1,319
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Pedagogy

Teaching global perspectives: engineering ethics across international and academic borders

, , &
Pages 228-239 | Received 14 Feb 2014, Accepted 03 May 2014, Published online: 19 Jun 2014

References

  • Beddoes, K. 2013. “Methodology Discourse as Boundary Work in the Construction of Engineering Education.” Social Studies of Science. doi: 10.1177/0306312713510431.
  • Bergen, J. 2014. “On Engineers Engaging Ethics through Dis-location and Reconnection.” Journal of Responsible Innovation. doi:10.1080/23299460.2014.922342.
  • Berry, R. M., J. Borenstein, and R. J. Butera. 2013. “Contentious Problems in Bioscience and Biotechnology: A Pilot Study of an Approach to Ethics Education.” Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (2): 653–668. doi: 10.1007/s11948-012-9359-6
  • Borenstein, J., M. J. Drake, R. Kirkman, and J. L. Swann. 2010. “The Engineering and Science Issues Test (ESIT): A Discipline-Specific Approach to Assessing Moral Judgment.” Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (2): 387–407. doi: 10.1007/s11948-009-9148-z
  • Bovill, C., A. Cook-Sather, and P. Felten. 2011. “Students as Co-creators of Teaching Approaches, Course Design, and Curricula: Implications for Academic Developers.” International Journal for Academic Development 16 (2): 133–145. doi: 10.1080/1360144X.2011.568690
  • Calvert, J. 2014. “Collaboration as a Research Method? Navigating Social Scientific Involvement in Synthetic Biology.” In Early Engagement and New Technologies: Opening up the Laboratory, edited by N. Doorn, D. Schuubiers, I. van de Poel, and M. E. Gorman, 175–194. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Calvert, J., and P. Martin. 2009. “The Role of Social Scientists in Synthetic Biology.” EMBO Reports 10 (3): 201–204. doi: 10.1038/embor.2009.15
  • Canary, H., J. Herkert, K. Ellison, and J. Wetmore. 2012. “Microethics and Macroethics in Graduate Education for Scientists and Engineers: Developing and Assessing Instructional Models.” In American society for engineering education annual conference proceedings, San Antonio, Texas, June 10–13.
  • Cech, E. A. 2014. “Culture of Disengagment in Engineering Education?” Science Technology & Human Values 39 (1): 42–72. doi: 10.1177/0162243913504305
  • Collins, H. 2004. “Interactional Expertise as a Third Kind of Knowledge.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 3: 125–143. doi: 10.1023/B:PHEN.0000040824.89221.1a
  • Downey, G. L., J. C. Lucena, B. M. Moskal, R. Parkhurst, T. Bigley, C. Hays, B. K. Jesiek et al. 2006. “The Globally Competent Engineer: Working Effectively with People Who Define Problems Differently.” Journal of Engineering Education 95 (2): 107–122. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00883.x
  • Faulkner, W. 2000. “Dualisms, Hierarchies and Gender in Engineering.” Social Studies of Science 30 (5): 759–792. doi: 10.1177/030631200030005005
  • Felder, R., and R. Brent. 2003. “Designing and Teaching Courses to Satisfy the ABET Engineering Criteria.” Journal of Engineering Education 92 (1): 7–25. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2003.tb00734.x
  • Fielding, M. 2001. “Students as Radical Agents of Change.” Journal of Educational Change 2: 123–141. doi: 10.1023/A:1017949213447
  • Florman, S. C. 1997. “Non-technical Studies for Engineers: The Challenge of Relevance.” European Journal of Engineering Eduation 22 (3): 249–258. doi: 10.1080/03043799708923457
  • Fortun, M. 2005. “For an Ethics of Promising, or: A Few Kind Words About James Watson.” New Genetics and Society 24 (2): 157–174. doi: 10.1080/14636770500184792
  • Gorman, M. E., A. Calleja-Lopez, S. N. Conley, and F. Mahootian. 2014. “Integrating Ethicists and Social Scientists into Cutting Edge Research and Technological Development.” In Early Engagement and New Technologies: Opening up the Laboratory, edited by N. Doorn, D. Schuurbiers, I. van de Poel, and M. E. Gorman, 157–173. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Guston, D. 2013. “Understanding ‘Anticipatory Governance’.” Social Studies of Science. doi:10.1177/0306312713508669.
  • Holsapple, M. A., D. D. Carpenter, J. A. Sutkus, C. J. Finelli, and T. S. Harding. 2012. “Framing Faculty and Student Discrepancies in Engineering Ethics Education Delivery.” Journal of Engineering Education 101 (2): 169–186. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00047.x
  • Hoople, G. 2014. “Engineering Ethics in Every Decision.” Journal of Responsible Innovation. doi:10.1080/23299460.2014.922341.
  • Hutchings, P., and M. Huber. 2010. “Foreword.” In Engaging Student Voices in the Study of Teaching and Learning, edited by C. Werder, and M. M. Otis, x–xii. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
  • Hutchings, P., M. T. Huber, and A. Ciccone. 2011. The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Reconsidered: Institutional Integration and Impact (Jossey-Bass/Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching), x–xii. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Lewis, M., J. M. Haviland-Jones, and L. Feldman Barrett, eds. 2008. Handbook of Emotions. 3rd ed. New York: The Guilford Press.
  • López, J. J., and J. Lunau. 2012. “ELSIfication in Canada: Legal Modes of Reasoning.” Science as Culture 21 (1): 77–99. doi: 10.1080/09505431.2011.576240
  • Mitcham, C. 2009. “A Historico-Ethical Perspective on Engineering Education: From Use and Convenience to Policy Engagement.” Engineering Studies 1 (1): 35–53. doi: 10.1080/19378620902725166
  • National Academy of Engineering. 2005. Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  • National Research Council. 2005. “How Students Learn: History, Mathematics, and Science in the Classroom. Committee on How People Learn, A Targeted Report for Teachers, M. S. Donovan and J. D. Bransford, Editors.” Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  • Newberry, B. 2004. “The Dilemma of Ethics in Engineering Education.” Science and Engineering Education 10 (2): 343–351.
  • Olsen, G. M., and J. S. Olsen. 2000. “Distance Matters.” Human-Computer Interactions 15 (2): 139–178. doi: 10.1207/S15327051HCI1523_4
  • Pawley, A. 2009. “Universalized Narratives: Patterns in How Faculty Members Define “Engineering.” Journal of Engineering Education 98 (4): 309–319. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01029.x
  • Pennington, D. D. 2008. “Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration and Learning.” Ecology and Society 13 (2): 1–13.
  • van de Poel, I., and L. Royakkers. 2011. Ethics, Technology and Engineering. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Poznic, M. 2014. “Technological Models: Epistemic and Responsible Perspectives.” Journal of Responsible Innovation. doi:10.1080/23299460.2014.922343.
  • Riley, D. 2012. “ Aiding and Abeting: The Bankruptcy of Outcomes-Based Education as a Change Strategy.” In American society for engineering education annual conference proceedings, San Antonio, Texas, June 10–13.
  • Robaey, Z. 2014. “A Commentary on Engineering Ethics Education, or How to Bring About Change Without Needing Scandals.” Journal of Responsible Innovation. doi:10.1080/23299460.2014.922345.
  • Roeser, S. 2012. “Emotional Engineers: Toward Morally Responsible Design.” Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (1): 103–115. doi: 10.1007/s11948-010-9236-0
  • Rolfe, D. 2014. “No Field is an Island: Why We Should Have Been Having an Interdisciplinary Discussion about Nano-Ethics All Along.” Journal of Responsible Innovation. doi:10.1080/23299460.2014.922340.
  • Schuurbiers, D., N. Doorn, I. van de Poel, and M. E. Gorman. 2014. “Mandates and Methods for Early Engagement.” In Early Engagement and New Technologies: Opening up the Laboratory, edited by N. Doorn, D. Schuubiers, I. van de Poel, and M. E. Gorman, 3–14. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Shuman, L., M. Besterfield-Sacre, and J. McGourty. 2005. “The ABET ‘Professional Skills’ – Can They Be Taught? Can They Be Assessed?” Journal of Engineering Education 94 (1): 41–55. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00828.x
  • Solomon, R. C. 2008. “The Philosophy of Emotions.” In Handbook of Emotions, 3rd ed., edited by M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones and L. Feldman Barrett, 3–16. New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Sorensen, K. H. 2009. “The Role of Social Science in Engineering.” In Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, Volume 9: Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences, edited by A. Meijers, 93–115. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Spruit, S. 2014. “Responsible Innovation through Ethics Education: Educating to Change Research Practice.” Journal of Responsible Innovation. doi:10.1080/23299460.2014.922344.
  • Sunderland, M. E. 2013. “Using Student Engagement to Relocate Ethics to the Core of the Engineering Curriculum.” Science and Engineering Ethics. doi:10.1007/s11948-013-9444-5.
  • Sunderland, M. E. 2014. “Taking Emotion Seriously: Meeting Students Where They Are.” Science and Engineering Ethics 20 (1): 183–195. doi: 10.1007/s11948-012-9427-y
  • Sunderland, M. E., J. Ahn, C. Carson, and W. Kastenberg. 2013. “Making Ethics Explicit: Relocating Ethics to the Core of Engineering Education.” In American society for engineering education annual conference proceedings, Atlanta, Georgia, June 23–26.
  • Taebi, B., A. Coorelije, E. Cuppen, M. Dignum, and U. Pesch. 2014. “Responsible Innovation as an Endorsement of Public Values: The Need for Interdisciplinary Research.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (1): 118–124. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2014.882072
  • Van den Hoven, J. 2013. “Options for Strengthening Responsible Research and Innovation.” Report of the Expert Group on the State of Art in Europe on Responsible Research and Innovation. Brussels: European Commission.
  • Wisnioski, M. 2009. “‘Liberal Education Has Failed’ Reading Like an Engineer in 1960s America.” Technology and Culture 50 (4): 753–782. doi: 10.1353/tech.0.0346
  • Wolf-Wendel, L., K. Ward, and J. Kinzie. 2009. “A Tangled Web of Terms: The Overlap and Unique Contribution of Involvement, Engagement, and Integration to Understanding College Student Success.” Journal of College Student Development 50 (4): 407–428. doi: 10.1353/csd.0.0077
  • Zandvoort, H., G. J. Hasselt, and J. A. B. A. F. Bonnet. 2008. “A Joint Venture Model for Teaching Required Courses in ‘Ethics and Engineering’ to Engineering Students.” European Journal of Engineering Education 33 (2): 187–195. doi: 10.1080/03043790801980003

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.