References
- Abbott, Alison. 2014. “Row Hits Flagship Brain Plan.” Nature 511 (July 10): 133–134. doi:10.1038/511133a.
- Arthur, W. Brian. 1994. Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
- Barben, Daniel, Erik Fisher, Cynthia Selin, and David H. Guston. 2008. “Anticipatory Governance of Nanotechnology: Foresight, Engagement, and Integration.” In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. 3rd ed., edited by Edward J. Hackett, Olga Amsterdamska, Michael Lynch, and Judy Wajcman, 979–1000. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Bimber, Bruce. 1996. The Politics of Expertise in Congress: The Rise and Fall of the Office of Technology Assessment. Albany: State University of New York Press.
- “Brain Fog.” 2014. Editorial. Nature 511 (July 10): 125. doi:10.1038/511125a.
- Collingridge, David. 1981. The Social Control of Technology. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Cross-Disorder Group of the Psychiatric Genomics. 2013. “Identification of Risk Loci with Shared Effects on Five Major Psychiatric Disorders: A Genome-wide Analysis.” The Lancet 381 (9875): 1371–1379. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62129-1.
- David, Paul A. 1997. Path Dependence and the Quest for Historical Economics: One More Chorus of the Ballad of QWERTY University of Oxford, Discussion Papers in Economic and Social History, Number 20.
- Dudai, Yadin, and Kathinka Evers. 2014. “To Simulate or Not to Simulate: What Are the Questions?” Neuron 84 (October 22): 254–261. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.09.031
- Eliasmith, Chris, and Oliver Trujillo. 2014. “The Use and Abuse of Large-scale Brain Models.” Current Opinion in Neurobiology 25: 1–6. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2013.09.009.
- Enserink, Martin, and Kai Kupferschmidt. 2014. “Updated: European Neuroscientists Revolt Against the E.U.'s Human Brain Project.” ScienceInsider (July 11). Accessed April 27, 2017. http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2014/07/updated-european-neuroscientists-revolt-against-eus-human-brain-project
- European Commission. 2008. Challenging Europe’s Research: Rationales for the European Research Area, EUR 23326. Accessed April 27, 2017. http://ec.europa.eu/research/era/pdf/eg7-era-rationales-final-report_en.pdf
- European Commission. 2014. The FET Flagship Model, Key Policy and Implementation Issues. Conclusions from an External Consultation Workshop. April 29. Brussels. Accessed April 27, 2017. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/conclusions-consultation-workshop-fet-flagship-model-key-policy-implementation-issues
- European Commission Staff Working Document SWD(2014)283. 2014. FET Flagships: A Novel Partnering Approach to Address Grand Scientific Challenges and to Boost Innovation in Europe. September 19.
- European Research Area Board. 2012. Investing in Research and Innovation for Grand Challenges. Report. Accessed April 27, 2017. http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/the-masis-report_en.pdf
- Fisher, Erik. 2005. “Lessons Learned from the Ethical, Legal and Social Implications Program (ELSI): Planning Societal Implications Research for the National Nanotechnology Program.” Technology in Society 27: 321–328. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2005. 04.006 doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.04.006
- Fisher, Erik, Roop L. Mahajan, and Carl Mitcham. 2006. “Midstream Modulation of Technology: Governance from Within.” Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 26 (6): 485–496. doi:10.1177/0270467606295402.
- Frégnac, Yves, and Gilles Laurent. 2014. “Where Is the Brain in the Human Brain Project?” Nature 513 (September 4): 27–29. doi: 10.1038/513027a
- García-Sancho, Miguel. 2016. “The Proactive Historian: Methodological Opportunities Around the New Archival Evidence on Modern Genomics.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 55 (February): 70–82. doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2015.09.005.
- Grand Challenges Canada (Grand Défis Canada). 2011. “The Grand Challenges Approach, January 2011.” Accessed April 27, 2017. http://www.grandchallenges.ca/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/thegrandchallengesapproach.pdf
- Greenbaum, Dov. 2013. “Grand Challenge: ELSI in a Changing Global Environment.” Frontiers in Genetics 4: 158. doi:10.3389/fgene.2013.00158.
- Guston, David. 2011. “Anticipatory Governance: A Strategic Vision for Building Reflexivity into Emerging Technologies.” Paper presented at Resilience 2011, Second International Science and Policy Conference, Tempe, AZ, March 11–16.
- Guston, David H. 2014. “Understanding ‘Anticipatory Governance’.” Social Studies of Science 44 (2): 218–242. doi:10.1177/0306312713508669.
- Guston, David H., and Daniel Sarewitz. 2002. “Real-Time Technology Assessment.” Technology in Society 24 (1–2): 93–109. doi:10.1016/S0160-791X(01)00047-1.
- The HBP Consortium. 2015. The Human Brain Project Framework Partnership Agreement. FPA Annex 1 Part B Draft 40 15102. Accessed April 27, 2017. https://sos.exo.io/public-website-production/filer_public/0d/95/0d95ec21-276a-478d-a2a9-d0c5922fb83a/fpa_annex_1_part_b.pdf?Expires=1493291489&AWSAccessKeyId=EXOfbc15da7163375962e86fa94&Signature=K4GKpQueMLSlCBT43u%2B2RDtY67o%3D
- The HBP-PS Consortium. 2012. The Human Brain Project. A Report to the European Commission. Accessed April 27, 2017. http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/ict/programme/fet/flagship/doc/6pilots-hbp-publicreport_en.pdf
- Kallerud, Egil, Effie Amanatidou, Paul Upham, Mika Nieminen, Antje Klitkou, Dorothy Sutherland Olsen, Maria Lima Toivanen, Juha Oksanen, and Lisa Scordato. 2013. “Dimensions of Research and Innovation Policies to Address Grand and Global Challenges.” NIFU Working Paper. Accessed May 8, 2017. https://brage.bibsys.no/xmlui/handle/11250/2358601
- Kearnes, Matthew, and Matthias Wienroth. 2011. A New Mandate? Research Policy in a Technological Society. Durham: Durham University.
- Kinaret, Jari, Vladimir Falko, Andrea Ferrari, Ana Helman, Jani Kivioja, Daniel Neumaier, Konstantin Novoselov, Vincenzo Palermo, and Stephan Roche. 2012. GRAPHENE-CA Graphene Science and Technology for ICT and Beyond: Deliverable 6.3 “Publishable Flagship Proposal Report.” Accessed April 27, 2017. http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/ict/programme/fet/flagship/doc/6pilots-graphene-publicreport_en.pdf
- Koslow, Stephen H. 2000. “Should the Neuroscience Community Make a Paradigm Shift to Sharing Primary Data?” Nature Neuroscience 3: 863–865. doi:10.1038/78760.
- Kranakis, Eda. 1988. “Technology Assessment and the Study of History.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 13 (3/4): 290–307. doi: 10.1177/016224398801303-409
- Kuhlmann, Stefan, and Arie Rip. 2014. The Challenge of Addressing Grand Challenges. University of Twente, January. Accessed April 27, 2017. http://ec.europa.eu/research/innovation-union/pdf/expert-groups/The_challenge_of_addressing_Grand_Challenges.pdf
- Markram, Henry. 2009. “A Brain in a Supercomputer.” Transcript of presentation at TEDGlobal 2009, Oxford, July 21–24. Accessed April 27, 2017. https://www.ted.com/talks/henry_markram_supercomputing_the_brain_s_secrets/transcript?language=en
- Neuroskeptic. 2014. “Interview: What’s Wrong with the Human Brain Project?” Discover Blog, July 11. Accessed April 27, 2017. http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/neuroskeptic/2014/07/11/whats-wrong-human-brain-project/#.WQIcGYjys2y
- Nordman, Alfred. 2014. “Responsible Innovation, the Art and Craft of Anticipation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (1): 87–98. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2014.882064
- van Oudheusden, Michiel. 2014. “Where Are the Politics in Responsible Innovation? European Governance, Technology Assessments, and Beyond.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (1): 67–86. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2014.882097
- Owen, Richard, Phil Macnaghten, and Jack Stilgoe. 2012. “Responsible Research and Innovation: From Science in Society to Science for Society, with Society.” Science and Public Policy 39 (6): 751–760. doi:10.1093/scipol/scs093.
- Ramirez, Rafael, and Angela Wilkinson. 2016. Strategic Reframing: The Oxford Scenario Planning Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Rip, Arie. 2014. “The Past and Future of RRI.” Life Sciences, Society and Policy 10 (17). doi:10.1186/s40504-014-0017-4.
- Rose, Nikolas. 2012. “Democracy in the Contemporary Life Sciences.” BioSocieties 7 (4): 459–472. doi: 10.1057/biosoc.2012.26
- Rose, Nikolas, and Joelle M. Abi-Rached. 2013. Neuro: The New Brain Sciences and the Management of the Mind. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Rose, Nikolas, Christine Aicardi, and Michael Reinsborough. 2015a. Foresight Report on Future Medicine. Human Brain Project deliverable to the European Commission. Accessed April 27, 2017. https://www.kcl.ac.uk/sspp/departments/sshm/research/Research-Groups/BIOS/BIOS-Projects/HBP/Report-on-future-medicineWebsite-version.pdf.
- Rose, Nikolas, Christine Aicardi, and Michael Reinsborough. 2015b. Foresight Report on Future Neuroscience. Human Brain Project deliverable to the European Commission. Accessed April 27, 2017. https://www.kcl.ac.uk/sspp/departments/sshm/research/Research-Groups/BIOS/BIOS-Projects/HBP/SP12-D12-1-2-Future-neuroscience-online.pdf
- Rose, Nikolas, Christine Aicardi, and Michael Reinsborough. 2015c. Future Neuroscience and the Human Brain Project. Building a Neuroscience Community: Community Modelling and Data Repositories. Workshop Report. Fondation Brocher, Hermance June 11–13. Accessed April 28, 2017. http://www.kcl.ac.uk/sspp/departments/sshm/research/Research-Groups/BIOS/BIOS-Projects/HBP/Report-Workshop-Fondation-Brocher-2015---Final.pdf
- Rose, Nikolas, Christine Aicardi, and Michael Reinsborough. 2016. Foresight Report on Future Computing and Robotics. Human Brain Project deliverable to the European Commission. Accessed April 27, 2017. http://www.kcl.ac.uk/sspp/departments/sshm/research/Research-Groups/BIOS/BIOS-Projects/HBP/Foresight%20Lab-Future%20of%20Computing%20and%20Robotics.pdf
- Rosenberg, Nathan. 1994. Exploring the Black Box: Technology, Economics, and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- von Schomberg, René. 2012. “Prospects for Technology Assessment in a Framework of Responsible Research and Innovation.” In Technikfolgen abschätzen lehren: Bildungspotenziale transdisziplinärer Methoden, edited by Marc Dusseldorp and Richard Beechcroft, 39–61. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
- Schot, Johanes, and Arie Rip. 1997. “The Past and Future of Constructive Technology Assessment.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 54 (2–3): 251–268. doi: 10.1016/S0040-1625(96)00180-1
- Seltzer, Daniel, Laurie Zoloth, Cristia Traina, and Lynne Kiesling. 2011. “Paved with Good Intentions: Rethinking the Ethics of ELSI Research.” Journal of Research Administration 42 (2): 15–24.
- Seth, Anil K. (2014) 2017. “The Human Brain Project Risks Becoming a Missed Opportunity.” NeuroBanter, July 15. Accessed April 27, 2017. https://neurobanter.com/2014/07/15/the-human-brain-project-risks-becoming-a-missed-opportunity/
- Stilgoe, Jack, Richard Owen, and Phil Macnaghten. 2013. “Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 42 (9): 1568–1580. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008.
- van der Heijden, Kees. 2005. Scenarios: The Art of Strategic Conversation. 2nd ed. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
- Viola, Roberto. 2016. “A Fantastic Voyage Ahead to Understand the Human Brain.” The Digital Single Market Blog (European Commission). November 30. Accessed April 27, 2017. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/blog/fantastic-voyage-ahead-understand-human-brain
- Wilkinson, Angela. 2009. “Scenario Practices: In Search of Theory.” Journal of Future Studies 13 (3): 107–114.
- Wilsdon, James. 2014. “From Foresight to Hindsight: The Promise of History in Responsible Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (1): 109–112. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2014.885176
- Wilsdon, James, and Rebecca Wills. 2004. See-Through Science: Why Public Engagement Needs to Move Upstream. Demos. Accessed April 28, 2017. https://www.demos.co.uk/files/Seethroughsciencefinal.pdf?1240939425
- Wynne, Brian. 2011. “Lab Work Goes Social, and Vice Versa: Strategising Public Engagement Processes.” Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4): 791–800. doi:10.1007/s11948-011-9316-9.
- Zwart, Hub, Laurens Landeweerd, and Arjan van Rooij. 2014. “Adapt or Perish? Assessing the Recent Shift in the European Research Funding Arena from ‘ELSA’ to ‘RRI’.” Life Sciences, Society and Policy 10 (11). doi:10.1186/s40504-014-0011-x.