Theorising community participation: successful concept or empty buzzword?

References

• Abbott, S. & McConkey, R. (2006). The barriers to social inclusion as perceived by people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 10(3), 275–287.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ackerly, B. (2005). Is liberalism the only way toward democracy? Confucianism and democracy. Political Theory, 33(4), 547–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander-Floyd, N. G. (2012). Disappearing acts: Reclaiming intersectionality in the social sciences in a post-black feminist era. Feminist Formations, 24(1):1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Amado, A. N., Stancliffe, R. J., McCarren, M., & McCallion, P. (2013). Social inclusion and community participation of individuals with intellectual/developmental disabilities. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 51(5), 360–375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, P., & Davis, F. A. (2004). Social capital, social inclusion and services for people with learning disabilities. Disability & Society, 19(3), 195–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beart, S., Hardy, G., & Buchan, L. (2004). Changing selves: A grounded theory account of belonging to a self-advocacy group for people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 17(2), 91–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigby, C. & Wiesel, I. (2011). Encounter as a dimension of social inclusion for people with intellectual disability: Beyond and between community presence and participation. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 36(4), 263–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buntinx, W. H. E., & Schalock, R. L. (2010). Models of disability, quality of life, and individualized supports: Implications for professional practice in intellectual disability. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 7(4), 283–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, S., Crenshaw, K. W., & McCall, L. (2013). Toward a field of intersectionality studies: Theory, applications, and praxis. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture & Society, 38(4), 785–810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobigo, V., Ouellette-Kuntz, H., Lysaght, R., & Martin, L. (2012). Shifting our conceptualization of social inclusion. Stigma Research and Action, 2(2), 75–84.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, D. (2007). ‘Well you go there to get off’: Visiting feminist care ethics through a women’s bathhouse. Feminist Theory, 8(3), 243–262.
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, R. A. & Lau, A. L. D. (2003). Community integration or community exposure? A review and discussion in relation to people with an intellectual disability. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 16(2), 145–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, K. (2008). Intersectional as buzzword: A sociology of science perspective on what makes a feminist theory successful. Feminist Theory, 9(1), 67–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, M. S. (1971). That’s interesting! Toward a phenomenology of sociology and a sociology of phenomenology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 1, 309–344.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, M. S. (1986). ‘That’s classic!’ The phenomenology and rhetoric of successful social theories. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 16, 285–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duggan, C., & Linehan, C. (2013). The role of “natural supports” in promoting independent living for people with disabilities; a review of existing literature. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 199–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrester-Jones, R., Carpenter, J., Coolen-Schrijner, P., Cambridge, P., Tate, A., Beecham, J., Hallam, A., Knapp, M., & Wooff, D. (2006). The social networks of people with intellectual disability living in the community 12 years after resettlement from long-stay hospitals. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 19, 285–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, E. (2010). Spaces of social inclusion and belonging for people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 54(1), 48–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, E. (2013). Making and gifting belonging: Creative arts and people with learning disabilities. Environment and Planning A, 45, 244–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kampert, A. L., & Gorerczny, A. J. (2007). Community involvement and socialization among individuals with mental retardation. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 3, 278–286.
   Google Scholar
• Mahar, A. L., Cobigo, V., & Stuart, H. (2013). Conceptualizing belonging. Disability & Rehabilitation, 35, 1026–1032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture & Society, 30(3), 1771–1800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. (2000). The democratic paradox. London, UK: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Overmars-Marx, T., Thomése, F., Verdonschot, M., & Meininger, H. (2014). Advancing social inclusion in the neighbourhood for people with an intellectual disability: An exploration of the literature. Disability & Society, 29(2), 255–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, A. (2013). Making space for belonging: Critical reflections on the implementation of personalized adult social care under the veil of meaningful inclusion. Social Science & Medicine, 88, 68–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, G. & Doyle, S. (2012). Getting a life – living independently and being included in the community: A legal study of the current use and future potential of the EU Structural Funds to contribute to the achievement of Article 19 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Report to the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Regional Office for Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Sandel, M. (1984). “Introduction.” In M. Sandel (Ed.), Liberalism and its critics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Simplican, S. C. & Leader, G. (2015). Counting inclusion with Chantal Mouffe: A radical democratic approach to intellectual disability research. Disability & Society, 30(5), 717–730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simplican, S. C., Leader, G., Kosciulek, J., & Leahy, M. (2015). Defining social inclusion of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities: An ecological model of interpersonal relationships and community participation. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 18–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiesel, I. & Bigby, C. (2016). Mainstream, inclusionary, and convivial places: Locating encounters between people with and without intellectual disabilities. Geographical Review, 106(2), 201–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar