128
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Commentary

Commentary on “Learning the lessons from personalisation in England” (Greig, 2019)

ORCID Icon
Pages 110-115 | Accepted 04 Aug 2019, Published online: 18 Sep 2019

References

  • Bigby, C. (2016). Commentary on “Reducing the inequality of luck” (Bonyhady, 2016). Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 3(2), 134–139. doi:10.1080/23297018.2016.1230835
  • Bonyhady, B. (2016). Reducing the inequality of luck: Keynote address at the 2015 Australasian society for intellectual disability national conference. Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 3(2), 115–123. doi:10.1080/23297018.2016.1172021
  • Boxall, K. (2016). Commentary on “Reducing the inequality of luck” (Bonyhady, 2016). Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 3(2), 124–128. doi:10.1080/23297018.2016.1219233
  • Boxall, K., Dowson, S., & Beresford, P. (2009). Selling individual budgets, choice and control: Local and global influences on UK social care policy for people with learning difficulties. Policy & Politics, 37(4), 499–515. doi:10.1332/030557309X445609
  • Farnsworth, K. (2019). Towards a whole-economy approach to the welfare state: Citizens, corporations and the state within the broad welfare mix. Social Policy Review 31: Analysis and Debate in Social Policy, 2019, 71–99.
  • Greig, R. (2019). Learning the lessons from personalisation in England. Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 6(2),99–109. doi:10.1080/23297018.2019.1579053
  • Meltzer, A., & Davy, L. (2019). Opportunities to enhance relational wellbeing through the National Disability Insurance Scheme: Implications from research on relationships and a content analysis of NDIS documentation. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 78, 250–264. doi:10.1111/1467-8500.12373
  • Miller, P. (2017). The age of entitlement has ended”: Designing a disability insurance scheme in turbulent times. Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 33(2), 95–113. doi:10.1080/21699763.2017.1302893
  • NDIS. (2019a). What is the NDIS? Canberra, National Disability Insurance Agency. Retrieved from www.ndis.gov.au/understanding/what-ndis
  • NDIS. (2019b). 3rd quarterly report: 2018-19 Q3, Canberra, National Disability Insurance Agency. Retrieved from https://www.ndis.gov.au/about-us/publications/quarterly-reports
  • NDIS. (2019c). National Dashboard as at 31 March 2019, Canberra, National Disability Insurance Agency. Retrieved from https://www.ndis.gov.au/media/1359/download
  • Needham, C., & Dickinson, H. (2018). Any one of us could be among that number”: Comparing the policy narratives for individualized disability funding in Australia and England. Social Policy & Administration, 52(3), 731–749. doi:10.1111/spol.12320
  • Perry, E., Waters, R., & Buchanan, A. (2019). Experiences of National Disability Insurance Scheme planning from the perspective of adults with intellectual disability. Australian Journal of Social Issues. Advance online publication. doi:10.1002/ajs4.72
  • Productivity Commission. (2011). Disability care and support. Canberra, ACT: Productivity Commission.
  • Wolfensberger, W. (1977). A multi-component advocacy/protection schema. Toronto, Ontario: Canadian Association for the Mentally Retarded.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.