Interactive reflection trainings on RRI for multiple stakeholder groups

References

• Boal, Augusto. 1999. Der Regenbogen Der Wünsche.: Methoden Aus Theater Und Therapie. Seelze: Kallmeyer.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., R. Cohen, and J. Sampson. 1988. “Peer Learning and Assessment.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 24 (4): 413–426. doi: 10.1080/0260293990240405
   Google Scholar
• Callon, Michel, and Analivia Lacoste. 2012. “Defending Responsible Innovation.” Debating Innovation 1 (1): 19–24.
   Google Scholar
• Cooperrider, David L., and Suresh Srivastva. 1987. “Appreciative Inquiry in Organizational Life.” In Research in Organizational Change and Development, Vol. 1, 129–169. JAI Press Inc. http://scholar.google.at/scholar_url?url=http://www.margiehartley.com/home/wp-content/uploads/file/APPRECIATIVE_INQUIRY_IN_Orgnizational_life.pdf&hl=de&sa=X&scisig=AAGBfm1HakunNJdwz_-O-vXMD2MTJUMSZA&nossl=1&oi=scholarr&ved=0ahUKEwjrg_bCss_NAhWH7xQKHQuHDlQQgAMIHSgAMAA.
   Google Scholar
• Creek, Michael, ilse Marschalek, Katharina Handler, Melanie Smallman, Norbert Steinhaus, Jean-Pierre Alix, Luc Van Dyck, et al. 2014. “D 2.1 – Guidelines for the Implementation of the Stakeholder Consultation in Relation to RRI.” Deliverable D 2.1. Ecsite, ZSI, University College London, CIPAST, Euroscience, European Business Network, European Schoolnet.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, David. 2013. Theater Zum Leben. Über Die Kunst Und Die Wissenschaft Des Dialogs in Gemeinwesen. Stuttgart: ibidem.
   Google Scholar
• Dostál, J. 2015. Inquiry-Based Instruction: Concept, Essence, Importance and Contribution Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci.
   Google Scholar
• EPSRC. 2015. “Framework for Responsible Innovation.” EPSRC. Accessed December 2016. https://www.epsrc.ac.uk/index.cfm/research/framework/.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2013. Options for Strengthening Responsible Research and Innovation. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• European Union, European Commission, and Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. 2013. Options for Strengthening Responsible Research and Innovation. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. 1984. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, Daniel, Eva Zuazua, Belen Perat, and Ignasi Lopez, eds. 2016. A Practical Guide to Responsible Research and Innovation. Key Lessons from RRI Tools. Spain: RRI Tools.
   Google Scholar
• Höykinpuro, Ritva, and Arja Ropo. 2014. “Visual Narratives on Organizational Space.” Journal of Organizational Change Management 27 (5): 780–792. doi: 10.1108/JOCM-09-2014-0174
   Google Scholar
• Human, Brett A., and Amanda Davies. 2010. “Stakeholder Consultation During the Planning Phase of Scientific Programs.” Marine Policy 34 (3): 645–654. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2009.12.003
   Google Scholar
• Johnstone, Keith, Christine Schreyer, and Petra Schreyer. 2014. Theaterspiele: Spontaneität, Improvisation und Theatersport. 9. Aufl. Berlin: Alexander-Verl.
   Google Scholar
• Klaassen, Pim, Frank Kupper, and Jacqueline Broerse. 2014. “Policy Brief on the State of the Art on RRI and a Working Definition of RRI.” Deliverable D 1.1. RRI Tools. Amsterdam: Athena Institute, VU University Amsterdam. http://www.rri-tools.eu/workplan-deliverables.
   Google Scholar
• Marschalek, ilse. 2015. “Assessing Stakeholders’ Needs and Constraints Related to RRI. Experiences and First Results of a Pan-European Stakeholder Consultation.” In The next Horizon of Technology Assessment, 93–100. Proceedings from the PACITA Conference in Berlin. Prague: Technology Centre ASCR.
   Google Scholar
• Marschalek, ilse. 2017. Public Engagement in Responsible Research and Innovation A Critical Reflection From the Practitioner’s Point of View. Vienna: University of Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• Marschalek, ilse, Katharina Handler, Margit Hofer, Daniel Garcia Jimenez, Michael Creek, and Luisa Marino. 2015. Hubs Manual for the M9–10 Consultation Workshop. RRI Tools. https://www.rri-tools.eu/documents/10184/16301/RRITools_HubsConsultationManual/.
   Google Scholar
• O'Donnell, A. M., and A. King. 1999. Cognitive Perspectives on Peer Learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, Richard. 2014. “The UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council’s Commitment to a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (1): 113–117. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2014.882065
   Google Scholar
• Owen, Richard, Phil Macnaghten, and Jack Stilgoe. 2012. “Responsible Research and Innovation: From Science in Society to Science for Society, with Society.” Science and Public Policy 39 (6): 751–760. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scs093
   Google Scholar
• Schrammel, Maria, ilse Marschalek, Elisabeth Unterfrauner, and Margit Hofer, eds. 2016. Self-Reflection Tool. Fostering Responsible Research and Innovation. Vienna: Rema print.
   Google Scholar
• Smallman, Melanie, Kaatje Lomme, and Natacha Faullimmel. 2015. “D 2.2. Report on the Analysis of Opportunities, Obstacles and Needs of the Stakeholder Groups in RRI Practices in Europe.” http://www.rri-tools.eu/documents/10182/18424/RRITools_D2.2-AnalysisNeeds+ConstraintsStakeholderGroupsRRI.pdf/d5aadef5–12c4–4045-a813–15a55fc534ff.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, Bernd. 2013. “Responsible Research and Innovation: The Role of Privacy in an Emerging Framework.” Science and Public Policy 40 (6): 708–716. doi: 10.1093/scipol/sct067
   Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, Jack, Richard Owen, and Phil Macnaghten. 2013. “Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 42 (9): 1568–1580. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008
   Google Scholar
• Sutcliffe, Hilary. 2011. “A Report on Responsible Research and Innovation by Hilary Sutcliffe.” https://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/rri-report-hilary-sutcliffe_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Von Schomberg, Rene. 2011. “Prospects for Technology Assessment in a Framework of Responsible Research and innovation.” In Technikfolgen abschätzen lehren: Bildungspotenziale transdisziplinärer Methode, 39–61. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Wickson, Fern, and Anna L. Carew. 2014. “Quality Criteria and Indicators for Responsible Research and Innovation: Learning From Transdisciplinarity.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (3): 254–273. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2014.963004
   Google Scholar