3,228
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Inclusion in responsible innovation: revisiting the desirability of opening up

, &
Pages 361-383 | Received 24 Jul 2016, Accepted 04 Jun 2020, Published online: 30 Jun 2020

References

  • Arkesteijn, Marlèn , Barbara van Mierlo , and Cees Leeuwis . 2015. “The Need for Reflexive Evaluation Approaches in Development Cooperation.” Evaluation 21 (1): 99–115.
  • Beers, Pieter J. , and Barbara van Mierlo . 2017. “Reflexivity and Learning in System Innovation Processes.” Sociologia Ruralis 57 (3): 415–436.
  • Blok, Vincent , and Pieter Lemmens . 2015. “The Emerging Concept of Responsible Innovation. Three Reasons Why it is Questionable and Calls for a Radical Transformation of the Concept of Innovation.” Responsible Innovation 2: 19–35. Springer.
  • Bouwman, Laura I , Hedwig Te Molder , Maria M Koelen , and Cees MJ Van Woerkum . 2009. “I Eat Healthfully but I am Not a Freak. Consumers’ Everyday Life Perspective on Healthful Eating.” Appetite 53 (3): 390–398.
  • Brand, Teunis , and Vincent Blok . 2019. “Responsible Innovation in Business: A Critical Reflection on Deliberative Engagement as a Central Governance Mechanism.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 6 (1): 4–24.
  • Burget, Mirjam , Emanuele Bardone , and Margus Pedaste . 2017. “Definitions and Conceptual Dimensions of Responsible Research and Innovation: A Literature Review.” Science and Engineering Ethics 23 (1): 1–19.
  • Cooke, Bill , and Uma Kothari . 2001. Participation: The New Tyranny? London : Zed Books.
  • De Hoop, Evelien , Auke Pols , and Henny Romijn . 2016. “Limits to Responsible Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 3 (2): 110–134.
  • Dewulf, A. , and R. Bouwen . 2012. “Issue Framing in Conversations for Change: Discursive Interaction Strategies for ‘Doing Differences’.” Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 48 (2): 168–193. doi:10.1177/0021886312438858.
  • Dewulf, A. , B. Gray , L. Putnam , R. Lewicki , N. Aarts , R. Bouwen , and C. van Woerkum . 2009. “Disentangling Approaches to Framing in Conflict and Negotiation Research: A Meta-Paradigmatic Perspective.” Human Relations 62 (2): 155–193. doi:10.1177/0018726708100356.
  • Dijksma, S. A. M. 2013. Letter from Secretary of State of Economic Affairs. Kamerstukken II 2013/14, 33 037, nr. 80, https://zoek.officielebekendmakingen.nl/kst-33037-80.html .
  • Doornewaard, G.J. , J.W. Reijs , A.C.G. Beldman , J.H. Jager and M.W. Hoogeveen . 2018. Sectorrapportage Duurzame Zuivelketen; Prestaties 2017 in perspectief [ Sector Report Sustainable Dairy Chain, Preformance 2017 in Perspective]. Wageningen : Wageningen Economic Research Report 2018-094. https://edepot.wur.nl/466401
  • Driessen, C. 2014. “Animal Deliberation: The Co-Evolution of Technology and Ethics on the Farm.” PhD thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
  • EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) . 11 July 2012. “E. coli: Rapid Response in a Crisis”. Accessed June 17, 2020. https://web.archive.org/web/20181224083524/https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/press/news/120711 .
  • Ely, Adrian , Patrick Van Zwanenberg , and Andrew Stirling . 2014. “Broadening Out and Opening Up Technology Assessment: Approaches to Enhance International Development, Co-Ordination and Democratisation.” Research Policy 43 (3): 505–518.
  • Gray, B. 2003. “Framing of Environmental Disputes.” In Making Sense of Intractable Environmental Conflicts. Frames and Cases , edited by R. J. Lewicki , B. Gray , and M. Elliott , 11–34. Washington/Covelo/London : Islands press.
  • Grin, John , and Rob Weterings . 2005. “Reflexive Monitoring of System Innovative Projects. Strategic Nature and Relevant Competences.” 6th Open Meeting of the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change Research Community, University of Bonn, 9–13 October 2005.
  • Irwin, A. , Jensen, T. , and Jones, K. 2013. “The Good, the Bad and the Perfect: Criticizing Engagement Practice.” Social Studies of Science 43: 118–135.
  • Jamison, Andrew , and Brian Wynne . 1998. “Sustainable Development and the Problem of Public Participation.” In Technology Policy Meets the Public, edited by Andrew Jamison, 7–17. Aalborg, Denmark: Department of Development and Planning, Aalborg University.
  • Ministry of Economic Affairs . 2013. Voornemen verdere behandeling wijziging meststoffen [ Procedure to Change Manure Policy]. The Hague: Ministry of Economic Affairs.
  • NZO and LTO . 2013. “Zuivelsector kiest voor grondgebonden melkveehouderij [Dairy Sector Choose for Land Bound Dairy Farms] Press Release.” Accessed September 3, 2015. https://www.lto.nl/actueel/nieuws/10838261%2FZuivelsector-kiest-voor-grondgebonden-melkveehouderij .
  • Onwezen, M. C. , H. M. Snoek , M. J. Reinders , and J. Voordouw . 2013. De Agrofoodmonitor: maatschappelijke waardering van de Agro & Food sector . Wageningen : LEI Wageningen UR.
  • Owen, R. , P. Macnaghten , and J. Stilgoe . 2012. “Responsible Research and Innovation: From Science in Society to Science for Society, with Society.” Science and Public Policy 39 (6): 751–760. doi:10.1093/scipol/scs093.
  • Pandza, K. , and P. Ellwood . 2013. “Strategic and Ethical Foundations for Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 42 (5): 1112–1125. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.02.007.
  • Pellé, Sophie. 2016. “Process, Outcomes, Virtues: The Normative Strategies of Responsible Research and Innovation and the Challenge of Moral Pluralism.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 3 (3): 233–254.
  • Regeer, Barbara J. 2009. “Making the Invisible Visible. Analysing the Development of Strategies and Changes in Knowledge Production to Deal with Persistent Problems in Sustainable Development.” PhD Study. Athena Institute, Vrije Universiteit.
  • Reijs, J. W. , C. Daatselaar , J. Helming , J. Jager , and A. Beldman . 2013. Grazing Dairy Cows in North-West Europe. Economic Farm Performance and Future Developments with Emphasis on the Dutch Situation . Wageningen : LEI, Wageningen UR, LEI Report 2013-001.
  • Roberts, Cameron , and Frank W. Geels . 2019. “Conditions and Intervention Strategies for the Deliberate Acceleration of Socio-Technical Transitions: Lessons from a Comparative Multi-Level Analysis of Two Historical Case Studies in Dutch and Danish Heating.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 31 (9): 1081–1103.
  • Scholten, VE , and V Blok . 2015. “Foreword: Responsible Innovation in the Private Sector.” Journal on Chain and Network Science 15 (2): 101–105.
  • Schot, Johan , and Frank W. Geels . 2008. “Strategic Niche Management and Sustainable Innovation Journeys: Theory, Findings, Research Agenda, and Policy.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 20 (5): 537–554.
  • Stilgoe, J. , R. Owen , and P. Macnaghten . 2013. “Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 42 (9): 1568–1580. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008.
  • Stirling, A. 2008. “‘Opening Up’ and ‘Closing Down’ – Power, Participation, and Pluralism in the Social Appraisal of Technology.” Science Technology & Human Values 33 (2): 262–294. doi:10.1177/0162243907311265.
  • STAP Board . 2013. “Urgentie document Versterking marktpositie glasgroente producenten [Urgency Document Strengthening Market Position Greenhouse Vegetable Producers].” STAP Foundation, Honselersdijk, The Netherlands: Stichting STAP.
  • Stichting STAP . 2013. “Persbericht: Gebrek aan urgentiegevoel stokt transitie verse voedingsketen [Press Release: Lacking Sense of Urgency Stymies Transition Fresh Foods Chain].” Accessed July 11, 2013. https://www.eenheidinvers.nl/nieuws/20130711-persbericht-gebrek-aan-urgentiegevoel-stokt-transitie-verse-voedingsketen .
  • Sustainable Dairy Chain . 2010. “Verder op weg naar een duurzame zuivelketen verslag 2009 [On the Road to Sustainable Dairy Chain Report 2019].” Accessed July 6, 2016. https://www.duurzamezuivelketen.nl/files/jaarverslag-2009-dzk.pdf .
  • Sustainable Dairy Chain . 2012. “Duurzame vooruitgang verslag 2011 [Sustainable Progress Report 2011].” Accessed July 6, 2016. https://www.duurzamezuivelketen.nl/files/jaarverslag-2011-dzk.pdf .
  • Sustainable Dairy Chain . 2014. “Herijking doelen Duurzame Zuivelketen [Goals adjusted Sustainable Dairy Chain].” Accessed September 3, 2015. https://www.duurzamezuivelketen.nl/nieuws/herijking-doelen-duurzame-zuivelketen2? p=5.
  • Sustainable Dairy Chain . 2015. “Meer melkveebedrijven met koeien in de wei [More Dairy Farms with Grazing Cows].” Accessed July 8, 2016. https://www.duurzamezuivelketen.nl/nieuws/meer-melkveebedrijven-met-koeien-in-de-wei2? p=2.
  • Tassone, Valentina C. , Catherine O’Mahony , Emma McKenna , Hansje J Eppink , and Arjen EJ Wals . 2018. “(Re-)designing Higher Education Curricula in Times of Systemic Dysfunction: A Responsible Research and Innovation Perspective.” Higher Education 76 (2): 337–352.
  • Van Den Pol-Van Dasselaar, A. , P. W. Blokland , T. J. A. Gies , G. Holshof , M. H. A. De Haan , H. S. D. Naeff , and A. P. Philipsen . 2015. Beweidbare oppervlakte en weidegang op melkveebedrijven in Nederland [Grazing grounds and grazing on dairy farms in the Netherlands]. Wageningen : Wageningen Livestock Research Report 917. https://edepot.wur.nl/362949.
  • Van Huijstee, Mariette , and Pieter Glasbergen . 2010. “Business–NGO Interactions in a Multi-Stakeholder Context.” Business and Society Review 115 (3): 249–284.
  • Van Lieshout, M. , A. Dewulf , N. Aarts , and C. Termeer . 2013. “Framing Scale Increase in Dutch Agricultural Policy 1950–2012.” Njas-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 64–65: 35–46. doi:10.1016/j.njas.2013.02.001.
  • Van Mierlo, Barbara , Arni Janssen , Ferry Leenstra , and Ellen van Weeghel . 2012. “Encouraging System Learning in Two Poultry Subsectors.” Agricultural Systems 115: 29–40.
  • Van Tatenhove, Jan P. M. , and Henri J. M. Goverde . 2002. “Strategies in Environmental Policy. A Historical Institutional Perspective.” In Greening Society. The Paradigm Shift in Dutch Environmental Politics , edited by P. J. Driessen and Pieter Glasbergen , 47–63. Dordrecht : Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Veen, M. , B. Gremmen , H. T. Molder , and C. van Woerkum . 2011. “Emergent Technologies Against the Background of Everyday Life: Discursive Psychology as a Technology Assessment Tool.” Public Understanding of Science 20 (6): 810–825. doi:10.1177/0963662510364202.
  • Von Schomberg, René . 2014. “The Quest for the ‘Right’ Impacts of Science and Technology: A Framework for Responsible Research and Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation 1. Innovative Solutions for Global Issues , edited by J. van den Hoven , N. Doorn , T. Swierstra , B. J. Koops , and H. Romijn , 33–50. Dordrecht, NL : Springer.
  • Voβ, Jan-Peter , Dierk Bauknecht , and René Kemp , eds. 2006. Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development . Cheltenham, UK / Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.
  • Walker, G. , and Shove, E. 2007. “Ambivalence, Sustainability and the Governance of Socio-technical Transitions.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 9 (3–4): 213–225.
  • Westling, Emma L , Liz Sharp , Marta Rychlewski , and Chiara Carrozza . 2014. “Developing Adaptive Capacity Through Reflexivity: Lessons from Collaborative Research with a UK Water Utility.” Critical Policy Studies 8 (4): 427–446.
  • Wickson, Fern , and Anna L Carew . 2014. “Quality Criteria and Indicators for Responsible Research and Innovation: Learning from Transdisciplinarity.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (3): 254–273.
  • Wynne, Brian. 2007. “Public Participation in Science and Technology: Performing and Obscuring a Political–Conceptual Category Mistake.” East Asian Science, Technology and Society 1 (1): 99–110.