Imagining the future through revisiting the past: the value of history in thinking about R(R)I’s possible future(s)

References

• Agar, Jon. 2008. “What Happened in the Sixties?” The British Journal for the History of Science 41 (4): 567–600. doi:10.1017/S0007087408001179.
   Google Scholar
• Anonymous. 1972. “People and Their Technologies.” Mosaic Magazine 3(1): 14–19.
   Google Scholar
• Arksey, Hilary, and Lisa O’Malley. 2005. “Scoping Studies: Towards a Methodological Framework.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 8 (1): 19–32. doi:10.1080/1364557032000119616.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, Alice. 2017. “The Scientific Revolution that Wasn't.” Radical History Review 2017: 149–172. doi:10.1215/01636545-3690930.
   Google Scholar
• Blount, Percy, and David M. Molina. 2019. “Bringing the Moon to Mankind: The Civil Rights Narrative in the Space Age.” In NASA and the Long Civil Rights Movement, edited by Stephen P. Waring, and Brian C. Odom, 44–61. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, Harvey. 1965. “The Interaction of Science and Technology: Another View.” In The Impact of Science on Technology, edited by Aaron A. Warner, Dean Morse, and Alfred S. Eichner, 37–63. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brundage, Miles, and David H. Guston. 2019. “Understanding the Movement (s) for Responsible Innovation.” In International Handbook on Responsible Innovation, edited by René von Schomberg, and Jonathan Hankins, 102–121. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Carson, Rachel. 1962. Silent Spring. Boston: Houghton Miffin Harcout.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, Randall. 1998. The Sociology of Philosophies: A Global Theory of Intellectual Change. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cutcliffe, Stephen H. 2000. Ideas, Machines, and Values: An Introduction to Science, Technology, and Society Studies. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• de Saille, Stevienna, Fabien Medvecky, Michiel van Oudheusden, Kevin Albertson, Effie Amanatidou, Timothy Birabi, and Mario Pansera. 2020. Responsibility Beyond Growth: A Case for Responsible Stagnation. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dear, Peter, and Sheila Jasanoff. 2010. “Dismantling Boundaries in Science and Technology Studies.” Isis 101 (4): 759–774. doi:10.1086/657475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeCarlo, Charles. 1964. “Perspectives on Technology.” In Technology and Social Change: Edited for the Columbia University Seminar on Technology and Social Change, edited by Eli Ginzberg, 8–44. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dedijer, Stevan. 1965. “A Workshop on the Research Policy of the United States.” Science 148 (3678): 1707–1709. Accessed December 15, 2020. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1716705.
   Google Scholar
• Dickson, David. 1988. The New Politics of Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doorn, Neelke, Daan Schuurbiers, Ibo Van de Poel, and Michael E. Gorman. 2014. Early Engagement and new Technologies: Opening up the Laboratory. Vol. 16. Charm: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Durepos, Gabrielle, and Albert J. Mills. 2018. “ANTi-History: An Alternative Approach to History.” In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Business and Management Research Methods, edited by Ann L. Cunliffe, Catherine Cassell, and Gina Grandy, 431–448. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Egan, Michael. 2017. “Survival Science: Crisis Disciplines and the Shock of the Environment in the 1970s1.” Centaurus; International Magazine of the History of Science and Medicine 59 (1–2): 26–39. doi:10.1111/1600-0498.12149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellul, Jacques. 1964. The Technological Society. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, Erik. 2020. “Reinventing Responsible Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (1): 1–5. doi:10.1080/23299460.2020.1712537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsberg, Ellen-Marie. 2015. “ELSA and RRI–Editorial.” Life Sciences, Society and Policy 11 (1): 1–3. doi:10.1186/s40504-014-0021-8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fouché, Rayvon. 2006. “Say it Loud, I’m Black and I'm Proud: African Americans, American Artifactual Culture, and Black Vernacular Technological Creativity.” American Quarterly 58 (3): 639–661. Accessed September 14, 2020. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40068387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frickel, Scott, and Neil Gross. 2005. “A General Theory of Scientific/Intellectual Movements.” American Sociological Review 70 (2): 204–232. doi:10.1177/000312240mody507000202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginzberg, Eli, ed. 1964. Technology and Social Change: Edited for the Columbia University Seminar on Technology and Social Change. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giugni, Marco. 1995. “Outcomes of New Social Movements.” In New Social Movements in Western Europe, edited by Hanspeter Kriesi, Ruud Koopmans, Jan Willem Duyvendak, and Marco Giugni. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graf, Rüdiger. 2017. “Détente Science? Transformations of Knowledge and Expertise in the 1970s.” Centaurus; International Magazine of the History of Science and Medicine 59 (1–2): 10–25. doi:10.1111/1600-0498.12148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grunwald, Armin. 2011. “Responsible Innovation: Bringing Together Technology Assessment, Applied Ethics, and STS Research.” Enterprise and Work Innovation Studies 7: 9–31. Accessed September 14, 2020. http://www.itas.kit.edu/pub/v/2011/grun11c.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Harvard Press Release. 1965. “Emilio Q. Daddario Congressional Papers, Collection #1000-163, Box 40.” Special Collections & Archives, Wesleyan University, Middletown, CT, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Hechler, Ken. 1980. Toward the Endless Frontier: History of the Committee on Science and Technology, 1959-79. Washington, DC: US House of Representatives.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, David J. 2007. Alternative Pathways in Science and Industry. Boston: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heymann, Matthias. 2017. “1970s: Turn of an Era in the History of Science?” Centaurus; International Magazine of the History of Science and Medicine 59 (1–2): 1–9. doi:10.1111/1600-0498.12146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, Sheila. 2000. “Reconstructing the Past, Constructing the Present: Can Science Studies and the History of Science Live Happily Ever After?” Social Studies of Science 30 (4): 621–631. Accessed September 14, 2020. http://www.jstor.org/stable/285783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, Sheila. 2016. “The Floating Ampersand: STS Past and STS to Come.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 2: 227–237. doi:10.17351/ests2016.78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jécquier, Nicolas, and Gerard Blanc. 1983. The World of Appropriate Technology: A Quantitative Analysis. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, Brendan. 1969. “Developing Lands Call on ‘Brain Bank’.” New York Times. Papers of Harvey Brooks, 1930s-1980s, HUGFP128.7, Box 39, Harvard University Archives, Pusey Library, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, David. 2012. How the Hippies Saved Physics: Science, Counterculture, and the Quantum Revival. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, David, and W. Patrick McCray, eds. 2016. Groovy Science: Knowledge, Innovation, and American Counterculture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kasper, Raphael, ed. 1972. Technology Assessment: Understanding the Social Con-Sequences of Technological Applications. New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, William. 1965. “VITA’s Aid to Need Nations: Leisure Time of Skilled Technicians Brings Answers to Knotty Problems.” The National Observer. Papers of Harvey Brooks, 1930s-1980s, HUGFP128.7, Box 39, Harvard University Archives, Pusey Library, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• King, David, and Les Levidow. 2016. “Introduction: Contesting Science and Technology, from the 1970s to the Present.” Science as Culture 25: 367–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, Thomas. 1976. Technology’s Future: The Hague Congress on Technology Assessment. Washington, DC: International Society for Technology Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Kranakis, Eda. 1988. “Technology Assessment and the Study of History.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 13 (3–4): 290–307. doi:10.1177/016224398801303-409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, Franklin. 1972. “Harvard University Program on Technology and Society, 1964–1972: A Final Review.” American Scientist 60 (6): 777–778. Accessed September 14, 2020. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27843474.
   Google Scholar
• Macekura, Stephen J. 2015. Of Limits and Growth: The Rise of Global Sustainable Development in the Twentieth Century. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marcuse, Herbert. 1964. One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mody, Cyrus C. M. 2016. “Responsible Innovation: The 1970s, Today, and the Implications for Equitable Growth.” Centre for Equitable Growth. Accessed September 14, 2020. https://cris.maastrichtuniversity.nl/en/publications/responsible-innovation-the-1970s-today-and-the-implications-for-e.
   Google Scholar
• Mody, Cyrus C. M. 2017. “Square Scientists and the Excluded Middle.” Centaurus; International Magazine of the History of Science and Medicine 59 (1–2): 58–71. doi:10.1111/1600-0498.12147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, Kelly. 2013. Disrupting Science: Social Movements, American Scientists, and the Politics of the Military, 1945-1975. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, Kelly, Daniel Lee Kleinman, David Hess, and Scott Frickel. 2011. “Science and Neoliberal Globalization: a Political Sociological Approach.” Theory and Society 40 (5): 505–532. doi:10.1007/s11186-011-9147-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford, Lewis. 1967. The Myth of the Machine: Technics and Human Development. San Diego: Harcourt, Brace & World.
   Google Scholar
• Nader, Ralph. 1965. Unsafe at Any Speed. New York: Grossman Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, Alondra. 2011. Body and Soul: The Black Panther Party and the Fight Against Medical Discrimination. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nordmann, Alfred. 2014. “Responsible Innovation, the Art and Craft of Anticipation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (1): 87–98. doi:10.1080/23299460.2014.882064.
   Google Scholar
• Nordmann, Alfred, Hans Radder, and Gregor Schiemann, eds. 2011. Science Transformed? Debating Claims of an Epochal Break. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, Richard, John R. Bessant, and Maggy Heintz, eds. 2013. Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, Richard, and Mario Pansera. 2019a. “Responsible Innovation and Responsible Research and Innovation.” In Handbook on Science and Public Policy, edited by Dagmar Simon, Stefan Kuhlmann, Julia Stamm, and Weert Canzler, 26–48. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, Richard, and Mario Pansera. 2019b. “Responsible Innovation: Process and Politics.” In International Handbook on Responsible Innovation, edited by René von Schomberg, and Jonathan Hankins, 35–48. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Özdemir, Vural. 2019. “Towards an Ethics-of-Ethics for Responsible Innovation.” In International Handbook on Responsible Innovation, edited by René von Schomberg, and Jonathan Hankins, 70–82. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pursell, Carroll. 1993. “The Rise and Fall of the Appropriate Technology Movement in the United States, 1965-1985.” Technology and Culture 34 (3): 629–637. doi:10.2307/3106707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quet, Mathieu. 2014. “Science to the People! (and Experimental Politics): Searching for the Roots of Participatory Discourse in Science and Technology in the 1970s in France.” Public Understanding of Science 23 (6): 628–645. doi:10.1177/0963662512469011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rip, Arie. 1979. “The Social Context of ‘Science, Technology and Society’s Courses.” Studies in Higher Education 4 (1): 15–26. doi:10.1080/03075077912331377061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rip, Arie. 1999. “STS in Europe.” Science, Technology and Society 4 (1): 73–80. doi:10.1177/097172189900400105
   Google Scholar
• Rommetveit, Kjetil, Niels Van Dijk, Kristrún Gunnarsdóttir, Kate O’Riordan, Serge Gutwirth, Roger Strand, and Brian Wynne. 2019. “Working Responsibly Across Boundaries? Some Practical and Theoretical Lessons.” In International Handbook on Responsible Innovation, edited by René von Schomberg, and Jonathan Hankins, 83–100. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Roszak, Theodore. 1969. The Making of a Counter Culture: Reflections on the Technocratic Society and Its Youthful Opposition. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schumacher, Ernst F. 1973. Small is Beautiful: a Study of Economics as if People Mattered. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Sismondo, Sergio. 2011. An Introduction to Science and Technology Studies. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Adrian. 2005. “The Alternative Technology Movement: An Analysis of its Framing and Negotiation of Technology Development.” Human Ecology Review 12 (2): 106–119. Accessed September 14, 2020. https://www.humanecologyreview.org/pastissues/her122/smith.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Smolka, Mareike. 2020. “Generative Critique in Interdisciplinary Collaborations: From Critique in and of the Neurosciences to Socio-Technical Integration Research as a Practice of Critique in R(R)I.” NanoEthics 14: 1–19. doi:10.1007/s11569-019-00362-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, Bernd Carsten. 2013. “Responsible Research and Innovation: The Role of Privacy in an Emerging Framework.” Science and Public Policy 40 (6): 708–716. doi:10.1093/scipol/sct067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, Jack, Richard Owen, and Phil Macnaghten. 2013. “Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 42 (9): 1568–1580. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tannenbaum, Frank, ed. 1965. A Community of Scholars: The University Seminars at Columbia. Connecticut: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• The Atlanta Journal. 1970. “Assessing US Technology”. Emilio Q. Daddario Congressional Papers, Collection #1000-163, Box 40. Special Collections & Archives, Wesleyan University, Middletown, CT, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, Fred. 2010. From Counterculture to Cyberculture: Stewart Brand, the Whole Earth Network, and the Rise of Digital Utopianism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• US Congress, House of Representatives. 1966. “Inquiries, Legislation, Policy Studies Re: Science and Technology: Review and Forecast.” Second Progress Report of the Subcommittee on Science, Research, and Development to the Committee on Science and Astronautics, 89th Congress, 2nd Session. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• US Congress, House of Representatives. 1967. “Technology Assessment Seminar.” Proceedings before the Subcommittee on Science, Research, and Development of the Committee on Science and Astronautics, 90th Congress, 1st Session. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Heijden, Hein-Anton. 1999. “Environmental Movements, Ecological Modernisation and Political Opportunity Structures.” Environmental Politics 8 (1): 199–221. doi:10.1080/09644019908414444.
   Google Scholar
• Vinciguerra, Thomas, ed. 2020. A Community of Scholars: Seventy-Five Years of the University Seminars at Columbia. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vinsel, Lee, and Andrew L. Russell. 2020. The Innovation Delusion: How our Obsession with the New has Disrupted the Work that Matters Most. New York: Currency.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, Robert. 1965. “Letter to Harvey Brooks. 15 January 1965.” Papers of Harvey Brooks, 1930s-1980s, HUGFP128.7, Box 39. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Archives, Pusey Library.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, Barbara. 1984. Alias Papa: A Life of Fritz Schumacher. London: Jonathan Cape.
   Google Scholar
• Willoughby, Kelvin. 1990. Technology Choice: A Critique of the Appropriate Technology Movement. Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilsdon, James. 2014. “From Foresight to Hindsight: The Promise of History in Responsible Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (1): 109–112. doi:10.1080/23299460.2014.885176.
   Google Scholar
• Wisnioski, Matthew. 2012. Engineers for Change: Competing Visions of Technology in 1960s America. Boston: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, Barbara. 1984. Alias Papa: A Life of Fritz Schumacher. London: Jonathan Cape.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmer-Merkle, Silke, and Torsten Fleischer. 2017. “Eclectic, Random, Intuitive? Technology Assessment, RRI, and their use of History.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 4 (2): 217–233. doi:10.1080/23299460.2017.1338105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwart, Hub, Laurens Landeweerd, and Arjan Van Rooij. 2014. “Adapt or Perish? Assessing the Recent Shift in the European Research Funding Arena from ‘ELSA’ to ‘RRI’.” Life Sciences, Society and Policy 10 (1): 1–19. doi:10.1186/s40504-014-0011-x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar