Imagined technology futures in demand-oriented technology assessment

References

• Bieber, D., and K. Schwarz, eds. 2011. Mit AAL-Dienstleistungen altern. Nutzerbedarfsanalysen im Kontext des Ambient Assisted Living. iso-Institut: Saarbrücken.
   Google Scholar
• Blackman, S., C. Matlo, C. Bobrovitskiy, A. Waldoch, M. L. Fang, P. Jackson, A. Mihailidis, L. Nygård, A. Astell, and A. Sixsmith. 2016. “Ambient Assisted Living Technologies for Aging Well: A Scoping Review.” Journal of Intelligent Systems 25 (1): 364–369. doi: 10.1515/jisys-2014-0136
   Google Scholar
• BMG (Bundesministerium für Gesundheit). 2013. Unterstützung Pflegebedürftiger durch technische Assistenzsysteme. Abschlussbericht: Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Calvaresi, D., D. Cesarini, P. Sernani, M. Marinoni, A. F. Dragoni, and A. Sturm. 2017. “Exploring the Ambient Assisted Living Domain: A Systematic Review.” Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing 8: 239–257. doi: 10.1007/s12652-016-0374-3
   Google Scholar
• Cuhls, K. 2003. “From Forecasting to Foresight Processes – New Participative Foresight Activities in Germany.” Journal of Forecasting 22 (2/3): 93–111. doi: 10.1002/for.848
   Google Scholar
• De Hoop, E., A. Pols, and H. Romijn. 2016. “Limits to Responsible Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 3 (2): 110–134. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2016.1231396
   Google Scholar
• Ferri, C., M. Prince, C. Brayne, H. Brodaty, L. Fratiglioni, M. Ganguli, K. Hall, et al. 2005. “Global Prevalence of Dementia: A Delphi Consensus Study.” Lancet 366: 2112–2117. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67889-0
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, E., and R. L. Mahajan. 2006. “ Midstream Modulation of Nanotechnology Research in an Academic Laboratory.” ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, IMECE2006. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME).
   Google Scholar
• Flipse, S. M., and S. Puylaert. 2017. “Organizing a Collaborative Development of Technological Design Requirements Using a Constructive Dialogue on Value Profiles: A Case in Automated Vehicle Development.” Science and Engineering Ethics: 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, B., P. Kahn, and A. Borning. 2002. “ Value Sensitive Design: Theory and Methods.” University of Washington Technical Report, 02–12.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. 2004. “From Sectoral Systems of Innovation to Socio-technical Systems Insights about Dynamics and Change from Sociology and Institutional Theory.” Research Policy 33: 897–920. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.015
   Google Scholar
• Geyer, J. 2015. “Einkommen und Vermögen der Pflegehaushalte in Deutschland.” DIW-Wochenbericht 82 (14/15): 323–328.
   Google Scholar
• Grunwald, A. 2011. “Responsible Innovation: Bringing Together Technology Assessment, Applied Ethics, and STS Research.” Enterprise and Work Innovation Studies 7: 9–31.
   Google Scholar
• Guston, D. H., E. Fisher, A. Grunwald, R. Owen, T. Swierstra, and S. van der Burg. 2014. “Responsible Innovation: Motivations for a New Journal.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (1): 1–8. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2014.885175
   Google Scholar
• Guston, D. H., and D. Sarewitz. 2002. “Real-Time Technology Assessment.” Technology in Society 24 (1): 93–109. doi: 10.1016/S0160-791X(01)00047-1
   Google Scholar
• Hmida, H. B., and A. Braun. 2017. “Enabling an Internet of Things Framework for Ambient Assisted Living.” In Ambient Assisted Living, edited by R. Wichert and B. Mand, 181–196. Switzerland: Springer International.
   Google Scholar
• Krings, B.-J., K. Böhle, M. Decker, L. Nierling, and C. Schneider. 2014. “ITA-Monitoring ‘Serviceroboter in Pflegearrangements’.” In Zukünftige Themen der Innovations- und Technikanalyse. Lessons Learned und ausgewählte Ergebnisse, KIT Scientific Reports, edited by M. Decker, T. Fleischer, J. Schippl, and N. Weinberger, 63–122. Karlsruhe: KIT Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Litz, F. T. 2008. Toward a Constructive Dialogue on Federal and State Roles in US Climate Change Policy. Arlington, VA.
   Google Scholar
• Moschetti, A., L. Fiorini, M. Aquilano, F. Cavallo, and P. Dario. 2014. “Preliminary Findings of the AALIANCE2 Ambient Assisted Living Roadmap.” In Ambient Assisted Living, edited by S. Longhi, P. Siciliano, M. Germani, and A. Monteriu, 335–342. Switzerland: Springer International.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, R., P. Macnaghten, and J. Stilgoe. 2012. “Responsible Research and Innovation: From Science in Society to Science for Society, with Society.” Science and Public Policy 39 (6): 751–760. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scs093
   Google Scholar
• Prince, M., E. Albanese, M. Guerchet, and M. Prina. 2014. Dementia and Risk Reduction. An Analysis of Protective and Modifiable Factors. World Alzheimer Report 2014. Alzheimer’s Disease International.
   Google Scholar
• Rip, A., T. J. Misa, and J. Schot, eds. 1995. Managing Technology in Society. The Approach of Constructive Technology Assessment. New York: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Rip, A., and H. Te Kulve. 2008. “Constructive Technology Assessment and Socio-technical Scenarios.” In Presenting Futures, edited by E. Fisher, C. Selin, and J. M. Wetmore, The Yearbook of Nanotechnology in Society, Vol. 1, 49–70. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schot, J., and A. Rip. 1997. “The Past and Future of Constructive Technology Assessment.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 54 (2/3): 251–268. doi: 10.1016/S0040-1625(96)00180-1
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, B. C. 2011. Pathways Towards Responsible ICT Innovation. Policy brief of STOA on the ETICA project. Science and Technology Options Assessment (STOA) Report. Publication Office of the European Parliament.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, B., M. Jirotka, and G. Eden. 2013. “Responsible Research and Innovation in Information and Communication Technology: Identifying and Engaging with the Ethical Implications of ICTs.” In Responsible Innovation, 1st ed., edited by R. Owen, M. Heintz, and J. Bessant, 199–218. London: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, J., R. Owen, and P. Macnaghten. 2013. “Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 42 (9): 1568–1580. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008
   Google Scholar
• von Schomberg, R., ed. 2011. Towards Responsible Research and Innovation in the Information and Communication Technologies and Security Technologies Fields. Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union. Accessed August 31, 2016. http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/mep-rapport-2011_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• von Schomberg, Rene. 2012. “Prospects for Technology Assessment in a Framework of Responsible Research and Innovation.” In Technikfolgen abschätzen lehren: Bildungspotenziale transdisziplinärer Methode, edited by M. Dusseldorp and R. Beecroft, 39–61. Wiesbaden: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Weinberger, N., and M. Decker. 2015. “Technische Unterstützung für Menschen mit Demenz? Zur Notwendigkeit einer bedarfsorientierten Technikentwicklung.” Technikfolgenabschätzung – Theorie und Praxis 24 (2): 36–45.
   Google Scholar