References
- Barthe, Y. 2005. Mobilisations et choix techniques. Le cas des déchets nucléaires. Lyon: AFSP.
- Callon, M., Y. Millo, and F. Muniesa, eds. 2007. Market Devices. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Foucault, M. 1984. “Polemics, Politics and Problematizations.” In The Foucault Reader, edited by P. Rabinow, 381–390. New York: Pantheon Books.
- Grunwald, A. 2012. “Synthetic biology: moral, epistemic and political dimensions of responsibility.” In Proceed with Caution? Concept and Application of the Precautionary Principle in Nanobiotechnology, edited by R. Paslack, J. S. Ach, B. Lüttenberg, and K.-M. Weltring, 243–259. Münster: LIT.
- Hirschman, A. O. 1994. “Social Conflicts as Pillars of Democratic Market Society.” Political Theory 22 (2): 203–218.
- Marres, N., and J. Lezaun. 2011. “Materials and Devices of the Public: An Introduction.” Economy and Society 40 (4): 489–509. doi: 10.1080/03085147.2011.602293
- Meyer, M., and S. Molyneux-Hodgson. Forthcoming. “Placing a New Science: Exploring Spatial and Temporal Configurations of Synthetic Biology.” In The Local Configuration of New Research Fields, Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook, edited by M. Merz and P. Sormani. Dordrecht: Springer.
- OPECST (Office parlementaire d’évaluation des choix scientifiques et technologiques). 2012. Les enjeux de la biologie de synthèse. Paris: OPECST.
- SNRI (Groupe de travail Biologie de synthèse). 2011. Biologie de synthèse: dévelopments, potentialités et défis. Paris: MESR.
- Star, S. L., and J. R. Griesemer. 1989. “Institutional Ecology, “Translations” and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39.” Social Studies of Science 19 (3): 387–420. doi: 10.1177/030631289019003001
- Thoreau, F. 2012. “Nanotechnologies et «innovation responsible»: sur la gouvernementalité d'un concept.” In Les nanotechnologies: vers un changement d’échelle éthique?, edited by C. Kermisch and M. G. Pinsart, 287–312. Bruxelles: Ethiques en action.