Anticipatory life-cycle assessment for responsible research and innovation

References

• Berube, David M. 2013. “Socialis Commodis and Life Cycle Analysis: A Critical Examination Of.” In Emerging Technologies: Socio-Behavioral Life Cycle Approaches, edited by Nora Savage, Michael Gorman, and Anita Street, 139–164. Singapore: Pan Stanford Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bhander, Gurbakhash Singh, Michael Hauschild, and Tim McAloone. 2003. “Implementing Life Cycle Assessment in Product Development.” Environmental Progress 22 (4): 255–267.
   Google Scholar
• Canis, Laure, Igor Linkov, and Thomas P. Seager. 2010. “Application of Stochastic Multiattribute Analysis to Assessment of Single Walled Carbon Nanotube Synthesis Processes.” Environmental Science & Technology 45 (12): 5068–5074.
   Google Scholar
• Collinge, William O., Amy E. Landis, Alex K. Jones, Laura A. Schaefer, and Melissa Bilec. 2013. “A Dynamic Life Cycle Assessment: Framework and Application to an Institutional Building.” International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 18 (3): 538–552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collingridge, David. 1980. The Social Control of Technology. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Dale, Alexander T., Andre F. de Lucena, Joe Marriott, Bruno S. M. C. Borba, Roberto Schaeffer, and Melissa Bilec. 2013. “Modeling Future Life-Cycle Environmental Impacts of Electricity Supplies in Brazil.” Energies 6 (7): 3182–3208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, J. Clarence. 2009. Oversight of Next Generation Nanotechnology. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.
   Google Scholar
• Eckelman, Matthew J., Meagan S. Mauter, Jacqueline A. Isaacs, and Menachem Elimelech. 2012. “New Perspectives on Nanomaterial Aquatic Ecotoxicity: Production Impacts Exceed Direct Exposure Impacts for Carbon Nanotoubes.” Environmental Science & Technology 46 (5): 2902–2910.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, Erik, and Arie Rip. 2013. “Responsible Innovation: Multi-Level Dynamics and Soft Intervention Practices.” In Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, edited by Richard Owen, John Bessant, and Maggy Heintz, 165–183. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Foley, Rider W., and Arnim Wiek. 2013. “Patterns of Nanotechnology Innovation and Governance within a Metropolitan Area.” Technology in Society 35 (4): 233–247.
   Google Scholar
• Guinee, Jeroen B., Reinout Heijungs, Gjalt Huppes, Alessandra Zamagni, Paolo Masoni, Roberto Buonamici, Tomas Ekvall, and Tomas Rydberg. 2011. “Life Cycle Assessment: Past, Present, and Future.” Environmental Science & Technology 45 (1): 90–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guston, D. 2013. “Understanding Anticipatory Governance.” Social Studies of Science. doi:10.1177/0306312713508669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutowski, Timothy G., Matthew S. Branham, Jeffrey B. Dahmus, Alissa J. Jones, Alexandre Thiriez, and Dusan P. Sekulic. 2009. “Thermodynamic Analysis of Resources Used in Manufacturing Processes.” Environmental Science & Technology 43 (5): 1584–1590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutowski, Timothy G., John Y. H. Liow, and Dusan P. Sekulic. 2010. “Minimum Energy Requirements for the Manufacturing of Carbon Nanotubes.” Paper presented at the IEEE international symposium on sustainable systems and technology (ISSST), Arlington, VA, May 17–19.
   Google Scholar
• Herwich, Edgar. 2005. “Life Cycle Approaches to Sustainable Consumption: A Critical Review.” Environmental Science & Technology 39 (13): 4673–4684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linkov, Igor, Matthew E. Bates, Laure J. Canis, Thomas P. Seager, and Jeffrey M. Keisler. 2011. “A Decision-Directed Approach for Prioritizing Research into the Impact of Nanomaterials on the Environment and Human Health.” Nature Nanotechnology 6 (12): 784–787.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, Shelie A., Amy E. Landis, and Thomas L. Theis. 2006. “Use of Monte Carlo Analysis to Characterize Nitrogen Fluxes in Agroecosystems.” Environmental Science & Technology 40 (7): 2324–2332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NRC (National Research Council). 2012. A Research Strategy for Environmental, Health, and Safety Aspects of Engineered Nanomaterials. Edited by Health Committee to Develop a Research Strategy for Environmental and Safety Aspects of Engineered Nanomaterials. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, Richard, David Baxter, Trevor Maynard, and Michael Depledge. 2009. “Beyond Regulation: Risk Pricing and Responsible Innovation.” Environmental Science & Technology 43 (18): 6902–6906.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, Richard, and Nicola Goldberg. 2010. “Responsible Innovation: A Pilot Study with the U.K. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council.” Risk Analysis 30 (11): 1699–1707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesonen, Hanna-Leena, Tomas Ekvall, Günter Fleischer, Gjalt Huppes, Christina Jahn, Zbigniews Klos, Gerald Rebitzer, et al. 2000. “Framework for Scenario Development in LCA.” The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 5 (1): 21–30.
   Google Scholar
• Prado-Lopez, Valentina, Thomas P. Seager, Mikhail Chester, Lise Laurin, Melissa Bernardo, and Steven Tylock. 2014. “Stochastic Multi-attribute Analysis (SMAA) as an Interpretation Method for Comparative Life-Cycle Assessment (LCA).” The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 19 (2): 405–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, Douglas K. R. 2009. “Co-Evolutionary Scenarios: An Application to Prospecting Futures of the Responsible Development of Nanotechnology.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 76 (9): 1222–1239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, Balint, and Marcel Weil. 2013. “Analysis of Materials and Energy Flows of Different Lithium Ion Traction Batteries.” Revue de Métallurgie 110 (1): 65–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spielmann, Michael, Roland Scholz, Olaf Tietje, and Peter de Haan. 2004. “Scenario Modeling in Prospective LCA of Transport Systems. Application of Formative Scenario Analysis.” The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 10 (5): 325–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, Jack, Richard Owen, and Phil Macnaghten. 2013. “Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 42 (9): 1568–1580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taebi, Behnam, Aad Correlje, Edwin Cuppen, Marloes Dignum, and Udo Pesch. 2014. “Responsible Innovation as an Endorsement of Public Values: The Need for Interdisciplinary Research.” Journal of Responsible Innovation. doi:10.1080/23299460.2014.882072
   Google Scholar
• Thabrew, Lanka, Arnim Wiek, and Robert Ries. 2009. “Environmental Decision Making in Multi-stakeholder Contexts: Applicability of Life Cycle Thinking in Development Planning and Implementation.” Journal of Cleaner Production 17 (1): 67–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNEP (United Nations Environmental Programme). 2013. “The Methodological Sheets for Subcategories in Social Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA)”. UNEP-DTIE, France. Accessed May 16, 2014. http://www.lifecycleinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/S-LCA_methodological_sheets_11.11.13.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Von Schomberg, Rene. 2013. “A Vision of Responsible Research and Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, edited by Richard Owen, John Bessant, and Maggy Heintz, 165–183. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Wender, Ben, and Thomas P. Seager. 2011. “Towards Prospective Life Cycle Assessment: Single Wall Carbon Nanotubes for Lithium-ion Batteries.” International symposium on sustainable systems and technology, Chicago, IL, May 16–18.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmermann, Benedikt, Hanna Dura, Manuel Baumann, and Marcel Weil. 2013. “Towards Prospective Time-Resolved LCA of Fully Electric Supercap-Vehicles in Germany.” 19th SETAC LCA case study symposium, Rome, Italy, December 11.
   Google Scholar