Advanced search
Publication Cover
Journal of Responsible Innovation Volume 5, 2018 - Issue sup1: Special Issue: Roadmap to Gene Drives: Research and Governance Needs in Social, Political, and Ecological Context; Guest Editors: Jason Delborne, Jennifer Kuzma, Fred Gould, Emma Frow, Caroline Leitschuh, and Jayce Sudweeks
Submit an article Journal homepage
1,594
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Editorial

Gene drives and the expanding horizon of governance

Erik FisherArizona State UniversityCorrespondence[email protected]
Pages S1-S3 | Published online: 24 Jan 2018

References

  • Baltzegar, J., J. Cavin Barnes, J. E. Elsensohn, N. Gutzmann, M. S. Jones, S. King, and J. Sudweeks. 2017. “Anticipating Complexity in the Deployment of Gene Drive Insects in Agriculture.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 5 (S1): S81–S97. doi:10.1080/23299460.2017.1407910.
  • Burt, A., M. Coulibaly, A. Crisanti, A. Diabate, and J. K. Kayondo. 2018. “Gene Drive to Reduce Malaria Transmission in Sub-Saharan Africa.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 5 (S1): S66–S80. doi:10.1080/23299460.2017.1419410.
  • Cohen, J. 2017. “Is there Really a Covert Manipulation of U.N. Discussions about Regulating Gene Drives?” Science, December 11. doi:10.1126/science.aar7289. http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/12/there-really-covert-manipulation-un-discussions-about-regulating-gene-drives.
  • Delborne, J., J. Kuzma, F. Gould, E. Frow, C. Leitschuh, and J. Sudweeks. 2018. “Mapping Research and Governance Needs for Gene Drives.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 5 (S1): S4–S12. doi:10.1080/23299460.2017.1419413.
  • ETC Group. 2017. “The Gene Drive Files.” http://www.etcgroup.org/content/gene-drive-files. December 4.
  • Evans, S. W., and M. J. Palmer. 2017. “Anomaly Handling and the Politics of Gene Drives.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 5 (S1): S223–S242. doi:10.1080/23299460.2017.1407911.
  • Fisher, E., and R. L. Mahajan. 2006. “Contradictory Intent? US Federal Legislation on Integrating Societal Concerns Into Nanotechnology Research and Development.” Science and Public Policy 33 (1): 5–16. doi: 10.3152/147154306781779181
  • Guston, D. H. 2014. “Understanding ‘Anticipatory Governance’.” Social Studies of Science 44 (2): 218–242. doi: 10.1177/0306312713508669
  • Hayes, K. R., G. R. Hosack, G. V. Dana, S. D. Foster, J. H. Ford, R. Thresher, A. Ickowicz, et al. 2018. “Identifying and Detecting Potentially Adverse Ecological Outcomes Associated with the Release of Gene Drive Modified Organisms.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 5 (S1): S139–S158. doi:10.1080/23299460.2017.1415585.
  • IOM (Institute of Medicine). 2011. The Science and Applications of Synthetic and Systems Biology: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/13239.
  • Kuzma, J., F. Gould, Z. Brown, J. Collins, J. Delborne, E. Frow, K. Esvelt, et al. 2017. “A Roadmap for Gene Drives: Using Institutional Analysis and Development to Frame Research Needs and Governance in a Systems Context.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 5 (S1): S13–S39. doi:10.1080/23299460.2017.1410344.
  • Leitschuh, C. M., D. Kanavy, G. A. Backus, R. X. Valdez, M. Serr, E. A. Pitts, D. Threadgill, and J. Godwin. 2017. “Developing Gene Drive Technologies to Eradicate Invasive Rodents From Islands.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 5 (S1): S121–S138. doi:10.1080/23299460.2017.1365232.
  • Medina, R. F. 2017. “Gene Drives and the Management of Agricultural Pests.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 5 (S1): S255–S262. doi:10.1080/23299460.2017.1407913.
  • Meghani, Z., and J. Kuzma. 2017. “Regulating Animals with Gene Drive Systems: Lessons From the Regulatory Assessment of a Genetically Engineered Mosquito.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 5 (S1): S203–S222. doi:10.1080/23299460.2017.1407912.
  • Min, J., A. L. Smidler, D. Najjar, and K. M. Esvelt. 2017. “Harnessing Gene Drives.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 5 (S1): S40–S65. doi:10.1080/23299460.2017.1415586.
  • Mitchell, P., Z. Brown, and N. McRoberts. 2017. “Economic Issues to Consider for Gene Drives.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 5 (S1): S180–S202. doi:10.1080/23299460.2017.1407914.
  • NASEM (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine). 2016a. Gene Drives on the Horizon: Advancing Science, Navigating Uncertainty, and Aligning Research with Public Values. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/23405.
  • NASEM (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine). 2016b. Neuroscience Trials of the Future: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/23502.
  • NASEM (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine). 2016c. Triennial Review of the National Nanotechnology Initiative. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/23603.
  • NASEM (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine). 2017. A Proposed Framework for Identifying Potential Biodefense Vulnerabilities Posed by Synthetic Biology: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/24832.
  • NAE-NRC (National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council). 2013. Positioning Synthetic Biology to Meet the Challenges of the 21st Century: Summary Report of a Six Academies Symposium Series. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/13316.
  • NRC (National Research Council). 2002. Small Wonders, Endless Frontiers: A Review of the National Nanotechnology Initiative. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/10395.
  • NRC (National Research Council). 2006. A Matter of Size: Triennial Review of the National Nanotechnology Initiative. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/11752.
  • NRC (National Research Council). 2009. Review of the Federal Strategy for Nanotechnology-Related Environmental, Health, and Safety Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/12559.
  • NRC (National Research Council). 2010. Synthetic Biology: Building on Nature’s Inspiration: Interdisciplinary Research Team Summaries. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/12836.
  • Nature. 2017. “Gene-Drive Technology Needs Thorough Scrutiny.” Editorial. Nature, December 5. doi: 10.1038/d41586-017-08214-4. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-017-08214-4.
  • Scott, M. J., F. Gould, M. D. Lorenzen, N. Grubbs, O. R. Edwards, D. A. O’Brochta. 2017. “Agricultural Production: Assessment of the Potential Use of Cas9-Mediated Gene Drive Systems for Agricultural Pest Control.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 5 (S1): S98–S120. doi:10.1080/23299460.2017.1410343.
  • Thompson, P. 2018. “The Roles of Ethics in Gene Drive Research and Governance.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 5 (S1): S159–S179. doi:10.1080/23299460.2017.1415587.
Supercharge Your Next Research Paper: Research and write your next paper with Jenni AI.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.