Responsible research and innovation: hopes and fears in the scientific community in Europe

References

• Besley, John , and Matthew Nisbet . 2013. “How Scientists View the Public, the Media and the Political Process.” Public Understanding of Science 22: 644–659. doi: 10.1177/0963662511418743
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blok, Vincent , and Pieter Lemmens . 2015. “The Emerging Concept of Responsible Innovation. Three Reasons Why it is Questionable and Calls for a Radical Transformation of the Concept of Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation 2: Concepts, Approaches, and Applications , edited by B.-J. Koops , 19–35. Basel: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, Ross , and Lindsay Paterson . 2005. “Coming Down from the Ivory Tower? Academics’ Civic and Economic Engagement with the Community.” Oxford Review of Education 31: 331–351. doi: 10.1080/03054980500221934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozeman, Barry , and Daniel Sarewitz . 2011. “Public Value Mapping and Science Policy Evaluation.” Minerva 49: 1–23. doi: 10.1007/s11024-011-9161-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bührer, Susanne , Ralf Lindner , Henrik Berghäuser , Richard Woolley , Niels Meilgaard , Angela Wroblewski , and Ingeborg Meier . 2017. “Monitoring the Evolution and Benefits of Responsible Research and Innovation (MoRRI). Report on the Researchers’ Survey.” European Commission. Accesssed July 7, 2019. http://www.technopolis-group.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/D9_1-Report-on-Benefits_Final.pdf .
   Google Scholar
• Burchell, Kevin. 2015. Factors Affecting Public Engagement by Researchers: Literature Review . London : Policy Research Institute. Accesssed July 7, 2019. https://wellcome.ac.uk/sites/default/files/wtp060036.pdf .
   Google Scholar
• Burns, Danny , and Heather Squires . 2011. Embedding Public Engagement in Higher Education: Final Report of the National Action Research Programme . National Co-ordinating Centre for Public Engagement. Accesssed July 7, 2019. https://www.publicengagement.ac.uk/sites/default/files/publication/action_research_report_0.pdf .
   Google Scholar
• Carrier, Martin. 2010. “Research Under Pressure: Methodological Features of Commercialized Science.” In The Commodification of Academic Research: Science and the Modern University , edited by H. Radder , 158–186. Pittsburgh : Pittsburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carrier, Martin. 2013. “Values and Objectivity in Science: Value-Ladenness, Pluralism and the Epistemic Attitude.” Science & Education 22: 2547–2568. doi: 10.1007/s11191-012-9481-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrier, Martin. 2019. “How to Conceive of Science for the Benefit of Society: Prospects of Responsible Research and Innovation.” Synthese . doi:10.1007/s11229-019-02254-1.
   Google Scholar
• de Saille, Stevienna. 2015. “Innovating Innovation Policy: The Emergence of ‘Responsible Research and Innovation’.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 2: 152–168. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2015.1045280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission . 2012. “Responsible Research and Innovation – Europe’s Ability to Respond to Societal Challenges.” Accesssed July 7, 2019. https://ec.europa.eu/research/swafs/pdf/pub_public_engagement/responsible-research-and-innovation-leaflet_en.pdf .
   Google Scholar
• Forsberg, Ellen-Marie , Clare Shelley-Egan , Miltos Ladikas , and Richard Owen . 2018. “Implementing Responsible Research and Innovation in Research Funding and Research Conducting Organisations. What Have We Learned So Far?” In Governance and Sustainability of Responsible Research and Innovation Processes , edited by F. Fernando , et al. , 3–11. Cham : Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Grinbaum, Alexei , and Christopher Groves . 2013. “What is ‘Responsible’ about Responsible Innovation? Understanding the Ethical Issues.” In Responsible Innovation , edited by R. Owen , J. Bessant , and M. Heintz , 119–142. Chichester : John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Guston, David. 2004. “Forget Politicizing Science. Let's Democratize Science!” Issues in Science & Technology 21: 25–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamlyn, Becky , Martin Shanahan , Hannah Lewis , Ellen O’Donoghue , Tim Hanson , and Kevin Burchell . 2015. Factors Affecting Public Engagement by Researchers. A Study on Behalf of a Consortium of UK Public Research Dunders . Wellcome Trust. Accessed February 2, 2019. https://wellcome.ac.uk/sites/default/files/wtp060032.pdf .
