Process, outcomes, virtues: the normative strategies of responsible research and innovation and the challenge of moral pluralism

References

• Adam, Barbara, and Christopher Groves. 2011. “Futures Tended: Care and Future-Oriented Responsibility.” Bulletin of Science Technology & Society 31 (1): 17–27. doi: 10.1177/0270467610391237
   Google Scholar
• Beck, Ulrich. [1986] 1992. Risk Society. Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Blok, Vincent. 2014. “Look who's Talking: Responsible Innovation, the Paradox of Dialogue and the Voice of the other in Communication and Negotiation Processes.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (2): 171–190. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2014.924239
   Google Scholar
• Blok, Vincent, and Pieter Lemmens. 2015. “The Emerging Concept of Responsible Innovation. Three Reasons why it is Questionable and Calls for a Radical Transformation of the Concept of Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation 2: Concepts, Approaches, and Applications, edited by B. J. Koops, I. Oosterlaken, H. A. Romijn, T. E. Swierstra, and J. van den Hoven, 19–35. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bohman, James. 1998. “Survey Article: The Coming Age of Deliberative Democracy.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 6 (4): 400–425. doi: 10.1111/1467-9760.00061
   Google Scholar
• Callon, Michel, and Annalivia Lacoste. 2011. “Defending Responsible Innovation.” Debating Innovation 1 (1): 19–27.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, Michel, Pierre Lascoumes, and Yannick Barthes. 2001. Agir dans un monde incertain. Essai sur la démocratie technique. Paris: Le Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Ceva, Emanuela. 2012. “Beyond Legitimacy. Can Proceduralism Say Anything Relevant about Justice?” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15 (2): 183–200. doi: 10.1080/13698230.2012.651018
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, Joshua. 1989. “Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy.” In The Good Polity, edited by Alan Hamlin and Philip Pettit, 17–34. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, Joshua. 1997. “Procedure and Substance in Deliberative Democracy.” In Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, edited by James Bohman and William Rehg, 407–437. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collingridge, David. 1980. The Social Control of Technology. London: Frances Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, Heather E. 2003. “The Moral Responsibilities of Scientists.” American Philosophical Quarterly 40 (1): 59–68.
   Google Scholar
• De Hoop, Evelien, Auke Pols, and Henny Romijn. 2016. “Limits to Responsible Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 3 (2): 1–25. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2016.1231396
   Google Scholar
• De Saille, Stevienna. 2015. “Innovating Innovation Policy: The Emergence of ‘Responsible Research and Innovation’.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 2 (2): 152–168. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2015.1045280
   Google Scholar
• Engster, Daniel. 2007. The Heart of Justice: Care Ethics and Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• European Commision (EC). 2013. Options for Strenghtening RRI. Report of the Expert Group on the State of Art in Europe on Responsible Research and Innovation. https://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/options-for-strengthening_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ferry, Jean-Marc. 1991. Les puissances de l'expérience. 2 vols. Paris: Éd. du Cerf.
   Google Scholar
• Fiorino, Daniel. 1990. “Citizen Participation and Environmental Risks: A Survey of Institutional Mechanisms.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 15 (2): 226–243. doi: 10.1177/016224399001500204
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, Erik, Roop L. Mahajan, and Carl Mitcham. 2006. “Midstream Modulation of Technology: Governance from within.” Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 26 (6): 485–496. doi: 10.1177/0270467606295402
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, Erik, and Genevieve Maricle. 2014. “Higher-Level Responsiveness? Socio-Technical Integration within US and UK Nanotechnology Research Priority Setting.” Science and Public Policy 42 (1): 72–85. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scu017
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, Erik, Michael O'Rourke, Robert Evans, Eric B. Kennedy, Michael E. Gorman, and Thomas P. Seager. 2015. “Mapping the Integrative Field: Taking Stock of Socio-Technical Collaborations.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 2 (1): 39–61. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2014.1001671
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, Erik, and Arie Rip. 2013. “Responsible Innovation: Multi-Level Dynamics and Soft Intervention Practices.” In Responsible Innovation. Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, edited by Richard Owen, John Bessant, and Maggy Heintz, 165–184. London: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Fishkin, James S., and Robert C. Luskin. 2005. “Experimenting with a Democratic Ideal: Deliberative Polling and Public Opinion.” Acta Politica 40 (3): 284–298. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500121
