A comparative, sociotechnical design perspective on Responsible Innovation: multidisciplinary research and education on digitized energy and Automated Vehicles

References

• Alexander, B. 2007. “Smart Meters, Real Time Pricing, and Demand Response Programs: Implications for Low Income Electric Customers.” Oak Ridge National Laboratory. http://www.virtualcap.org/downloads/CIF/Smart_Meter_Paper.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Allgemeiner Deutscher Automobil-Club e.V. 2020. “Diese Daten sammelt ein modernes Auto.” https://www.adac.de/rund-ums-fahrzeug/ausstattung-technik-zubehoer/assistenzsysteme/daten-modernes-auto/.
   Google Scholar
• Bagloee, S., M. Tavana, M. Asadi, and T. Oliver. 2016. “Autonomous Vehicles: Challenges, Opportunities, and Future Implications for Transportation Policies.” Journal of Modern Transportation 24 (4): 284–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balmer, A., J. Calvert, C. Marris, S. Molyneux-Hodgson, E. Frow, M. Kearnes, K. Bulpin, et al. 2016. “Five Rules of Thumb for Post-ELSI Interdisciplinary Collaborations.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 3 (1): 73–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, K. 2020. “The Cameras in Your Car May be Harvesting Data as You Drive.” Consumer Reports, April 15. https://www.consumerreports.org/automotive-technology/the-cameras-in-your-car-may-be-harvesting-data-as-you-drive-a3473812015.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, K., M. Beedle, A. Van Bennekum, A. Cockburn, W. Cunningham, M. Fowler, J. Grenning, et al. 2001. “Manifesto for Agile Software Development.” https://moodle2019-20.ua.es/moodle/pluginfile.php/2213/mod_resource/content/2/agile-manifesto.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, I., and D. Sarewitz. 2006. “Too Little, Too Late? Research Policies on the Societal Implications of Nanotechnology in the United States.” Science as Culture 15 (4): 309–325.
   Google Scholar
• Blok, V., P. Lemmens, et al. 2015. “The Emerging Concept of Responsible Innovation. Three Reasons Why it is Questionable and Calls for a Radical Transformation of the Concept of Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation 2: Concepts, Approaches, and Applications, edited by B.-J. Koops, 19–35. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Boenink, M., and O. Kudina. 2020. “"Values in Responsible Research and Innovation: From Entities to Practices.”.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (3): 450–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronet, F., R. Eglash, G. Gabriele, D. Hess, and L. Kagan. 2003. “Product Design and Innovation: Evolution of an Interdisciplinary Design Curriculum.” International Journal of Engineering Education 19 (1): 183–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buehler, R. 2018. “Can Public Transportation Compete with Automated and Connected Cars?” Journal of Public Transportation 21 (1): 7–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bundesbeauftragter für den Datenschutz und die Informationsfreiheit. 2020. “Der Bundesbeauftragte für den Datenschutz und die Informationsfreiheit.” https://www.bfdi.bund.de/DE/Home/home_node.html.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. 1987. “Society in the Making: The Study of Technology as a Tool for Sociological Analysis.” In The Social Construction of Technological Systems, edited by W. Bijker, T. Hughes, and T. Pinch, 83–103. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Canis, B., and R. Lattanzio. 2014. “US and EU Motor Vehicle Standards: Issues for Transatlantic Trade Negotiations.” CRS Report, 43399. https://www.hsdl.org/?view&did=751039.
   Google Scholar
• Charness, N. 2008. “Aging and Human Performance.” Human Factors 50 (3): 548–555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S., and C. Liu. 2017. “From Demand Response to Transactive Energy: State of the Art.” Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy 5 (1): 10–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenen, C., and A. Grunwald. 2017. “Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) in Quantum Technology.” Ethics and Information Technology 19 (4): 277–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, H., R. Evans, and M. Gorman. 2007. “Trading Zones and Interactional Expertise.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 38 (4): 657–666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahn, S. 2014. “Fair Information Practice Principles (FIPPs).” Department of Homeland Security, Privacy Office. https://www.dhs.gov/publication/fair-information-practice-principles-fipps/.
   Google Scholar
• De Saille, S. 2015. “Innovating Innovation Policy: The Emergence of Responsible Research and Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 2 (2): 152–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastwood, C., L. Klerkx, M. Ayre, and B. Dela Rue. 2019. “Managing Socio-Ethical Challenges in the Development of Smart Farming: From a Fragmented to a Comprehensive Approach for Responsible Research and Innovation.” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 32 (5-6): 741–768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ely, A., P. Van Zwanenberg, and A. Stirling. 2014. “Broadening Out and Opening up Technology Assessment: Approaches to Enhance International Development, Co-Ordination and Democratisation.” Research Policy 43 (3): 505–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2014. “Responsible Research and Innovation: Europe’s Ability to Respond to Societal Challenges.” European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/research/swafs/pdf/pub_rri/KI0214595ENC.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2016. “Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the Protection of Natural Persons with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data and on the Free Movement of Such Data, and Repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation).” Official Journal of the European Union. April 27, 2016. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32016R0679&from=EN/.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2020. “Institutional Changes toward Responsible Research and Innovation. Directorate General for Innovation, Science with and for Society Program.” https://op.europa.eu/en/web/eu-law-and-publications/publication-detail/-/publication/582ef256-cbcc-11ea-adf7-01aa75ed71a1.
