http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6105-7794
References
- Department of Business, Innovation and Skills. 2015a. Fulfilling Our Potential: Teaching Excellence, Social Mobility and Student Choice, CMND. 9141. London: HMSO.
- Department of Business, Innovation and Skills. 2015b. Review of Research Excellence Framework (REF): Terms of reference. London: Department of Business, Innovation and Skills.
- Department of Business, Innovation and Skills. 2016. Lord Stern’s Review of the Research Excellence Framework: Call for Evidence. London: Department of Business, Innovation and Skills.
- Donovan, Claire. 2008. “The Australian Research Quality Framework: A Live Experiment in Capturing the Social, Economic, Environmental, and Cultural Returns of Publicly Funded Research.” New Directions for Evaluation 118: 47–60. doi: 10.1002/ev.260
- Donovan, Claire. 2011. “State of the Art in Assessing Research Impact: Introduction to a Special Issue.” Research Evaluation 20 (3): 175–179. doi: 10.3152/095820211X13118583635918
- Donovan, Claire, and Stephen Hanney. 2011. “The ‘Payback Framework’ Explained.” Research Evaluation 20 (3): 181–183. doi: 10.3152/095820211X13118583635756
- HEFCE [Higher Education Funding Council for England]. 2015. “REF Impact.” Accessed May 9, 2016. http://www.hefce.ac.uk/rsrch/REFimpact/.
- Hicks, Diana, Paul Wouters, Ludo Waltman, Sarah de Rijcke, and Ismael Rafols. 2015. “Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for Research Metrics.” Nature 520: 429–431. doi: 10.1038/520429a
- Joly, Pierre-Benoît, Ariane Gaunand, Laurence Colinet, Philippe Larédo, Stéphane Lemarié, and Mireille Matt. 2015. “ASIRPA: A Comprehensive Theory-Based Approach to Assessing the Societal Impacts of a Research Organization.” Research Evaluation 24 (4): 440–453. doi: 10.1093/reseval/rvv015
- Martin, Ben. 2011. “The Research Excellence Framework and the ‘Impact Agenda’: Are we Creating a Frankenstein Monster?” Research Evaluation 20 (3): 247–254. doi: 10.3152/095820211X13118583635693
- Martin, Ben. 2016. “What’s Happening to Our Universities?” Science Policy Research Unit Working Paper Series, SWPS 2016-03. Brighton: University of Sussex.
- Oancea, Alis. 2016. “Challenging the Grudging Consensus Behind the REF.” Times Higher Education, March 25. Accessed May 9, 2016. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/blog/challenging-grudging-consensus-behind-ref.
- Research Councils UK. 2016. “Pathways to Impact.” Accessed May 9, 2016. http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/innovation/impacts/.
- Spaapen, Jack, and Leonie van Drooge. 2011. “Introducing ‘Productive Interactions’ in Social Impact Assessment.” Research Evaluation 20 (3): 211–218. doi: 10.3152/095820211X12941371876742
- Wilsdon, James. 2016. “Consensus and Conflict: What Do Responses to Stern Tell Us About the Future of the REF?” WONKHE, 18 April. Accessed May 9, 2016. http://wonkhe.com/blogs/consensus-and-conflict-what-do-responses-to-stern-tell-us-about-the-future-of-the-ref/.
- Wilsdon, James, Liz Allen, Eleonora Belfiore, Philip Campbell, Stephen Curry, Steven Hill, Richard Jones, et al. 2015. The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management. Bristol: HEFCE. Accessed May 9, 2016. doi:10.13140/RG.2.1.4929.1363.