Responsible research and innovation meets multispecies studies: why RRI needs to be a more-than-human exercise

References

• Abrahamsson, Sebastian, and Filippo Bertoni. 2014. “Compost Politics: Experimenting with Togetherness in Vermicomposting.” Environmental Humanities 4 (1): 125–148. doi:10.1215/22011919-3614962.
   Google Scholar
• Calvert, Jane, and Erika Szymanski. 2020. “A Feeling for the (Micro)Organism? Yeastiness, Organism Agnosticism and Whole Genome Synthesis.” New Genetics and Society, 1–19. doi:10.1080/14636778.2020.1736537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candea, Matea. 2013. “Habituating Meerkats and Redescribing Animal Behaviour Science.” Theory, Culture & Society 30 (7/8): 105–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, Sarah R., and Maja Horst. 2015. “Crafting the Group: Care in Research Management.” Social Studies of Science 45 (3): 371–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Despret, Vincianne. 2004. “The Body We Care for: Figures of Anthropo-Zoo-Genesis.” Body & Society 10: 111–134.
   Google Scholar
• Despret, Vincianne. 2013. “Responding Bodies and Partial Affinities in Human–Animal Worlds.” Theory, Culture & Society 30 (7–8): 51–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Despret, Vincianne. 2015. “Models and Methods.” Angelaki 20 (2): 37–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Despret, V., and M. Meuret. 2016. “Cosmoecological Sheep and the Arts of Living on a Damaged Planet.” Environmental Humanities 8 (1): 24–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donati, Kelly. 2019. “‘Herding is His Favourite Thing in the World’: Convivial World-Making on a Multispecies Farm.” Journal of Rural Studies 66 (February): 119–129. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.12.008.
   Google Scholar
• Giraud, Eva, and Gregory Hollin. 2016. “Care, Laboratory Beagles and Affective Utopia.” Theory, Culture & Society 33 (4): 27–49. doi:10.1177/0263276415619685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhough, Beth. 2012. “Where Species Meet and Mingle: Endemic Human-Virus Relations, Embodied Communication and More-Than-Human Agency at the Common Cold Unit 1946–90.” Cultural Geographies 19 (3): 281–301. doi:10.1177/1474474011422029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna J. 2003. The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness. Vol. 1. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna. 2007. When Species Meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna. 2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, Anne, Rosemary L. Hill, and Christopher Till. 2018. “The Limits of Responsible Innovation: Exploring Care, Vulnerability and Precision Medicine.” Technology in Society, Technology and the Good Society 52: 24–31. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2017.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk, Robert G. W. 2018. “Recovering The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique: The 3Rs and the Human Essence of Animal Research.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 43 (4): 622–648. doi:10.1177/0162243917726579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latimer, Joanna, and Mara Miele. 2013. “Naturecultures? Science, Affect and the non-Human.” Theory, Culture & Society 30 (7–8): 5–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindner, Ralf, Stefan Kuhlmann, Sally Randles, Bjørn Bedsted, Guido Gorgoni, Erich Griessler, Allison Loconto, and Neils Mejlgaard, eds. 2016. Navigating Towards Shared Responsibility in Research and Innovation. Approach, Process and Results of the Res-AGorA Project. Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research ISI: Karlsruhe.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, Carmen, and Sarah Hartley. 2018. “Responsibility and Laboratory Animal Research Governance.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 43 (4): 723–741.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellizzoni, Luigi. 2004. “Responsibility and Environmental Governance.” Environmental Politics 13: 541–565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puig de la Bellacasa, Maria. 2011. “Matters of Care in Technoscience: Assembling Neglected Things.” Social Studies of Science 41 (1): 85–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puig de la Bellacasa, Maria. 2015. “Making Time for Soil: Technoscientific Futurity and the Pace of Care.” Social Studies of Science 45 (5): 691–716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, Bernd C. 2013. “Responsible Research and Innovation: The Role of Privacy in an Emerging Framework.” Science and Public Policy 40 (6): 708–716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stengers, Isabelle. 1997. Power and Invention: Situating Science. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stengers, Isabelle. 2010. Cosmopolitics, Vol. 1. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stengers, Isabelle. 2011. Cosmopolitics II. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, Jack, Richard Owen, and Phil Macnaghten. 2013. “Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 42 (9): 1568–1580. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szymanski, Erika, and Jane Calvert. 2018. “Designing with Living Systems in the Synthetic Year Project.” Nature Communications, doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05332-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dooren, Thom. 2016. “Authentic Crows: Identity, Captivity, and Emergent Forms of Life.” Theory, Culture & Society 33 (2): 29–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viseu, A. 2015. “Caring for Nanotechnology? Being an Integrated Social Scientist.” Social Studies of Science 45 (5): 642–664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickson, Fern. 2016. “Do We Care about Synbiodiversity? Questions Arising from an Investigation into Whether There are GM Crops in the Svalbard Global Seed Vault.” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 29 (5): 787–811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar