommodation services for people with intellectual disability, La Trobe University On-line Repository http://hdl.handle.net/1959.9/308905.
   Google Scholar
• Bigby, C., Webber, R., & Bowers, B. (2014). Sibling roles in the lives of older group home residents with intellectual disability: Working with staff to safeguard wellbeing. Australian Social Work. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/0312407X.2014.950678
   Google Scholar
• Bigby, C., Douglas, J., & Whiteside, M. (2015). Processes and dilemmas in support for decision making. Report to Scope. Melbourne: Living with Disability Research Centre, LaTrobe University On- Line Repository. [ link to be provided]
   Google Scholar
• Boundy, M., & Fleischner, B. (2013). Supported Decision Making Instead of Guardianship: An international overview. Washington: TASC, National Disability Rights Network.
   Google Scholar
• Bowey, L., & McGlaughlinm A. (2005). Assessing the barriers to achieving genuine housing choice for adults with a learning disability: the views of family carers and professionals. British Journal of Social Work, 35(1), 139–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, I., & Brown, R. I. (2009). Choice as an aspect of quality of life for people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 6(1), 11–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browning, M. (2010). Report by Michelle Browning 2010 Churchill Fellow To Investigate New Models of Guardianship and the Emerging Practice of Supported Decision Making. Retrieved from https://www.churchilltrust.com.au/media/fellows/Browning_Michelle_2010.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Browning, M., Bigby, C., & Douglas, J. (2014). Supported Decision-Making: Understanding how its conceptual link to legal capacity is influencing the development of practice. Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 1(1), 34–45.
   Google Scholar
• Carney, T. (2013). Participation & service access rights for people with intellectual disability: A role for law? Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 38(1), 59–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carney, T. (2014). Clarifying, operationalising and evaluating supported decision making models. Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 1(1), 46–50.
   Google Scholar
• Carney, T., & Beaupert, F. (2013). Public and private bricolage-challenges balancing law, services & civil society in advancing CRPD supported decision making. UNSW Law Journal, 36(1), 175–201.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Human Services. (2014). A guide to supporting people with a disability to make their own decisions. Melbourne, Victoria: Department of Human Services.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, J., Drummond, M., Knox, L., & Mealings, M. (in press). Rethinking social-relational perspectives in rehabilitation: traumatic brain injury as a case study. In K. McPherson, B. E. Gibson, & A. Leplege (Eds.), Rethinking rehabilitation theory. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellem, K., O'Connor, M., Wilson, J., & Williams, S. (2013). Social work with marginalised people who have a mild or borderline intellectual disability: Practicing gentleness and encouraging hope. Australian Social Work, 66(1), 56–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knox, L., Douglas, J., & Bigby, C. (2015a). “I won't be around forever”: Understanding the decision-making experiences of adults with severe TBI and their parents. Neuropscychological Rehabilitation, doi:org/10.1080/09602011.2015.1019519
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Knox, L., Douglas, J, & Bigby, C. (2015b).“The biggest thing is trying to live for two people”: Spousal experiences of supporting decision-making participation for partners with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, doi:10.3109/02699052.2015.1004753
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Knox, L., Douglas, J. M., & Bigby, C. (2013). Whose decision is it anyway? How clinicians support decision-making participation after acquired brain injury. Disability & Rehabilitation, 35(22), 1926–1932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohn, N. A., & Blumenthal, J. A. (2014). A critical assessment of supported decision-making for persons aging with intellectual disabilities. Disability and Health Journal, 7(1), S40–S43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law Commission Ontario. (2013). Capacity of adults with mental disabilities and the federal RDSP. Toronto: Law Commission of Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• Law Commission Ontario. (2014). Legal capacity, decision-making and guardianship. discussion paper may 2014. Toronto: Law Commission of Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, A. (2013). Foreword. University of New South Wales Law Journal, 36(1), 170–174.
   Google Scholar
• Nota, L., Ferrari, L., Soresi, S., & Wehmeyer, M. (2007). Self‐determination, social abilities and the quality of life of people with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 51(11), 850–865.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, A., Lord, J., & deFranco, A. (2013). Active citizenship and disability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Then, S.-N. (2013). Evolution and innovation in guardianship laws: Assisted decision-making. Sydney Law Review, 35(1), 133–166.
   Google Scholar
• Victorian Law Reform Commission. (2012). Guardianship: Final report. Melbourne: Victorian Law Reform Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, J., & Joseph, R. (2011). Listening to those rarely heard. Melbourne: Scope Victoria.
   Google Scholar
• Willner, P., Bailey, R., Parry, R., & Dymond, S. (2010). Evaluation of the ability of people with intellectual disabilities to ‘weigh up' information in two tests of financial reasoning. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 54(4), 380–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar