Advantages and disadvantages of societal engagement: a case study in a research and technology organization

References

• Ahrweiler, Petra , Nigel Gilbert , Benjamin Schrempf , Barbara Grimpe , and Marina Jirotka . 2019. “The Role of Civil Society Organisations in European Responsible Research and Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 6 (1): 25–49. doi:10.1080/23299460.2018.1534508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnaldi, S. , and F. Neresini . 2019. “The Role of Intermediary Organizations in the Mainstreaming of Responsible Research and Innovation in the Italian Industrial Sector.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 6 (3): 361–367. doi:10.1080/23299460.2019.1608616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Autio, Erkko , and Llewellyn D.W. Thomas . 2014. “Innovation Ecosystems: Implications for Innovation Management?” In The Oxford Handbook of Innovation Management , edited by Mark Dodgson , David M. Gann , and Nelson Phillips , 204–228. Oxford, UK : Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blok, Vincent. 2014. “Look Who’s Talking: Responsible Innovation, the Paradox of Dialogue and the Voice of the Other in Communication and Negation Processes.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (2): 171–190.
   Google Scholar
• Blok, Vincent. 2019. “From Participation to Interruption: Towards an Ethics of Stakeholder Engagement, Participation and Partnership in Corporate Social Responsibility and Responsible Innovation.” In Handbook Responsible Innovation , edited by René Von Schomberg , and Jonathan Hankins , 243–257. Cheltenham, UK : Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Brand, Teunis , and Vincent Blok . 2019. “Responsible Innovation in Business: A Critical Reflection on Deliberative Engagement as a Central Governance Mechanism.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 6 (1): 4–24. doi:10.1080/23299460.2019.1575681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brey, Philip. 2017. “Ethics of Emerging Technologies.” In The Ethics of Technology: Methods and Approaches , edited by Sven Ove Hansson , 175–192. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Carayannis, Elias , and David F. J. Campbell . 2009. “‘Mode 3’ and ‘Quadruple Helix’: Toward a 21st Century Fractal Innovation Ecosystem.” International Journal of Technology Management 46 (3–4): 201–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrier, Martin , and Minea Gartzlaff . 2019. “Responsible Research and Innovation: Hopes and Fears in the Scientific Community in Europe.” Journal of Responsible Innovation , 1–21. doi:10.1080/23299460.2019.1692571.
   Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, Henry , Wim Vanhaverbeke , and Joel West . 2006. Open Innovation: Researching a new Paradigm . Oxford : Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, John. 1965. Experience and Nature . La Salle, IL : Open Court Publishing. Reprint, Not in File.
   Google Scholar
• Doorn, Neelke , Daan Schuurbiers , Ibo Van de Poel , and Michael E. Gorman . 2013. “Early Engagement and New Technologies: Towards Comprehensive Technology Engagement?” In Early Engagement and New Technologies: Opening Up the Laboratory , edited by Neelke Doorn , Daan Schuurbiers , Ibo Van de Poel , and Michael E. Gorman , 233–251. Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Drath, Wilfred H. , Cynthia D. McCauley , Charles J. Palus , Ellen Van Velsor , Patricia M.G. O’Connor , and John B. McGuire . 2008. “Direction, Alignment, Commitment: Toward a More Integrative Ontology of Leadership.” The Leadership Quarterly 19 (6): 635–653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H. , and L. Leydesdorff . 1995. “The Triple Helix – University-Industry-Government Relations: A Laboratory for Knowledge Based Economic Development.” EASST Review 14: 14–19.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission . 2016. Open Innovation, Open Science, Open to the World: A Vision for Europe . Brussels : European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, Erik. 2019. “Editorial Introduction: Questioning Inclusion in Business, Policy, and Public Values.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 6 (1): 1–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, Erik , Michael O'Rourke , Robert Evans , Eric B. Kennedy , Michael E. Gorman , and Thomas P. Seager . 2015. “Mapping the Integrative Field: Taking Stock of Socio-Technical Collaborations.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 2 (1): 39–61. doi:10.1080/23299460.2014.1001671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floridi, Luciano , Josh Cowls , Monica Beltrametti , Raja Chatila , Patrice Chazerand , Virginia Dignum , Christoph Luetge , et al. 2018. “AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations.” Minds and Machines 28: 689–707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsberg, Ellen-Marie. 2019. “Responsible Research and Innovation in the Broader Innovation System: Reflections on Responsibility in Standardisation, Assessment and Patenting Practices.” In International Handbook on Responsible Innovation: A Global Resource , edited by Rene Von Schomberg , and Jonathan Hankins , 150–166. Cheltenham, UK : Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R. Edward. 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach . Boston, MA : Pitman.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R. Edward , and John McVea . 2006. “A Stakeholder Approach to Strategic Management.” In The Blackwell Handbook of Strategic Management , edited by Michael A. Hitt , R. Edward Freeman , and Jeefrey S. Harrison , 183–201. Oxford : Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, Batya , and Peter Kahn . 2003. “Human Values, Ethics, and Design.” In The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies and Emerging Applications , edited by Julie Jacko , and Andrew Sears , 1177–1201. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, Batya , Peter Kahn , and Alan Borning . 2006. “Value Sensitive Design and Information Systems.” In Human-computer Interaction and Management Information Systems , edited by Ping Zhang , and Dennis Galletta , 348–372. Armonk, NY : M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, Batya , Peter Kahn , and Alan Borning . 2013. “Value Sensitive Design and Information Systems.” In Early Engagement and New Technologies: Opening Up the Laboratory , edited by Neelke Doorn , Daan Schuurbiers , Ibo Van de Poel , and Michael E. Gorman , 55–95. Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Greenbaum, Joan. 1993. “PD: A Personal Statement.” Communications of the ACM 36 (4): 47.
   Google Scholar
• Grunwald, Armin. 2014. “Technology Assessment for Responsible Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation 1: Innovative Solutions for Global Issues , edited by Jeroen Van den Hoven , Neelke Doorn , Tsjalling Swierstra , Bert-Jaap Koops , and Henny Romijn , 15–32. Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Grunwald, Armin , and Matthias Achternbosch . 2013. “Technology Assesment and Approaches to Early Engagement.” In Early Engagement and New Technologies: Opening Up the Laboratory , edited by Neelke Doorn , Daan Schuurbiers , Ibo Van de Poel , and Michael E. Gorman , 15–34. Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Guertler, Matthias R. , Anton Kriz , and Nathalie Sick . 2020. “Encouraging and Enabling Action Research in Innovation Management.” R&D Management n/a (n/a). doi:10.1111/radm.12413.
   Google Scholar
• Hennen, Leonard , and Linda Nierling . 2019. “Responsible Innovation and Technology Assessment in Europe: Barriers and Opportunities for Establishing Structures and Principles of Democratic Science and Technology Policy.” In International Handbook on Responsible Innovation: A Global Resource , edited by Rene Von Schomberg , and Jonathan Hankins , 211–223. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Hibbert, Paul , Christine Coupland , and Robert MacIntosh . 2010. “Reflexivity: Recursion and Relationality in Organizational Research Processes.” Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management 5 (1): 47–62.
   Google Scholar
• High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence . 2019. Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI . Brussels : European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Hubert, Agnès. 2011. Empowering People, Driving Change: Social Innovation in the European Union . Bureau of European Policy Advisers.
   Google Scholar
• ISO . 2010. ISO 9241-210:2010 Ergonomics of Human-System Interaction–Part 210: Human-Centred Design for Interactive Systems . Geneva : ISO.
   Google Scholar
• Joss, Simon , and Sergio Bellucci , eds. 2002. Participatory Technology Assessment: European Perspectives . London, UK : Centre for the Study of Democracy.
   Google Scholar
• Long, Thomas B. , Vincent Blok , Steven Dorrestijn , and Phil Macnaghten . 2020. “The Design and Testing of a Tool for Developing Responsible Innovation in Start-up Enterprises.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (1): 45–75. doi:10.1080/23299460.2019.1608785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubberink, Rob , Vincent Blok , Johan Van Ophem , and Onno Omta . 2017. “Lessons for Responsible Innovation in the Business Context: A Systematic Literature Review of Responsible, Social and Sustainable Innovation Practices.” Sustainability 9 (5). doi:10.3390/su9050721.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubberink, Rob , Vincent Blok , Johan van Ophem , and Onno Omta . 2019. “Responsible Innovation by Social Entrepreneurs: An Exploratory Study of Values Integration in Innovations.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 6 (2): 179–210. doi:10.1080/23299460.2019.1572374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lüthje, Christian , and Cornelis Herstatt . 2004. “The Lead User Method: An Outline of Empirical Findings and Issues for Future Research.” R & D Management 34 (5): 553–568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, Mariana. 2018. MISSIONS: Mission-Oriented Research & Innovation in the European Union: A Problem-Solving Approach to Fuel Innovation-led Growth . Brussels : European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• McPhee, Chris , Magnus Hoppe , and Erik Lindhult . 2019. “Editorial: Action Research.” Technology Innovation Management Review 9 (4): 3–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulgan, Geoff , Simon Tucker , Rushanara Ali , and Ben Sanders . 2007. Social Innovation: What it is, Why it Matters and How it can be Accelerated . Oxford : Said Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, Robin , Julie Caulier-Grice , and Geoff Mulgan . 2010. The Open Book of Social Innovation . London : The Young Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Nordmann, Alfred. 2019. “The Ties That Bind: Collective Experimentation and Participatory Design as Paradigms for Responsible Innovation.” In International Handbook on Responsible Innovation: A Global Resource , edited by Rene Von Schomberg , and Jonathan Hankins , 181–193. Cheltenham, UK : Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Ollila, Susanne , and Anna Yström . 2020. “Action Research for Innovation Management: Three Benefits, Three Challenges, and Three Spaces.” R&D Management n/a (n/a), doi:10.1111/radm.12407.
   Google Scholar
• Orr, Kevin , and Mike Bennett . 2009. “Reflexivity in the co-Production of Academic-Practitioner Research.” Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management 4 (1): 85–102.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, Carl. 2009. “After Reflexivity: Ethics, Freedom and the Writing of Organization Studies.” Organization Studies 30 (6): 653–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro, Barbara , Lars Bengtsson , Paul Benneworth , Susanne Bührer , Elena Castro-Martínez , Meiken Hansen , Katharina Jarmai , et al. 2018. “Introducing the Dilemma of Societal Alignment for Inclusive and Responsible Research and Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 5 (3): 316–331. doi:10.1080/23299460.2018.1495033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rip, Arie , Thomas J. Misa , and Johan Schot . 1995. “Constructive Technology Assessment: A New Paradigm for Managing Technology in Society.” In Managing Technology in Society , edited by Arie Rip , Thomas J. Misa , and Johan Schot , 1–12. London and New York : Pinter Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Rip, Arie , and Douglas K.R. Robinson . 2013. “Constructive Technology Assessment and the Methodology of Insertion.” In Early Engagement and New Technologies: Opening up the Laboratory , edited by Neelke Doorn , Daan Schuurbiers , Ibo Van de Poel , and Michael E. Gorman , 37–53. Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, Elizabeth B.-N. , and Pieter Jan Stappers . 2008. “Co-Creation and the New Landscapes of Design.” CoDesign 4 (1): 5–18.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, Donald A. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action . New York : Basic Books. Reprint, Not in File.
   Google Scholar
• Schot, Johan , and Arie Rip . 1997. “The Past and Future of Constructive Technology Assessment.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 54 (2–3): 251–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuler, Douglas , and Aki Namioka , eds. 1993. Participatory Design: Principles and Practices . Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, Luciana Maines da , Claudia Cristina Bitencourt , Kadígia Faccin , and Tatiana Iakovleva . 2019. “The Role of Stakeholders in the Context of Responsible Innovation: A Meta-Synthesis.” Sustainability 11 (6): 1766–1790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinuzzi, Clay. 2005. “The Methodology of Participatory Design.” Technical Communication 52 (2): 163–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, Marc. 2011. “Tensions in Human-Centred Design.” CoDesign 7 (1): 45–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, Marc. 2013. “Co-Design as a Process of Joint Inquiry and Imagination.” Design Issues 29 (2): 16–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, Marc. 2015. “Upon Opening the Black Box and Finding it Full: Exporing the Ethics in Design Practices.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 40 (3): 389–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, Marc , Menno Manschot , and Nicole de Koning . 2011. “Benefits of Co-Design in Service Design Projects.” International Journal of Design 5 (2): 53–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, Jack , Richard Owen , and Phil Macnaghten . 2013. “Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 42: 1568–1580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stirling, Andy. 2008. ““Opening up” and “Closing Down”: Power, Participation, and Pluralism in the Social Appraisal of Technology.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 33 (2): 262–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sykes, K. , and P. Macnaghten . 2013. “Responsible Innovation: Opening Up Dialogue and Debate.” In Responsible Innovation (1st ed.), edited by Richard Owen , John Bessant , and Maggie Heintz , 85–107. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• van de Poel, Ibo , Lotte Asveld , Steven Flipse , Pim Klaassen , Zenlin Kwee , Maria Maia , Elvio Mantovani , Christopher Nathan , Andrea Porcari , and Emad Yaghmaei . 2020. “Learning to do Responsible Innovation in Industry: Six Lessons.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (3): 697–707. doi:10.1080/23299460.2020.1791506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Hippel, Eric. 2005. Democratizing Innovation . Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• von Schomberg, René . 2013. “A Vision of Responsible Research and Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society , edited by Richard Owen , John Bessant , and Maggie Heintz , 51–74. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, Karl. 2002. “Real-time Reflexivity: Prods to Reflection.” Organization Studies 23 (6): 893–898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, Robert. 1994. Case Study Research . 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks : Sage. Reprint, Not in File.
   Google Scholar