‘Nothing really responsible goes on here’: scientists’ experience and practice of responsibility

References

• Balmer, Andrew S., Jane Calvert, Claire Marris, Susan Molyneux-Hodgson, Emma Frow, Matthew Kearnes, Kate Bulpin, Pablo Schyfter, Adrian Mackenzie, and Paul Martin. 2016. “Five Rules of Thumb for Post-ELSI Interdisciplinary Collaborations.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 3: 73–80. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2016.1177867
   Google Scholar
• Bornmann, Lutz. 2013. “What Is Societal Impact of Research and How Can It Be Assessed? A Literature Survey.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64 (2): 217–233. doi:10.1002/asi.22803.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, S. R., and M. Horst. 2015a. “Crafting the Group: Care in Research Management.” Social Studies of Science 45 (3): 371–393. doi: 10.1177/0306312715585820
   Google Scholar
• Davies, S. R., and M. Horst. 2015b. “Responsible Innovation in the US, UK and Denmark: Governance Landscapes.” In Responsible Innovation 2, edited by B.-J. Koops, I. Oosterlaken, H. Romijn, T. Swierstra, and J. van den Hoven, 37–56. Springer International Publishing. Accessed 6 May 2015. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-17308-5_3.
   Google Scholar
• Donovan, Claire. 2011. “State of the Art in Assessing Research Impact: Introduction to a Special Issue.” Research Evaluation 20 (3): 175–179. http://rev.oxfordjournals.org/content/20/3/175.short. doi: 10.3152/095820211X13118583635918
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, H. E. 2003. “The Moral Responsibilities of Scientists (Tensions Between Autonomy and Responsibility).” American Philosophical Quarterly. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20010097.
   Google Scholar
• Du Gay, P. 2000. In Praise of Bureaucracy. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., A. Webster, C. Gebhardt, and B. R. C. Terra. 2000. “The Future of the University and the University of the Future: Evolution of Ivory Tower to Entrepreneurial Paradigm.” Research Policy 29 (2): 313–330. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733399000694. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00069-4
   Google Scholar
• Felt, Ulrike, Judith Igelsböck, Andrea Schikowitz, and Thomas Völker. 2016. “Transdisciplinary Sustainability Research in Practice Between Imaginaries of Collective Experimentation and Entrenched Academic Value Orders.” Science, Technology & Human Values. doi:10.1177/0162243915626989.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, Erik. 2005. “Lessons Learned from the Ethical, Legal and Social Implications Program (ELSI): Planning Societal Implications Research for the National Nanotechnology Program.” Technology in Society 27 (3): 321–328. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.04.006
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, Erik. 2007. “Ethnographic Invention: Probing the Capacity of Laboratory Decisions.” NanoEthics 1 (2): 155–165. doi: 10.1007/s11569-007-0016-5
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, E., R. L. Mahajan, and C. Mitcham. 2006. “Midstream Modulation of Technology: Governance from Within.” Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 26 (6): 485–496. doi: 10.1177/0270467606295402
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, Erik, Michael O’Rourke, Robert Evans, Eric B. Kennedy, Michael E. Gorman, and Thomas P. Seager. 2015. “Mapping the Integrative Field: Taking Stock of Socio-technical Collaborations.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 2 (1): 39–61. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2014.1001671
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, Erik, and Daan Schuurbiers. 2013. “Socio-technical Integration Research: Collaborative Inquiry at the Midstream of Research and Development.” In Early Engagement and New Technologies: Opening up the Laboratory, 97–110. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Flipse, S. M., M. C. A. van der Sanden, and P. Osseweijer. 2012. “Midstream Modulation in Biotechnology Industry: Redefining What is ‘Part of the Job’ of Researchers in Industry.” Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (3): 1141–1164. doi: 10.1007/s11948-012-9411-6
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, Bent. 2006. “Five Misunderstandings about Case-study Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 12 (2): 219–245. doi: 10.1177/1077800405284363
   Google Scholar
• Frankel, Mark S. 2015. “An Empirical Exploration of Scientists’ Social Responsibilities.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 2 (3): 301–310. doi:10.1080/23299460.2015.1096737.
   Google Scholar
• Glerup, Cecilie. 2015. “Organizing Science in Society: The Conduct and Justifications of Responsible Research.” (PhD Dissertation). Copenhagen Business School, Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• Glerup, Cecilie, and Maja Horst. 2014. “Mapping ‘Social Responsibility’ in Science.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (1): 31–50. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2014.882077
   Google Scholar
• Grunwald, Armin. 2011. “Responsible Innovation: Bringing Together Technology Assessment, Applied Ethics, and STS Research.” Enterprise and Work Innovation Studies 7 (Jan.): 9–31. http://run.unl.pt/handle/10362/7944.
   Google Scholar
• Guston, David H, Erik Fisher, Armin Grunwald, Richard Owen, Tsjalling Swierstra, and Simone van der Burg. 2014. “Responsible Innovation: Motivations for a New Journal.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (1): 1–8. doi:10.1080/23299460.2014.885175.
   Google Scholar
• Hackett, E. J. 2005. “Essential Tensions Identity, Control, and Risk in Research.” Social Studies of Science 35 (5): 787–826. doi: 10.1177/0306312705056045
   Google Scholar
• Hackett, E. J. 2014. “Academic Capitalism.” Science, Technology & Human Values 39 (5): 635–638. doi: 10.1177/0162243914540219
   Google Scholar
• Holbrook, J Britt. 2012. “Re-assessing the Science – Society Relation: The Case of the US National Science Foundation’s Broader Impacts Merit Review Criterion (1997–2011).” Technology in Society 27: 437–451. February. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.08.001.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, A. 2006. “The Politics of Talk Coming to Terms with the ‘New’ scientific Governance.” Social Studies of Science. http://sss.sagepub.com/content/36/2/299.short.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 2005. Designs On Nature: Science And Democracy In Europe And The United States. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Jong S., K. Barker, D. Cox, D. Person, and P. van den Besselaar. 2011. Societal Impact of Enabling Research Fields: ICT Research: A Dutch and a UK Case. Proceedings of European Network of Indicator Designers Conference, Rome.
   Google Scholar
• Kearnes, Matthew, and Arie Rip. 2009. “The Emerging Governance Landscape of Nanotechnology.” In Jenseits Von Regulierung: Zum Politischen Umgang Mit Der Nanotechnologie, 97–121. Berlin: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft.
   Google Scholar
• Kjølberg, Kamilla Lein, and Roger Strand. 2011. “Conversations about Responsible Nanoresearch.” NanoEthics 5 (1): 99–113. doi:10.1007/s11569-011-0114-2.
   Google Scholar
• Kleinman, D. L. 1995. Politics on the Endless Frontier: Postwar Research Policy in the United States. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knorr Cetina, K. 1999. Epistimic Cultures, How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koops, Bert-Jaap, Ilse Oosterlaken, Henny Romijn, Tsjalling Swierstra, and Jeroen van den Hoven. 2015. Responsible Innovation 2: Concepts, Approaches, and Applications. Springer. https://books.google.dk/books?id=ZkjmCAAAQBAJ.
   Google Scholar
• Law, John. 1994. Organizing Modernity. Cambridge: Blackwell Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Lentzos, Filippa. 2009. “Synthetic Biology in the Social Context: The UK Debate to Date.” Biosocieties 4 (2–3): 303–315. doi:10.1017/S1745855209990172.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, B. 1993. “The Critique of Science Becomes Academic.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 18 (2): 247–259. doi: 10.1177/016224399301800208
   Google Scholar
• Martin, B. R. 2011. “The Research Excellence Framework and the ‘Impact Agenda’: Are We Creating a Frankenstein Monster?” Research Evaluation 20 (3): 247–254. doi: 10.3152/095820211X13118583635693
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, E., and C. Kelty. 2010. “Responsibility and Nanotechnology.” Social Studies of Science 40 (3): 405–432. doi:10.1177/0306312709351762.
   Google Scholar
• Meek, V. Lynn. 2000. “Diversity and Marketisation of Higher Education: Incompatible Concepts?” Higher Education Policy 13 (1): 23–39. doi: 10.1016/S0952-8733(99)00030-6
   Google Scholar
• Mejlgaard, Niels. 2009. “The Trajectory of Scientific Citizenship in Denmark: Changing Balances Between Public Competence and Public Participation.” Science and Public Policy 36 (6): 483–496. doi: 10.3152/030234209X460962
   Google Scholar
• Merton, Robert K. 1973. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitcham, C. 2003. “Co-responsibility for Research Integrity.” Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (2): 273–290. doi: 10.1007/s11948-003-0014-0
   Google Scholar
• Nowotny, Helga. 1999. “The Place of People in our Knowledge.” European Review 7 (2): 247–262. doi: 10.1017/S1062798700004026
   Google Scholar
• Owen, Richard, Phil Macnaghten, and Jack Stilgoe. 2012. “Responsible Research and Innovation: From Science in Society to Science for Society, with Society.” Science and Public Policy 39 (6): 751–760. doi:10.1093/scipol/scs093.
   Google Scholar
• Prakash, Aseem. 2000. “Responsible Care: An Assessment.” Business & Society 39 (2): 183–209. doi:10.1177/000765030003900204.
   Google Scholar
• Roco, Mihail C, Barbara Harthorn, David Guston, and Philip Shapira. 2011. “Innovative and Responsible Governance of Nanotechnology for Societal Development.” Journal of Nanoparticle Research 13 (Sept.): 3557–3590. doi:10.1007/s11051-011-0454-4.
   Google Scholar
• The Royal Academy of Engineering. 2009. Synthetic Biology: Scope, Applications and Implications. London: The Royal Academy of Engineering. http://www.raeng.org.uk/news/publications/list/reports/Synthetic_biology.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• de Saille, Stevienna. 2015. “Innovating Innovation Policy: The Emergence of ‘Responsible Research and Innovation’.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 2 (2): 152–168. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2015.1045280
   Google Scholar
• Schuurbiers, Daan. 2011. “What Happens in the Lab: Applying Midstream Modulation to Enhance Critical Reflection in the Laboratory.” Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4): 769–788. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9317-8
   Google Scholar
• Schuurbiers, D., P. Osseweijer, and J. Kinderlerer. 2009. “Implementing the Netherlands Code of Conduct for Scientific Practice – A Case Study.” Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (2): 213–231. doi: 10.1007/s11948-009-9114-9
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, D. 2001. Interpretating Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing, Talk, Text and Interaction. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Slaughter, Sheila, and Larry L. Leslie. 1997. Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University. The Johns Hopkins University Press. 2715 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218-4319 ($39.95). http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED409816.
   Google Scholar
• Spruit, Shannon L., Gordon D. Hoople, and David A. Rolfe. 2015. “Just a Cog in the Machine? The Individual Responsibility of Researchers in Nanotechnology Is a Duty to Collectivize.” Science and Engineering Ethics (May): 1–17. doi:10.1007/s11948-015-9718-1.
   Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, J. 2013. “Foreword: Why Responsible Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, edited by R. Owen, J. Bessant and M. Heintz, 11–17. Chichester: Wilery.
   Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, J., R. Owen, and P. Macnaghten. 2013. “Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 42 (9): 1568–1580. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008
   Google Scholar
• Swierstra, T., and A. Rip. 2007. “Nano-ethics as NEST-ethics: Patterns of Moral Argumentation About New and Emerging Science and Technology.” NanoEthics 1 (1): 3–20. doi: 10.1007/s11569-007-0005-8
   Google Scholar
• Van der Burg, S., and A. van Gorp. 2005. “Understanding Moral Responsibility in the Design of Trailers.” Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (2): 235–256. doi: 10.1007/s11948-005-0044-x
   Google Scholar
• von Schomberg, Rene. 2013. “A Vision of Responsible Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation, edited by Richard Owen, M. Heintz and J. Bessant, 51–74. London: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Watermeyer, Richard. 2015. “Lost in the ‘Third Space’: The Impact of Public Engagement in Higher Education on Academic Identity, Research Practice and Career Progression.” European Journal of Higher Education 5 (3): 331–347. doi:10.1080/21568235.2015.1044546.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, Max. (1917) 2004. The Vocation Lectures. Indianapolis: Hackett.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. 1995. Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wender, Ben A, Rider W Foley, Troy A Hottle, Jathan Sadowski, Valentina Prado-Lopez, Daniel A Eisenberg, Lise Laurin, and Thomas P Seager. 2014. “Anticipatory Life-cycle Assessment for Responsible Research and Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (2): 200–207. doi:10.1080/23299460.2014.920121.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, Stephen, Richard Jones, and Alison Geldart. 2007. Nanotechnology: From the Science to the Social: The Social, Ethical and Economic Aspects of the Debate. Swindon: Economic and Social Research Council. http://www.esrc.ac.uk/ESRCInfoCentre/Images/ESRC_Nano07_tcm6-18918.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Yearley, S. 2009. “The Ethical Landscape: Identifying the Right Way to Think About the Ethical and Societal Aspects of Synthetic Biology Research and Products.” Journal of The Royal Society Interface 6 (Suppl. 4): S559–S564. http://rsif.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/6/Suppl_4/S559.short. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2009.0055.focus
   Google Scholar