Collective improvisation as a means to responsibly govern serendipity in social innovation processes

References

• Almirall, Esteve , Melissa Lee , and Jonathan Wareham . 2012. “Mapping Living Labs in the Landscape of Innovation Methodologies.” Technology Innovation Management Review 2 (9): 12–18.
   Google Scholar
• Almirall, Esteve , and Jonathan Wareham . 2008. “Living Labs and Open Innovation: Roles and Applicability.” eJOV: The Electronic Journal for Virtual Organization & Networks 10: 21–46.
   Google Scholar
• Avelino, Flor , Julia M. Wittmayer , Bonno Pel , Paul Weaver , Adina Dumitru , Alex Haxeltine , and Tim O’Riordan . 2019. “Transformative Social Innovation and (dis) Empowerment.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 145: 195–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballon, Pieter , and Dimitri Schuurman . 2015. “Living Labs: Concepts, Tools and Cases.” Info 17 (4): 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, Phil , Lorna M. Campbell , and Martin Hawksey . 2013. “Writing in Book Sprints.” In Proceedings of OER13: Creating a Virtuous Circle. Nottingham, England. Accessed January 3, 2020. http://publications.cetis.org.uk/2013/764 .
   Google Scholar
• Bergvall-Kåreborn, Birgitta , Carina Ihlström Eriksson , Anna Ståhlbröst , and Jesper, Svensson. 2009. “A Milieu for Innovation – Defining Living Labs.” Presented at the 2nd ISPIM Innovation Symposium, New York, December 6–9.
   Google Scholar
• Boal, Augusto. 2006. The Aesthetics of the Oppressed . London : Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boronowsky, Michael , Otthein Herzog , Peter Knackfuß , and Michael Lawo . 2006. “Wearable Computing – An Approach for Living Labs.” In 3rd International Forum on Applied Wearable Computing 2006, 1–8. VDE.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, Kathy. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis . London : Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, Henry William. 2003. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting From Technology . Boston, MA : Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, Byounghyun , and Woojin Park . 2018. “Applying a Theory of Situation Awareness to Idea Generation: Mitigation of Design Fixation.” In Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018), edited by Sebastiano Bagnara, Riccardo Tartaglia, Sara Albolino, Thomas Alexander, and Yushi Fujita, 622–628. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Coenen, Tanguy , Lynn Coorevits , and Bram Lievens . 2015. “The Wearable Living Lab: How Wearables Could Support Living Labs.” In Open Living Lab Days, Istanbul, 25–28 August.
   Google Scholar
• Copeland, Samantha. 2017. “On Serendipity in Science: Discovery at the Intersection of Chance and Wisdom.” Synthese 196 (6): 2385–2406. doi:10.1007/s11229-017-1544-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunha, Miguel. P.E. 2005. “Serendipity: Why Some Organizations are Luckier Than Others”. Universidade Nova de Lisboa (Ed.), FEUNL Working Paper Series .
   Google Scholar
• Cunha, Miguel. P.E. , Joao Vieira da Cunha , and Ken Kamoche . 1999. “Organizational Improvisation: What, When, How and Why.” International Journal of Management Reviews 1 (3): 299–341.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, Patrick , and Lisa Daniel . 2010. “Understanding Social Innovation: A Provisional Framework.” International Journal of Technology Management 51 (1): 9–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Hoop, Evelien , Auke Pols , and Henny Romijn . 2016. “Limits to Responsible Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 3 (2): 110–134. doi:10.1080/23299460.2016.1231396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Rond, Mark. 2014. “The Structure of Serendipity.” Culture and Organization 20 (5): 342–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell’Era, Claudio , and Paolo Landoni . 2014. “Living Lab: A Methodology Between User-Centred Design and Participatory Design.” Creativity and Innovation Management 23 (2): 137–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dougherty, Dale. 2012. “The Maker Movement.” Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization 7 (3): 11–14.
   Google Scholar
• Drazin, Robert , Mary Ann Glynn , and Robert K. Kazanjian . 1999. “Multilevel Theorizing About Creativity in Organizations: A Sensemaking Perspective.” Academy of Management Review 24 (2): 286–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards-Schachter, Mónica E. , Cristian E. Matti , and Enrique Alcántara . 2012. “Fostering Quality of Life Through Social Innovation: A Living Lab Methodology Study Case.” Review of Policy Research 29 (6): 672–692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdelez, Sanda. 1999. “Information Encountering: It’s More Than Just Bumping Into Information.” Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 25 (3): 26–29.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, Mats , Veli-Pekka Niitamo , and Seija Kulkki . 2005. State-of-the-Art in Utilizing Living Labs Approach to User-Centric ICT Innovation-a European Approach . Lulea : Center for Distance-spanning Technology.
   Google Scholar
• European Network of Living Labs . 2020. “What are Living Labs.” Accessed July 26, 2020. https://enoll.org/about-us/ .
   Google Scholar
• Følstad, Asbjørn. 2008. “Living Labs for Innovation and Development of Information and Communication Technology: A Literature Review.” eJOV 10: 99–131.
   Google Scholar
• Fraaije, Aafke , and Steven M. Flipse . 2019. “Synthesizing an Implementation Framework for Responsible Research and Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (1): 1–25. doi:10.1080/23299460.2019.1676685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, Rosanna , and Roger Calantone . 2002. “A Critical Look at Technological Innovation Typology and Innovativeness Terminology: A Literature Review.” Journal of Product Innovation Management: An International Publication of the Product Development & Management Association 19 (2): 110–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grove, Wouter. 2018. “Living Labs and Designed Serendipity: Collaboratively Discovering the UDUBSit & Mfunzi Emerging Platforms.” Afrika Focus 31 (1): 91–113.
   Google Scholar
• Hadida, Allègre L. , William Tarvainen , and Jed Rose . 2015. “Organizational Improvisation: A Consolidating Review and Framework.” International Journal of Management Reviews 17 (4): 437–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan, Zaid. 2014. The Social Labs Revolution: A New Approach to Solving Our Most Complex Challenges . First Edition. San Francisco, CA : Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hossain, Mokter , Seppo Leminen , and Mika Westerlund . 2019. “A Systematic Review of Living lab Literature.” Journal of Cleaner Production 213: 976–988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchins, Edwin. 1995. Cognition in the Wild . Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, Tim. 2010. “The Textility of Making.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 34 (1): 91–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingold, Tim , and Elizabeth Hallam . 2007. Creativity and Cultural Improvisation . Oxford : Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Lawley, James , and Penny Tompkins . 2008. Maximising Serendipity: The Art of Recognising and Fostering Potential. Esitetty tilaisuudessa The Developing Group.
   Google Scholar
• LEDGER . 2020. The Venture Builder for Human Centric Solutions. Accessed January 2, 2020. https://ledgerproject.eu .
   Google Scholar
• Leminen, Seppo , and Mika Westerlund . 2017. “Categorization of Innovation Tools in Living Labs.” Technology Innovation Management Review 7 (1): 15–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makri, Stephann , and Ann Blandford . 2012. “Coming Across Information Serendipitously–Part 1: A Process Model.” Journal of Documentation 68 (5): 684–705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, Kim , and Anabel Quan-Haase . 2016. “The Role of Agency in Historians’ Experiences of Serendipity in Physical and Digital Information Environments.” Journal of Documentation 72 (6): 1008–1026. doi:10.1108/JD-11-2015-0144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, Lee , and Nick Wilson . 2017. “Defining Creativity with Discovery.” Creativity Research Journal 29 (4): 417–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCay-Peet, Lori , and Elaine G. Toms . 2010. “The Process of Serendipity in Knowledge Work.” Proceedings of the third symposium on Information interaction in context, 377–382.
