Limits of decentered governance in science-society policies

References

• Aagaard, K., C. Bloch, and J. W. Schneider. 2015. “Impacts of Performance-based Research Funding Systems: The Case of the Norwegian Publication Indicator.” Research Evaluation 24 (2): 106–117. doi: 10.1093/reseval/rvv003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Åm, H. 2019. “Ethics as Ritual: Smoothing Over Moments of Dislocation in Biomedicine.” Sociology of Health and Illness 41 (3): 455–469. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12818
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angelis, J., A. Swenning, and A. Håkansson. 2017. “Evaluation of the RCN’s BIOTEK2021 Programme.” Final report. Technopolis. Accessed September 12, 2018. https://www.google.com/url?sa=tandrct=jandq=andesrc=sandsource=webandcd=1andcad=rjaanduact=8andved=2ahUKEwju5_yUm7XdAhUK1SwKHY67CPQQFjAAegQIARACandurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.forskningsradet.no%2Fservlet%2FSatellite%3Fcid%3D1254033845417%26pagename%3DVedleggPointer%26target%3D_blankandusg=AOvVaw3wqs9rRS1QLNakYlrn9PHH.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, K., and S. Könninger. 2018. “From Experiments to Ecosystems? Reviewing Public Participation, Scientific Governance and the Systemic Turn.” Public Understanding of Science 27 (6): 674–689. doi: 10.1177/0963662517717375
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callon, M., P. Lascoumes, and Y. Barthe. 2009. Acting in an Uncertain World. An Essay on Technical Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Calvert, J. 2015. “Collaboration as a Research Method? Navigating Social Scientific Involvement in Synthetic Biology.” In Early Engagement and New Technologies: Opening Up the Laboratory, edited by N. Doorn, D. Schuurbiers, I. van de Poel, and M. E. Gorman, 175–194. Heidelberg/New York/London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, J., D. Bainton, N. Lendvai, and P. Stubbs. 2015. Making Policy Move. Towards a Politics of Translation and Assemblage. Bristol/Chicago: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• D’Andrea, L., M. Berliri, and L. F. Marta. 2018. “Benchmarking Report, Deliverable 1.2.” Project: Fostering improved training tools for responsible research and innovation (Fit4RRI), European commission. Accessed April 4, 2019. https://zenodo.org/record/1434355#.XKXJ_iCxU2w.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, S. R., and M. Horst. 2015. “Responsible Innovation in the US, UK and Denmark: Governance Landscapes.” In Responsible Innovation 2: Concepts, Approaches, and Applications, edited by B.-J. Koops, I. Oosterlaken, H. Romijn, T. Swierstra, and J. van den Hoven, 37–56. London: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Delgado, A., and H. Åm. 2018. “Experiments in Interdisciplinarity: Responsible Research and Innovation and the Public Good.” PLoS Biology 16 (3): e2003921. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2003921.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Saille, S. 2015. “Innovating Innovation Policy: The Emergence of ‘Responsible Research and Innovation’.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 2 (2): 152–168. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2015.1045280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2012. “Responsible Research and Innovation.” Europe’s ability to respond to societal challenges. Accessed December 14, 2017. https://ec.europa.eu/research/swafs/pdf/pub_public_engagement/responsible-research-and-innovation-leaflet_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Felt, U. 2009. “Introduction: Knowing and Living in Academic Research.” In Knowing and Living in Academic Research: Convergence and Heterogeneities in European Research Cultures, edited by U. Felt, 17–39. Prague: Institute of Sociology of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic.
   Google Scholar
• Felt, U. 2017. “‘Response-able Practices’ or ‘New Bureaucracies of Virtue’: The Challenges of Making RRI Work in Academic Environments.” In Responsible Innovation 3, edited by L. Asveld, R. van Dam-Mieras, T. Swierstra, S. Lavrijssen, K. Linse, and J. van den Hoven, 49–68. London: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Felt, U., D. Barben, A. Irwin, P.-B. Joly, A. Rip, A. Stirling, and T. Stöckelová. 2013. “Science in Society: Caring for our Futures in Turbulent Times.” Strasbourg (ESF Science Policy Briefing). Accessed March 2014. http://www.esf.org/fileadmin/Public_documents/Publications/spb50_ScienceInSociety.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Felt, U., and B. Wynne. 2007. “Taking the European Knowledge Society Seriously.” Report of the Expert Group on Science and Governance to the Science, Economy and Society Directorate, Directorate-General for Research, European Commission, Luxembourg: EUR 22700.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F., D. Torgerson, A. Durnová, and M. Orsini. 2015. Handbook of Critical Policy Studies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Fochler, M., U. Felt, and R. Müller. 2016. “Unsustainable Growth, Hyper-Competition, and Worth in Life Science Research: Narrowing, Evaluative Repertoires in Doctoral and Postdoctoral Scientists’ Work and Lives.” Minerva 54: 175–200. doi: 10.1007/s11024-016-9292-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, R. 2009. “What is ‘Translation’?” Evidence and Policy 5 (4): 429–447. doi: 10.1332/174426409X478770
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R., S. Griggs, and A. Boaz. 2011. “The Practice of Policy Making.” Evidence and Policy 7 (2): 127–136. doi: 10.1332/174426411X579180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glerup, C., S. R. Davies, and M. Horst. 2017 “Nothing Really Responsible Goes on Here: Scientists Experience and Practice of Responsibility.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 4(3): 319–336. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2017.1378462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glerup, C., and M. Horst. 2014. “Mapping ‘Social Responsibility’ in Science.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (1): 31–50. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2014.882077
   Google Scholar
• Gottweis, H. 1998. Governing Molecules. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gottweis, H., K. Braun, Y. Haila, M. Hajer, A. Loeber, I. Metzler, L. Reynolds, S. Schultz, and B. Szerszynski. 2008. “Participation and the New Governance of Life.” BioSocieties 3 (3): 265–286. doi: 10.1017/S1745855208006194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griggs, S., A. Norval, and H. Wagenaar. 2014. Practices of Freedom. Decentred Governance, Conflict and Democratic Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. A., and H. Wagenaar. 2003. Deliberative Policy Analysis. Understanding Governance in the Network Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, S., W. Pearce, and A. Taylor. 2017. “Against the Tide of Depoliticisation: The Politics of Research Governance.” Policy and Politics 45 (3): 361–377. doi: 10.1332/030557316X14681503832036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilgartner, S., B. Prainsack, and B. Hurlbut. 2017. “Ethics as Governance in Genomics and Beyond.” In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by U. Felt, R. Fouché, C. A. Miller, and L. Smith-Doerr, 4th ed., 823–852. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, A. 2006. “The Politics of Talk: Coming to Terms with the ‘New’ Scientific Governance.” Social Studies of Science 36 (2): 299–320. doi: 10.1177/0306312706053350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 2005. Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kjølberg, K., and R. Strand. 2011. “Conversations About Responsible Nanoresearch.” NanoEthics 5 (1): 99–113. doi: 10.1007/s11569-011-0114-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Loeber, A., B. van Mierlo, J. Grin, J., and C. Leeuwis. 2007. “The Practical Value of Theory.” In Social Learning Towards a Sustainable World, edited by A. Wals and T. van der Ley, 83–97. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Nowotny, H., P. Scott, and M. Gibbons. 2001. Re-thinking Science. Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge/Malden: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Nydal, R., A. Myhr, and B. Myskja. 2016. “From Ethics of Restriction to Ethics of Construction: ELSA Researcher in Norway.” Nordic Journal of Science and Technology Studies 3 (1): 34–45. doi: 10.5324/njsts.v3i1.2155
   Google Scholar
• Owen, R., J. Stilgoe, P. Macnaghten, M. Gorman, E. Fisher, and D. Guston. 2013. “A Framework for Responsible Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, edited by R. Owen, J. Bessant, and M. Heintz, 27–50. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• RCN (Research Council of Norway). 2014. “Samfunnsansvarlig Innovasjon – Et RRI-rammeverk for BIOTEK2021, NANO2021, IKTPLUSS and SAMANSVAR.” Accessed December 15, 2017. https://www.forskningsradet.no/prognett-biotek2021/Artikkel/Ansvarlig_forskning_og_innovasjon_RRI/1254026368432?lang=no.
   Google Scholar
• Reckwitz, A. 2002. “Toward a Theory of Social Practices: A Development in Culturalist Theorizing.” European Journal of Social Theory 5 (2): 243–263. doi: 10.1177/13684310222225432
   Google Scholar
• Rouse, J. 2007. “Practice Theory.” In Philosophy of Anthropology and Sociology. Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, edited by S. P. Turner and M. W. Risjord, 639–681. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Sigl, L. 2016. “On the Tacit Governance of Research by Uncertainty: How Early Stage Researchers Contribute to the Governance of Life Science Research.” Science, Technology and Human Values 41 (3): 347–374. doi: 10.1177/0162243915599069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solbu, G. 2018. “The Physiology of Imagined Publics.” Science and Technology Studies 31 (2): 39–54. doi: 10.23987/sts.60908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, K. 2010a. “Universitetsreformer I vitenskapsformaterte samfunn – Fra ekspansjon til effektivitet?” Vårdøger 32: 43–70.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, K. 2010b. “Fra Excel Til Excellence? Måling og veiing av regnearkuniversitetet.” Vårdøger 32: 115–133.
   Google Scholar
• Stengers, I. 1999. For en demokratisering av vitenskapen. Oslo: Spartacus.
   Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, J., R. Owen, and P. Macnaghten. 2013. “Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 42 (9): 1568–1580. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Hove, L., and F. Wickson. 2017. “Responsible Research is not Good Science: Divergences Inhibiting the Enactment of RRI in Nanosafety.” Nanoethics 11 (3): 213–228. doi: 10.1007/s11569-017-0306-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viseu, A. 2015. “Caring for Nanotechnology? Being an Integrated Social Scientist.” Social Studies of Science 45 (5): 642–664. doi: 10.1177/0306312715598666
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, H. 2011. Meaning in Action. Interpretation and Dialogue in Policy Analysis. New York: M.C. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, H., and S. C. Cook. 2003. “Understanding Policy Practices: Action, Dialectic and Deliberation.” In Deliberative Policy Analysis. Understanding Governance in the Network Society, edited by M. A. Hajer and H. Wagenaar, 139–171. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, M. 2009. “Governance-driven Democratization.” Critical Policy Studies 3 (1): 3–13. doi: 10.1080/19460170903158040
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, R. 1994. Learning from Strangers. The Art and Method of Qualitative Interview Studies. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wickson, F., R. Strand, and K. Kjølberg. 2015. “The Walkshop Approach to Science and Technology Ethics.” Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (1): 241–264. doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9526-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwart, H., L. Landeweerd, and A. van Rooij. 2014. “Adapt or Perish? Assessing the Recent Shift in the European Research Funding Arena from ‘ELSA’ to ‘RRI’.” Life Sciences, Society and Policy 10 (11). doi:10.1186/s40504-014-0011-x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar