Addressing scarcities in responsible innovation

References

• Adger, W. N., and A. Jordan, eds. 2009. Governing Sustainability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, J., and M. Wissenburg, eds. 2001. Sustaining Liberal Democracy; Ecological Challenges and Opportunities. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Blok, V. 2014. “Look Who’s Talking: Responsible Innovation, the Paradox of Dialogue and the Voice of the Other in Communication and Negotiation Processes.” 9460 (February 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Chilvers, J., and M. Kearnes, eds. 2016. Remaking Participation. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Collingridge, D. 1980. The Social Control of Technology. Milton. Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duckworth, H. A., and R. A. Moore. 2010. Social Responsibility; Failure Mode Effects and Analysis. Boca Raton: Taylor and Frances.
   Google Scholar
• Elster, J. 2011. “Deliberation Cycles and Misrepresentation.” In Epistemic Democracy in Practice, 20th–22nd October 2011, 91–111. New Haven, CT: Yale Univeristy.
   Google Scholar
• Felt, U., D. Barben., A. Irwin, P.-B. Joly, A. Rip, A. Stirling, and T. Stockelova. 2013. Science in Society: Caring for Our Futures in Turbulent Times. Strasbourg: European Science Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, E. 2010. “Risk Regulatory Concepts and the Law.” In Risk and Regulatory Policy: Improving the Governance of Risk, 45–92. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, R., and P. Bellaby. 2007. Risk and the Public Acceptance of New Technologies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gee D., M. MacGarvin, A. Stirling, J. Keys, S. Vaz, and B. Wynne, eds. 2001. Late Lessons from Early Warnings: The Precautionary Principle 1896–2000. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, David, Philippe Grandjean, Steffen Foss Hansen, Sybille van den Hove, Malcolm MacGarvin, Jock Martin, Gitte Nielsen, David Quist, and David Stanners, eds. 2013. Late Lessons from Early Warnings: Science, Precaution, Innovation. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Gianni, R., and P. Goujon. 2014. Governance of Responsible Innovation – Analytical Grid. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Groves, C. 2015. “Logic of Choice or Logic of Care? Uncertainty, Technological Mediation and Responsible Innovation.” NanoEthics 9: 321–333. doi: 10.1007/s11569-015-0238-x
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1976. Legitimation Crisis. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hilgartner, S. 2004. “The Credibility of Science on Stage.” Social Studies of Science 34 (3): 443–452. doi: 10.1177/0306312704043694
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. 2011. The Blame Game: Spin, Bureaucracy, and Self-preservation in Government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnstone, P., and A. Stirling. 2015. Comparing Nuclear Power Trajectories in Germany and the UK: From “Regimes” to “Democracies” in Sociotechnical Transitions and Discontinuities. Brighton: Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex.
   Google Scholar
• Koops, B.-J., I. Oosterlaken, H. Romijn, T. Swierstra, and J. van den Hoven, eds. 2015. Responsible Innovation 2. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Leach, M., I. Scoones, and A. Stirling. 2010. Dynamic Sustainabilities: Technology, Environment, Social Justice. Abingdon: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Maasen, S., and P. Wengart, eds. 2005. Democratization of Expertise? Exploring Novel Forms of Scientific Advice in Political Decision-making. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mehta, L. 2010. The Limits to Scarcity: Contesting the Politics of Allocation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, R., J. Bessant, and M. Heintz, eds. 2013. Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, R., P. Macnaghten, and J. Stilgoe. 2012. “Responsible Research and Innovation: From Science in Society to Science for Society, with Society.” Science and Public Policy 39 (6): 751–760. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scs093
   Google Scholar
• Pellé, S., and B. Reber. 2013. Governance of Responsible Innovation – The Theoretical Landscape. Paris: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Pellizzoni, L. 2001. “The Myth of the Best Argument: Power, Deliberation and Reason.” British Journal of Sociology 52 (1): 59–86. doi: 10.1080/00071310020023037
   Google Scholar
• Pellizzoni, L. 2005. “Trust, Responsibility and Environmental Policy.” European Societies 7 (4): 567–594. doi: 10.1080/14616690500194118
   Google Scholar
• Redclift, M., and D. Springett, eds. 2015. The Routledge International Handbook of Sustainable Development. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Renn, O., M. Dreyer, and SpringerLink. 2009. Food Safety Governance: Integrating Science, Precaution and Public Involvement. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Saward, M. 2000. Democratic Innovation: Deliberation, Representation and Association. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schomberg, R. Von. 2013. “A Vision of Responsible Research and Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, edited by M. Owen, R. Bessant, and J. Heintz, 1–35. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Scoones, Ian, Rebecca Smalley, Ruth Hall, and Dzodzi Tsikata. 2014. “Narratives of Scarcity: Understanding the ‘Global Resource Grab’.” February.
   Google Scholar
• Scoones, I., M. Leach, and P. Newell. 2015. The Politics of Green Transformations. London: Routledge Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, J., R. Owen, and P. Macnaghten. 2013. “Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 42 (9): 1568–1580.
   Google Scholar
• Stirling, A. 2007. “Risk, Precaution and Science: Towards a More Constructive Policy Debate. Talking Point on the Precautionary Principle.” EMBO Reports 8 (4): 309–315. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400953
   Google Scholar
• Stirling, A. 2008. ““Opening Up” and “Closing Down”: Power, Participation, and Pluralism in the Social Appraisal of Technology.” Science, Technology and Human Values 23 (2): 262–294.
   Google Scholar
• Stirling, A. 2012. “Opening Up the Politics of Knowledge and Power in Bioscience.” PLoS Biology 10 (1): e1001233. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001233
   Google Scholar
• Stirling, A. 2014. “Towards Innovation Democracy: Participation, Responsibility and Precaution in Innovation Governance.” In Annual Report of the Government Chief Scientific Adviser 2014, Innovation: Managing Risk, Not Avoiding It. Evidence and Case Studies, 49–62. London: Government Office of Science. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/376505/14.
   Google Scholar
• Stirling, A. 2016. “Knowing Doing Governing: Realising Heterodyne Democracies.” In Knowing Governance: The Epistemic Construction of Political Order, edited by J.-P. Voß and R. Freeman, 22–44. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Stirling, A. Forthcoming. “Precaution in the Governance of Technology.” In Oxford Handbook on the Law and Regulation of Technology, edited by K. Yeung. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• UN. 2014. Open Working Group Proposal for Sustainable Development Goals. New York: United Nations General Assembly.
   Google Scholar
• Van Oudheusden, M. 2014. “Where Are the Politics in Responsible Innovation? European Governance, Technology Assessments, and Beyond.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 0 (0): 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987. Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wynne, B. 1992. “Uncertainty and Environmental Learning: Reconceiving Science and Policy in the Preventive Paradigm.” Global Environmental Change 2:111–127. doi: 10.1016/0959-3780(92)90017-2
   Google Scholar
• Wynne, B. 2007. “Public Participation in Science and Technology: Performing and Obscuring a Political–Conceptual Category Mistake.” East Asian Science, Technology and Society: an International Journal 1 (1): 99–110.
   Google Scholar