Scientists’ views on (moral) luck

References

• Adam, Barbara , and Chris Groves . 2011. “Futures Tended: Care and Future-Oriented Responsibility.” Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 31 (1): 17–27. doi:10.1177/0270467610391237.
   Google Scholar
• Adam, David. 2019. “Science Funders Gamble on Grant Lotteries.” Nature 575 (7784): 574–575. doi:10.1038/d41586-019-03572-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, Mark B. 2009. Science in Democracy: Expertise, Institutions, and Representation . Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Copeland, Samantha. 2017. “On Serendipity in Science: Discovery at the Intersection of Chance and Wisdom.” Synthese , doi:10.1007/s11229-017-1544-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copeland, Samantha. 2018. “‘Fleming Leapt on the Unusual Like a Weasel on a Vole’ – challenging the Paradigm of Serendipity in Science.” Perspectives on Science 26 (6): 694–721. doi: 10.1162/posc_a_00294
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, Elisabeth. 1998. “Nobel: Always the Winners, Never the Losers.” Science 282 (5392): 1256–1257. doi:10.1126/science.282.5392.1256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunha, Miguel Pina , R. Clegg Stewart , and Mendonça Sandro . 2010. “On Serendipity and Organizing.” European Management Journal 28 (5): 319–330. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2010.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cushman, Fiery. 2008. “Crime and Punishment: Distinguishing the Roles of Causal and Intentional Analyses in Moral Judgment.” Cognition 108 (2): 353–380. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.03.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dierckx de Casterlé, Bernadette , Els Bryon Chris Gastmans , and Yvonne Denier . 2012. “QUAGOL: A Guide for Qualitative Data Analysis.” International Journal of Nursing Studies 49 (3): 360–371. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.09.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enoch, David. 2019. “Playing the Hand You're Dealt: How Moral Luck Is Different From Morally Significant Plain Luck (and Probably Doesn't Exist).” Midwest Studies In Philosophy 43 (1): 257–270. doi:10.1111/misp.12115.
   Google Scholar
• Enoch, David , and Andrei Marmor . 2007. “The Case Against Moral Luck.” Law and Philosophy 26 (4): 405–436. doi:10.1007/s10982-006-9001-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fine, G. A. , and J. Deegan . 1996. “Three Principles of Serendip: Insight, Chance and Discovery in Qualitative Research.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 9 (4): 434–447. doi: 10.1080/0951839960090405
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, John Martin. 2012. “Indeterminism and Control: An Approach to the Problem of Luck.” In Deep Control: Essays on Free Will and Value , edited by John Martin Fischer , Robert Kane , Derk Pereboom , and Manuel Vargas , 85–105. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, Robert H. 2017. Success and Luck - Good Fortune and the Myth of Meritocracy . Princeton : Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gillies, Donald. 2015. “Serendipity and Chance in Scientific Discovery: Policy Implications for Global Society.” In The Handbook of Global Science, Technology, and Innovation , edited by Daniele Archibugi and Andrea Filippetti , 525–539. Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Green, Judith , and Nicki Thorogood . 2018. Qualitative Methods for Health Research . 4th ed, Introducing Qualitative Methods series . London : SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Grinbaum, Alexei , and Christopher Groves . 2013. “What is ‘Responsible’ About Responsible Innovation?: Understanding the Ethical Issues.” In Responsible Innovation , edited by Richard Owen , John R. Bessant , and Maggy Heintz , 119–142. Chichester : John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Hanna, Nathan. 2014. “Moral Luck Defended.” Noûs 48 (4): 683–698. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0068.2012.00869.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartman, Robert J. 2019. “Accepting Moral Luck.” In The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy and Psychology of Luck , edited by Ian M. Church , and Robert J. Hartman , 227. New York : Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hennink, Monique M. , Bonnie N. Kaiser , and Vincent C. Marconi . 2017. “Code Saturation Versus Meaning Saturation: How Many Interviews Are Enough?” Qualitative Health Research 27 (4): 591–608. doi:10.1177/1049732316665344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heuer, Ulrike. 2016. “Moralischer Zufall und Kontrolle Durch Fertigkeiten.” Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 70 (1): 5–27. doi:10.3196/004433016818285962.
   Google Scholar
• King, Matt. 2014. “Two Faces of Desert.” Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition 169 (3): 401–424. doi:10.1007/s11098-013-0188-5.
   Google Scholar
• Kneer, Markus , and Edouard Machery . 2019. “No Luck for Moral Luck.” Cognition 182: 331–348. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.09.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, Victor. 2019. “Empirical Vindication of Moral Luck.” Noûs 53 (4): 987–1007. doi:10.1111/nous.12250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lench, Heather C. , Darren Domsky , Rachel Smallman , and Kathleen E. Darbor . 2015. “Beliefs in Moral Luck: When and why Blame Hinges on Luck.” British Journal of Psychology 106 (2): 272–287. doi:10.1111/bjop.12072.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, Nadine , and Sabina Leonelli . 2016. “How Does One ‘Open’ Science? Questions of Value in Biological Research.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 42 (2): 280–305. doi:10.1177/0162243916672071.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loveday, Vik. 2018. “Luck, Chance, and Happenstance? Perceptions of Success and Failure Amongst Fixed-Term Academic Staff in UK Higher Education.” The British Journal of Sociology 69 (3): 758–775. doi:10.1111/1468-4446.12307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, Mike W. 2007. Creativity: Ethics and Excellence in Science . Lanham, MD : Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• McKinnon, Rachel. 2014. “You Make Your Own Luck.” Metaphilosophy 45 (4-5): 558–577. doi:10.1111/meta.12107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, Robert K. 1968. “The Matthew Effect in Science.” Science 159 (3810): 56–63. doi:10.1126/science.159.3810.56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mickelson, Kristin M. 2019. “Free Will, Self-Creation, and the Paradox of Moral Luck.” Midwest Studies In Philosophy 43 (1): 224–256. doi:10.1111/misp.12114.
   Google Scholar
• Nagel, Thomas. 1991. “Moral Luck.” In Mortal Questions , 24–38. London : Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, David , Jack Stilgoe , Phil Macnaghten , Mike Gorman , Erik Fisher , and David H Guston . 2013. “A Framework for Responsible Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation - Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society , edited by David Owen , John R. Bessant , and Maggy Heintz , 27–50. Chichesters, WS : John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Prainsack, Barbara , and Sabina Leonelli . 2017. “Responsibility.” In Science and the Politics of Openness: Here be Monsters , edited by Brigitte Nerlich , Sarah Hartley , Sujatha Raman , and Smith Alexander , 97–106. Manchester : Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rescher, Nicholas. 1995. Luck: The Brilliant Randomness of Everyday Life . 1st ed. New York : Farrar Straus & Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, Royston M. 1989. “Serendipity: Accidental Discoveries in Science.” New York : John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Roumbanis, Lambros. 2019. “Peer Review or Lottery? A Critical Analysis of Two Different Forms of Decision-Making Mechanisms for Allocation of Research Grants.” Science, Technology, & Human Values . doi:10.1177/0162243918822744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sand, Martin. 2020. “Did Alexander Fleming Deserve the Nobel Prize?” Science and Engineering Ethics 26: 899–919. doi:10.1007/s11948-019-00149-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shabo, Seth. 2020. “The Two-Stage Luck Objection.” Noûs 54 (1): 3–23. doi:10.1111/nous.12243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, Jack , Richard Owen , and Phil Macnaghten . 2013. “Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 42 (9): 1568–1580. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strevens, Michael. 2003. “The Role of the Priority Rule in Science.” The Journal of Philosophy 100 (2): 55–79. doi: 10.5840/jphil2003100224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong, Allison , Peter Sainsbury , and Jonathan Craig . 2007. “Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ): a 32-Item Checklist for Interviews and Focus Groups.” International Journal for Quality in Health Care 19 (6): 349–357. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzm042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trout, J. D. 2016. Wondrous Truths: The Improbable Rise of Modern Science . New York : Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trout, J. D. 2019. “Luck in Science.” In The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy and Psychology of Luck , edited by Ian M. Church and Robert J. Hartman , 391–400. New York : Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van Andel, Pek. 1994. “Anatomy of the Unsought Finding. Serendipity: Orgin, History, Domains, Traditions, Appearances, Patterns and Programmability.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (2): 631–648. doi:10.1093/bjps/45.2.631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, Bernard. ed. 1981. “Moral Luck.” In Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973-1980 , 20–39. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, Susan. 2001. “The Moral of Moral Luck.” Philosophical Exchange 31 (1): 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Yaqub, Ohid. 2018. “Serendipity: Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory.” Research Policy 47 (1): 169–179. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.10.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, Michael J. 2015. “Moral Luck Reexamined.” In Agency and Responsibility , edited by David W. Shoemaker , 136–159. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, Michael J. 2019. “Denying Moral Luck.” In The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy and Psychology of Luck , edited by Ian M. Church and Robert J. Hartman , 216–226. New Jersey : Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zuckerman, Harriet. 1970. “Stratification in American Science.” Sociological Inquiry 40 (2): 235–257. doi:10.1111/j.1475-682X.1970.tb01010.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuckerman, Harriet. 1996. Scientific Elites. Nobel Laureates in the United States . 2nd ed. New York : Routledge.
   Google Scholar