Does the Australian National Disability Insurance Scheme enhance personal quality of life?

References

• Aristotle. (1999). Nicomachean ethics (2nd ed.). Irwin Trans. T. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Attorney-General. (2009). Shut out: The experience of people with disabilities and their families in Australia. Canberra, ACT: CanPrint Communications.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Department of Human Services. (2016). Market position statement: Victoria, April 2016. Retrieved from https://myplace.ndis.gov.au/ndisstorefront/html/sites/default/files/documents/Market%20Position%20Statement/Victorian-MPS.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bigby, C. (2008). Beset by obstacles: A review of Australian policy development to support ageing in place for people with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 33(1), 77–86. doi:10.1080/13668250701852433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigby, C. (2010). A five country comparative review of accommodation support policies for older people with intellectual disability. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disability, 7(1), 3–15. doi:10.1111/j.1741-1130–1130.2010.00242.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigby, C. (2013). A National Disability Insurance Scheme: Challenges for social work. Australian Social Work, 66(1), 1–6. doi:10.1080/0312407X.2013.771602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigby, C. (2014). Is the National Disability Insurance Scheme taking account of people with intellectual disabilities? Research and Practice in Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities, 1(2), 93–97. doi:10.1080/23297018.2014.974484
   Google Scholar
• Bigby, C., & Wisel, I. (2011). Encounter as a dimension of social inclusion for people with intellectual disability: Beyond and between community presence and participation. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 36(4), 263–267. doi:10.3109/13668250.2011.619166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleasdale, M. (1994). Deconstructing social role valorization. Interaction, 7(4), 16–22.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, D. (2016). August 3. Implementing the NDIS in the ACT. Essential NDIS briefing, NDS workshop held in Canberra, ACT.
   Google Scholar
• Butteriss, M. (2012). NDIS: In context. Journal of Social Inclusion, 3(2), 102–107.
   Google Scholar
• Clegg, J. (2000). Beyond ethical individualism. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 44(1), 1–11. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2788.2000.00257.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clement, T., & Bigby, C. (2010). Group homes for people with intellectual disabilities: Encouraging inclusion and participation. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Corker, M. (1999). Differences, conflations and foundations: The limits to “accurate” theoretical representation of disabled people's experience? Disability and Society, 14(5), 627–642. doi: 10.1080/09687599925984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courtenay, W. J. (1987). Schools and scholars in fourteenth century England. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, E. (2015). It's all about relationships: Getting the best from my team. Retrieved from. http://incharge.net.au/its-all-about-relationships-getting-the-best-from-my-team/
   Google Scholar
• Gilmore, G., & Cuskelly, M. (2015). Vulnerability to loneliness in people with intellectual disability: An explanatory model. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 11(3), 192–199. doi:10.1111/jppi.12089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodley, D., Lawthorm, R., & Runswick Cole, K. (2014). Posthuman disability studies. Subjectivity, 7(4), 342–361. doi:10.1057/sub.2014.15
   Google Scholar
• Henman, P., & Foster, M. (2015). Models of disability support governance: A framework for assessing and reforming social policy. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 50(3), 233–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macmurray, J. (1936). Freedom in the modern world (2nd ed.). London: Faber & Faber.
   Google Scholar
• Macmurray, J. (1963). Persons in relation. London: Faber & Faber.
   Google Scholar
• Mansell, J., & Beadle-Brown, J. (2004). Person-centered planning or person-centered action? Policy and practice in intellectual disability services. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 17, 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mladenov, T. (2015). Critical theory and disability: A phenomenological approach. New York: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• National Disability Insurance Agency. (2103). 2013-2016 strategic plan. Retrieved from https://myplace.ndis.gov.au/ndisstorefront/html/sites/default/files/documents/strategic_plan_2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• National Disability Insurance Agency (NDIA). (2016). Quarter report to COAG Disability Reform Council. Geelong, Victoria: Author. Retrieved from https://myplace.ndis.gov.au/ndisstorefront/html/sites/default/files/documents/Quarterly-Reports/Report-to-the-Disability-Reform-Council-Q10-1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS). (2016). Evaluation of the trial of the National Disability Insurance Scheme. Retrieved from http://ndisevaluation.net.au/
   Google Scholar
• O'Connor, M. (2014). The National Disability Insurance Scheme for people with mild intellectual disability: Potential pitfalls for consideration. Research and Practice in Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities, 1(1), 17–23. doi:10.1080/23297018.2014.908815
   Google Scholar
• People with Disability Australia. (2015). National Disability Insurance Scheme citizens’ jury scorecard for the National Disability Insurance Agency and People with a Disability Australia 17^th – 20^th February. Sydney: Author. Retrieved from https://www.pwd.org.au/documents/pdf/ndis_citizensJuryScorecard.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Productivity Commission. (2011). Disability care and support: Report No. 54. Retrieved from http://www.pc.gov.au/inquiries/completed/disability-sipport/report
   Google Scholar
• Research and Practice in Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities (RAPIDD). (2016). See articles by Bonyhady, Boxall, Dowse & Dew, Bigby, Buchanan. Research and Practice in Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities, 3(2), 115–199.
   Google Scholar
• Reinders, J. S. (2000). The future of the disabled in liberal society: An ethical analysis. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reinders, J. S. (2002). The good life for citizens with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 46(1) 1–5. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2788.2002.00386.x/abstract
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinders, J. S. (2008). Receiving the gift of friendship: Profound disability, theological anthropology, and ethics. Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eredmans.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, L. (2017). The National Disability Insurance Scheme. NSW Parliament Research Service, 1, 1–11. Retrieved from https://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/researchpapers/Pages/TheNationalDisabilityInsuranceScheme.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, T. (1997). Cultural representation of disabled people: Dustbins or disavowal? In L. Barton & M. Oliver (Eds.), Disability studies: Past, present and future (pp. 217–233). Leeds: Disability Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stephens, A., Cullen, M., & Massey, L. (2014). Will the National Disability Insurance Scheme improve the lives of those most in need? Effective service delivery for people with acquired brain injury and other disabilities in remote Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 73(2), 260–270. doi:10.1111/1467-8500.12073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stubblefield, A. (2014). Living a good life in adult-sized diapers. In J. E. Bickenbach, F. Felder, & B. Schmitz, (Eds.), Disability and the good human life (pp. 219–242). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. (1997). Critical policy analysis: Exploring contexts, texts and consequences. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 18(1), 23–35. doi:10.1080/0159630970180102
   Google Scholar
• Terzi, L. (2004). A social model of disability: A philosophical critique. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 21(2), 141–157. doi:10.1111/j.0264-3758.2004.00269.x
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. (2002). Disability theory: Key ideas, issues and thinkers. In C. Barns, M. Oliver, & L. Barton, (Eds.), Disability studies today (pp. 38–57). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend-White, C., Pham, A. N. T., & Vassos, M. V. (2012). A systematic review of quality of life measures for people with intellectual disabilities and challenging behaviours. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 56(3), 270–284. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01427.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy, J. (2014). Building partnerships between service providers and families of people with disabilities: One family's journey. Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 1(2), 128–141. doi:10.1080/23297018.2014.961592
   Google Scholar
• Treanor, D. (2014). Disability, critical thinking and personalism. Appraisal, 10(2), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2006). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Treaty Series, 2515(December), 3.
   Google Scholar