Creating relevant knowledge in transdisciplinary research projects - Coping with inherent tensions

References

• Åm, Heidrun. 2019. “Limits of Decentered Governance in Science-Society Policies.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 6 (2): 163–178. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2019.1605483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, Hanne. 2013. “The Second Essential Tension: On Tradition and Innovation in Interdisciplinary Research.” Topoi 32 (1): 3–8. doi: 10.1007/s11245-012-9133-z
   Google Scholar
• Berger, P. L. , and T. Luckmann . [1966] 1991. The Social Construction of Reality . Harmondsworth, UK : Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Blättel-Mink, Birgit , and Hans Kastenholz . 2005. “Transdisciplinarity in Sustainability Research: Diffusion Conditions of an Institutional Innovation.” International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 12 (1): 1–12. doi: 10.1080/13504500509469613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumer, Herbert. 1986. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method . Berkeley : University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bornmann, Lutz. 2012. “Measuring the Societal Impact of Research.” EMBO Reports 13 (8): 673–676. doi: 10.1038/embor.2012.99
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bos, Colette , Bart Walhout , Alexander Peine , and Harro van Lente . 2014. “Steering With Big Words: Articulating Ideographs in Research Programs.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (2): 151–170. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2014.922732
   Google Scholar
• Brundtland, Gro Harlem. 1987. Our Common Future , edited by World Commission on Environment and Development . Oxford : Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, Michel. 1986. “Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay.” In Power, Action and Belief. A New Sociology of Knowledge? edited by John Law , 196–233. London : Routledge/Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, Michel. 1999. “The Role of Lay People in the Production and Dissemination of Scientific Knowledge.” Science, Technology & Society 4 (1): 81. doi: 10.1177/097172189900400106
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, Kathy. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory. A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis . London : Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, Adele E. 2005. Situational Analysis. Grounded Theory after the Postmodern Turn . Thousand Oaks : Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, Barbara. 2004. Narratives in Social Science Research . London : Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Demeritt, David. 2000. “The New Social Contract for Science: Accountability, Relevance, and Value in US and UK Science and Research Policy.” Antipode 32 (3): 308–329. doi: 10.1111/1467-8330.00137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, Paul N. , Matthew S. Mayernik , Archer L. Batcheller , Geoffrey C. Bowker , and Christine L. Borgman . 2011. “Science Friction: Data, Metadata, and Collaboration.” Social Studies of Science 41 (5): 667–690. doi: 10.1177/0306312711413314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elzinga, Aant. 2012. “Features of the Current Science Policy Regime: Viewed in Historical Perspective.” Science and Public Policy 39 (4): 416–428. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scs046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enengel, Barbara , Andreas Muhar , Marianne Penker , Bernhard Freyer , Stephanie Drlik , and Florian Ritter . 2012. “Co-Production of Knowledge in Transdisciplinary Doctoral Theses on Landscape Development—An Analysis of Actor Roles and Knowledge Types in Different Research Phases.” Landscape and Urban Planning 105: 106–117. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission . 2009. “The Lund Declaration. Europe Must Focus on the Grand Challenges of Our Time.” In. Accessed February 12, 2019. https://era.gv.at/object/document/130/attach/1lund_declaration_final_version_9_july.pdf .
   Google Scholar
• European Commission . 2012. “Responsible Research and Innovation. Europe's Ability to Respond to Societal Challenges.” In. Accessed February 12, 2019. http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/responsible-research-and-innovation-leaflet_en.pdf .
   Google Scholar
• Felt, Ulrike. 2009. Knowing and Living in Academic Research. Convergence and Heterogeneity in Research Cultures in the European Context . Prague : Institute of Sociology of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic.
   Google Scholar
• Felt, Ulrike , Judith Igelsböck , Andrea Schikowitz , and Thomas Völker . 2013. “‘Growing Into What?’ The (Un-)disciplined Socialisation of Early Stage Researchers in Transdisciplinary Research.” Higher Education 65 (4): 511–524. doi: 10.1007/s10734-012-9560-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felt, Ulrike , Judith Igelsböck , Andrea Schikowitz , and Thomas Völker . 2016. “Transdisciplinary Sustainability Research in Practice: Between Imaginaries of Collective Experimentation and Entrenched Academic Value Orders.” Science, Technology and Human Values 41 (4): 732–761. doi: 10.1177/0162243915626989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujimura, Joan H. 1987. “Constructing ‘Do-Able’ Problems in Cancer Research: Articulating Alignment.” Social Studies of Science 17 (2): 257–293. doi: 10.1177/030631287017002003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujimura, Joan H. 1992. “Crafting Science: Standardized Packages, Boundary Objects and “Translation”.” In Science as Practice and Culture , edited by Andrew Pickering , 168–211. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galison, Peter. 1996. “Computer Simulations and the Trading Zone.” In The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Contexts, and Power , edited by Peter Galison , and D. J. Stump , 119–157. Stanford : Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glerup, Cecilie , Sarah R. Davies , and Maja Horst . 2017. “‘Nothing Really Responsible Goes on Here’: Scientists’ Experience and Practice of Responsibility.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 4 (3): 319–336. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2017.1378462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalo-Turpin, Héloise , Nathalie Couix , and Laurent Hazard . 2008. “Rethinking Partnerships With the Aim of Producing Knowledge With Practical Relevance: a Case Study in the Field of Ecological Restoration.” Ecology and Society 13 (2). doi: 10.5751/ES-02658-130253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granjou, Céline , and Isabelle Arpin . 2015. “Epistemic Commitments: Making Relevant Science in Biodiversity Studies.” Science, Technology & Human Values 40 (6): 1022–1046. doi: 10.1177/0162243915587361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackett, Edward J. 2005. “Essential Tensions: Identity, Control, and Risk in Research.” Social Studies of Science 35 (5): 787–826. doi: 10.1177/0306312705056045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackett, Edward , and Diana Rhoten . 2009. “The Snowbird Charrette: Integrative Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Environmental Research Design.” Minerva 47 (4): 407–440. doi: 10.1007/s11024-009-9136-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hessels, Laurens K. , Harro van Lente , and Ruud Smits . 2009. “In Search of Relevance: The Changing Contract between Science and Society.” Science and Public Policy 36 (5): 387–401. doi: 10.3152/030234209X442034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch Hadorn, Gertrude , H. Hoffmann-Riem , S. Biber-Klemm , W. Grossenbacher-Mansuy , D. Joye , C. Pohl , U. Wiesmann , and E. Zemp . 2008. Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research . Bern : Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Holbrook, J. Britt , and Robert Frodeman . 2011. “Peer Review and the Ex Ante Assessment of Societal Impacts.” Research Evaluation 20 (3): 239–246. doi: 10.3152/095820211X12941371876788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Igelsböck, Judith. 2016. “Designing “Integration Machines”.” In Scientific Knowledge and the Transgression of Boundaries , edited by Bettina-Johanna Krings , Hannot Rodríguez , and Anna Schleisiek , 133–160. Wiesbaden : Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
   Google Scholar
• Jahn, Thomas , Matthias Bergmann , and Florian Keil . 2012. “Transdisciplinarity: Between Mainstreaming and Marginalization.” Ecological Economics 79 (0): 1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.017
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, Sheila. 2003. “Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing Science.” Minerva 41 (3): 223–244. doi: 10.1023/A:1025557512320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, Julie Thompson. 2014. “Discourses of Transdisciplinarity: Looking Back to the Future.” Futures 63: 68–74. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2014.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinman, D. L. , and S. Suryanarayanan . 2012. “Dying Bees and the Social Production of Ignorance.” Science, Technology & Human Values 38 (4): 492–517. doi: 10.1177/0162243912442575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klenk, N. , and K. Meehan . 2015. “Climate Change and Transdisciplinary Science: Problematizing the Integration Imperative.” Environmental Science & Policy 54: 160–167. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.05.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klenk, Nicole L. , and Katie Meehan . 2017. “Transdisciplinary Sustainability Research Beyond Engagement Models: Toward Adventures in Relevance.” Environmental Science & Policy 78: 27–35. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knorr-Cetina, Karin D. 1982. “Scientific Communities or Transepistemic Arenas of Research? A Critique of Quasi-Economic Models of Science.” Social Studies of Science 12 (1): 101–130. doi: 10.1177/030631282012001005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knuuttila, Tarja , Martina Merz , and Erika Mattila . 2006. “Computer Models and Simulations in Scientific Practice. Editorial to a Special Issue.” Science Studies 19 (1): 3–11.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Thomas S. 1977. The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change . Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, D. J. , A. Wiek , M. Bergmann , M. Stauffacher , P. Martens , P. Moll , and C. Thomas . 2012. “Transdisciplinary Research in Sustainability Science: Practice, Principles, and Challenges.” Sustainability Science 7 (1): 25–43. doi: 10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, John. 1999. “After ANT.” In Actor Network Theory and after , edited by John Law , and John Hassard , 1–14. Oxford/Malden : Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Law, John. 2004. After Method. Mess in Social Science Research . New York : Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Maasen, Sabine , and Oliver Lieven . 2006. “Transdisciplinarity: A New Mode of Governing Science?” Science and Public Policy 33 (6): 399–410. doi: 10.3152/147154306781778803
   Google Scholar
• Nightingale, Paul , and Alister Scott . 2007. “Peer Review and the Relevance Gap: Ten Suggestions for Policy-Makers.” Science and Public Policy 34 (8): 543–553. doi: 10.3152/030234207X254396
   Google Scholar
• Nowotny, Helga. 2003. “Democratising Expertise and Socially Robust Knowledge.” Science and Public Policy 30 (3): 151–156. doi: 10.3152/147154303781780461
   Google Scholar
• Owen, Richard , Phil Macnaghten , and Jack Stilgoe . 2012. “Responsible Research and Innovation: From Science in Society to Science for Society, With Society.” Science and Public Policy 39 (6): 751–760. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scs093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, Richard , Jack Stilgoe , Phil Macnaghten , Mike Gorman , Erik Fisher , and Dave Guston . 2013. “A Framework for Responsible Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society , edited by Richard Owen , John Bessant , and Maggy Heintz , 27–50. Chichester : John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Polk, Merritt. 2014. “Achieving the Promise of Transdisciplinarity: A Critical Exploration of the Relationship Between Transdisciplinary Research and Societal Problem Solving.” Sustainability Science 9 (4): 439–451. doi: 10.1007/s11625-014-0247-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, Theodore M. 1995. Trust in Numbers. The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life . Princeton : Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rip, Arie. 1997. “A Cognitive Approach to Relevance of Science.” Social Science Information 36 (4): 615–640. doi: 10.1177/053901897036004003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. C. 1998. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed . Yale : Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, David , and Friedrich Schiemer . 2015. “Crossing Boundaries: Complex Systems, Transdisciplinarity and Applied Impact Agendas.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 12 (0): 6–11. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2014.08.007
   Google Scholar
• Swan, Jacky , Mike Bresnen , Maxine Robertson , Sue Newell , and Sue Dopson . 2010. “When Policy Meets Practice: Colliding Logics and the Challenges of ‘Mode 2’ Initiatives in the Translation of Academic Knowledge.” Organization Studies 31 (9–10): 1311–1340. doi: 10.1177/0170840610374402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torka, Marc. 2006. “Die Projektförmigkeit der Forschung.” Die Hochschule 1 (2006): 63–83.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, V. Kelly , Karina Benessaiah , Scott Warren , and David Iwaniec . 2015. “Essential Tensions in Interdisciplinary Scholarship: Navigating Challenges in Affect, Epistemologies, and Structure in Environment–Society Research Centers.” Higher Education 70 (4): 649–665. doi: 10.1007/s10734-015-9859-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Conference on Environment and Development . 1992. “Agenda 21.” In. Rio de Janeiro/Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• Von Schomberg, Rene. 2011. Towards Responsible Research and Innovation in the Information and Communication Technologies and Security Technologies Fields . Luxembourg : Publication Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Weingart, Peter. 1997. “From ‘Finalization’ to ‘Mode 2': Old Wine in New Bottles?” Social Science Information 36 (4): 591–613. doi: 10.1177/053901897036004002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woelert, Peter , and Victoria Millar . 2013. “The ‘Paradox of Interdisciplinarity’ in Australian Research Governance.” Higher Education 66 (6): 755–767. doi: 10.1007/s10734-013-9634-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zscheischler, J. , S. Rogga , and M. Busse . 2017. “The Adoption and Implementation of Transdisciplinary Research in the Field of Land-Use Science—A Comparative Case Study.” Sustainability 9 (11): 1926. doi: 10.3390/su9111926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar