Propping up interdisciplinarity: responsibility in university flagship research

References

• Aaser, Peter, Martinius Knudsen, Ola Huse Ramstad, Rosanne van de Wijdeven, Stefano Nichele, Ioanna Sandvig, Gunnar Tufte, et al. 2017. “Towards Making a Cyborg: A Closed-Loop Reservoir-Neuro System.” Artificial Life conference proceedings 14. 430–437. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aker-Bjerke, Danielle. 2016. “Dette kyborgtrollet vil være vennen din” Under dusken, February 9. https://dusken.no/artikkel/25702/dette-kyborgtrollet-vil-vre-vennen-din/.
   Google Scholar
• Besley, John C., Anthony Dudo, Shupei Yuan, and Frank Lawrence. 2018. “Understanding Scientists’ Willingness to Engage.” Science Communication 40 (5): 559–590. doi:10.1177/1075547018786561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besley, John C., Sang Hwa Oh, and Matthew Nisbet. 2013. “Predicting Scientists’ Participation in Public Life.” Public Understanding of Science 22 (8): 971–987. doi:10.1177/0963662512459315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besley, John C., Kathryn O’Hara, and Anthony Dudo. 2019. “Strategic Science Communication as Planned Behavior: Understanding Scientists’ Willingness to Choose Specific Tactics.” PloS one 14 (10): 1–18. doi:10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0224039.
   Google Scholar
• Besley, J. C., T. P. Newman, A. Dudo, and L. A. Tiffany. 2020. “Exploring Scholars' Public Engagement Goals in Canada and the United States.” Public Understanding of Science 29 (8): 855–867. doi:10.1177/0963662520950671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickerstaff, Karen, Irene Lorenzoni, Mavis Jones, and Nick Pidgeon. 2010. “Locating Scientific Citizenship: The Institutional Contexts and Cultures of Public Engagement.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 35 (4): 474–500. doi:10.1177/0162243909345835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bijker, Wiebe E. 2010. “How is Technology Made?—That is the Question!.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 34 (1): 63–76. doi:10.1093/cje/bep068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boenink, Marianne, and Olya Kudina. 2020. “Values in Responsible Research and Innovation: From Entities to Practices.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (3): 1–21. doi:10.1080/23299460.2020.1806451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buset, Pål. 2018. “Våre barn, maskinene.” Vårt land, November 14. https://reportasje.vl.no/artikkel/250-vare-barn-maskinene.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, W., and J. H. John. 2009. “Triangulation.” In Encyclopedia of Case Study Research, edited by Albert J. Mills, Gabrielle Durepos, and Elden Wiebe, 944–947. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Jenny L. 2020. How Artifacts Afford: The Power and Politics of Everyday Things. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis Jenny L., and James B. Chouinard. 2016. “Theorizing Affordances: From Request to Refuse.” Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 36 (4): 241–248. doi:10.1177/0270467617714944.
   Google Scholar
• Delgado, Anna, Kamilla Lein Kjølberg, and Fern Wickson. 2011. “Public Engagement Coming of age: From Theory to Practice in STS Encounters with Nanotechnology.” Public Understanding of Science 20 (6): 826–845. doi:10.1177/0963662510363054.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, Sandra K., Katy E. Pearce, Jessica Vitak, and Jeffrey W. Treem. 2017. “Explicating Affordances: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Affordances in Communication Research.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 22: 35–52. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faraj, Samer, and Bijan Azad. 2012. “The Materiality of Technology: An Affordance Perspective.” In Materiality and Organizing, edited by Paul Leonardi, Bonnie Nardi, and Jannis Kallinikos, 237–258. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foley, Rider, and Beverley Gibbs. 2019. “Connecting Engineering Processes and Responsible Innovation: A Response to Macro-Ethical Challenges.” Engineering Studies 11 (1): 9–33. doi:10.1080/19378629.2019.1576693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, James J. 1977. “The Theory of Affordances.” In Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing, edited by R. Shaw, and J. Bransford, 67–82. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gjefsen, Mads Dahl. 2013. “Limits to Prediction: Europeanizing Technology in an Expert Forum.” European Journal of Futures Research 1 (1): 1–9. doi:10.1007/s40309-013-0024-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gjefsen, Mads Dahl. 2017. “Crafting the Expert-Advocate: Training and Recruitment Efforts in the Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage Community.” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 30 (3): 259–282. doi:10.1080/13511610.2016.1214819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groves, Christopher. 2017. “Review of RRI Tools Project, Http://www.rri-Tools.eu.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 4 (3): 371–374. doi:10.1080/23299460.2017.1359482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamlyn, Becky, Martin Shanahan, Hannah Lewis, Ellen O’Donoghue, Tim Hanson, and Kevin Burchell. 2015. Factors Affecting Public Engagement by Researchers. London: TNS.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, Sarah, Warren Pearce, Carmen McLeod, Beverley Gibbs, S. Connelly, J. Couto, T. Moreira, et al. 2016. The TERRAIN Tool for Teaching Responsible Research and Innovation. Nottingham: University of Nottingham.
