A retrospective analysis of responsible innovation for low-technology innovation in the Global South

References

• Agunwamba, J. C. 1998. “Solid Waste Management in Nigeria: Problems and Issues.” Environmental Management 22 (6): 849–856. doi: 10.1007/s002679900152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akintan, K., S. Jewitt, and M. Clifford. 2018. “Culture, Tradition, and Taboo: Understanding the Social Shaping of Fuel Choices and Cooking Practices in Nigeria.” Energy Research and Social Science 40: 14–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.11.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashden. 2015. Winner Case Study Summary: BURN Manufacturing, Kenya. https://beamexchange.org/uploads/filer_public/53/ca/53cad464-f4d4-4763-80f3-c751b1eec54a/burn_kenya.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, D., K. Openshaw, K. Smith, and R. van der Plas. 1994. What Makes People Cook with Improved Biomass Stoves? A Comparative International Review of Stove Programmes. Energy Series Technical Paper 242, World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, P., and S. Jack. 2008. “Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers.” The Qualitative Report 13 (4): 544–559.
   Google Scholar
• Biddle, J. B. 2017. “Genetically Engineered Crops and Responsible Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 4 (1): 24–42. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2017.1287522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blok, V., and P. Lemmens. 2015. “The Emerging Concept of Responsible Innovation. Three Reasons Why It Is Questionable and Calls for a Radical Transformation of the Concept of Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation 2: Concepts, Approaches, and Applications, edited by, B.-J. Koops, I. Oosterlaken, H. Romijn, T. Swierstra, and J. van den Hoven. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Chaturvedi, S., K. R. Srinivas, and A. Kumar. 2016. “Agriculture Technology Choices and the Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) Framework: Emerging Experiences from China and India.” Asian Biotechnology and Development Review 18 (1): 93–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, R. 1981. “Rapid Rural Appraisal: Rationale and Repertoire.” Public Administration and Development 1: 95–106. doi: 10.1002/pad.4230010202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, R. 1985. “Agricultural Research for Resource-Poor Farmers: The Farmer-First-and-Last Model.” Agricultural Administration 20 (1): 1–30. doi: 10.1016/0309-586X(85)90063-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, R. 2008. Revolutions in Development Inquiry. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Chataway, J., R. Hanlin, and R. Kaplinsky. 2014. “Inclusive Innovation: An Architecture for Policy Development.” Innovation and Development 4 (1): 33–54. doi: 10.1080/2157930X.2013.876800
   Google Scholar
• Cozzens, S. E. 2012. “Social Cohesion at the Global Level: The Roles of Science and Technology.” Science and Public Policy 39: 557–561. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scs067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Campos, A. S., S. Hartley, C. de Koning, J. Lezaun, and L. Velho. 2017. “Responsible Innovation and Political Accountability: Genetically Modified Mosquitoes in Brazil.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 4 (1): 5–23. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23299460.2017.1326257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Hoop, E., A. Pols, and H. Romijn. 2016. “Limits to Responsible Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 3 (2): 110–134. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2016.1231396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eden, G., M. Jirotka, and B. Stahl. 2013. “Responsible Research and Innovation: Critical Reflection into the Potential Social Consequences of ICT.” In: IEEE Seventh International Conference on Research challenges in information science (RCIS), 1–12. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• EPSRC (Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council). 2018. Framework for Responsible Innovation. https://epsrc.ukri.org/index.cfm/research/framework/.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. 1995. Encountering Development. The Making and Unmaking of The Third World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. 1996. “Constructing Nature. Elements for a Poststructural Political Ecology.” In Liberation Ecologies: Development, Environment, Social Movements, edited by R. Peet, and M. Watts, 46–68. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, S. W. 2014. “Synthetic Biology: Missing the Point.” Nature 510 (11 June): 218. doi: 10.1038/510218b
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Felt, U., and B. Wynne. 2007. Taking European Knowledge Society Seriously. Report prepared for European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. http://bookshop.europa.eu/en/taking-european-knowledge-society-seriously-pbKINA22700/.
   Google Scholar
• Fressoli, M., E. Around, D. Abrol, A. Smith, A. Ely, and R. Dias. 2014. “When Grassroots Innovation Movements Encounter Mainstream Institutions: Implications for Models of Inclusive Innovation.” Innovation and Development 4 (2): 277–292. doi: 10.1080/2157930X.2014.921354
   Google Scholar
• Germann, D. 1995. “The Stove, the Kitchen – From Simplicity to Diversity.” In Stove Images: A Documentation of Improved and Traditional Stoves in Africa, Asia and Latin America, edited by B. Westhoff and D. Germann, 16–17. Frankfurt: Brandes and Apsel.
   Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, E. R. D., R. Allen, M. Allaby, J. Davoll, and S. Lawrence. 1972. “A Blueprint for Survival.” The Ecologist 2 (1): 1–43.
   Google Scholar
• GOV UK. 2017. UK Strategy for the Global Challenges Research Fund (GCRF). London: Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy. https://www.ukri.org/files/legacy/research/gcrf-strategy-june-2017/.
   Google Scholar
• Heeks, R., C. Foster, and Y. Nugroho. 2014. “New Models of Inclusive Innovation for Development.” Innovation and Development 4 (2): 175–185. doi: 10.1080/2157930X.2014.928982
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch-Kreinsen, H. 2008. “‘Low-Technology’: A Forgotten Sector in Innovation Policy.” Journal of Technology Management & Innovation 3 (3): 11–20. doi: 10.4067/S0718-27242008000100002
   Google Scholar
• Jewitt, S., and S. Rahman. 2017. “Energy Poverty, Institutional Reform and Challenges of Sustainable Development: the Case of India.” Progress in Development Studies 17 (2): 173–185. doi: 10.1177/1464993416688837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, B., and A. D. Andersen, eds. 2012. Learning, Innovation and Inclusive Development: New Perspectives on Economic Development Strategy and Development aid. Aalborg: Globelics Thematic Report.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, A., S. Cunningham-Burley, and R. Tutton. 2007. “Shifting Subject Positions: Experts and lay People in Public Dialogue.” Social Studies of Science 37: 385–411. doi: 10.1177/0306312706068492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach, M., and I. Scoones. 2006. “The Slow Race: Making Science and Technology Work for the Poor.” London: Demos, 06.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, S. S., T. Vos, A. D. Flaxman, G. Danaei, K. Shibuya, H. Adair-Rohani, M. A. AlMazroa, M. Amann, H. R. Anderson, K. G. Andrews, et al. 2012. “A Comparative Risk Assessment of Burden of Disease and Injury Attributable to 67 Risk Factors and Risk Factor Clusters in 21 Regions, 1990–2010: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.” The Lancet 380: 2224–2260. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61766-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macnaghten, P., R. Owen, J. Stilgoe, B. Wynne, A. Azevedo, A. de Campos, J. Chilvers, et al. 2014. “Responsible Innovation across Borders: Tensions, Paradoxes and Possibilities.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (2): 191–199. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2014.922249
   Google Scholar
• Marris, C. 2015. “The Construction of Imaginaries of the Public as a Threat to Synthetic Biology.” Science as Culture 24 (1): 83–98. doi: 10.1080/09505431.2014.986320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masera, O. R., B. D. Saatkamp, and D. M. Kammen. 2000. “From Linear Fuel Switching to Multiple Cooking Strategies: A Critique and Alternative to the Energy Ladder Model.” World Development 28 (12): 2083–2103. doi: 10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00076-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadows, D. H. 1972. Limits to Growth. A Report on the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind. London: Potomac Associates Book.
   Google Scholar
• Neefjes, K. 2000. Environments and Livelihoods: Strategies for Sustainability. Oxford: Oxfam.
   Google Scholar
• Nowotny, H., P. Scott, M. Gibbons, and P. B. Scott. 2001. Re-thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an age of Uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2012. Innovation for Inclusive Growth. Paris. http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecd-inclusive-innovation.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, R., P. Macnaghten, J. Stilgoe, M. Gorman, E. Fisher, and D. Guston. 2013. “A Framework for Responsible Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, edited by R. Owen, J. Bessant, and M. Heintz, 27–50. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Pansera, M., and R. Owen. 2015. “Framing Resource-Constrained Innovation at the ‘Bottom of the Pyramid’: Insights from an Ethnographic Case Study in Rural Bangladesh.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 92: 300–311. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2014.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pansera, M., and R. Owen. 2018. “Framing Inclusive Innovation Within the Discourse of Development: Insights from Case Studies in India.” Research Policy 47 (1): 23–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkhill, K., N. Pidgeon, A. Corner, and N. Vaughan. 2013. “Deliberation and Responsible Innovation: A Geoengineering Case Study.” In Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, edited by R. Owen, J. Bessant, and M. Heintz, 219–238. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Pretty, J., and Shah, P. 1999. “Soil and Water Conservation: A Brief History of Coercion and Control.” In Fertile Ground: The Impacts of Participatory Watershed Management, edited by F. Hinchcliffe, J. Thompson, J. N. Pretty, I. Guijt, and P. Shah, 1–12. London, UK: Intermediate Technology Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Ray, C., M. Clifford, and S. Jewitt. 2014. “The Introduction and Uptake of Improved Cookstoves: Making Sense of Engineers, Social Scientists, Barriers, Markets and Participation.” Boiling Point 64: 2–5. HEDON.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. 2006. Ordinary Cities between Modernity and Development. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, C., E. Moore-Delate, and C. Messinger. 2016. How do we Evaluate our Cookstoves? The Meaning of CLEANER and Getting our Definitions Right. Lilongwe, Malawi: Malawi Cleaner Cooking Camp.