   Google Scholar
• Hansson, Sven Ove. 2011. “Coping with the Unpredictable Effects of Future Technologies.” Philosophy & Technology 24: 137–149. doi: 10.1007/s13347-011-0014-y
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, Sarah , Warren Pearce , and Alasdair Taylor . 2016. “Against the Tide of Depoliticisation: The Politics of Research Governance.” Policy & Politics 45: 361–377. doi: 10.1332/030557316X14681503832036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, Sheila. 2003. “Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing Science.” Minerva 41: 223–244. doi: 10.1023/A:1025557512320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitcher, Philip. 2011. Science in a Democratic Society . Amherst, NY : Prometheus Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Rainer , Grace Mbungu , Edward Anderson , Blagovesta Chonkova , Zoya Damianova , Houda Davis , Siri Dencker , et al. 2014. “Report on Current Praxis of Policies and Activities Supporting Societal Engagement in Research and Innovation.” Engage2020. Accesssed July 7, 2019. http://engage2020.eu/media/D3.1-Current-Praxis-of-Policies-and-Activities.pdf .
   Google Scholar
• Kuzma, Jennifer , and Pat Roberts . 2018. “Cataloguing the Barriers Facing RRI in Innovation Pathways: A Response to the Dilemma of Societal Alignment.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 5: 338–346. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2018.1511329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindner, Ralf , Stefan Kuhlmann , Sally Randles , Bjørn Bedsted , Guido Gorgoni , Erich Griessler , Allison Loconto , and Niels Mejlgaard . 2016. “Navigating Towards Shared Responsibility in Research and Innovation. Approach, Process and Results of the Res-AGorA Project.” Accesssed July 7, 2019. https://ris.utwente.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/5572411/RES_AGorA_ebook.pdf .
   Google Scholar
• Lo, Yin-Yueh. 2016. “Online Communication Beyond the Scientific Community. Scientists’ Use of New Media in Germany, Taiwan and the United States to Address the Public.” Dissertation, Freie Universität Berlin. Accesssed July 7, 2019. https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/bitstream/handle/fub188/7426/Diss_Lo_2016.pdf?sequence=1 .
   Google Scholar
• Loroño-Leturiondo, Maria , and Sarah Davies . 2018. “Responsibility and Science Communication: Scientists’ Experiences of and Perspectives on Public Communication Activities.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 5: 170–185. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2018.1434739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macnaghten, Phil. 2016. “Responsible Innovation and the Reshaping of Existing Technological Trajectories: The Hard Case of Genetically Modified Crops.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 3: 282–289. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2016.1255700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathews, Debra , Andrea Kalfoglou , and Kathy Hudson . 2005. “Geneticists’ Views on Science Policy Formation and Public Outreach.” American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A 137A: 161–169. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.30849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meuser, Michael , and Ulrike Nagel . 1991. “ExpertInneninterviews – Vielfach Erprobt, Wenig Bedacht: ein Beitrag zur Qualitativen Methodendiskussion.” In Qualitativ-empirische Sozialforschung. Konzepte, Methoden, Analysen , edited by D. Garz , and K. Kraimer , 441–471. Wiesbaden : VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Nordmann, Alfred. 2014. “Responsible Innovation, the Art and Craft of Anticipation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1: 87–98. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2014.882064
   Google Scholar
• Perkmann, Markus , Valentina Tartari , Maureen McKelvey , Erkko Autio , Anders Broström , Pablo D’Este , Riccardo Fini , et al. 2013. “Academic Engagement and Commercialisation: A Review of the Literature on University–Industry Relations.” Research Policy 42: 423–442. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, Hans Peter. 2013. “Gap Between Science and Media Revisited: Scientists as Public Communicators.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110: 14102–14109. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1212745110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, Hans Peter , Dominique Brossard , Susanne de Cheveigné , Sharon Dunwoody , Monika Kallfass , Steve Miller , Shoji Tsuchida , Anna Cain , and Anne-Sophie Paquez . 2009. “Kontakte biomedizinischer Forscher mit Journalisten und Öffentlichkeit: internationaler Vergleich von Erfahrungen und Einstellungen in Deutschland, Frankreich, Großbritannien, Japan und den USA.” In Medienorientierung biomedizinischer Forscher im internationalen Vergleich. Die Schnittstelle von Wissenschaft & Journalismus und ihre politische Relevanz , edited by Hans Peter Peters , 45–100. Jülich: Forschungszentrum Jülich.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center . 2009. “Public Praises Science; Scientists Fault Public, Media. Scientific Achievements Less Prominent Than a Decade Ago. A Survey Conducted in Collaboration with the American Association for the Advancement of Science.” Accesssed July 7, 2019. http://www.people-press.org/2009/07/09/public-praises-science-scientists-fault-public-media .