   Google Scholar
• Fung, Archon. 2006. “Varieties of Participation in Complex Governance.” Public Administration Review 66 (Issue Supplement s1): 66–75. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00667.x
   Google Scholar
• Funtowicz, Silvio O., and Jerome R. Ravetz. 1992. “Three Types of Risk Assessment and the Emergence of Post Normal Science.” In Social Theories of Risk, edited by Sheldon Krimsky and Dominic Golding, 251–273. New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, Michael, Camille Limoges, Helga Nowotny, Simon Schwartzman, Peter Scott, and Martin Trow. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a Different Voice – Psychological Theory & Women's Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grinbaum, Alexei, and Christopher Groves. 2013. “What is the ‘Responsible’ in Responsible Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation. Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, edited by Richard Owen, John Bessant, and Maggy Heintz, 119–142. London: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Groves, Christopher. 2009. “Future Ethics: Risk, Care and Non-Reciprocal Responsibility.” Journal of Global Ethics 5 (1): 17–31. doi: 10.1080/17449620902765286
   Google Scholar
• Groves, Christopher. 2014. Care, Uncertainty and Intergenerational Ethics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Grunwald, Armin. 2010. “From Speculative Nanoethics to Explorative Philosophy of Nanotechnology.” NanoEthics 4 (2): 91–101. doi: 10.1007/s11569-010-0088-5
   Google Scholar
• Grunwald, Armin. 2012. Responsible Nanobiotechnology. Singapore: Pan Stanford Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Grunwald, Armin. 2014. “Technology Assessment for Responsible Innovation”. In Responsible Innovation Vol. 1. Innovative Solutions for Global Issues, edited by J. Van den Hoven, B. J. Koops, H. A. Romijn, T. E. Swierstra, and I. Oosterlaken, 15–32. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Guston, David. 2014. “Understanding ‘Anticipatory Governance’.” Social Studies of Science 44 (2): 219–243. doi: 10.1177/0306312713508669
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. [1981] 1984–1987. Theory of Communicative Action. Two Volumes. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hellström, Tomas. 2003. “Systemic Innovation and Risk: Technology Assessment and the Challenge of Responsible Innovation.” Technology in Society 25 (3): 369–384. doi: 10.1016/S0160-791X(03)00041-1
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, Sheila. 2003. “Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing Science.” Minerva 41 (3): 223–244. doi: 10.1023/A:1025557512320
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, Sheila. 2011. “Constitutional Moments in Governing Science and Technology.” Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4): 621–638. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9302-2
   Google Scholar
• Kelty, Chistopher M. 2009. “Beyond Implications and Applications: The Story of ‘Safety by Design’.” NanoEthics 3 (2): 79–96. doi: 10.1007/s11569-009-0066-y
   Google Scholar
• Koehn, Daryl. 2011. “Care Ethics and Unintended Consequences.” In Applying Care Ethics to Business, edited by Maurice Hamington and Maureen Sander-Staudt, 141–153. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Laurent, Brice. 2010. Les Politiques des Nanotechnologies. Paris: Charles Léopold-Mayer.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Robert G., and Judith Petts. 2013. “Adaptive Governance for Responsible Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation. Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, edited by Richard Owen, John Bessant, and Maggy Heintz, 143–164. London: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Lenoble, Jacques, and Marc Maesschalck. 2003. Toward a Theory of Governance: The Action of Norms. London: Kluwer Law International.
   Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1999. Dependant Rational Animals: Why Human Beings Need the Virtues. London: Duckworth.
   Google Scholar
• Macnaghten, Phil. 2010. “Researching Technoscientific Concerns in the Making: Narrative Structures, Public Responses, and Emerging Nanotechnologies.” Environment and Planning A 42 (1): 23–37. doi: 10.1068/a41349
   Google Scholar
• Maesschalck, Marc. 2001. Normes et Contextes. Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, Jane J. 1983. Beyond Adversary Democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitcham, Carl. 2003. “Co-Responsibility for Research Integrity.” Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (2): 273–290. doi: 10.1007/s11948-003-0014-0
   Google Scholar
• Muniesa, Fabian, and Lenglet. 2013. “Responsible Innovation in Finance: Directions and Implications.” In Responsible Innovation. Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, edited by Richard Owen, John Bessant, and Maggy Heintz, 185–198. London: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, Morten Velsing. 2016. “The Concept of Responsiveness in the Governance of Research and Innovation.” Science and Public Policy. doi:10.1093/scipol/scv078.