   Google Scholar
• Schumacher, R. 1973. Small is Beautiful. London: Abacus.
   Google Scholar
• Sesan, T. 2014. “Global Imperatives, Local Contingencies: An Analysis of Divergent Priorities and Dominant Perspectives in Stove Development from the 1970s to Date.” Progress in Development Studies 14 (1): 3–20. doi: 10.1177/1464993413504345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sesan, T., S. Jewitt, M. Clifford, and C. Ray. 2018. “Toilet Training: What can the Cookstove Sector Learn from Improved Sanitation Promotion?” International Journal of Environmental Health Research 28: 667–682. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603123.2018.1503235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiva, V. 1988. Staying Alive: Women, Ecology and Survival in India. New Delhi: Kali for Women.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, G. L. 2010. “Mobilizing Cookstoves for Development: A Dual Adoption Framework Analysis of Collaborative Technology Innovations in Western India.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 42: 2011–2030. doi: 10.1068/a42498
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, B. C., N. McBride, K. Wakunuma, and C. Flick. 2014. “The Empathic Care Robot: A Prototype of Responsible Research and Innovation.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 84: 74–85. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. 1995. The Art of Case Study Research: Perspective in Practice. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, J., R. Owen, and P. Macnaghten. 2013. “Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation” Research Policy 42 (9): 1568–1580. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulnicane, I. 2016. “‘Grand Challenges’ Concept: a Return of the ‘big Ideas’ in Science, Technology and Innovation Policy?” International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy 11 (1/2/3): 5–21. doi: 10.1504/IJFIP.2016.078378
   Google Scholar
• Urmee, T., D. Harries, and A. Schlapfer. 2009. “Issues Related to Rural Electrification Using Renewable Energy in Developing Countries of Asia and Pacific.” Renewable Energy 34 (2): 354–357. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2008.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanloqueren, G., and P. V. Baret. 2009. “How Agricultural Research Systems Shape a Technological Regime That Develops Genetic Engineering but Locks Out Agroecological Innovations.” Research Policy 38 (6): 971–983. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2009.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voeten, J., N. Roome, N. T. Huong, G. de Groot, and J. de Haan. 2014. “Conceptualizing Responsible Innovation in Craft Villages in Vietnam.” In Responsible Innovation 1: Innovative Solutions for Global Issues, edited by J. van den Hoven, N. Doorn, T. Swierstra, B.-J. Koops, and H. Romijn, 149–179. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Westhoff, B., and D. Germann. 1995. Stove Images: A Documentation of Improved and Traditional Stoves in Africa, Asia and Latin America. Frankfurt: Brandes and Apsel.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, Pak-Hang. 2016. “Responsible Innovation for Decent Nonliberal Peoples: A Dilemma?” Journal of Responsible Innovation 3 (2): 154–168. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2016.1216709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. 2016. Burning Opportunity. Clean Household Energy for Health, Sustainable Development, and Wellbeing of Women and Children. Geneva: WHO Press.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization and UNICEF. 2015. WASH in the 2030 Agenda: New Global Indicators for Drinking Water, Sanitation and Hygiene. Geneva: WHO.
   Google Scholar
• Wickson, F. and E. M. Forsberg. 2015. “Standardising Responsibility? The Significance of Interstitial Spaces.” Journal of Science and Engineering Ethics 21: 1159–1180. doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9602-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynne, B. 2006. “Public Engagement as a Means of Restoring Public Trust in Science–Hitting the Notes, but Missing the Music?” Community Genetics 9: 211–220.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yin, R. 2009. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 4th ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar