Considering expert takeovers in citizen involvement processes

References

• Anttonen, M., M. Lammi, J. Mykkänen, and P. Repo. 2018. “Circular Economy in the Triple Helix of Innovation Systems.” Sustainability 10 (8): 1–14. doi: 10.3390/su10082646
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechtold, U., L. Capari, and N. Gudowsky. 2017. “Futures of Ageing and Technology–Comparing Different Actors’ Prospective Views.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 4 (2): 157–176. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2017.1360721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedsted, B., J. Ibsen-Jensen, E. Kloppenborg, B. Kyhn, M. Kaarakainen, K. Matschoss, and P. Repo. 2016. European Citizens’ Visions for a Sustainable EU Future. Research Priorities and Policy Advice. Deliverable 3.3 of the CASI project. Accessed 8 August 2018. http://www.casi2020.eu/app/web1/files/download/casi-d3-3-european-citizens-visions-for-sustainable-eu-future.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Blei, D. M., A. Y. Ng, and M. I. Jordan. 2003, January. “Latent Dirichlet Allocation.” Journal of Machine Learning Research 3: 993–1022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, M. B. 2006. “Survey Article: Citizen Panels and the Concept of Representation.” Journal of Political Philosophy 14 (2): 203–225. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9760.2006.00245.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess, J., and J. Chilvers. 2006. “Upping the Ante: A Conceptual Framework for Designing and Evaluating Participatory Technology Assessments.” Science and Public Policy 33 (10): 713–728. doi: 10.3152/147154306781778551
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, C. M. 1997. The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Civisti. 2011. Periodic Report Summary. Accessed 8 August 2018. http://cordis.europa.eu/result/rcn/45954_en.html.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A. 1994. “A Democratic Dilemma: System Effectiveness Versus Citizen Participation.” Political Science Quarterly 109 (1): 23–34. doi: 10.2307/2151659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Hoop, E., A. Pols, and H. Romijn. 2016. “Limits to Responsible Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 3 (2): 110–134. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2016.1231396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jong, I. M., F. Kupper, and J. Broerse. 2016. “Inclusive Deliberation and Action in Emerging RRI Practices: The Case of Neuroimaging in Security Management.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 3 (1): 26–49. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2015.1137752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Saille, S. 2015. “Innovating Innovation Policy: The Emergence of ‘Responsible Research and Innovation’.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 2 (2): 152–168. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2015.1045280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decker, M., N. Weinberger, B. J. Krings, and J. Hirsch. 2017. “Imagined Technology Futures in Demand-Oriented Technology Assessment.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 4 (2): 177–196. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2017.1360720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, R., and A. Plows. 2007. “Listening Without Prejudice? Re-Discovering the Value of the Disinterested Citizen.” Social Studies of Science 37 (6): 827–853. doi: 10.1177/0306312707076602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fieller, E., H. Hartley, and E. Pearson. 1957. “Tests for Rank Correlation Coefficients.” Biometrika 44 (3/4): 470–481. doi: 10.2307/2332878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fligstein, N. 2013. “Understanding Stability and Change in Fields.” Research in Organizational Behavior 33: 39–51. doi: 10.1016/j.riob.2013.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsberg, E. M., G. Quaglio, H. O’Kane, T. Karapiperis, L. van Woensel, and S. Arnaldi. 2015. “Assessment of Science and Technologies: Advising for and with Responsibility.” Technology in Society 42: 21–27. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2014.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudowsky, N., and M. Sotoudeh. 2017. “Into Blue Skies – a Transdisciplinary Foresight and Co-Creation Method for Adding Robustness to Visioneering.” NanoEthics 11 (1): 93–106. doi: 10.1007/s11569-017-0284-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauke, J., and T. Kossowski. 2011. “Comparison of Values of Pearson’s and Spearman’s Correlation Coefficients on the Same Sets of Data.” Quaestiones Geographicae 30 (2): 87–93. doi: 10.2478/v10117-011-0021-1
