Anomaly handling and the politics of gene drives

References

• Akbari, Omar S., Hugo J. Bellen, Ethan Bier, Simon L. Bullock, Austin Burt, George M. Church, Kevin R. Cook, et al. 2015. “Safeguarding Gene Drive Experiments in the Laboratory.” Science 349 (6251): 927–929. doi:10.1126/science.aac7932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australia Group. 2016. “Statement by the Chair of the 2016 Australia Group Plenary.” Accessed September 27, 2017. http://www.australiagroup.net/en/agm_june2016.html.
   Google Scholar
• Bachrach, Peter, and Morton S. Baratz. 1962. “Two Faces of Power.” The American Political Science Review 56 (4): 947–952. doi:10.2307/1952796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balmer, Andrew S., Jane Calvert, Claire Marris, Susan Molyneux-Hodgson, Emma Frow, Matthew Kearnes, Kate Bulpin, Pablo Schyfter, Adrian MacKenzie, and Paul Martin. 2015. “Taking Roles in Interdisciplinary Collaborations: Reflections on Working in Post-ELSI Spaces in the UK Synthetic Biology Community.” Science and Technology Studies 28 (3): 3–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baltimore, David, Paul Berg, Michael Botchan, Dana Carroll, R. Alta Charo, George Church, Jacob E. Corn, et al. 2015. “A Prudent Path Forward for Genomic Engineering and Germline Gene Modification.” Science 348 (6230): 36–38. doi:10.1126/science.aab1028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, Frank R., and Bryan D. Jones. 2009. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. 2nd ed. Chicago Studies in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biotechnology WG (Biotechnology Working Group of the National Science and Technology Council). 2017. Modernizing the Regulatory System for Biotechnology Products: An Update to the Coordinated Framework for the Regulation of Biotechnology. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/2017_coordinated_framework_update.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bloor, David. 1978. “Polyhedra and the Abominations of Leviticus.” The British Journal for the History of Science 11 (3): 245–272. doi:10.1017/S000708740004379X.
   Google Scholar
• Bowker, Geoffrey C., and Susan Leigh Star. 1999. Sorting Things Out : Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Callaway, Ewen. 2016. “‘Gene Drive’ Moratorium Shot Down at UN Biodiversity Meeting.” Nature News, December. doi:10.1038/nature.2016.21216.
   Google Scholar
• Callaway, Ewen. 2017. “Gene Drives Thwarted by Emergence of Resistant Organisms.” Nature News 542 (7639): 15. doi:10.1038/542015a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, Sarah. 2015. “Comment from Sarah Carter.” The Food and Drug Administration’s Notice on Clarifying Current Roles and Responsibilities Described in the Coordinated Framework for the Regulation of Biotechnology and Developing a Long-Term Strategy for the Regulation of the Products of Biotechnology. Comment ID: FDA-2015-N-3403-0710. Docket ID: FDA-2015-N-3403. Accessed September 27, 2017. https://www.regulations.gov/docket?D=FDA-2015-N-3403.
   Google Scholar
• CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity). 1992. “Article I.” In Convention of Biological Diversity, 3. Rio de Janeiro, June 5. https://treaties.un.org/doc/Treaties/1992/06/19920605%2008-44%20PM/Ch_XXVII_08p.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity). 2010. “Decision Adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity at Its Tenth Meeting.” UNEP/CBD/COP/DEC/X/13. United Nations Environment Program. https://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/cop-10/cop-10-dec-13-en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• CGS and FoE (Center for Genetics and Society, and Friends of the Earth). 2015. Extreme Genetic Engineering and the Human Future: Reclaiming Emerging Biotechnology for the Common Good. Center for Genetics and Society. http://webiva-downton.s3.amazonaws.com/877/8b/d/7012/FOE_ExtremeGenEngineering_10.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Champer, Jackson, Anna Buchman, and Omar S. Akbari. 2016. “Cheating Evolution: Engineering Gene Drives to Manipulate the Fate of Wild Populations.” Nature Reviews Genetics 17 (3): 146–159. doi:10.1038/nrg.2015.34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charo, R. Alta, and Henry T. Greely. 2015. “CRISPR Critters and CRISPR Cracks.” The American Journal of Bioethics 15 (12): 11–17. doi:10.1080/15265161.2015.1104138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clapper, James R. 2016. “Worldwide Threat Assessment of the US Intelligence Community.” US Senate Armed Services Committee. https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/SASC_Unclassified_2016_ATA_SFR_FINAL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• CSWGGD (Civil Society Working Group on Gene Drives). 2016a. “Common Call for a Global Moratorium on Genetically-Engineered Gene Drives.” Synbiowatch. http://www.synbiowatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/CBD-Gene-Drive-Sign-on-Letter-English.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• CSWGGD (Civil Society Working Group on Gene Drives). 2016b. “Reckless Driving: Gene Drives and the End of Nature.” SynBioWatch. September. http://www.synbiowatch.org/2016/08/reckless-driving/.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, John. 1903. Studies in Logical Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. http://archive.org/details/studiesinlogical00dewerich.
   Google Scholar
• DiCarlo, James E., Alejandro Chavez, Sven L. Dietz, Kevin M. Esvelt, and George M. Church. 2015. “Safeguarding CRISPR-Cas9 Gene Drives in Yeast.” Nature Biotechnology (November). Advance online publication. doi:10.1038/nbt.3412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. 1966. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, Mary. 1986. How Institutions Think. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Esvelt, Kevin. 2016. “Gene Editing Can Drive Science to Openness.” Nature News 534 (7606): 153. doi:10.1038/534153a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esvelt, Kevin M. 2017a. “Precaution: Open Gene Drive Research.” Science 355 (6325): 589–590. doi: 10.1126/science.aal5325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esvelt, Kevin M. 2017b. “Gene Drive and Collective Oversight.” GeneWatch 30 (1): 11–12.
   Google Scholar
• Esvelt, Kevin M., Andrea L. Smidler, Flaminia Catteruccia, and George M. Church. 2014. “Concerning RNA-Guided Gene Drives for the Alteration of Wild Populations.” ELife ( July): e03401. doi:10.7554/eLife.03401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, Samuel A. W., and Walter D. Valdivia. 2012. “Export Controls and the Tensions Between Academic Freedom and National Security.” Minerva 50 (2): 169–190. doi:10.1007/s11024-012-9196-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairchild, Steven, Caroline R. M. Kennedy, Philippe Mauger, Todd J. Savage, and Raymond A. Zilinskas. 2016. Findings of the 2016 Symposium on Export Control of Emerging Biotechnologies. Monterey, CA: International Biosecurity and Prevention Forum, and James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Gantz, Valentino M., and Ethan Bier. 2015. “The Mutagenic Chain Reaction: A Method for Converting Heterozygous to Homozygous Mutations.” Science 348 (6233): 442–444. doi:10.1126/science.aaa5945.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, Jade. 2016. “Active Genetics Goes Global.” UC San Diego News Center. October 27. http://ucsdnews.ucsd.edu/feature/active_genetics_goes_global?utm_campaign=thisweek&utm_medium=email&utm_source=tw-2016-10-27.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, Andrew, Roberto Galizi, Kyros Kyrou, Alekos Simoni, Carla Siniscalchi, Dimitris Katsanos, Matthew Gribble, et al. 2016. “A CRISPR-Cas9 Gene Drive System Targeting Female Reproduction in the Malaria Mosquito Vector Anopheles Gambiae.” Nature Biotechnology 34 (1): 78–83. doi:10.1038/nbt.3439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna Jeanne. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women : The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• iGEM (International Genetically Engineered Machines Competition). 2017. “Gene Drives Safety Policy.” Accessed September 27, 2017. http://2017.igem.org/Safety/Policies.
   Google Scholar
• InterAcademy Panel, Royal Society (UK), Polish Academy of Sciences, and National Academies of Sciences (US). 2016. “The Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention: Implications of Advances in Science and Technology: Meeting Summary.” https://royalsociety.org/~/media/policy/projects/biological-toxin-weapons-convention/biological-toxin-weapons-convention-btwc-april-2016-meeting-summary.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Isaacs, Farren J., Peter A. Carr, Harris H. Wang, Marc J. Lajoie, Bram Sterling, Laurens Kraal, Andrew C. Tolonen, et al. 2011. “Precise Manipulation of Chromosomes in Vivo Enables Genome-Wide Codon Replacement.” Science 333 (6040): 348–353. doi:10.1126/science.1205822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, Stephanie. 2015. “Statement on Behalf of the Foundational for the National Institutes of Health at the First Public Meeting – Gene Drive Research in Non-Human Organisms: Recommendations for Responsible Conduct.” Accessed September 24, 2017. http://nas-sites.org/gene-drives/2015/08/04/first-public-meeting/.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, Sheila. 2004. “Ordering Knowledge, Ordering Society.” In States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and Social Order, edited by Sheila Jasanoff, 13–45. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, Sheila. 2005a. Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Oxford: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, Sheila. 2005b. “In the Democracies of DNA: Ontological Uncertainty and Political Order in Three States.” New Genetics and Society 24 (2): 139–156. doi:10.1080/14636770500190864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, Sheila, J. Benjamin Hurlbut, and Krishanu Saha. 2015. “CRISPR Democracy: Gene Editing and the Need for Inclusive Deliberation.” Issues in Science and Technology XXXII (1). http://issues.org/32-1/crispr-democracy-gene-editing-and-the-need-for-inclusive-deliberation/.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, Sheila, and Sang-Hyun Kim, eds. 2015. Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaebnick, Gregory E. 2015. “Bioethics Forum Blog – A Moratorium on Gene Editing?” Bioethics Forum, March 27. http://www.thehastingscenter.org/Bioethicsforum/Post.aspx?id=7359&blogid=140.
   Google Scholar
• Kaebnick, Gregory E., Elizabeth Heitman, James P. Collins, Jason A. Delborne, Wayne G. Landis, Keegan Sawyer, Lisa A. Taneyhill, and David E. Winickoff. 2016. “Precaution and Governance of Emerging Technologies.” Science 354 (6313): 710–711. doi:10.1126/science.aah5125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Thomas S. (1964) 1996. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 3rd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakatos, Imre. 1976. Proofs and Refutations: The Logic of Mathematical Discovery. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latham, Jonathan. 2017. “Gene Drives: A Scientific Case for a Complete and Perpetual Ban.” Independent Science News, February 13. https://www.independentsciencenews.org/environment/gene-drives-a-scientific-case-for-a-complete-and-perpetual-ban/.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Law, John, ed. 1991. A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology, and Domination. Sociological Review Monograph 38. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mandell, Daniel J., Marc J. Lajoie, Michael T. Mee, Ryo Takeuchi, Gleb Kuznetsov, Julie E. Norville, Christopher J. Gregg, Barry L. Stoddard, and George M. Church. 2015. “Biocontainment of Genetically Modified Organisms by Synthetic Protein Design.” Nature 518 (7537): 55–60. doi:10.1038/nature14121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marden, Emily. 2003. “Risk and Regulation: U.S. Regulatory Policy on Genetically Modified Food and Agriculture.” Boston College Law Review 44 (3): 733.
   Google Scholar
• Min, John, Charleston Noble, Devora Najjar, and Kevin Esvelt. 2017a. “Daisy Quorum Drives for the Genetic Restoration of Wild Populations.” bioRxiv ( March): 115618. doi:10.1101/115618.
   Google Scholar
• Min, John, Charleston Noble, Devora Najjar, and Kevin M. Esvelt. 2017b. “Daisyfield Gene Drive Systems Harness Repeated Genomic Elements as a Generational Clock to Limit Spread.” bioRxiv ( February). doi:10.1101/104877.
   Google Scholar
• NASEM (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine). 2015. “First Public Meeting – Gene Drive Research in Non-human Organisms: Recommendations for Responsible Conduct.” Accessed September 24, 2017. http://nas-sites.org/gene-drives/2015/08/04/first-public-meeting/.
   Google Scholar
• NASEM (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine). 2016. Gene Drives on the Horizon: Advancing Science, Navigating Uncertainty, and Aligning Research with Public Values. https://www.nap.edu/catalog/23405/gene-drives-on-the-horizon-advancing-science-navigating-uncertainty-and.
   Google Scholar
• NASEM (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine). 2017. Preparing for Future Products of Biotechnology. Prepublication Copy. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. https://www.nap.edu/catalog/24605/preparing-for-future-products-of-biotechnology.
   Google Scholar
• Noble, Charleston, John Min, Jason Olejarz, Joanna Buchthal, Alejandro Chavez, Andrea L. Smidler, Erika A. DeBenedictis, George M. Church, Martin A. Nowak, and Kevin M. Esvelt. 2016. “Daisy-Chain Gene Drives for the Alteration of Local Populations.” bioRxiv ( June): 57307. doi:10.1101/057307.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2009. The Bioeconomy to 2030: Designing a Policy Agenda. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:hul.ebookbatch.OECD_batch:9789264056886en.
   Google Scholar
• Oye, Kenneth. 2014. “A New Technique Called Gene Drives Has Great Promise, and Great Risks.” MIT Technology Review. https://www.technologyreview.com/s/530156/proceed-with-caution/.
   Google Scholar
• Oye, Kenneth A., Kevin Esvelt, Evan Appleton, Flaminia Catteruccia, George Church, Todd Kuiken, Shlomiya Bar-Yam Lightfoot, Julie McNamara, Andrea Smidler, and James P. Collins. 2014. “Regulating Gene Drives.” Science 345 (6197): 626–628. doi:10.1126/science.1254287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, Megan J., Francis Fukuyama, and David A. Relman. 2015. “A More Systematic Approach to Biological Risk.” Science 350 (6267): 1471–1473. doi:10.1126/science.aad8849.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabinow, Paul, and Gaymon Bennett. 2012. Designing Human Practices: An Experiment with Synthetic Biology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Randazzo, Fil. 2015. “ Statement on Behalf of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation at the First Public Meeting – Gene Drive Research in Non-human Organisms: Recommendations for Responsible Conduct.” Accessed September 24, 2017. http://nas-sites.org/gene-drives/2015/08/04/first-public-meeting/.
   Google Scholar
• Rappert, Brian. 2001. “The Distribution and Resolution of the Ambiguities of Technology, or Why Bobby Can’t Spray.” Social Studies of Science 31 (4): 557–591. doi:10.1177/030631201031004004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rappert, Brian. 2005. “Prohibitions, Weapons and Controversy: Managing the Problems of Ordering.” Social Studies of Science 35 (2): 211–240. doi:10.1177/0306312705046629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, Steve. 2012. “Uncomfortable Knowledge: The Social Construction of Ignorance in Science and Environmental Policy Discourses.” Economy and Society 41 (1): 107–125. doi:10.1080/03085147.2011.637335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regalado, Antonio. 2016. “Top U.S. Intelligence Official Calls Gene Editing a WMD Threat.” MIT Technology Review, February 9. https://www.technologyreview.com/s/600774/top-us-intelligence-official-calls-gene-editing-a-wmd-threat/.
   Google Scholar
• Rittel, Horst W. J., and Melvin M. Webber. 1973. “Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning.” Policy Sciences 4 (2): 155–169. doi: 10.1007/BF01405730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rovner, Alexis J., Adrian D. Haimovich, Spencer R. Katz, Zhe Li, Michael W. Grome, Brandon M. Gassaway, Miriam Amiram, et al. 2015. “Recoded Organisms Engineered to Depend on Synthetic Amino Acids.” Nature 518 (7537): 89–93. doi:10.1038/nature14095.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits, Martijntje. 2006. “Taming Monsters: The Cultural Domestication of New Technology.” Technology in Society 28 (4): 489–504. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2006.09.008.
   Google Scholar
• Spradling, Allan. 2015. “Gene Drive: More Research, Not More Regulations.” Genes to Genomes (blog), November 24. http://genestogenomes.org/gene-drive-more-research-not-more-regulations/.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, Jim. 2016. “The National Academies’ Gene Drive Study Has Ignored Important and Obvious Issues.” The Guardian, June 9, sec. Science. https://www.theguardian.com/science/political-science/2016/jun/09/the-national-academies-gene-drive-study-has-ignored-important-and-obvious-issues.
   Google Scholar
• Unckless, Robert L., Andrew G. Clark, and Philipp W. Messer. 2017. “Evolution of Resistance Against CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Drive.” Genetics 205 (2): 827–841. doi:10.1534/genetics.116.197285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USG (United States Government). 2012. United States Government Policy for Oversight of Life Sciences Dual Use Research of Concern. Washington, DC: U.S. Federal Government. http://www.phe.gov/s3/dualuse/Documents/us-policy-durc-032812.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• USG (United States Government). 2014. United States Government Policy for Institutional Oversight of Life Sciences Dual Use Research of Concern. Washington, DC: U.S. Federal Government. http://www.phe.gov/s3/dualuse/Documents/durc-policy.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• US White House. 2012. National Bioeconomy Blueprint. Washington, DC: The White House.
   Google Scholar
• Wattendorf, Col. Daniel. 2015. “Statement on Behalf of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency at the First Public Meeting – Gene Drive Research in Non-human Organisms: Recommendations for Responsible Conduct.” Accessed September 24, 2017. http://nas-sites.org/gene-drives/2015/08/04/first-public-meeting/.
   Google Scholar
• Webber, Bruce L., S. Raghu, and Owain R. Edwards. 2015. “Opinion: Is CRISPR-Based Gene Drive a Biocontrol Silver Bullet or Global Conservation Threat?” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112 (34): 10565–10567. doi:10.1073/pnas.1514258112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolinetz, Carrie. 2015. “Statement on Behalf of the National Institutes of Health at the First Public Meeting – Gene Drive Research in Non-human Organisms: Recommendations for Responsible Conduct.” Accessed September 24, 2017. http://nas-sites.org/gene-drives/2015/08/04/first-public-meeting/.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, Robert. 2016. At Eighth Review Conference of the Biological Weapons Convention, Geneva, November 25. http://www.unog.ch/80256EDD006B8954/(httpAssets)/4228C43A8E40AE06C125807A0057164D/$file/USA+closing+and+compromise+text.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, Susan. 1994. Molecular Politics : Developing American and British Regulatory Policy for Genetic Engineering, 1972–1982. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar