The renaissance of techno-utopianism as a challenge for responsible innovation

References

• Adam, Barbara, and Chris Groves. 2007. Future Matters: Action, Knowledge, Ethics. Boston, MA: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Chris. 2012. Makers: The New Industrial Revolution. New York, NY: Crown Business.
   Google Scholar
• Barba, Evan. 2015. “Three Reasons Why the Future Is in the Making.” Science, Technology & Human Values 40 (4): 638–650. doi:10.1177/0162243915572263.
   Google Scholar
• Bostrom, Nick. 2014. Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, Adrian. 2004. “Wealth Without Money.” Accessed August 5, 2016. http://reprap.org/wiki/Wealth_Without_Money.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, Sarah. 2016. “Participation as Pleasure: Citizenship and Science Communication.” In Remaking Participation: Science, Environment and Emergent Publics, edited by Jason Chilvers and Matthew Kearnes, 162–177. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dickel, Sascha. 2011. Enhancement-Utopien: Soziologische Analysen zur Konstruktion des Neuen Menschen. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Dickel, Sascha. 2013. “Beyond Cynicism: Climate Engineering Technologies and Vegan Diets as Alternative Solutions for Climate Change.” In Global Environmental Change: New Drivers for Resistance, Crime and Terrorism?, edited by Achim Maas, Balázs Bodó, Clementine Burnley, Irina Comardicea, and Roger Roffey, 243–260. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Dickel, Sascha. 2014. “Be Afraid of the Unmodified Body! The Social Construction of Risk in Enhancement Utopianism.” In The Human Enhancement Debate and Disability: New Bodies for a Better Life, edited by Miriam Eilers, Katrin Grüber, and Christoph Rehmann-Sutter, 227–244. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dickel, Sascha. 2016. “Post-Technokratie: Prekäre Verantwortung in digitalen Kontexten.” Soziale Systeme 19 (2): 282–303.
   Google Scholar
• Dickel, Sascha, and Jan-Felix Schrape. 2016. “Materializing Digital Futures.” In The Decentralized and Networked Future of Value Creation: 3D Printing and Its Implications for Society, Industry, and Sustainable Development, edited by Jan-Peter Ferdinand, Ulrich Petschow, and Sascha Dickel, 163–178. Basel: Springer International.
   Google Scholar
• Dickel, Sascha, and Jan-Felix Schrape. 2017. “The Logic of Digital Utopianism.” NanoEthics. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s11569-017-0285-6.
   Google Scholar
• Dolata, Ulrich, and Jan-Felix Schrape. 2016. “Masses, Crowds, Communities, Movements: Collective Action in the Internet Age.” Social Movement Studies 15 (1): 1–18. doi: 10.1080/14742837.2015.1055722
   Google Scholar
• Gershenfeld, Neil A. 2005. Fab: The Coming Revolution on Your Desktop. From Personal Computers to Personal Fabrication. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gershenfeld, Neil A. 2012. “How to Make Almost Anything. The Digital Fabrication Revolution.” Foreign Affairs 91 (6): 43–57.
   Google Scholar
• Grunwald, Armin. 2014. “The Hermeneutic Side of Responsible Research and Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (3): 274–291. doi:10.1080/23299460.2014.968437.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, Sheila, and Sang-Hyun Kim. 2009. “Containing the Atom: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Nuclear Power in the United States and South Korea.” Minerva 47 (2): 119–146. doi: 10.1007/s11024-009-9124-4
   Google Scholar
• Koselleck, Reinhart. 1989. Vergangene Zukunft: Zur Semantik geschichtlicher Zeiten. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Kurzweil, Ray. 2005. The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. New York, NY: Viking.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, Niklas. 1976. “The Future Cannot Begin. Temporal Structures in Modern Society.” Social Research 43 (1): 130–152.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, Niklas. 2000. The Reality of the Mass Media. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, Niklas. 2013. Theory of Society 2. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nassehi, Armin. 1994. “No Time for Utopia: The Absence of Utopian Contents in Modern Concepts of Time.” Time & Society 3 (1): 47–78. doi:10.1177/0961463X94003001003.
   Google Scholar
• Nordmann, Alfred. 2011. “The Age of Technoscience.” In Science Transformed? Debating Claims of an Epochal Break, edited by Alfred Nordmann, Hans Radder, and Gregor Schiemann, 19–30. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nordmann, Alfred. 2014. “Responsible Innovation, the Art and Craft of Anticipation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (1): 87–98. doi:10.1080/23299460.2014.882064.
   Google Scholar
• Rifkin, Jeremy. 2014. The Zero Marginal Cost Society: The Internet of Things, the Collaborative Commons, and the Eclipse of Capitalism. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ritzer, George, and Nathan Jurgenson. 2010. “Production, Consumption, Prosumption: The Nature of Capitalism in the Age of the Digital ‘Prosumer’.” Journal of Consumer Culture 10 (1): 13–36. doi:10.1177/1469540509354673.
   Google Scholar
• Rödder, Simone, Martina Franzen, and Peter Weingart. 2012. The Sciences’ Media Connection: Public Communication and Its Repercussions. Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook 28. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schrape, Jan-Felix. 2012. Wiederkehrende Erwartungen. Prognosen, Visionen und Mythen um neue Medien seit 1970. Boizenburg: Hülsbusch.
   Google Scholar
• Schrape, Jan-Felix. 2016a. “Big Data: Informatisierung der Gesellschaft 4.0.” Berliner Debatte Initial 27 (4): 12–21.
   Google Scholar
• Schrape, Jan-Felix. 2016b. Social Media, Mass Media and the ‘Public Sphere’. Differentiation, Complementarity and Co-Existence. Research Contributions to Organizational Sociology and Innovation Studies 2016-01. Stuttgart: University of Stuttgart.
   Google Scholar
• Selin, Cynthia. 2014. “On Not Forgetting Futures.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (1): 103–108. doi:10.1080/23299460.2014.884378.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, Lucy, Randall Trigg, and Jeanette Blomberg. 2002. “Working Artefacts: Ethnomethods of the Prototype.” British Journal of Sociology 53 (2): 163–179. doi:10.1080/00071310220133287.
   Google Scholar
• Tocchetti, Sara. 2012. “DIYbiologists as ‘Makers’ of Personal Biologies: How MAKE Magazine and Maker Faires Contribute in Constituting Biology as a Personal Technology.” Journal of Peer Production 2. Accessed August 5, 2016. http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-2/peer-reviewed-papers/diybiologists-as-makers/.
   Google Scholar
• Wilie, Alex. 2010. “Prototypes in Design: Materializing Futures.” limm 1. Accessed August 5, 2016. http://limn.it/prototypes-in-design-materializing-futures/.
   Google Scholar