http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2488-5985
References
- Calvert, J., and P. Martin. 2009. “The Role of Social Scientists in Synthetic Biology.” EMBO Reports 10 (3): 201–204. doi: 10.1038/embor.2009.15
- Fisher, E. 2005. “Lessons Learned from the Ethical, Legal and Social Implications Program (ELSI): Planning Societal Implications Research for the National Nanotechnology Program.” Technology in Society 27 (3): 321–328. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.04.006
- Lee, R. G. 2012. “Look at Mother Nature on the Run in the 21st Century: Responsibility, Research and Innovation.” Transnational Environmental Law 1 (1): 105–117. doi: 10.1017/S2047102511000136
- Roco, M. C., Harthorn, B., Guston, D., and P. Shapira. 2011. “Innovative and Responsible Governance of Nanotechnology for Societal Development.” Journal of Nanoparticle Research 13 (9): 3557–3590. doi: 10.1007/s11051-011-0454-4
- Shapira, P., J. Youtie, and A. L. Porter. 2010. “The Emergence of Social Science Research on Nanotechnology.” Scientometrics 85 (2): 595–611. doi: 10.1007/s11192-010-0204-x
- Von Schomberg, R. 2013. “A Vision of Responsible Research and Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, edited by R. Owen, J. Bessant, and M. Heintz, 53–74. Chichester: Wiley.
- Youtie, J., P. Shapira, and Y. Li. 2014. A Comparison of Social Science Research in Synthetic Biology and Nanotechnology. Working Paper. Atlanta: Georgia Tech Program in Science, Technology and Innovation Policy.
![Supercharge Your Next Research Paper: Research and write your next paper with Jenni AI.]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/112446/MPU-L1EB.png"})