Anticipating risks, governance needs, and public perceptions of de-extinction

References

• Barben, D., E. Fisher, C. Selin, and D. H. Guston. 2007. “Anticipatory Governance of Nanotechnology: Foresight, Engagement, and Integration.” In Handbook of Sciene and Technology Studies, edited by E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, and J. Wajcman, 3rd ed., 979–1000. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berne, R. W. 2008. “Science Fiction, Nano-Ethics, and the Moral Imagination.” In Presenting Futures, edited by E. Fisher, C. Selin, and J. M Wetmore, 291–302. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Blumm, M. C., and L. Ritchie. 2005. “The Pioneer Spirit and the Public Trust: The American Rule of Capture and State Ownership of Wildlife.” Environmental Law 35: 673.
   Google Scholar
• Borup, M., N. Brown, K. Konrad, and H. Van Lente. 2006. “The Sociology of Expectations in Science and Technology.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18 (3-4): 285–298. doi: 10.1080/09537320600777002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand, S. 2013. “Opinion: The Case for Reviving Extinct Species.” National Geographic. http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2013/03/130311-deextinction-reviving-extinct-species-opinion-animals-science/.
   Google Scholar
• Bratspies, R. M. 2004. “Glowing in the Dark: How America's First Transgenic Animal Escaped Regulation.” Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology 6: 457.
   Google Scholar
• Camacho, A. E. 2015. “Going the Way of the Dodo: De-Extinction, Dualisms, and Reframing Conservation.” Washington University Law Review 92: 2014–2038.
   Google Scholar
• Carlin, N. F., I. Wurman, and T. Zakim. 2013. “How to Permit Your Mammoth: Some Legal Implications of De-Extinction.” Stanford Environmental Law Journal 33: 3.
   Google Scholar
• CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity). 2000. “Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity.” United Nations Environment Program (UNEP), Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity https://bch.cbd.int/protocol/cpb_publications.shtml.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences. Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, M. J. 1997. “Risk Society and Ecological Modernisation Alternative Visions for Post-Industrial Nations.” Futures 29 (2): 105–119. doi: 10.1016/S0016-3287(96)00071-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, S. 2014. “The Ethics of De-Extinction.” NanoEthics 8 (2): 165–178. doi: 10.1007/s11569-014-0201-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, G., E. Pieri, and P. T. Robbins. 2004. “The Scientists Think and the Public Feels’: Expert Perceptions of the Discourse of GM Food.” Discourse & Society 15 (4): 433–449. doi: 10.1177/0957926504043708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings, C. L., and J. Kuzma. 2017. “Societal Risk Evaluation Scheme (SRES): Scenario-Based Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Synthetic Biology Applications.” PLoS One 12 (1): e0168564. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168564
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dabrock, P. 2009. “Playing God? Synthetic Biology as a Theological and Ethical Challenge.” Systems and Synthetic Biology 3: 47–54. doi: 10.1007/s11693-009-9028-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davies, A., R. Bryce, and S. Redpath. 2013. “Use of Multicriteria Decision Analysis to Address Conservation Conflicts.” Conservation Biology 27 (5): 936–944. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12090
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delord, J. 2014. “Can we Really Re-Create an Extinct Species by Cloning? A Metaphysical Analysis.” In The Ethics of Animal Re-Creation and Modification edited by M. Oksanen and H. Siipi, 22–39. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Devlin, H. 2017. “Woolly Mammoth on Verge of Resurrection, Scientists Reveal.” The Guardian, https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/feb/16/woolly-mammoth-resurrection-scientists.
   Google Scholar
• Dunkerley, D., and P. Glasner. 1998. “Empowering the Public? Citizens’ Juries and the New Genetic Technologies.” Critical Public Health 8 (3): 181–192. doi: 10.1080/09581599808402906
   Google Scholar
• Esvelt, K. M., A. L. Smidler, F. Catteruccia, and G. M. Church. 2014. “Concerning RNA-Guided Gene Drives for the Alteration of Wild Populations.” eLife, e03401. doi:10.7554/eLife.03401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FDA. 2009. Guidance for Industry Regulation of Genetically Engineered Animals Containing Heritable Recombinant DNA Constructs. Rockville, MD: Federal Drug Administration (FDA).
   Google Scholar
• Fiester, A. 2005. “Ethical Issues in Animal Cloning.” Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 48 (3): 328–343. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2005.0072
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finucane, M. L., and J. L. Holup. 2005. “Psychosocial and Cultural Factors Affecting the Perceived Risk of Genetically Modified Food: An Overview of the Literature.” Social Science & Medicine 60 (7): 1603–1612. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorese, G., M. Catenacci, E. Verdolini, and V. Bosetti. 2013. “Advanced Biofuels: Future Perspectives From an Expert Elicitation Survey.” Energy Policy 56: 293–311. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.12.061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folch, J., M. Cocero, P. Chesné, J. Alabart, V. Domínguez, Y. Cognié, A. Roche, A. Fernández-Arias, J. Martí, and P. Sánchez. 2009. “First Birth of an Animal from an Extinct Subspecies (Capra Pyrenaica Pyrenaica) by Cloning.” Theriogenology 71 (6): 1026–1034. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.11.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortun, M. 2001. “Mediated Speculations in the Genomics Futures Markets.” New Genetics and Society 20 (2): 139–156. doi: 10.1080/14636770124557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frewer, L. J., Ivo A van der Lans, A. R. Fischer, M. J. Reinders, D. Menozzi, X. Zhang, I. van den Berg, and K. L. Zimmermann. 2013. “Public Perceptions of Agri-Food Applications of Genetic Modification–a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Trends in Food Science & Technology 30 (2): 142–152. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2013.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grech, K. S. 2004. “Detailed Discussion of the Laws Affecting Zoos.” Michigan State University College of Law, Animal Legal & Historical Center. https://www.animallaw.info/article/detailed-discussion-laws-affecting-zoos.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J. 2014. A Feathered River Across the Sky: The Passenger Pigeon's Flight to Extinction. New York: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Guba, E. G., and Y. S. Lincoln. 1994. “Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, 163–164. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hamdouch, A., and M. Depret. 2010. “Policy Integration Strategy and the Development of the ‘Green Economy’: Foundations and Implementation Patterns.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 53 (4): 473–490. doi: 10.1080/09640561003703889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, K. R., and S. C. Barry. 2008. “Are There any Consistent Predictors of Invasion Success?” Biological Invasions 10 (4): 483–506. doi: 10.1007/s10530-007-9146-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung, C. M., P. J. Shaner, R. M. Zink, W. C. Liu, T. C. Chu, W. S. Huang, and S. H. Li. 2014. “Drastic Population Fluctuations Explain the Rapid Extinction of the Passenger Pigeon.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111 (29): 10636–10641. doi:10.1073/pnas.1401526111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iacona, G., R. F. Maloney, I. Chadès, J. R. Bennett, P. J. Seddon, and H. P. Possingham. 2017. “Prioritizing Revived Species: What are the Conservation Management Implications of De-Extinction?” Functional Ecology 31 (5): 1041–1048. doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.12720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IUCN SSC. 2016. IUCN SSC Guiding Principles on Creating Proxies of Extinct Species for Conservation Benefit. Gland: International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Species Survival Commission (SSC).
   Google Scholar
• Jeschke, J. M., F. Keesing, and R. S. Ostfeld. 2013. “Novel Organisms: Comparing Invasive Species, GMOs, and Emerging Pathogens.” Ambio 42 (5): 541–548. doi: 10.1007/s13280-013-0387-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, D. 2013. “Reintroduction and De-Extinction.” Bioscience 63 (9): 719–720. doi: 10.1093/bioscience/63.9.719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. 2010. “Fixing the Communications Failure.” Nature 463 (7279): 296–297. doi: 10.1038/463296a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. M., D. Braman, P. Slovic, J. Gastil, and G. Cohen. 2009. “Cultural Cognition of the Risks and Benefits of Nanotechnology.” Nature Nanotechnology 4 (2): 87–90. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2008.341
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karinen, R., and D. H. Guston. 2009. “Toward Anticipatory Governance: The Experience with Nanotechnology.” In Governing Future Technologies edited by M. Kaiser, M. Kurath, S. Maasen, and C. Rehmann-Sutter, 217–232. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kerschner, C., and M. Ehlers. 2016. “A Framework of Attitudes Towards Technology in Theory and Practice.” Ecological Economics 126: 139–151. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.02.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, J. 2003. “GloFish Casts Light on Murky Policing of Transgenic Animals.” Nature 426 (6965): 372. doi:10.1038/426372b.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuzma, J. 2016. “A Missed Opportunity for U.S. Biotechnology Regulation.” Science 353 (6305): 1211–1213. doi:10.1126/science.aai7854.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuzma, J., and T. Tanji. 2010. “Unpackaging Synthetic Biology: Identification of Oversight Policy Problems and Options.” Regulation & Governance 4 (1): 92–112. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5991.2010.01071.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latxague, E., I. Sache, J. Pinon, D. Andrivon, M. Barbier, and F. Suffert. 2007. “A Methodology for Assessing the Risk Posed by the Deliberate and Harmful use of Plant Pathogens in Europe.” EPPO Bulletin 37 (2): 427–435. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2338.2007.01118.x
   Google Scholar
• Lee Jenni, G. D., M. N. Peterson, J. Katz Jameson, and F. W. Cubbage. 2015. “Military Perspectives on Public Relations Related to Environmental Issues.” Journal of Public Relations Research 27 (4): 353–369. doi: 10.1080/1062726X.2015.1027770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, A. C. 2013. “Does Geoengineering Present a Moral Hazard.” Ecology LQ 40: 673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinelli, L., M. Oksanen, and H. Siipi. 2014. “De-extinction: a Novel and Remarkable Case of bio-Objectification.” Croatian Medical Journal 55 (4): 423–427. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2014.55.423
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx, L. 1994. “The Idea of “Technology” and Postmodern Pessimism.” In Technology, Pessimism, and Postmodernism, 11–28. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• McCauley, D. J., M. Hardesty-Moore, B. S. Halpern, and H. S. Young. 2017. “A Mammoth Undertaking: Harnessing Insight From Functional Ecology to Shape De-Extinction Priority Setting.” Functional Ecology 31 (5): 1003–1011. doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.12728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoy, E. D., and K. Berry. 2008. “Using an Ecological Ethics Framework to Make Decisions About the Relocation of Wildlife.” Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (4): 505–521. doi: 10.1007/s11948-008-9091-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, M. G., M. Henrion, and M. Small. 1990. Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Naidoo, R., A. Balmford, P. J. Ferraro, S. Polasky, T. H. Ricketts, and M. Rouget. 2006. “Integrating Economic Costs Into Conservation Planning.” Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21 (12): 681–687. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2006.10.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nightingale, P., and P. Martin. 2004. “The Myth of the Biotech Revolution.” Trends in Biotechnology 22 (11): 564–569. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.09.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novak, B. J. 2013. “The Great Comeback: Bringing a Species Back From Extinction.” The Futurist 47 (5): 40.
   Google Scholar
• Okuno, E. 2017. “Frankenstein’s Mammoth: Anticipating the Global Legal Framework for De-Extinction.” Ecology Law Quarterly 43 (3): 581–634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OSTP, U. 1986. “Coordinated Framework for Regulation of Biotechnology.” Federal Register 51: 23302–23350.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oye, K. A., K. Esvelt, E. Appleton, F. Catteruccia, G. Church, T. Kuiken, S. B. Lightfoot, J. McNamara, A. Smidler, and J. P. Collins. 2014. “Biotechnology. Regulating Gene Drives.” Science 345 (6197): 626–628. doi:10.1126/science.1254287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palkopoulou, E., S. Mallick, P. Skoglund, J. Enk, N. Rohland, H. Li, A. Omrak, S. Vartanyan, H. Poinar, and A. Götherström. 2015. “Complete Genomes Reveal Signatures of Demographic and Genetic Declines in the Woolly Mammoth.” Current Biology 25 (10): 1395–1400. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pimm, S. L. 2013. “Opinion: The Case Against Species Revival.” National Geographic: Daily News.
   Google Scholar
• Pimm, S. L., and P. Raven. 2000. “Biodiversity: Extinction by Numbers.” Nature 403 (6772): 843–845. doi: 10.1038/35002708
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricciardi, A., and J. Cohen. 2007. “The Invasiveness of an Introduced Species Does not Predict its Impact.” Biological Invasions 9 (3): 309–315. doi: 10.1007/s10530-006-9034-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandler, R. 2014. “The Ethics of Reviving Long Extinct Species.” Conservation Biology 28 (2): 354–360. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satterfield, T., R. Gregory, S. Klain, M. Roberts, and K. M. Chan. 2013. “Culture, Intangibles and Metrics in Environmental Management.” Journal of Environmental Management 117: 103–114. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.11.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seddon, P. J., A. Moehrenschlager, and J. Ewen. 2014. “Reintroducing Resurrected Species: Selecting DeExtinction Candidates.” Trends in Ecology & Evolution 29 (3): 140–147. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2014.01.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, B. 2015. How to Clone a Mammoth: The Science of De-Extinction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, B. 2017. “Pathways to de-Extinction: how Close can we get to Resurrection of an Extinct Species?” Functional Ecology 31 (5): 996–1002. doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.12705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharpe, L. M. 2014. “Public Perspectives on Genetic Biocontrol Technologies for Controlling Invasive Fish.” Biological Invasions 16 (6): 1241–1256. doi: 10.1007/s10530-013-0545-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shellabarger, R., M. N. Peterson, and E. Sills. 2012. “How Conservation and Humanitarian Groups Respond to Production of Border Security on the Arizona–Sonora Border.” Local Environment 17 (4): 481–493. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2012.678311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherkow, J. S., and H. T. Greely. 2013. “What if Extinction is Not Forever?” Science 340 (6128): 32–33. doi:10.1126/science.1236965.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, J., R. Owen, and P. Macnaghten. 2013. “Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 42 (9): 1568–1580. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suffert, F., É Latxague, and I. Sache. 2009. “Plant Pathogens as Agroterrorist Weapons: Assessment of the Threat for European Agriculture and Forestry.” Food Security 1 (2): 221–232. doi: 10.1007/s12571-009-0014-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland, W. J., P. Barnard, S. Broad, M. Clout, B. Connor, I. M. Côté, L. V. Dicks, H. Doran, A. C. Entwistle, and E. Fleishman. 2017. “A 2017 Horizon Scan of Emerging Issues for Global Conservation and Biological Diversity.” Trends in Ecology & Evolution 32 (1): 31–40. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2016.11.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedlow, M. R. 2015. “The Woolly-Mammoth in the Room: The Patentability of Animals Brought Back From Extinction Through Cloning and Genetic Engineering.” Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts 11 (3): 183–196.
   Google Scholar
• Teddlie, C., and F. Yu. 2007. “Mixed Methods Sampling: A Typology with Examples.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1 (1): 77–100. doi: 10.1177/1558689806292430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorpe, A. S., and A. G. Stanley. 2011. “Determining Appropriate Goals for Restoration of Imperiled Communities and Species.” Journal of Applied Ecology 48 (2): 275–279. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.01972.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turney, J. 1998. Frankenstein's Footsteps: Science, Genetics and Popular Culture. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tutton, R. 2011. “Promising Pessimism: Reading the Futures to be Avoided in Biotech.” Social Studies of Science 41 (3): 411–429. doi: 10.1177/0306312710397398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vàzquez-Salat, N., B. Salter, G. Smets, and L. Houdebine. 2012. “The Current State of GMO Governance: Are we Ready for GM Animals?” Biotechnology Advances 30 (6): 1336–1343. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2012.02.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yashina, S., S. Gubin, S. Maksimovich, A. Yashina, E. Gakhova, and D. Gilichinsky. 2012. “Regeneration of Whole Fertile Plants From 30,000-y-old Fruit Tissue Buried in Siberian Permafrost.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 (10): 4008–4013. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1118386109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimov, S. A. 2005. “Pleistocene Park: Return of the Mammoth's Ecosystem.” Science 308 (5723): 796–798. doi:308/5723/796 doi: 10.1126/science.1113442
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar