Innovating innovation policy: the emergence of ‘Responsible Research and Innovation’

References

• Arksey, Hilary, and L. O'Malley. 2005. “Scoping Studies: Towards a Methodological Framework.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 8 (1): 19–32. doi: 10.1080/1364557032000119616
   Google Scholar
• Badouard, Romaine. 2013. “Implementing Political Principles Through Devices: The Case of the European Commission's Online Consultations.” Paper presented at the Devices of Responsibility, Ecole des Mines, Paris, September 12–13.
   Google Scholar
• C(2011). 5023. 2011. Science in Society Work Programme 2012 Part 5 – Capacities. http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/doc/call/fp7/common/31557–5._science_in_society_wp2012_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, Murray. 2010. “A Coffee Conundrum.” The New York Times, 3 August. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/04/business/energy-environment/04coffee.html.
   Google Scholar
• CEU. 2008. Council Conclusions on the Launch of the ‘Ljubljana Process’ – Towards Full Realisation of ERA (10231/08). http://www.consilium.europa.eu/Newsroom.
   Google Scholar
• CEU. 2012. Outcome of Proceedings from Competitiveness Council of 31 May 2012, on the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and the Council Establishing Horizon 2020 – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014–2020) – Partial General Approach (10663/12). http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/12/st10/st10663.en12.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Charter of the Fundamental Rights of the European Union. 2000/C 364/01, 18.12.2000. Brussels: Official Journal of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• COM(95) 688. 1995. Green Paper on Innovation. Brussels: Official Journal of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• COM(2000) 6 final. 2000. Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Towards a European Research Area. Brussels: Official Journal of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• COM(2000) 1. 2000. Communication from the Commission on the Precautionary Principle. http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/health_consumer/library/pub/pub07_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• COM(2001) 428 final. 2001. European Governance – a White Paper. Brussels: Official Journal of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• COM(2005) 24 final. 2005. Working Together for Growth and Jobs – a New Start for the Lisbon Strategy. Brussels: Official Journal of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• COM(2007) 161. 2007. Green Paper on the European Research Area: New Perspectives. Brussels: Official Journal of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• COM(2010) 2020 final. 2010. Communication from the Commission: Europe 2020: A Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth. Brussels: Official Journal of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• COM(2010) 546 final. 2010. Europe 2020 Flagship Initiative: Innovation Union. Brussels: Official Journal of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• COM(2011) 48. 2011. Green Paper – from Challenges to Opportunities: Towards a Common Strategic Framework for EU Research and Innovation Funding. Brussels: Official Journal of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• COM(2011) 809 final. 2011. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council: Establishing Horizon 2020 – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014–2020). Brussels: Official Journal of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• COM(2011) 810 final. 2011. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Laying Down the Rules for the Participation and Dissemination in ‘Horizon 2020 – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014–2020)’. Brussels: Official Journal of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• COM(2011) 811 final. 2011. Proposal for a Council Decision Establishing the Specific Programme Implementing Horizon 2020 – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014–2020). Brussels: Official Journal of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• COM(2011) 812 final. 2011. Proposal for a Council Regulation on the Research and Training Programme of the European Atomic Energy Community (2014–2018) Complementing the Horizon 2020 – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation. Brussels: Official Journal of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Dratwa, Jim, and Brice Laurent. 2013. “Europe's Collective Experiment with Research and Ethics as a Construction of Responsibility.” Paper presented at Devices of Responsibility, Ecole des Mines, Paris, September 12–13.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, John S., Robert E. Goodin, Aviezer Tucker, and Bernard Reber. 2009. “Promethean Elites Encounter Precautionary Publics: The Case of GM Foods.” Science, Technology & Human Values 34 (3): 263–288. doi: 10.1177/0162243907310297
   Google Scholar
• EC. 1997. Research and Technological Development Activities of the European Union: Annual Report 1996 (CG-NA-17–242-EN-C). http://bookshop.europa.eu.
   Google Scholar
• EC. 1999. Research and Technological Development Activities of the European Union: Annual Report 1999 (CG-NA-19–067-EN-C). http://bookshop.europa.eu.
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2003. Measures to Improve Higher Education/Research Relations in Order to Strengthen the Strategic Basis of the ERA (KI-NA-20–905-EN-C). http://bookshop.europa.eu.
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2004. Communication from the Commission: Towards a European Strategy for Nanotechnology (KI-60-04-272-EN-C). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2008a. Challenging Europe's Research: Rationales for the European Research Area (ERA) (KI-NA-23326-EN-C). http://bookshop.europa.eu.
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2008b. “ Public Engagement in Science.” Report of the Science in Society session at the future of science and technology in Europe, Lisbon, October 8–10, 2007 (KI-NA-23334-EN-C). http://bookshop.europa.eu.
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2009a. Goverscience Seminar on Inclusive Risk Governance, Brussels, 4–5 December 2008 (KI-NA-23910-EN-C). http://bookshop.europa.eu.
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2009b. Knowledge for Growth: Prospects for Science, Technology and Innovation (KI-NA-24047-EN-C). http://bookshop.europa.eu.
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2009c. Preparing Europe for a New Renaissance: A Strategic View of the European Research Area: First Report of the European Research Area Board 2009 (KI-NA-23905-EN-C). http://bookshop.europa.eu.
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2010a. Communicating Nanotechnology: Why, to Whom, Saying What and How? An Action-Packed Roadmap Towards a Brand New Dialogue (KI-NA-24055-EN-C). http://bookshop.europa.eu.
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2010b. Strengthening the Role of European Technology Platforms in Addressing Europe's Grand Societal Challenges (KI-NA-24196-EN-C). http://bookshop.europa.eu.
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2011a. European Forward-Looking Activities: Building the Future of ‘Innovation Union’ and ERA (KINA-24-796-EN-C). http://bookshop.europa.eu.
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2011b. Newsletter, DG Research Workshop on Responsible Research & Innovation in Europe. May 16–17, 2001. http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/responsible-research-and-innovation-workshop-newsletter_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2012a. Ethical and Regulatory Challenges to Science and Research Policy at the Global Level (KI-NA-25-101-EN-C). http://bookshop.europa.eu.
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2012b. The European Citizens’ Initiative: Empowering Citizens (BD-32-12-308-EN-C). http://bookshop.europa.eu.
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2012c. High Level Panel on the Socio-Economic Benefits of the European Research Area: Final Report (KI-NA-25-359-EN-C). http://bookshop.europa.eu.
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2012d. Responsible Research and Innovation: Europe's Ability to Respond to Societal Challenges (KI-31-12-921-EN-C). http://bookshop.europa.eu.
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2013a. Co-Creating European Union Citizenship: Policy Review (KI-NA-25948-EN-C). http://bookshop.europa.eu.
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2013b. Investing in European Success: Research and Innovation to Boost Growth and Jobs in Europe. http://bookshop.europa.eu.
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2013c. Options for Strengthening Responsible Research and Innovation (KI-NA-25-766-EN-C). http://bookshop.europa.eu.
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2013d. Special Eurobarometer 401: Responsible Research and Innovation. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_401_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2014. Budgets – FP7 – Research. http://ec.europa.eu/research/fp7/index_en.cfm?pg=budget.
   Google Scholar
• EESC. 2012. Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the Proposals for Horizon 2020 – Com(2011) 809, 810, 811, 812 (INT/614-615-616-631). http://eescopinions.eesc.europa.eu/eescopiniondocument.aspx?language=en&docnr=806&year=2012.
   Google Scholar
• EESC. 2014. Opinion on COM(2014) 339, ‘Research and Innovation as Sources of Renewed Growth’. https://webapi.cor.europa.eu/documentsanonymous/eesc-2014-04694-00-00-ac-tra-en.doc.
   Google Scholar
• Felt, Ulrike, Daniel Barben, Alan Irwin, Pierre-Benoit Joly, Arie Rip, Andy Stirling, and Tereza Stöckelová. 2013. Science in Society: Caring for Our Futures in Turbulent Times. Report prepared for European Science Foundation, Science Policy Briefing #50. http://www.esf.org.
   Google Scholar
• Felt, Ulrike, and Brian Wynne. 2007. Taking European Knowledge Society Seriously. Report prepared for European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. http://bookshop.europa.eu/en/taking-european-knowledge-society-seriously-pbKINA22700/.
   Google Scholar
• Grunwald, Armin. 2012. Responsible Nanobiotechnology: Philosophy and Ethics. Singapore: Pan Stanford.
   Google Scholar
• Hamblin, James. 2015. “A Brewing Problem.” The Atlantic, 2 March. http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2015/03/the-abominable-k-cup-coffee-pod-environment-problem/386501/.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, Sarah, and Kate M. Millar. 2014. “The Challenges of Consulting the Public on Science Policy: Examining the Development of European Risk Assessment Policy for Genetically Modified Animals.” Review of Policy Research 31 (6): 481–502. doi: 10.1111/ropr.12102
   Google Scholar
• Hatgioannides, John, and Marika Karanassou. 2011. “Warrant Economics, Call-Put Policy Options and the Fallacies of Economic Theory.” IZA Discussion Paper No. 6251. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1981207.
   Google Scholar
• Hellström, Tomas. 2003. “Systemic Innovation and Risk: Technology Assessment and the Challenge of Responsible Innovation.” Technology in Society 25 (3): 369–384. doi: 10.1016/S0160-791X(03)00041-1
   Google Scholar
• Hume, Margee. 2010. “Compassion without Action: Examining the Young Consumers Consumption and Attitude to Sustainable Consumption.” Journal of World Business 45 (4): 385–394. doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2009.08.007
   Google Scholar
• Huza, Alexandru. 2014. “The Cohesion Versus Better Spending Debate During the Negotiation of the EU Multiannual Financial Framework 2014–2020.” Knowledge Horizons – Economics 62: 91–99.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, Sheila. 2006. States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and the Social Order. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kastrinos, Nikos. 2010. “Policies for Co-Ordination in the European Research Area: A View from the Social Sciences and Humanities.” Science and Public Policy 37 (4): 297–310. doi: 10.3152/030234210X496646
   Google Scholar
• Lisbon European Council. 2000. Presidency Conclusions. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/summits/lis1_en.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Macnaghten, Phil, Sarah Davies, and Matthew Kearnes. 2010. “Narrative and Public Engagement: Some Findings from the Deepen Project.” In Understanding Public Debate on Nanotechnologies: Options for Framing Public Policy, edited by Rene von Schomberg and Sarah Davies, 13–29. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Mejlgaard, Niels, Carter Bloch, Lise Degn, Mathias W. Nielsen, and Tine Ravn. 2012. “Locating Science in Society across Europe: Clusters and Consequences.” Science and Public Policy 39 (6): 741–750. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scs092
   Google Scholar
• Owen, Richard, and Nicola Goldberg. 2010. “Responsible Innovation: A Pilot Study with the U.K. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council.” Risk Analysis 30 (11): 1699–1707. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01517.x
   Google Scholar
• Owen, Richard, Phil Macnaghten, and Jack Stilgoe. 2012. “Responsible Research and Innovation: From Science in Society to Science for Society, with Society.” Science and Public Policy 39 (6): 751–760. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scs093
   Google Scholar
• Owen, Richard, Jack Stilgoe, Phil Macnaghten, Mike Gorman, Eric Fisher, and David H. Guston. 2013. “A Framework for Responsible Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, edited by Richard Owen, J. Bessant and M. Heintz, 27–50. London: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, Michael. 1962. “The Republic of Science.” Minerva 1 (1): 54–73. doi: 10.1007/BF01101453
   Google Scholar
• Rask, Mikko, Saule Maciukaite-Zviniene, and Jurgita Petrauskiene. 2012. “Innovations in Public Engagement and Participatory Performance of the Nations.” Science and Public Policy 39 (6): 710–721. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scs089
   Google Scholar
• Rechel, Bernd, Emily Grundy, Jean-Marie Robine, Jonathan Cylus, Johan P. Mackenbach, Cecile Knai, and Martin McKee. 2013. “Ageing in the European Union.” The Lancet 381 (9874): 1312–1322. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62087-X
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, Douglas K. R. 2009. “Co-Evolutionary Scenarios: An Application to Prospecting Futures of the Responsible Development of Nanotechnology.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 76 (9): 1222–1239. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2009.07.015
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, Claire, Nina Holland, David Leloup, and Hans Muilerman. 2013. “Conflicts of Interest at the European Food Safety Authority Erode Public Confidence.” Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 67: 717–720. doi: 10.1136/jech-2012-202185
   Google Scholar
• Schmitter, Phillippe. 2006. “Governance in the European Union: A Viable Mechanism for Future Legitimation?” In Governance and Democracy: Comparing National, European and International Experiences, edited by Arthur Benz and Yannis Papadapoulos, 157–175. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Science Europe. 2015. Empowering Researchers to Provide Societal Value: Towards Innovation Communities That Leverage Excellence-Focused Research. Report prepared for Science Europe. http://www.scienceeurope.org/engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Scienceindialogue.dk. 2012. Conference Report – Science in Dialogue: Towards a European Model for Responsible Research and Innovation. Odense, Denmark, April 23–25. http://scienceindialogue.dk/documentation.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, Bernd Carsten. 2012. “Responsible Research and Innovation in Information Systems.” European Journal of Information Systems 21 (3): 207–211. doi: 10.1057/ejis.2012.19
   Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, Joseph, Amartya Sen, and Jean-Paul Fitoussi. 2009. Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. http://www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr.
   Google Scholar
• Stirling, Andy. 2006. From Science and Society to Science in Society: Towards a Framework for ‘Co-Operative Research’. Report prepared for European Commission, Directorate-Generale for Research and Innovation. http://bookshop.europa.eu/en/from-science-and-society-to-science-in-society-pbKINA22072/.
   Google Scholar
• Sturgis, Patruck, and Nick Allum. 2004. “Science in Society: Re-Evaluating the Deficit Model of Public Attitudes.” Public Understanding of Science 13: 55–74. doi: 10.1177/0963662504042690
   Google Scholar
• Sutcliffe, Hilary. 2011. A Report on Responsible Research & Innovation. http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/rri-report-hilary-sutcliffe_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Tallacchini, Mariachiara. 2015. “To Bind or Not to Bind? European Ethics as Soft Law.” In Science and Democracy: Making Knowledge and Making Power in the Biosciences and Beyond, edited by Stephen Hilgartner, Clark Miller and Rob Hagendijk, 156–175. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Te Kulve, Haico, and Arie Rip. 2011. “Constructing Productive Engagement: Pre-Engagement Tools for Emerging Technologies.” Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4): 699–714. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9304-0
   Google Scholar
• The Royal Society. 2004. Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties. Report prepared for The Royal Society. London. https://royalsociety.org/policy/publications/2004/nanoscience-nanotechnologies/.
   Google Scholar
• Thorpe, Charles, and Jane Gregory. 2010. “Producing the Post-Fordist Public: The Political Economy of Public Engagement with Science.” Science as Culture 19 (3): 273–301. doi: 10.1080/09505430903194504
   Google Scholar
• Treaty of Lisbon, Amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty Establishing the European Community. 2007/C 306/01, 17.12.2007. Brussels: Official Journal of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Tyfield, David. 2012. “A Cultural Political Economy of Research and Innovation in an Age of Crisis.” Minerva 50 (2): 149–167. doi: 10.1007/s11024-012-9201-y
   Google Scholar
• Van den Hove, Sybille, Jacqueline McGlade, Pierre Mottet, and Michael H. Depledge. 2012. “The Innovation Union: A Perfect Means to Confused Ends?” Environmental Science & Policy 16: 73–80. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.11.006
   Google Scholar
• Van Oudheusden, Michiel. 2014. “Where Are the Politics in Responsible Innovation? European Governance, Technology Assessments, and Beyond.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (1): 67–86. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2014.882097
   Google Scholar
• Von Schomberg, Rene. 2007. From the Ethics of Technology Towards an Ethics of Knowledge Policy & Knowledge Assessment. Report prepared for European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. http://bookshop.europa.eu/en/from-the-ethics-of-technology-towards-an-ethics-of-knowledge-policy-knowledge-assessment-pbKIX106232/.
   Google Scholar
• Von Schomberg, Rene. 2011. Towards Responsible Research and Innovation in the Information and Communication Technologies and Security Technologies Fields. Report prepared for the European Commission, KI-NA-24835-EN-C. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Von Schomberg, Rene. 2013. “A Vision of Responsible Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, edited by Richard Owen, John Bessant and Maggy Heintz, 51–74. London: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Wilsdon, James, Brian Wynne, and Jack Stilgoe. 2005. The Public Value of Science. Or How to Ensure That Science Really Matters. http://www.demos.co.uk/publications/publicvalueofscience.
   Google Scholar
• Yanow, Dvora. 1993. “The Communication of Policy Meanings: Implementation as Interpretation and Text.” Policy Sciences 26: 41–61. doi: 10.1007/BF01006496
   Google Scholar