   Google Scholar
• Horlick-Jones, T., G. Rowe, and J. Walls. 2007. “Citizen Engagement Processes as Information Systems: The Role of Knowledge and the Concept of Translation Quality.” Public Understanding of Science 16 (3): 259–278. doi: 10.1177/0963662506074792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hotelling, H., and M. R. Pabst. 1936. “Rank Correlation and Tests of Significance Involving No Assumption of Normality.” The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 7 (1): 29–43. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177732543
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., M. Ramesh, and A. Perl. 2009. Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles & Policy Subsystems. Toronto: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobi, A., I. Andersen, M. Rask, A. Lanckriet, E. Van den Cruyce, L. Van Damme, B. Warrington, et al. 2011. Final Project Report (Deliverable 3.3), Civisti Project. Accessed 8 August 2018. http://civisti.org/files/images/Civisti_Final_Report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 2003. “Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing Science.” Minerva 41 (3): 223–244. doi: 10.1023/A:1025557512320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, M.-L., and S. Schøning. 2016. Vision Catalogue. Encompassing the Visions from All 30 Countries. Cimulact project, Deliverable 1.3. Accessed 8 August 2018. http://www.cimulact.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/D1.3final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kaarakainen, M., P. Repo, K. Matschoss, B. Bedsted, Z. Damianova, R. Popper, and M. Rask. 2015. 50 Citizen Visions on Sustainable Futures. CASI project. Accessed 8 August 2018. http://www.casi2020.eu/app/web1/files/download/50-citizen-visions-report-casi.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kahane, D., K. Loptson, J. Herriman, and M. Hardy. 2013. “Stakeholder and Citizen Roles in Public Deliberation.” Journal of Public Deliberation 9 (2): 1–35.
   Google Scholar
• Kiran, A. H., N. Oudshoorn, and P. P. Verbeek. 2015. “Beyond Checklists: Toward an Ethical-Constructive Technology Assessment.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 2 (1): 5–19. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2014.992769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koops, B.-J. 2015. “The Concepts, Approaches, and Applications of Responsible Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation 2, edited by B. J. Koops, I. Oosterlaken, H. Romijn, T. Swierstra, and J. van den Hoven, 1–15. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Linnerooth-Bayer, J., A. Scolobig, S. Ferlisi, L. Cascini, and M. Thompson. 2016. “Expert Engagement in Participatory Processes: Translating Stakeholder Discourses Into Policy Options.” Natural Hazards 81 (1): 69–88. doi: 10.1007/s11069-015-1805-8
   Google Scholar
• Matschoss, K., and P. Repo. 2018. “Governance Experiments in Climate Action: Empirical Findings from the 28 European Union Countries.” Environmental Politics 27 (4): 598–620. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2018.1443743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matschoss, K., P. Repo, M. Kaarakainen, E. Kloppenborg, J. Ibsen-Jensen, and B. Kyhn. 2015. Citizen Assessment of Priorities for European Research. CASI project. Accessed 8 August 2018. http://www.casi2020.eu/app/web1/files/download/citizen-assessment-of-priorities-for-european-research-casi.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• McCallum, A. K. 2002. MALLET: A Machine Learning for Language Toolkit. Accessed 8 August 2018. http://mallet.cs.umass.edu.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, R., P. Macnaghten, and J. Stilgoe. 2012. “Responsible Research and Innovation: From Science in Society to Science for Society, with Society.” Science and Public Policy 39 (6): 751–760. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scs093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacita. 2016. Final Report Summary. Accessed 8 August 2018. http://cordis.europa.eu/result/rcn/177948_fr.html.
   Google Scholar
• Pieczka, M., and O. Escobar. 2013. “Dialogue and Science: Innovation in Policy-Making and the Discourse of Public Engagement in the UK.” Science and Public Policy 40 (1): 113–126. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scs073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rask, M., and Z. Damianova. 2009. Citizen Visions – Preliminary Content Report. Civisti project. Accessed 8 August 2018. http://www.civisti.org/files/images/Preliminary_content_analysis_FINAL_CORR.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Renn, O., and P.-J. Schweizer. 2009. “Inclusive Risk Governance: Concepts and Application to Environmental Policy Making.” Environmental Policy and Governance 19 (3): 174–185. doi: 10.1002/eet.507
   Google Scholar
• Repo, P., M. Anttonen, J. Mykkänen, and M. Lammi. 2018. “Lack of Congruence Between European Citizen Perspectives and Policies on Circular Economy.” European Journal of Sustainable Development 7 (1): 249–264. doi: 10.14207/ejsd.2018.v7n1p249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Repo, P., M. Kaarakainen, and K. Matschoss. 2015. European Research Priorities Based on Citizen Visions. CASI project. Accessed 8 August 2018. http://www.casi2020.eu/app/web1/files/download/casi-report-expert-workshop-published.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Repo, P., and K. Matschoss. 2018. “Citizen Visions for European Futures – Methodological Considerations and Implications.” European Journal of Futures Research 6 (20). doi:10.1186/s40309-018-0149-5.
   Google Scholar
• Repo, P., K. Matschoss, and P. Timonen. 2017. “Sustainable Futures: Comparing Methodologies for Analyzing Citizen Visions in Europe.” Sociology Study 7 (5): 246–262.
   Google Scholar
• Rip, A. 2014. “The Past and Future of RRI.” Life Sciences, Society and Policy 10: 17. 15pp. doi: 10.1186/s40504-014-0017-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rip, A. 2016. “The Clothes of the Emperor. An Essay on RRI in and Around Brussels.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 3 (3): 290–304. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2016.1255701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosa, A., N. Gudowsky, and P. Warnke. 2018. “But Do They Deliver? Participatory Agenda Setting on the Test Bed.” European Journal of Futures Research 6 (1): 14. doi: 10.1186/s40309-018-0143-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schot, J., and A. Rip. 1997. “The Past and Future of Constructive Technology Assessment.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 54 (2-3): 251–268. doi: 10.1016/S0040-1625(96)00180-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, J., S. J. Lock, and J. Wilsdon. 2014. “Why Should We Promote Public Engagement with Science?” Public Understanding of Science 23 (1): 4–15. doi: 10.1177/0963662513518154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stirling, A. 2008. “‘Opening Up’ and ‘Closing Down’ Power, Participation, and Pluralism in the Social Appraisal of Technology.” Science, Technology & Human Values 33 (2): 262–294. doi: 10.1177/0162243907311265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutcliffe, H. 2011. A Report on Responsible Research & Innovation. Report concerning DG Research workshop on Responsible Research & Innovation in Europe, Brussels, 16–17 May 2011. MATTER. Accessed 8 August 2018. http://www.diss.unimi.it/extfiles/unimidire/243201/attachment/a-report-on-responsible-research-innovation.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. 2002. “Modern Social Imaginaries.” Public Culture 14 (1): 91–124. doi: 10.1215/08992363-14-1-91
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voices. 2015. Final Report Summary. Accessed 8 August 2018. http://cordis.europa.eu/result/rcn/158173_en.html.
   Google Scholar
• von Hippel, E. 2005. Democratizing Innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• von Schomberg, R. 2013. “A Vision of Responsible Research and Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation. Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, edited by R. Owen, M. Heintz, and J. Bessant, 51–74. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Wilsdon, J., and R. Willis. 2004. See-Through Science: Why Public Engagement Needs to Move Upstream. London: Demos.
   Google Scholar
• Wynne, B. 2006. “Public Engagement as a Means of Restoring Public Trust in Science – Hitting the Notes, but Missing the Music?” Public Health Genomics 9 (3): 211–220. doi: 10.1159/000092659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar