Advanced search
Publication Cover
Journal of Responsible Innovation Volume 4, 2017 - Issue 2: Into the wild: Futures and Responsibilities in Technology Assessment
Submit an article Journal homepage
1,097
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Editorial

Entangled futures and responsibilities in technology assessment

Erik FisherCorrespondence[email protected]
Pages 83-84 | Published online: 27 Sep 2017

References

  • Bechtold, Ulrike, Daniela Fuchs, and Niklas Gudowsky. 2017. “Imagining Socio-technical Futures: Challenges and Opportunities for Technology Assessment.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 4 (2). doi:10.1080/23299460.2017.1364617.
  • Decker, Michael, Nora Weinberger, Bettina-Johanna Krings, and Johannes Hirsch. 2017. “Imagined Technology Futures in Demand-oriented Technology Assessment.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 4 (2). doi:10.1080/23299460.2017.1360720.
  • Delvenne, Pierre. 2017. “Responsible Research and Innovation as a Travesty of Technology Assessment?” Journal of Responsible Innovation 4 (2). doi:10.1080/23299460.2017.1328653.
  • Dickel, Sascha, and Jan-Felix Schrape. 2017. “The Renaissance of Techno-Utopianism as a Challenge for Responsible Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 4 (2). doi:10.1080/23299460.2017.1310523.
  • Grunwald, Armin. 2017. “Assigning Meaning to NEST by Technology Futures: Extended Responsibility of Technology Assessment in RRI.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 4 (2). doi:10.1080/23299460.2017.1360719.
  • Lösch, Andreas, Reinhard Heil, and Christoph Schneider. 2017. “Responsibilization Through Visions.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 4 (2). doi:10.1080/23299460.2017.1360717.
  • Nentwich, Michael. 2017. “A Short Response to Van Lente, Swierstra and Joly’s Essay ‘Responsible Innovation as a Critique of Technology Assessment’.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 4 (2). doi:10.1080/23299460.2017.1325698.
  • Schulz-Schaeffer, Ingo, and Martin Meister. 2017. “Laboratory Settings as Built Anticipations – Prototype Scenarios as Negotiation Arenas Between the Present and Imagined Futures.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 4 (2). doi:10.1080/23299460.2017.1326260.
  • Torgersen, Helge, and Daniela Fuchs. 2017. “Technology Assessment as a Myth Buster: Deconstructing Myths Around Emerging Technologies.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 4 (2). doi:10.1080/23299460.2017.1320157.
  • Van Est, Rinie. 2017. “Responsible Innovation as a Source of Inspiration for Technology Assessment, and Vice Versa: The Common Challenge of Responsibility, Representation, Issue Identification, and Orientation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 4 (2). doi:10.1080/23299460.2017.1328652.
  • Van Lente, Harro, Tsjalling Swierstra, and Pierre-Benoît Joly. 2017. “Responsible Innovation as a Critique of Technology Assessment.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 4 (2). doi:10.1080/23299460.2017.1326261.
  • Zimmer-Merkle, Silke, and Torsten Fleischer. 2017. “Eclectic, Random, Intuitive? Technology Assessment, RRI, and their use of History.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 4 (2). doi:10.1080/23299460.2017.1338105.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.