   Google Scholar
• Porth, Emily , Lada Timotijević , Daniela Fuchs , Christian Hofmaier , and Mark Morrison . 2017. “Three Reports on Barriers and Incentives for Societal Engagement under RRI, one for each R&I domain.” PROSO Engaging Society for RRI. Accesssed July 7, 2019. http://www.proso-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/proso_d3.2_barriers_and_incentives_in_three_ri_domains.pdf .
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, Nathan. 1991. “Critical Issues in Science Policy Research.” Science and Public Policy 18: 335–346. doi: 10.1093/spp/18.6.335
   Google Scholar
• Small, Bruce , and Mary Mallon . 2007. “Science, Society, Ethics, and Trust: Scientists’ Reflections on the Commercialization and Democratization of Science.” International Studies of Management & Organization 37: 103–124. doi: 10.2753/IMO0020-8825370105
   Google Scholar
• Smallman, Melanie , Kaatje Komme , and Natacha Faullimmel . 2015. “Report on the Analysis of Opportunities, Obstacles and Needs of the Stakeholder Groups in RRI Practices in Europe.” Accesssed July 7, 2019. https://www.rri-tools.eu/documents/10184/107098/RRITools_D2.2-AnalysisNeeds+ConstraintsStakeholderGroupsRRI.pdf/83c55909-118c-4cad-b7e4-74d5a770c8a1 .
   Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, Jack , Richard Owen , and Phil Macnaghten . 2013. “Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 42: 1568–1580. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes, Donald E. 1997. Pasteur’s Quadrant. Basic Science and Technological Innovation . Washington, DC : Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tartari, Valentin , and Stefano Breschi . 2012. “Set Them Free: Scientists’ Evaluations of the Benefits and Costs of University-Industry Research Collaboration.” Minerva 21: 1117–1147.
   Google Scholar
• van Hove, Lilian , and Fern Wickson . 2017. “Responsible Research Is Not Good Science: Divergences Inhibiting the Enactment of RRI in Nanosafety.” Nanoethics 11: 213–228. doi: 10.1007/s11569-017-0306-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Schomberg, René . 2013. “A Vision of Responsible Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Innovation of Science and Innovation in Society , edited by R. Owen , M. Heintz , and J. Bessant , 51–74. London : John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Young, Emma. 2007. “Non-invasive Glucose Monitoring for Diabetes: Five Strategies Under Development.” The Pharmaceutical Journal , October 12, 2017. Accesssed July 7, 2019. https://www.pharmaceutical-journal.com/news-and-analysis/features/non-invasive-glucose-monitoring-for-diabetes-five-strategies-under-development/20203666.article?firstPass=false .
   Google Scholar
• Young, Nathan , and Ralph Matthews . 2007. “Experts’ Understanding of the Public: Knowledge Control in a Risk Controversy.” Public Understanding of Science 16: 123–144. doi: 10.1177/0963662507060586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar