The role of civil society organisations in European responsible research and innovation

References

• Beinare, Dace, and Mark McCarthy. 2012. “Civil Society Organisations, Social Innovation and Health Research in Europe.” European Journal of Public Health 22 (6): 889–893. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckr152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benington, J. 2010. “From Public Choice to Public Value.” In Public Value. Theory and Practice, edited by J. Benington, and M. Moore, 31–51. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Blok, V. 2014. “Look Who’s Talking: Responsible Innovation, the Paradox of Dialogue and the Voice of the Other in Communication and Negotiation Processes.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (2): 171–190. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2014.924239
   Google Scholar
• Böschen, Stefan, and Simon Pfersdorf. 2014. Model of CSO Participation in research Governance. CONSIDER Project, Deliverable D3.3. http://observatory-rri.info/sites/default/files/obs-governance-arrangement/D3.3%20Model%20of%20CSO%20Participation%20in%20Research.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• De Marchi, V. 2012. “Environmental Innovation and R&D Cooperation: Empirical Evidence from Spanish Manufacturing Firms.” Research Policy 41 (3): 614–623. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Saille, S. 2015. “Innovating Innovation Policy: The Emergence of Responsible Research and Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 2 (2): 152–168. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2015.1045280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2007a. Directorate-General for Research (ed.). Taking European Knowledge Society Seriously. Report of the Expert Group on Science and Governance to the Science, economy and Society Directorate. Brussels: EUR 22700.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2007b. Directorate-General for Research (ed.). Policy Review of Projects in the Area of Social, Economic and Governance aspects of Sustainable Development. Carried out by Martin O’Connor. In: RTD info, Policy Review Series n°3. Brussels/Luxembourg.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2007c. Directorate-General for Research (ed.). Report of the Expert Group on Humanities. Positioning Humanities Research in the 7th Framework Programme. Brussels/Luxembourg.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2007d. Directorate General for Research (ed.). Banthien, H.; Bonaccorsi, A.; Clarysse, B.; Havas, A.; Leijten, J.; Menéndez, J.; Reger, G. & Romanainen, J. The Future of Key Research Actors in the European Research Area. Synthesis Paper. Brussels/Luxembourg.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2008a. EC Joint Research Centre – Institute for the Protection and Security of the Citizen (ed.). e-Participation: Promoting dialogue and deliberation between institutions and civil society. In: JRC Scientific and Technical Reports. Luxembourg.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2008b. Directorate-General for Research (ed.). Public Engagement in Science. Report of the Science in Society Session. Brussels/Luxembourg [Portuguese Presidency Conference, The FUTURE OF SCIENCE and TECHNOLOGY in EUROPE, Lisbon, 8-10 October 2007].
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2009. Directorate General for Research (ed.). A code of conduct for responsible nanosciences and nanotechnologies research [Commission recommendation] & Responsible nanosciences and nanotechnologies research [Council conclusions]. Brussels/Luxembourg.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2010a. Europe 2020 – public consultation. Overview of responses. Commission Staff Working Document. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2010b. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation (ed.). Science, economy and society. Highlights 2009. In: Socio-economic Sciences and Humanities. Science in Society. Brussels/Luxembourg.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2011a. European Economic and Social Committee. The Europe 2020 Steering Committee (ed.). Europe 2020 Strategy. Civil Society Involvement in the National Reform Programmes. Summary report based on contributions from the national Economic and Social Councils and similar organisations in Member States. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2011b. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. von Schomberg, René (eds.). Towards Responsible Research and Innovation in the Information and Communication Technologies and Security Technologies Fields. In: Publication series of the Ethics and Gender Unit of DG Research and Innovation. Luxembourg.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2011c. EC Joint Research Centre. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies; Centeno, Clara (eds.) Haché, Alexandra. Under the Radar: The Contribution of Civil Society and Third Sector Organisations to elnclusion. In: JRC Scientific and Technical Reports. Luxembourg. doi:10.2791/59558.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2011d. Directorate General for Research (ed.). Science, economy and society highlights 2010. Socio-economic Science and Humanities. Science in Society. Brussels/Luxembourg.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2013a. Directorate General for Research and Innovation (ed.). Options for Strengthening Responsible Research and Innovation. Report of the Expert Group on the State of Art in Europe on Responsible Research and Innovation. Brussels/Luxembourg.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2013b. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation (ed.). Scientific evidence for policy-making. Research insights from Socio-economic Sciences and Humanities. Brussels/Luxembourg.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2013c. Optimising Civil Society Participation in Research. European Policy Brief. n/a.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2014. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation (ed.). The role of philanthropy in the promotion of Responsible Research and Innovation. Report of the participatory workshop held on 21–22 October 2013. Brussels/Luxembourg.
   Google Scholar
• Ekboir, J., and G. Parellada. 2001. “Continuous Innovation Processes: Public–Private Interactions and Technology Policy.” In Agricultural Research Policy in an era of Privatisation: Experiences from the Developing World, edited by D. Byerlee, and R. G. Echeverría, 120–154. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.
   Google Scholar
• Elzen, B., F. W. Geels, C. Leeuwis, and B. van Mierlo. 2011. “Normative Contestation in Transitions ‘in the Making’: Animal Welfare Concerns and System Innovation in Pig Husbandry.” Research Policy 40 (2): 263–275. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evers, A. 2013. “The Concept of ‘Civil Society’: Different Understandings and their Implications for Third Sector Policies.” Voluntary Sector Review 4 (2): 149–164. doi: 10.1332/204080513X667800
   Google Scholar
• Ferretti, Maria Paola, and Vincenzo Pavone. 2009. “What do Civil Society Organisations Expect From Participation in Science? Lessons from Germany and Spain on the Issue of GMOs.” Science and Public Policy 36 (4): 287–299. doi:10.3152/030234209X436527.
   Google Scholar
• Fondation Sciences Citoyennes, (ed). 2014. Why and how to participate in the European Research and Innovation Framework Programme Horizon 2020?. Manual for civil society organizations. Paris. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/research/swafs/pdf/pub_public_engagement/manual_H2020_NGOs_Sept_2014.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gall, Éric, Glen Millot, and Claudia Neubauer. 2009. Participation of Civil Society Organisations in Research. STACS. Science, Technology and Civil Society. n/a. http://communityresearchcanada.ca/res/download.php?id=420.1.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W., and John Urry. 2014. “Regime Resistance Against low-Carbon Transitions: Introducing Politics and Power Into the Multi-Level Perspective.” Theory, Culture & Society 31 (5): 21–40. doi: 10.1177/0263276414531627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, M., and W. Krohn. 2005. “Society as Experiment: Sociological Foundations for a Self-Experimental Society.” History of the Human Sciences 18 (2): 63–86. doi: 10.1177/0952695105054182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermans, F., L. Klerkx, and D. Roep. 2015. “Structural Conditions for Collaboration and Learning in Innovation Networks: Using an Innovation System Performance Lens to Analyse Agricultural Knowledge Systems.” The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 21 (1): 35–54. doi: 10.1080/1389224X.2014.991113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodson, M., and S. Marvin. 2010. World Cities and Climate Change: Producing Urban Ecological Security. New York: McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins, M. M., and P. Nightingale. 2006. “Strategic Risk Management Using Complementary Assets: Organizational Capabilities and the Commercialization of Human Genetic Testing in the UK.” Research Policy 35 (3): 355–374. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutter, B. M., and J. O'Mahony. 2004. Business Regulation: Reviewing the Regulatory Potential of Civil Society Organisations (Vol. 26). London: Centre for Analysis of Risk and Regulation, London School of Economics and Political Science.
   Google Scholar
• Krabbenborg, L., and H. A. Mulder. 2015. “Upstream Public Engagement in Nanotechnology: Constraints and Opportunities.” Science Communication 37 (4): 452–484. doi: 10.1177/1075547015588601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mampuys, R., and W. A. Brom. 2015. “Governance Strategies for Responding to Alarming Studies on the Safety of GM Crops.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 2 (2): 201–219. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2015.1057797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nugroho, Y. 2011. “Opening the Black Box: The Adoption of Innovations in the Voluntary Sector—The Case of Indonesian Civil Society Organisations.” Research Policy 40 (5): 761–777. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2011.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, R., J. Stilgoe, P. Macnaghten, M. Gorman, E. Fisher, and D. Guston. 2013. “A Framework for Responsible Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, edited by R. Owen, J. Bessant, and M. Heintz, 27–50. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Paraskevopoulou, E. 2012. “Non-technological Regulatory Effects: Implications for Innovation and Innovation Policy.” Research Policy 41 (6): 1058–1071. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parayil, G. 2003. “Mapping Technological Trajectories of the Green Revolution and the Gene Revolution from Modernization to Globalization.” Research Policy 32 (6): 971–990. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00106-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penna, C. C., and F. W. Geels. 2015. “Climate Change and the Slow Reorientation of the American car Industry (1979–2012): An Application and Extension of the Dialectic Issue LifeCycle (DILC) Model.” Research Policy 44 (5): 1029–1048. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2014.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randles, S., P. Laredo, A. Loconto, B. Walhout, B. Walhout, and R. Lindner. 2016. “Framings and Frameworks: six Grand Narratives of de Facto RRI.” In Navigating Towards Shared Responsibility in Research and Innovation: Approach, Process and Results of the Res-AGorA Project, edited by R. Lindner, S. Kuhlmann, S. Randles, B. Bedsted, G. Gorgoni, E. Griessler, A. Loconto, and N. Mejlgaard, 31–36. Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer ISI.
   Google Scholar
• Seyfang, G., A. Haxeltine, T. Hargreaves, and N. Longhurst. 2010. Energy and communities in transition – Towards a new research agenda on agency and civil society in sustainability transitions. CSERGE Working Paper EDM 10–13. Available at http://hdl.handle.net/10419/48803.
   Google Scholar
• Späth, P., and H. Rohracher. 2010. “‘Energy Regions’: The Transformative Power of Regional Discourses on Socio-Technical Futures.” Research Policy 39 (4): 449–458. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutcliffe, Hilary. 2011. A Report on responsible Research and Innovation. Prepared for the European Commission, DG RTD. MATTER, London. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/rri-report-hilary-sutcliffe_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Taminiau, Y. 2006. “Beyond Known Uncertainties: Interventions at the Fuel–Engine Interface.” Research Policy 35 (2): 247–265. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanloqueren, G., and P. V. Baret. 2009. “How Agricultural Research Systems Shape a Technological Regime That Develops Genetic Engineering but Locks out Agroecological Innovations.” Research Policy 38 (6): 971–983. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2009.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Oudheusden, M., N. Charlier, B. Rosskamp, and P. Delvenne. 2015. “Broadening, Deepening, and Governing Innovation: Flemish Technology Assessment in Historical and Socio-Political Perspective.” Research Policy 44 (10): 1877–1886. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2015.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar