Inclusive deliberation and action in emerging RRI practices: the case of neuroimaging in security management

References

• Ansari, Daniel, Bert De Smedt, and Roland H. Grabner. 2012. “Neuroeducation – A Critical Overview of an Emerging Field.” Neuroethics 5 (2): 105–117. doi:10.1007/s12152-011-9119-3.
   Google Scholar
• Arentshorst, Marlous E., Jacqueline E. W. Broerse, Anneloes Roelofsen, and Tjard de Cock Buning. 2014. “Towards Responsible Neuroimaging Applications in Health Care: Guiding Visions of Scientists and Technology Developers.” In Responsible Innovation 1, edited by Jeroen van den Hoven, Neelke Doorn, Tsjalling Swierstra, Bert-Jaap Koops, and Henny Romijn, 255–280. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bal, Roland, and Femke Mastboom. 2007. “Engaging with Technologies in Practice: Travelling the Northwest Passage.” Science as Culture 16 (3): 253–266. doi:10.1080/09505430701568651.
   Google Scholar
• Belcher, Annabelle, and Walter Sinnott-Armstrong. 2010. “Neurolaw.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 1 (1): 18–22. doi:10.1002/wcs.8.
   Google Scholar
• Borup, Mads, Nik Brown, Kornelia Konrad, and Harro van Lente. 2006. “The Sociology of Expectations in Science and Technology.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18 (3–4): 285–298. doi:10.1080/09537320600777002.
   Google Scholar
• Canli, Turhan. 2006. “When Genes and Brains Unite: Ethical Implications of Genomic Neuroimaging.” In Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice, and Policy, edited by Judy Illes, 169–184. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clinard, Marshall, and Robert Meier. 2015. Sociology of Deviant Behavior. 13 ed. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2014. “Secure Societies – Protecting Freedom and Security of Europe and its Citizens.” Accessed November 20. http://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/secure-societies-%E2%80%93-protecting-freedom-and-security-europe-and-its-citizens.
   Google Scholar
• Edelenbosch, Rosanne, Frank Kupper, and Jacqueline E. W. Broerse. 2013. “The Application of Neurogenomics to Education: Analyzing Guiding Visions.” New Genetics and Society 32 (3): 285–301. doi:10.1080/14636778.2013.808033.
   Google Scholar
• Farah, Martha J., and Paul Root Wolpe. 2004. “Monitoring and Manipulating Brain Function: New Neuroscience Technologies and their Ethical Implications.” Hastings Center Report 34 (3): 35–45. doi: 10.2307/3528418
   Google Scholar
• Gunter, Tracy D. 2014. “Can We Trust Consumers with Their Brains? Popular Cognitive Neuroscience, Brain Images, Self-Help and the Consumer.” Indiana Health Law Review 11 (2): 483–552. doi:10.18060/18887.
   Google Scholar
• Hedgecoe, Adam, and Paul Martin. 2003. “The Drugs Don't Work: Expectations and the Shaping of Pharmacogenetics.” Social Studies of Science 33 (3): 327–364. doi:10.1177/03063127030333002.
   Google Scholar
• Hollander, Jocelyn A. 2004. “The Social Contexts of Focus Groups.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 33 (5): 602–637. doi:10.1177/0891241604266988.
   Google Scholar
• House, James S. 2008. “Social Psychology, Social Science, and Economics: Twentieth Century Progress and Problems, Twenty-First Century Prospects.” Social Psychology Quarterly 71 (3): 232–256. doi:10.1177/019027250807100306.
   Google Scholar
• Hüsing, Bärbel, Lutz Jäncke, and Brigitte Tag. 2006. Impact Assessment of Neuroimaging: Final Report. Vol. 50. Zürich: vdf Hochschulverlag AG.
   Google Scholar
• de Jong, Irja Marije, Frank Kupper, Anneloes Roelofsen, and Jacqueline E. W. Broerse. 2015. “Exploring Responsible Innovation as a Guiding Concept: The Case of Neuroimaging in Justice and Security.” In Responsible Innovation 2: Concepts, Approaches and Applications, edited by Bert-Jaap Koops, Ilse Oosterlaken, Henny Romijn, Tsjalling Swierstra, and Jeroen van den Hoven, 57–84. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kearnes, Matthew, Robin Grove-White, Phil Macnaghten, James Wilsdon, and Brian Wynne. 2006. “From Bio to Nano: Learning Lessons from the UK Agricultural Biotechnology Controversy.” Science as Culture 15 (4): 291–307. doi:10.1080/09505430601022619.
   Google Scholar
• Kiran, Asle H. 2012. “Does Responsible Innovation Presuppose Design Instrumentalism? Examining the Case of Telecare at Home in the Netherlands.” Technology in Society 34 (3): 216–226. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2012.07.001.
   Google Scholar
• de Kogel, C. H. 2008. “De hersenen in beeld: neurobiologisch onderzoek en vraagstukken op het gebied van verklaring, reductie en preventie van criminaliteit.” In Onderzoek en Beleid, edited by WODC, 1–199. Den Haag: WODC.
   Google Scholar
• Koops, Bert-Jaap. 2015. “Introduction.” In Responsible Innovation 2: Concepts, Approaches and Applications, edited by Jeroen van den Hoven, Ilse Oosterlaken, Bert-Jaap Koops, and Henny Romijn, 1–15. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Nick, Amanda J. Broderick, and Laura Chamberlain. 2007. “What Is ‘Neuromarketing’? A Discussion and Agenda for Future Research.” International Journal of Psychophysiology 63 (2): 199–204. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.03.007
   Google Scholar
• Levi, Michael, and David S Wall. 2004. “Technologies, Security, and Privacy in the Post-9/11 European Information Society.” Journal of Law and Society 31 (2): 194–220. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6478.2004.00287.x
   Google Scholar
• Lodge, Juliet. 2007. “Biometrics: A Challenge For Privacy Or Public Policy-Certified Identity And Uncertainties.” Minority, Politics, Society 1: 193–206.
   Google Scholar
• Lyon, David, ed. 2003. Surveillance as Social Sorting: Privacy, Risk, and Digital Discrimination. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Macnaghten, Phil, Matthew B. Kearnes, and Brian Wynne. 2005. “Nanotechnology, Governance, and Public Deliberation: What Role for the Social Sciences?” Science Communication 27 (2): 268–291. doi:10.1177/1075547005281531.
   Google Scholar
• Nordmann, Alfred. 2010. “A Forensics of Wishing: Technology Assessment in the Age of Technoscience.” Poiesis & Praxis 7 (1–2): 5–15. doi:10.1007/s10202-010-0081-7.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, Richard, John Bessant, and Maggy Heintz, eds. 2013. Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, Richard, Phil Macnaghten, and Jack Stilgoe. 2012. “Responsible Research and Innovation: From Science in Society to Science for Society, with Society.” Science and Public Policy 39 (6): 751–760. doi:10.1093/scipol/scs093.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, Michael Quinn. 1990. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Peissl, Walter. 2010. “Privacy and Security – A Way to Manage the Dilemma.” In ISSE 2009 Securing Electronic Business Processes, edited by Norbert Pohlmann, Helmut Reimer, and Wolfgang Schneider, 187–196. Wiesbaden: Vieweg+Teubner.
   Google Scholar
• Pickersgill, Martyn, Sarah Cunningham-Burley, and Paul Martin. 2011. “Constituting Neurologic Subjects: Neuroscience, Subjectivity and the Mundane Significance of the Brain.” Subjectivity 4 (3): 346–365. doi: 10.1057/sub.2011.10
   Google Scholar
• Pontell, Henry N. 2007. “Deviance, Reactivist Definitions of.” In Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology, edited by George Ritzer. Blackwell Reference Online.
   Google Scholar
• Rip, Arie, and Haico Te Kulve. 2008. “Constructive Technology Assessment and Socio-Technical Scenarios.” In The Yearbook of Nanotechnology in Society, Volume I: Presenting Futures, 49–70. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Roelofsen, Anneloes. 2011. “Exploring the Future of Ecogenomics: Constructive Technology Assessment and Emerging Technologies.” PhD thesis, Athena Institute, VU University Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Roelofsen, A., Jacqueline E. W. Broerse, Tjard de Cock Buning, and Joske F. G. Bunders. 2008. “Exploring the Future of Ecological Genomics: Integrating CTA with Vision Assessment.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 75 (3): 334–355. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2007.01.004.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, Nikolas. 2001. “The Politics of Life Itself.” Theory, Culture & Society 18 (6): 1–30. doi:10.1177/02632760122052020.
   Google Scholar
• Schnittker, Jason. 2013. “Social Structure and Personality.” In Handbook of Social Psychology, edited by John DeLamater, and Amanda Ward, 89–115. Boston, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Shearing, Clifford, and Les Johnston. 2005. “Justice in the Risk Society.” Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology 38 (1): 25–38. doi:10.1375/acri.38.1.25.
   Google Scholar
• Van Melik, Rianne, and Jan Van Weesep. 2006. “Terrorismebestrijding of criminaliteitspreventie.” Agora 22 (1): 20–23.
   Google Scholar
• Van Merkerk, Rutger O., and Ruud E. H. M. Smits. 2008. “Tailoring CTA for Emerging Technologies.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 75 (3): 312–333. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2007.01.003.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, Maureen. 2007. Illusions of Security: Global Surveillance and Democracy in the Post-9/11 World. San Francisco: City Lights Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, Etienne. 2002. “Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems.” In How Organizations Learn: Managing the Search for Knowledge, edited by K. Starkey, S. Tempest, and A. McKinlay, 238–258. London: Thomson Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, James W. 2005. “Reflections on the Private Versus Public Policing of Economic Crime.” British Journal of Criminology 45 (3): 316–339. doi:10.1093/bjc/azh083.
   Google Scholar
• Zedner, Lucia. 2007. “Pre-Crime and Post-Criminology?” Theoretical Criminology 11 (2): 261–281. doi:10.1177/1362480607075851.
   Google Scholar