   Google Scholar
• Hornmoen, Harald, Knut Jørgen Vie, and Mads Dahl Gjefsen. forthcoming. “Embodied communication. Questioning researchers’ evaluation of communication experiences: A combined interview- and media-based study of communicating socially contestable research.” Observatorio 15 (3).
   Google Scholar
• Horst, Maja. 2013. “A Field of Expertise, the Organization, or Science Itself? Scientists’ Perception of Representing Research in Public Communication.” Science Communication 35 (6): 758–779. doi:10.1177%2F1075547013487513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchby, Ian. 2001. “Technologies, Texts and Affordances.” Sociology 35 (2): 441–456. doi:10.1017/S0038038501000219.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, Sheila, and Sang-Hyun Kim. 2013. “Sociotechnical Imaginaries and National Energy Policies.” Science as Culture 22 (2): 189–196. doi:10.1080/09505431.2013.786990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loroño-Leturiondo, Maria, and Sarah R. Davies. 2018. “Responsibility and Science Communication: Scientists’ Experiences of and Perspectives on Public Communication Activities.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 5 (2): 170–185. doi:10.1080/23299460.2018.1434739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markusson, Nils, Mads Dahl Gjefsen, Jennie C. Stephens, and David Tyfield. 2017. “The Political Economy of Technical Fixes: The (mis) Alignment of Clean Fossil and Political Regimes.” Energy Research & Social Science 23: 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2016.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mejlgaard, N., M. V. Christensen, R. Strand, et al. 2019. “Teaching Responsible Research and Innovation: A Phronetic Perspective.” Science and Engineering Ethics 25: 597–615. doi:10.1007/s11948-018-0029-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neresini, Federico, and Massimiano Bucchi. 2011. “Which Indicators for the new Public Engagement Activities? An Exploratory Study of European Research Institutions.” Public Understanding of Science 20 (1): 64–79. doi:10.1177/0963662510388363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, Richard, Phil Macnaghten, and Jack Stilgoe. 2012. “Responsible Research and Innovation: From Science in Society to Science for Society, with Society.” Science and Public Policy 39 (6): 751–760. doi:10.1093/scipol/scs093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinch, Trevor. J., and Wiebe E. Bijker. 1984. “The Social Construction of Facts and Artifacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology Might Benefit Each Other.” Social Studies of Science 14 (3): 399–441. doi:10.1177/030631284014003004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rappert, Brian. 2003. “Technologies, Texts and Possibilities: A Reply to Hutchby.” Sociology 37 (3): 565–580. doi:10.1177/00380385030373010.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, Gene, and Lynn J. Frewer. 2005. “A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 30: 251–290. doi:10.1177/0162243904271724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, J., R. Owen, and P. Macnaghten. 2013. “Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 42 (9): 1568–1580. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vie, Knut Jørgen, and Mads Dahl Gjefsen. 2020. “Research communication in a multidisciplinary attempt at making a cyborg – can scientists be empowered to engage in dialogue with the public?.” Manuscript in development, OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University.
   Google Scholar
• Vie, Knut Jørgen, Erik Thorstensen, Mads Dahl Gjefsen, and Stefano Nichele. 2020. “Cyborg ethics.” Manuscript in development, OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University.
   Google Scholar
• von Schomberg, René. 2011. “Introduction.” In Towards Responsible Research and Innovation in the Information and Communication Technologies and Security Technologies Fields, edited by R. von Schomberg, 7–15. Brussels: Directorate General for Research and Innovation, European Union.
   Google Scholar
• von Schomberg, René. 2013. “A Vision of Responsible Research and Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, edited by Richard Owen, John Bessant, and Maggy Heintz, 51–74. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Winner, Langdon. 1988. The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wittrock, C., and E.-M. Forsberg. 2019. Handbook for Organisations Aimed at Strengthening Responsible Research and Innovation, RRI-Practice project report. Deliverable 17.6.
   Google Scholar
• Wittrock, Christian, Ellen-Marie Forsberg, Auke Pols, Philip Macnaghten, and David Ludwig. 2020. Implementing Responsible Research and Innovation. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wolden, Grete. 2017. “Denne roboten blir styrt av levende hjerneceller” Forskning.no, March 7. https://forskning.no/ntnu-partner/denne-roboten-blir-styrt-av-levende-hjerneceller/360915.
   Google Scholar
• Wynne, Brian. 1988. “Unruly Technology: Practical Rules, Impractical Discourses and Public Understanding.” Social Studies of Science 18 (1): 147–167. doi:10.1177/030631288018001006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynne, Brian. 1992. “Misunderstood Misunderstanding: Social Identities and Public Uptake of Science.” Public Understanding of Science 1 (3): 281–304. doi:10.1088/0963-6625/1/3/004.
   Google Scholar