The roles of ethics in gene drive research and governance

References

• Agrawal, A. 1995. “Dismantling the Divide Between Indigenous and Scientific Knowledge.” Development and Change 26: 413–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, E. 1995. “Knowledge, Human Interests, and Objectivity in Feminist Epistemology.” Philosophical Topics 23 (2): 27–58.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, T., R. Dagger, and D. I. O’Neill. 2014. Political Ideologies and the Democratic Ideal. 9th ed. Boston: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, M., and G. Gaskell, eds. 2002. Biotechnology – The Making of a Global Controversy. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beauchamp, T. 2003. “The Origins, Goals, and Core Commitments of the Belmont Report and Principles of Biomedical Ethics.” In The Story of Bioethics: From Seminal Works to Contemporary Explorations, edited by J. K. Walter, and E. P. Klein, 17–46. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boal, I. A. 1995. “A Flow of Monsters: Luddism and Virtual Technologies.” In Resisting the Virtual Life: The Culture and Politics of Information, edited by J. Brook, and I. Boal, 3–16. San Francisco: City Lights.
   Google Scholar
• Brunk, C., L. Haworth, and B. Lee. 1991. Value Assumptions in Risk Assessment: A Case Study of the Alachlor Controversy. Waterloo, ON: Wilfrid Laurier Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buckley, J., P. B. Thompson, and K. P. Whyte. 2017. “Collingridge’s Dilemma and the Early Ethical Assessment of Emerging Technology: The Case of Nanotechnology Enabled Biosensers.” Technology in Society 48: 54–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulger, R. E., E. Heitman, S. J. Reiser, eds. 2002. The Ethical Dimensions of the Biological and Health Sciences. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caulfield, T., A. L. McGuire, M. Cho, J. A. Buchanan, M. M. Burgess, U. Danilczyk, Christina M. Diaz, et al. 2008. “Research Ethics Recommendations for Whole-Genome Research: Consensus Statement.” PLoS Biology 6 (3): e73. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charo, R. A., and H. T. Greely. 2015. “CRISPR Critters and CRISPR Cracks.” The American Journal of Bioethics 15: 11–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conley, J. M., G. Lázaro-Muñoz, A. E. R. Prince, A. M. Davis, and R. J. Cadigan. 2015. “Scientific Social Responsibility: Lessons from the Corporate Social Responsibility Movement.” The American Journal of Bioethics 15: 64–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cranor, C. F. 1997. “The Normative Nature of Risk Assessment: Features and Possibilities.” Risk: Health, Safety Environment 8 (2): 123–136.
   Google Scholar
• Dotson, K. 2014. “Conceptualizing Epistemic Oppression.” Social Epistemology 28: 115–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, H. 2000. “Inductive Risk and Values in Science.” Philosophy of Science, 67: 559–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, K. C. 2009. “The Ethical Significance of Language in the Environmental Sciences: Case Studies from Pollution Research.” Ethics, Place & Environment 12: 157–173.
   Google Scholar
• Flotte, Terence R. 2016. “Gene Drives: Biological Shield or Ecological Menace?” Human Gene Therapy 27 (8): 561–562.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerriero, E. 2017. “Fiduciary Responsibility, 1974 to 2017.” Journal of Financial Service Professionals 71 (2): 89–96.
   Google Scholar
• Guston, D. H. 2014. “Understanding ‘Anticipatory Governance’.” Social Studies of Science 44: 218–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutmann, A., and D. Thompson. 1997. “Deliberating about Bioethics.” Hastings Center Report 27 (3): 38–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1975. Legitimation Crisis. T. McCarthy, Tr. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. 1998. Is Science Multi-Cultural? Postcolonialisms, Feminisms, and Epistemologies. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herring, R. J. 2015. “State Science, Risk and Agricultural Biotechnology: Bt Cotton to Bt Brinjal in India.” Journal of Peasant Studies 42: 159–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks, D. J. 2017. “Genetically Engineered Crops, Inclusion and Democracy.” Perspectives on Science 25 (4): 488–520.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, J. 1993. Bad Blood: The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment. New and Expanded ed. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S. A. 1976. “Fiduciary Responsibility in the Management of the Corporation.” The Business Lawyer 31: 883–927.
   Google Scholar
• Kasperson, R. E., and J. X. Kasperson. 1991. “Hidden Hazards.” In Acceptable Evidence: Science and Values in Risk Management, edited by D. G. Mayo and R. D. Hollander, 13–46. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kasperson, J. X., R. E. Kasperson, N. Pidgeon, and P. Slovic. 2003. “The Social Amplification of Risk: Assessing Fifteen Years of Research and Theory.” In The Social Amplification of Risk, edited by N. Pidgeon, R. E. Kasperson, and P. Slovic, 13–46. New York: Cambridge U. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kasperson, R. E., O. Renn, P. Slovic, H. S. Brown, J. Emel, R. Goble, J. X. Kasperson, and Samuel Ratick. 1988. “The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework.” Risk Analysis 8: 177–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kipnis, K., N. M. P. King, and R. M. Nelson. 2006. “An Open Letter to Institutional Review Boards Considering Northfield Laboratories’ PolyHeme® Trial.” The American Journal of Bioethics 6: 18–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitcher, P. 2001. Science, Truth and Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lavery, J. V., L. C. Harrington, and T. W. Scott. 2008. “Ethical, Social and Cultural Considerations for Site Selection for Research with Genetically Modified Mosquitoes.” The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 79: 312–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, R., Z. Pieniak, and W. Verbeke. 2014. “Food-related Hazards in China: Consumers’ Perceptions of Risk and Trust in Information Sources.” Food Control 46: 291–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longino, H. E. 1990. Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Longino, H. E. 1994. “In Search of Feminist Epistemology.” The Monist 77: 472–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macklin, R. 1992. “Universality of the Nuremberg Code.” In The Nazi Doctors and the Nuremberg Code, edited by G. J. Annas, and M. A. Grodin, 240–257. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, J. M., and C. E. Taylor. 2009. “Malaria Control with Transgenic Mosquitoes.” PLoS Medicine 6 (2): e1000020. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGann, J., and M. Johnstone. 2005. “The Power Shift and the NGO Credibility Crisis.” Brown Journal of World Affairs 11: 159–172.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, S., and M. J. Selgelid. 2007. “Ethical and Philosophical Consideration of the Dual-Use Dilemma in the Biological Sciences.” Science and Engineering Ethics 13: 523–580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro, William, and Rachel Schurman. 2008. “Sustaining Outrage: Cultural Capital, Strategic Location and Motivating Sensibilities in the U.S. Anti-Genetic Engineering Movement.” In The Fight Over Food: Producers, Consumers and Activists Challenge the Global Food System, edited by W. Wright and G. Middendorf, 145–176. University Park: The Penn State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• NAS (National Academies of Science). 1995. On Being a Scientist. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• NASEM (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine). 2016. Gene Drives on the Horizon. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• NCPHSBBR (National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research). 1978. The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research (Department of Health, Education, & Welfare Publication No. OS 78-0012).