   Google Scholar
• McCay-Peet, Lori , and Elaine G. Toms . 2015. “Investigating Serendipity: How it Unfolds and What may Influence it.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 66 (7): 1463–1476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montuori, Alfonso. 2003. “The Complexity of Improvisation and the Improvisation of Complexity: Social Science, art and Creativity.” Human Relations 56 (2): 237–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, Wanda J. 1996. “Improvising Organizational Transformation Over Time: A Situated Change Perspective.” Information Systems Research 7 (1): 63–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, Wanda J. 2000. “Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations.” Organization Science 11 (4): 404–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallot, Marc , Alex Alishevskikh , Thomas Holzmann , Piotr Krawczyk , and Rudolf Ruland . 2014. “CONEX: Creating serendipitous connections among Living Labs and horizon 2020 Challenges.” 2014 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE), 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Pallot, Marc , Brigitte Trousse , Bernard Senach , and Dominique Scapin . 2010. “Living Lab Research Landscape: From User Centred Design and User Experience towards User Cocreation.” First European Summer School “Living Labs”, Inria (ICT Usage Lab), Userlab, EsoceNet, Universcience, Aug 2010, Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, Andrew. 1995. The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science . Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sauer, Sabrina. 2013. “User Innovativeness in Living Laboratories: Everyday User Improvisations with ICTs as a Source of Innovation.” PhD diss., University of Twente.
   Google Scholar
• Sauer, Sabrina , and Maarten de Rijke . 2016. “Seeking Serendipity: A Living Lab Approach to Understanding Creative Retrieval in Broadcast Media Production.” Proceedings of the 39th International ACM SIGIR conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 989–992.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, R. Keith. 2000. “Improvisational Cultures: Collaborative Emergence and Creativity in Improvisation.” Mind, Culture, and Activity 7 (3): 180–185.
   Google Scholar
• Schuurman, Dimitri , Aron-Levi Herregodts , Annabel Georges , and Olivier Rits . 2019. “Innovation Management in Living Lab Projects: The Innovatrix Framework.” Technology Innovation Management Review 9 (3): 63–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seham, Amy E. 2001. Whose Improv is it Anyway? Beyond Second City : Univ. Press of Mississippi.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Thomas S.J. 2017. “Of Makerspaces and Hacklabs: Emergence, Experiment and Ontological Theatre at the Edinburgh Hacklab, Scotland.” Scottish Geographical Journal 133 (2): 130–154. doi:10.1080/14702541.2017.1321137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smyth, Michael , and Ingi Helgason . 2017. “Making and Unfinishedness: Designing Toolkits for Negotiation.” The Design Journal 20 (1): 3966–3974. doi:10.1080/14606925.2017.1352899.
   Google Scholar
• Sole, Deborah , and Amy Edmondson . 2002. “Situated Knowledge and Learning in Dispersed Teams.” British Journal of Management 13 (2): 17–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistical Office of the European Communities . 2005. Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data 4, Publications de l'OCDE.
   Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, Jack , Robert Owen , and Phil Macnaghten . 2013. “Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 42 (9): 1568–1580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmermans, Job , Vincent Blok , Robert Braun , Renate Wesselink , and Rasmus Øjvind Nielsen . 2020. “Social Labs as an Inclusive Methodology to Implement and Study Social Change: The Case of Responsible Research and Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation . doi:10.1080/23299460.2020.1787751.
   Google Scholar
• Trasformatorio . 2020. “Trasformatorio #0: White Paper and Report”. Accessed January 2, 2020. http://trasformatorio.net/?page_id=2702 .
   Google Scholar
• Unsworth, Kerrie. 2001. “Unpacking Creativity.” Academy of Management Review 26 (2): 289–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Walt, Jacobus S. , Albertus A.K. Buitendag , Jan J. Zaaiman , and Joey Jansen Van Vuuren . 2009. “Community Living Lab as a Collaborative Innovation Environment.” Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology 6 (1): 421–436.
   Google Scholar
• Van Kranenburg, Rob. 2019. “NGI Ledger Opens Up for Second Round of Funding.” Edgeryders.eu, November 19. https://edgeryders.eu/t/ngi-ledger-opens-for-second-round-of-funding/11346 .
   Google Scholar
• Van Oost, Ellen , Stefan Verhaegh , and Nelly Oudshoorn . 2009. “From Innovation Community to Community Innovation: User-Initiated Innovation in Wireless Leiden.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 34 (2): 182–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wartiovaara, Markus , Tom Lahti , and Joakim Wincent . 2019. “The Role of Inspiration in Entrepreneurship: Theory and the Future Research Agenda.” Journal of Business Research 101: 548–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weick, Karl E. 1998. “Introductory Essay – Improvisation as a Mindset for Organizational Analysis.” Organization Science 9 (5): 543–555. doi:10.1287/orsc.9.5.543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar