References
- Balmer, Andrew S., and Kate J. Bulpin. 2013. “Left to Their Own Devices: Post-ELSI, Ethical Equipment and the International Genetically Engineered Machine (iGEM) Competition.” Biosocieties 8 (3): 311–335. doi: 10.1057/biosoc.2013.13
- Cockerton, Caitlin. 2011. “Going Synthetic: How Scientists and Engineers Imagine and Build a New Biology.” PhD diss., The London School of Economics and Political Science.
- Endy, Drew. 2014. “Synthetic Biology – What Should We Be Vibrating About?” TEDxStanford. Accessed December 15. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rf5tTe_i7aA.
- Frow, Emma, and Jane Calvert. 2013. “‘Can Simple Biological Systems Be Built from Standardized Interchangeable parts?’ Negotiating Biology and Engineering in Synthetic Biology competition.” Engineering Studies 5 (1): 42–58. doi: 10.1080/19378629.2013.764881
- Fye, Shannon. 2011. “An Examination of Technical Difficulties and Contingencies Among Gene Synthesis Companies.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association; Washington DC, September 1–4.
- Tait, Joyce. 2009. “Governing Synthetic Biology: Processes and Outcomes.” In Synthetic Biology the Technoscience and Its Societal Consequences, edited by Markus Schmidt, Alexander Kelle, Agomoni Ganglui-Mitra, and Huib de Vriend, 141–154. Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
- Vogel, Kathleen M. 2008. “Framing Biosecurity: An Alternative to the Biotech Revolution Model?” Science and Public Policy 35 (1): 45–54. doi: 10.3152/030234208X270513
- Vogel, Kathleen M. 2013. Phantom Menace or Looming Danger?: A New Framework for Assessing Bioweapons Threats. Baltimore, MA: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
- Vogel, Kathleen M. 2014. “Revolution Versus Evolution?: Understanding Scientific and Technological Diffusion in Synthetic Biology and their Implications for Biosecurity Policies.” Biosocieties 9 (4): 365–392. doi: 10.1057/biosoc.2014.31