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, T. H., E. Jelsø, and S. Öhman. 2002. “Traditional Blue and Modern Green Resistance.” In Biotechnology – The Making of a Global Controversy, edited by M. Bauer, and G. Gaskell, 179–202. Cambridge: Cambridge U. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, B. 2015. Sustainable Values, Sustainable Change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Percival, R.V., C. H. Schroeder, A. S. Miller, and J. P. Leape. 2013. Environmental Regulation: Law, Science, and Policy. 13th ed. Indianapolis: Wolters Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, T. R. 1997. Sharing the Earth: The Rhetoric of Sustainable Development. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pielke, Roger A. 2007. The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Resnik, D. B. 2014. “Ethical Issues in Field Trials of Genetically Modified Disease-Resistant Mosquitoes.” Developing World Bioethics 14 (1): 37–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rip, A. and H. te Kulve. 2008. “Constructive Technology Assessment and Socio-Technical Scenarios.” In The Yearbook of Nanotechnology in Society, Vol. 1, edited by E. Fisheret al., 49–70. Dordrecht, NL: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rollin, B. E. 2006. Science and Ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, W. D. 1977. The Anatomy of Risk. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Sandel, M. J. 2010. Justice: What’s the Right Thing to Do? New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Sankar, P. L., and M. K. Cho. 2015. “Engineering Values into Genetic Engineering: A Proposed Analytic Framework for Scientific Social Responsibility.” The American Journal of Bioethics 15: 18–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheman, Naomi. 2011. Shifting Ground: Knowledge and Reality, Transgression and Trustworthiness. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sclove, R. 1995. Democracy and Technology. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shrader-Frechette, K. 1991. Risk and Rationality: Philosophical Foundations for Populist Reforms. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slovic, P. 1987. “Perception of Risk.” Science 236: 280–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic, P. 1999. “Trust, Emotion, Sex, Politics, and Science: Surveying the Risk-Assessment Battlefield.” Risk Analysis 19: 689–701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starr, C., and C. Whipple. 1980. “Risks of Risk Decisions.” Science 208: 1114–1119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, P., and H. V. Fineberg, eds. 1996. Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, J., R. Owen, and P. Macnaghten. 2013. “Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 42 (9): 1568–1580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, P. B. 2003. “Value Judgments and Risk Comparisons: The Case of Genetically Engineered Crops.” Plant Physiology 132: 10–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, P. B. 2008. “Current Ethical Issues in Animal Biotechnology.” Reproduction, Fertility and Development 20: 67–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, P. B. 2012. “Synthetic Biology Needs a Synthetic Bioethics.” Ethics, Policy and the Environment 15: 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, P. B., and W. Hannah. 2008. “Food and Agricultural Biotechnology: A Summary and Analysis of Ethical Concerns.” Advances in Biochemical Engineering and Biotechnology 111: 229–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuana, N. 2004. “Coming to Understand: Orgasm and the Epistemology of Ignorance.” Hypatia 19: 194–232.
   Google Scholar
• Tuana, N. 2006. “The Speculum of Ignorance: The Women’s Health Movement and Epistemologies of Ignorance.” Hypatia 21 (3): 1–19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tuana, N. 2013. “Embedding Philosophers in the Practice of Science: Bringing Humanities to the Sciences.” Synthese 190: 1955–1973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virgina Tech Research Team. 2017. “Flint Water Study.” Accessed July 17, 2017. http://flintwaterstudy.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Von Schomberg, R. 2007. “From the Ethics of Technology Towards an Ethics of Knowledge Policy & Knowledge Assessment.” Accessed January 17, 2017. SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2436380 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2436380.
   Google Scholar
• Whyte, K. P. 2017. “The Dakota Access Pipeline, Environmental Injustice and U.S. Settler Colonialism.” Red Ink: International Journal of Indigenous Literature, Arts and Humanities 19 (1): 154–169.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO)/Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR)/Foundation of the National Institutes of Health (FNIH). 2014. “The Guidance Framework for Field Testing Genetically Engineered Mosquitoes.” TDR, June, 2014,169 pp. ISBN: ISBN 978 92 4 150748 6.  http://www.who.int/tdr/publications/year/2014/guide-fmrk-gm-mosquit/en/.
   Google Scholar
• Wynne, B. 1989. “Sheepfarming After Chernobyl: A Case Study in Communicating Scientific Information.” Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 31 (2): 10–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynne, B. 2001. “Creating Public Alienation: Expert Cultures of Risk and Ethics on GMOs.” Science as Culture 10 (4): 445–481.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar