Framing responsible innovation in synthetic biology: the need for a critical discourse analysis approach

References

• Barben, D., E. Fisher, C. Selin, and D. H. Guston. 2008. “Anticipatory Governance of Nanotechnology: Foresight, Engagement, and Integration.” In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by O. A. Edward, J. Hackett, M. Lynch, and J. Wajcman, 979–1000. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bessant, J. 2013. “Innovation in the Twenty-first Century.” In Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, edited by R. Owen, J. Bessant, and M. Heintz, 1–25. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, L., J. Adams, P. Sutton, J. Bainbridge, E. Birney, J. Calvert, A. Collis, et al. 2012. A Synthetic Biology Roadmap for the UK. Swindon: Technology Strategy Board.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, H. E. 2003. “The Moral Responsibilities of Scientists: Tensions between Autonomy and Responsibility.” American Philosophical Quarterly 40 (1): 59–68. doi:10.2307/20010097
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, E., and A. Rip. 2013. “Responsible Innovation: Multi-level Dynamics and Soft Intervention Practices.” In Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, edited by R. Owen, J. Bessant, and M. Heintz, 165–183. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. 2011. An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. 3rd ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Glerup, C., and M. Horst. 2014. “Mapping ‘Social Responsibility’ in Science.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (1): 31–50. doi:10.1080/23299460.2014.882077 doi: 10.1080/23299460.2014.882077
   Google Scholar
• Grinbaum, A., and C. Groves. 2013. “What Is ‘Responsible’ about Responsible Innovation? Understanding the Ethical Issues.” In Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, edited by R. Owen, J. Bessant, and M. Heintz, 119–142. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Grunwald, A. 2011. “Responsible Innovation: Bringing together Technology Assessment, Applied Ethics, and STS Research.” Enterprise and Work Innovation Studies 7: 9–31.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, A. K. 2012. “Innovations for the Poor by the Poor.” International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development 5 (1): 28–39. doi: 10.1504/IJTLID.2012.044875
   Google Scholar
• Guston, D. H. 2013. “‘Daddy, Can I Have a Puddle Gator?’: Creativity, Anticipation, and Responsible Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, edited by R. Owen, J. Bessant, and M. Heintz, 109–118. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Guston, D. H., and D. Sarewitz. 2002. “Real-time Technology Assessment.” Technology in Society 24 (1): 93–109. doi: 10.1016/S0160-791X(01)00047-1
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. 2006. “Doing Discourse Analysis: Coalitions, Practices, Meaning.” In Words Matter in Policy and Planning: Discourse Theory and Method in the Social Sciences, edited by M. van den Brink, and T. Metze, 65–74. Utrecht: Netherlands Geographical Studies 344.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 2003. “Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing Science.” Minerva 41 (3): 223–244. doi:10.1023/A:1025557512320
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R. 2008. “When it Pays to ask the Public.” Nature Nanotechnology 3 (10): 578–579. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2008.288
   Google Scholar
• Kelty, C. M. 2008. Responsibility: McKeon and Ricoeur. Anthropology of the Contemporary Research Collaboratory. http://hdl.handle.net/10524/1625.
   Google Scholar
• Mitcham, C. 2003. “Co-responsibility for Research Integrity.” Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (2): 273–290. doi:10.1007/s11948-003-0014-0 doi: 10.1007/s11948-003-0014-0
   Google Scholar
• Owen, R. 2014a. Responsible Research and Innovation: Options for Research and Innovation Policy in the EU. Brussels: European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/research/innovation-union/pdf/expert-groups/Responsible_Research_and_Innovation.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, R. 2014b. “The UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council's commitment to a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (1): 113–117. doi:10.1080/23299460.2014.882065 doi: 10.1080/23299460.2014.882065
   Google Scholar
• Owen, R., P. Macnaghten, and J. Stilgoe. 2012. “Responsible Research and Innovation: From Science in Society to Science for Society, with Society.” Science and Public Policy 39 (6): 751–760. doi:10.1093/scipol/scs093 doi: 10.1093/scipol/scs093
   Google Scholar
• Owen, R., J. Stilgoe, P. Macnaghten, M. Gorman, E. Fisher, and D. Guston. 2013. “A Framework for Responsible Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, edited by R. Owen, J. Bessant, and M. Heintz, 27–50. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Pansera, M., and R. Owen. 2014. “Eco-Innovation at the “Bottom of the Pyramid”.” In Collaboration for Sustainability and Innovation: A Role For Sustainability Driven by the Global South? edited by D. A. Vazquez-Brust, J. Sarkis, and J. J. Cordeiro, 293–313. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• PCSBI. 2010. New Directions: The Ethics of Synthetic Biology and Emerging Technologies. Washington, DC: Presidential Commission of the Study of Bioethical Issues.
   Google Scholar
• Pellizzoni, L. 2004. “Responsibility and Environmental Governance.” Environmental Politics 13 (3): 541–565. doi: 10.1080/0964401042000229034
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, H. S. 1999. “Institutionally Divided Moral Responsibility.” Social Philosophy and Policy 16 (2): 218–249. doi: 10.1017/S0265052500002454
   Google Scholar
• Rip, A., and J.-P. Voß. 2013. “Umbrella Terms as a Conduit in the Governance of Emerging Science and Technology.” Science, Technology and Innovation Studies 9 (2): 40–59.
   Google Scholar
• Rome Declaration. 2014. “Rome Declaration on Responsible Research and Innovation in Europe.” Paper presented at the SIS-RRI Conference, Rome. http://www.sis-rri-conference.eu/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/RomeDeclaration_Final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schot, J., and A. Rip. 1997. “The Past and Future of Constructive Technology Assessment.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 54 (2): 251–268. doi: 10.1016/S0040-1625(96)00180-1
   Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, J., R. Owen, and P. Macnaghten. 2013. “Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 42 (9): 1568–1580. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008 doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008
   Google Scholar
• Stirling, A. 2008. ““Opening Up” and “Closing Down” Power, Participation, and Pluralism in the Social Appraisal of Technology.” Science, Technology & Human Values 33 (2): 262–294. doi: 10.1177/0162243907311265
   Google Scholar
• Van Oudheusden, M. 2014. “Where are the Politics in Responsible Innovation? European Governance, Technology Assessments, and Beyond.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (1): 67–86. doi:10.1080/23299460.2014.882097 doi: 10.1080/23299460.2014.882097
   Google Scholar
• Voices for Innovation. n.d. “The Voices Project.” Retrieved March 6, 2014, from http://www.voicesforinnovation.eu/
   Google Scholar
• Von Schomberg, R. 2011. “Towards Responsible Research and Innovation in the Information and Communication Technologies and Security Technologies Fields.” Available at SSRN 2436399.
   Google Scholar
• Von Schomberg, R. 2013. “A Vision of Responsible Research and Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, edited by R. Owen, J. Bessant, and M. Heintz, 51–74. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Wynne, B. 1993. “Public Uptake of Science: A Case for Institutional Reflexivity.” Public Understanding of Science 2 (4): 321–337. doi: 10.1088/0963-6625/2/4/003
   Google Scholar