   Google Scholar
• Noddings, Nel. 1984. Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nordmann, Alfred. 2014. “Responsible Innovation, the Art and Craft of Anticipation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (1): 87–98. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2014.882064
   Google Scholar
• Nordmann, Alfred, and Phil Macnaghten. 2010. “Engaging Narratives and the Limits of Lay Ethics: Introduction.” Nanoethics 4 (2): 133–140. doi: 10.1007/s11569-010-0095-6
   Google Scholar
• Nowotny, Helga, Peter Scott, and Michael Gibbons. 2001. Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, Martha. 1993. “Non Relative Virtues: An Aristotelian Approach.” In The Quality of Life, edited by Martha Nussbaum and Amartya Sen, 242–269. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, Martha. 2000. Woman and Human Development. The Capability Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, Martha. 2006. Frontiers of Justice. Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Harvard: Belknap Press.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, Richard, John Bessant, and Maggy Heintz, eds. 2013. Responsible Innovation. Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society. London: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, Richard, Phil Macnaghten, and Jack Stilgoe. 2012. “Responsible Research and Innovation: From Science in Society to Science for Society, with Society.” Science and Public Policy 39 (6): 751–760. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scs093
   Google Scholar
• Owen, Richard, Phil Macnaghten, Jack Stilgoe, M. Gorman, Erik Fisher, and David Guston. 2013. “A Framework for Responsible Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation. Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, edited by Richard Owen, John Bessant, and Maggy Heintz, 27–50. London: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Pandza, Krsto, and Paul Ellwood. 2013. “Strategic and Ethical Foundations for Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 42 (5): 1112–1112. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.02.007
   Google Scholar
• Pavie, Xavier. 2014. “The Importance of Responsible-Innovation and the Necessity of ‘Innovation-Care’.” Philosophy of Management 13 (1): 21–42. doi: 10.5840/pom20141313
   Google Scholar
• Pavie, Xavier, and Julie Egal. 2014. “Innovation and Responsibility: A Managerial Approach to the Integration of Responsibility in a Disruptive Innovation Model.” In Responsible Innovation 1: Innovative Solutions for Global Issues, edited by J. Van den Hoven, B. J. Koops, H. A. Romijn, T. E. Swierstra, and I. Oosterlaken, 53–66. London: John Wiley
   Google Scholar
• Pavie, Xavier, Victor Scholten, and Daphne Carthy. 2014. Responsible Innovation: From Concept to Practice. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pellé, Sophie. 2016. “Responsibility as Care for Research and Innovation.” Proceedings of the PACITA conference, 25–27 February 2015, The next horizon of Technology assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Pellé, Sophie. 2017a. Business, Innovation and Responsibility. London: Wiley-ISTE.
   Google Scholar
• Pellé, Sophie. 2017b. “Responsibility in Research and Innovation: The Potential of Care Ethics.” In RRI. Concept and Practices, edited by Gianni Robert, Bernard Reber, and John Pearson. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pellé, Sophie, and Vanessa Nurock. 2012. “Of Nanochips and Persons: Toward an Ethics of Diagnostic Technology in Personalized Medicine.” Nanoethics 6 (3): 155–165. doi: 10.1007/s11569-012-0158-y
   Google Scholar
• Pellé, Sophie, and Bernard Reber. 2015. “Responsible Innovation in the Light of Moral Reponsibility.” Journal on Chain and Network Science 15 (2): 107–117. doi: 10.3920/JCNS2014.x017
   Google Scholar
• Pellé, Sophie, and Bernard Reber. 2016. From Ethics of Research to Responsible Research and Innovation. London: Wiley – ISTE.
   Google Scholar
• Pellizzoni, Luigi. 2004. “Responsibility and Environmental Governance.” Environmental Politics 13 (3): 541–565. doi: 10.1080/0964401042000229034
   Google Scholar
• Perez, Oren. 2011. “Responsive Regulation and Second-Order Reflexivity: On the Limits of Regulatory Intervention.” UBC Law Review 44 (3): 743–778.
   Google Scholar
• Pisano, Umberto. 2012. “Resilience and Sustainable Development: Theory of Resilience, Systems Thinking and Adaptive Governance.” ESDN Quarterly Report 26.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, John. 1993. Political Liberalism, The John Dewey Essays in Philosophy, 4. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, Henry S. 1999. “Institutionally Divided Moral Responsibility.” In Responsibility, edited by Ellen F. Paul, Fred D. Miller, and Jeffrey Paul, 218–249. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richter, Jennifer A., Abraham S. D. Tidwell, Erik Fisher, and Thaddeus R. Miller. 2016. “STIRring the Grid: Engaging Energy Systems Design and Planning in the Context of Urban Sociotechnical Imaginaries.” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research. doi/full/10.1080/13511610.2016.1237281.
   Google Scholar
• Rip, Arie. 2006. “A Co-Evolutionary Approach to Reflexive Governance – and its Ironies.” In Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development, edited by Jan-Peter Voss, Dierk Bauknecht, and Ren Kemp, 82–100. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Rip, Arie, and Haico te Kulve. 2008. “Constructive Technology Assessment and Socio-Technical Scenarios.” In The Yearbook of Nanotechnology in Society, Volume I: Presenting Futures, edited by E. Fisher, C. Selin, and J. M. Wetmore, 49–70. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, Douglas K. R., Lu Huang, Ying Guo, and Alan L. Porter. 2013. “Forecasting Innovation Pathways (FIP) for New and Emerging Science and Technologies.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 80 (2): 267–285. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.06.004
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, Doris, and Miltos Ladikas. 2015. “Towards Principled Responsible Research and Innovation: Employing the Difference Principle in Funding Decisions.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 2 (2): 169–183. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2015.1057798
   Google Scholar
• Schuurbiers, Daan. 2011. “What Happens in the Lab: Applying Midstream Modulation to Enhance Critical Reflection in the Laboratory.” Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4): 769–788. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9317-8
   Google Scholar
• Selin, Cynthia. 2007. “Expectations and the Emergence of Nanotechnology.” Science, Technology and Human Values 32 (2): 196–220. doi: 10.1177/0162243906296918
   Google Scholar
• Setiawan, Andri D., and Rajbeer Singh. 2015. “Responsible Innovation in Practice: The Adoption of Solar PV in Telecom Towers in Indonesia.” Responsible Innovation 2: concepts, approaches, and applications, 225–243. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, Bernd, Grace Eden, and Marina Jirotka. 2013. “Responsible Research and Innovation in Information and Communication Technology.” In Responsible Innovation. Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, edited by Richard Owen, John Bessant, and Maggy Heintz, 199–218. London: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, Jürg. 2012. The Foundations of Deliberative Democracy. Empirical Research and Normative Implications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, Jack, Richard Owen, and Phil Macnaghten. 2013. “Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 42 (9): 1568–1580. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008
   Google Scholar
• Stirling, Andrew. 2005. “Opening up or closing down? Analysis, participation and power in the social appraisal of technology.” In Science, Citizenship and Globalisation, edited by Melissa Leach, Ian Scoones, and Brian Wynne, 218–231. London: Zed.
   Google Scholar
• Stirling, Andrew. 2008. “‘Opening Up’ and ‘Closing Down’ Power, Participation, and Pluralism in the Social Appraisal of Technology.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 33 (2): 262–294. doi: 10.1177/0162243907311265
   Google Scholar
• Sutcliffe, Hilary. 2011. “ A report on Responsible Research & Innovation, prepared for the DG for Research and Innovation, European Commission.” http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/rri-report-hilary-sutcliffe_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sykes, Kathy, and Phil Macnaghten. 2013. “Responsible Innovation – Opening Up Dialogue and Debate.” In Responsible Innovation. Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, edited by Richard Owen, John Bessant, and Maggy Heintz, 85–108. London: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, Dennis F. 2008. “Deliberative Democratic Theory and Empirical Political Science.” Annual Review of Political Science, 11: 497–520. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.081306.070555
   Google Scholar
• Treaty of Lisbon Amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty Establishing the European Community, 13 December 2007. 2007/C 306/01. Accessed November 17, 2016. http://www.refworld.org/docid/476258d32.html.
   Google Scholar
• Tronto, Joan. [1993] 2009. Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethics of Care. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Hoven, Jeroen. 2013. “Value Sensitive Design and Responsible Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation. Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, edited by Richard Owen, John Bessant, and Maggy Heintz, 75–84. London: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Hoven, Jeroen. 2014. “Responsible Innovation: A New Look at Technology and Ethics.” In Responsible Innovation vol. 1. Innovative Solutions for Global Issues, edited by Jeroen Van den Hoven, B. J. Koops, H. A. Romijn, T. E. Swierstra, and I. Oosterlaken, 3–14. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Van Oudheusden, Michiel. 2014. “Where are the Politics in Responsible Innovation? European Governance, Technology Assessments, and Beyond.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (1): 67–86. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2014.882097
   Google Scholar
• Von Schomberg, René. 2013. “A Vision of Responsible Innovation”. In Responsible Innovation. Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, edited by Richard Owen, John Bessant, and Maggy Heintz, 51–74. London: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Voss, Dierk, and Ren Kemp. 2006. “Introduction.” In Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development, edited by Jan-Peter Voss, Dierk Bauknecht, and Ren Kemp, 3–28. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Bernard. 1981. Moral Luck. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winickoff, David, Leila Jamal, and Nicholas Anderson. 2016. “New Modes of Engagement for Big Data Research.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 3 (2): 169–177. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2016.1190443
   Google Scholar
• Wong, Pak-Hang. 2016. “Responsible Innovation for Decent Nonliberal Peoples: A Dilemma?” Journal of Responsible Innovation 3 (2): 154–168. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2016.1216709
   Google Scholar
• Wynne, Brian. 1993. “Public Uptake of Science: A Case for Institutional Reflexivity.” Public Understanding of Science 2 (4): 321–337. doi: 10.1088/0963-6625/2/4/003
   Google Scholar
• Wynne, Brian. 2011. “Lab Work goes Social, and Vice Versa: Strategising Public Engagement Processes.” Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4): 791–800. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9316-9
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler, Rafael. 2015. “Justice and Innovation – Towards Principles for Creating a Fair Space for Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 2 (2): 184–200. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2015.1057796
   Google Scholar