   Google Scholar
• Fagnant, D., and K. Kockelman. 2015. “Preparing a Nation for Autonomous Vehicles: Opportunities, Barriers and Policy Recommendations.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 77: 167–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felt, U., J. Igelsböck, A. Schikowitz, and T. Völker. 2016. “Transdisciplinary Sustainability Research in Practice: Between Imaginaries of Collective Experimentation and Entrenched Academic Value Orders.” Science, Technology, and Human Values 41 (4): 732–761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, E., and G. Maricle. 2015. “Higher-level Responsiveness? Socio-Technical Integration Within US and UK Nanotechnology Research Priority Setting.” Science and Public Policy 42 (1): 72–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, E., and D. Schuurbiers. 2013. “Socio-technical Integration Research: Collaborative Inquiry Atthe Midstream of Research and Development.” In Early Engagement and New Technologies: Opening up the Laboratory, edited by N. Dorn, D. Schuubiers, I. van den Poel, and M. Gorman, 97–110. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, E., M. O'Rourke, R. Evans, E. Kennedy, M. Gorman, T.P. Seager. 2015. “Mapping the integrative field: Taking stock of socio-technical collaborations.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 2 (1): 39–61.
   Google Scholar
• Flipse, S., and C. van de Loo. 2018. “Responsible Innovation During Front-end Development: Increasing Intervention Capacities for Enhancing Project Management Reflections on Complexity.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 5 (2): 225–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. 2005. “The Dynamics of Transitions in Socio-Technical Systems: A Multi-Level Analysis of the Transition Pathway from Horse-Drawn Carriages to Automobiles (1860–1930).” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 17 (4): 445–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. 2007. “Transformations of Large Technical Systems: A Multilevel Analysis of the Dutch Highway System (1950-2000).” Science, Technology, and Human Values 32 (2): 123–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F., F. Kern, G. Fuchs, C. Hinderer, G. Kungl, J. Mylan, M. Neukirch, and S. Wassermann. 2016. “The Enactment of Socio-Technical Transition Pathways: a Reformulated Typology and a Comparative Multi-Level Analysis of the German and UK Low-Carbon Electricity Transitions (1990–2014).” Research Policy 45 (4): 896–913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, A., E. Forsberg, C. Shelley-Egan, R. Arias, S. Daimer, G. Dalton, A. Cristóbal, M. Dreyer, et al. 2020. “Joint Declaration on Mainstreaming RRI Across Horizon Europe.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (3): 708–711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guston, D. 2014. “Understanding ‘Anticipatory Governance.’.” Social Studies of Science 44 (2): 218–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guston, D., and D. Sarewitz. 2002. “Real-time Technology Assessment.” Technology in Society 24: 93–109.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. 2015. Objectivity and Diversity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, D. 1995. Science and Technology in a Multicultural World. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, D. 2020. “Incumbent-led Transitions and Civil Society: Future Autonomous Vehicle Policy and Consumer Organizations in the United States.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 151: 119825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, D., and B. Sovacool. 2020. “Sociotechnical Matters: Science and Technology Studies Perspectives in Energy Studies.” Energy Research and Social Science 65: 101462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, P. T. 1987. “The Evolution of Large Technological Systems.” In The Social Construction of Technological Systems, edited by W. Bijker, P. T. Hughes, and T. Pinch, 51–82. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, T. P. 1993. Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880-1930. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 2011. Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koops, B., I. Oosterlaken, H. Romijn, T. Swierstra, and J. Van den Hoven, eds. 2015. Responsible Innovation 2: Concepts, Approaches, and Applications. Charm: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, D., and D. Hess. 2020. “Regulations for On-Road Testing of Connected and Automated Vehicles: Assessing the Potential for Global Safety Harmonization.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 136: 85–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, D., and D. Hess. 2021a. “Privacy and Smart Meters in Residential Buildings: a Comparative Analysis and Assessment of Harmonization Potential.” Utilities Policy 70: 101188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, D., and D. Hess. 2021b. “Public Opinion on Connected and Automated Vehicles: Safety, Privacy, and Security.” Vanderbilt University, under review.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, D., D. Hess, and H. Neema. 2020. “The Challenges of Implementing Transactive Energy: A Comparative Analysis of Experimental Projects.” The Electricity Journal 33 (10): 106865.
   Google Scholar
• Lemmer, K., W. Damm, J. Stzipanovits, S. Sastry, C. Tomlin, F. Köster, and M. Jipp. 2018. “Societal and Technological Challenges for Highly Automated Road Transportation Systems in Germany and the U.S.” https://www.safetrans-de.org/de/SafeTRANS-Mags/Roadmaps/Washington_WS_2018_Report_internal_final_SES_20191127_digital.pdf?m=1575981783.
   Google Scholar
• Lessig, L. 2006. Code: And Other Laws of Cyberspace. Version 2.0. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Long, T. B., V. Blok, S. Dorrestijn, and P. Macnaghten. 2020. “The Design and Testing of a Tool for Developing Responsible Innovation in Start-up Enterprises.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (1): 45–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macnaghten, P. 2016. “Responsible Innovation and the Reshaping of Existing Technological Trajectories: the Hard Case of Genetically Modified Crops.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 3 (3): 282–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKane, R., and D. Hess. 2021. “Ridesourcing and Urban Inequality in Chicago: Connecting Mobility Disparities to Unequal Development and Gentrification.” Vanderbilt University, under review.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C., and C. Wyborn. 2020. “Co-production in Global Sustainability: Histories and Theories.” Environmental Science & Policy 113: 88–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation. 2015. “Dear Colleague Letter: Supporting Research Advances in Smart and Connected Communities.” NSF, 15–120. https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2015/nsf15120/nsf15120.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Neema, H., S. Phillips, D. Lee, D. Hess, Z. Threet, T. Roth, and C. Nguyen. 2021. “Transactive Energy and Solarization: Assessing the Potential for Demand Curve Management and Cost Savings.” In HotSoS ‘21: Hot Topics in the Science of Security, April 13–15, 2021, (Virtual). ACM (Association for Computing Machinery), New York, NY, USA, 8 pages. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/1122445.1122456.
   Google Scholar
• Nieusma, D. 2018. “Engineering/Design Frictions: Exploring Competing Knowledge Systems via Efforts to Integrate Design Principles Into Engineering Education.” Paper presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2—30420
   Google Scholar
• Owen, R., and M. Pansera. 2019. “Responsible Innovation and Responsible Research and Innovation.” In Handbook on Science and Public Policy, edited by D. Simon, S. Kuhlmann, J. Stamm, and W. Canzler, 26–48. Cheltenham, U.K: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, R., M. Pansera, P. Macnaghten, and S. Randles. 2021. “Organisational Institutionalisation of Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 50 (1): 104132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinch, T., and W. Bijker. 1987. “The Social Construction of Facts and Artifacts: Or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology Might Benefit Each Other.” In The Social Construction of Technological Systems, edited by W. Bijker, T. Hughes, and T. Pinch, 17–50. Cambridge, Ma: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Powells, G., and M. Fell. 2019. “Flexibility Capital and Flexibility Justice in Smart Energy Systems.” Energy Research and Social Science 54: 56–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radatz, A., M. Reinsborough, E. Fisher, El Corley, and D. Guston. 2019. “An Assessment of Engaged Social Science Research in Nanoscale Science and Engineering Communities.” Science and Public Policy 46 (6): 853–865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. 2014. The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley, Ca: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rip, A. 2018. Futures of Science and Technology in Society. Wiesbaden: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• SAE International. 2018. “Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles.” SAE International. June 15. https://saemobilus.sae.org/content/J3016_201806/.
   Google Scholar
• SafeTrans. 2019. “Position paper. Safety, Security, and Certifiability of Future Man-Machine Systems.” https://www.safetrans-de.org/de/Uploads/AK_2018_RLE_CPS/SafeTRANS_RLECPS_Positionspapier_v1_20191126.pdf?m=1575979981.
   Google Scholar
• Scacchi, Walt. 2004. “Socio-technical Design.” The Encyclopedia of Human-computer Interaction. Interaction Design Foundation. 1: 656–659.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, A. 2006. “Patterns of Change in the Use of Imprisonment in the American States: An Integration of Path Dependence, Punctuated Equilibrium and Policy Design Approaches.” Political Research Quarterly 59 (3): 457–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smolka, M., E. Fisher, A. Hausstein. 2020. “From Affect to Action: Choices in Attending to Disconcertment in Interdisciplinary Collaborations.” Science, Technology, & Human Values, 0162243920974088
   Google Scholar
• Sovacool, B., D. Hess, S. Amir, et al. 2020. “Sociotechnical Agendas: Reviewing Future Directions for Energy and Climate Research.” Energy Research and Social Science 70: 101617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sovacool, B., K. Lovell, and M. Ting. 2018. “Reconfiguration, Contestation, and Decline: Conceptualizing Mature Large Technical Systems.” Science, Technology, and Human Values 43 (6): 1066–1097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, M, and J. Nauta. 2020. “Advantages and disadvantages of societal engagement: a case study in a research and technology organization.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (3): 598–619.
   Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, J., R. Owen, and P. Macnaghten. 2013. “Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 42 (9): 1568–1580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taebi, B., A. Correlje, E. Cuppen, M. Dignum, and U. Pesch. 2014. “Responsible Innovation as an Endorsement of Public Values: The Need for Interdisciplinary Research.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (1): 118–124.
   Google Scholar
• Traweek, S. 1992. “Border Crossing: Narrative Strategies in Science Studies and among Physicists in Tsukuba Science City, Japan.” In Science as Practice and Culture, edited by A. Pickering, 429–465. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Poel, I. 2009. “Values in Engineering Design.” In Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 9: Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences, edited by A. Meijers, 973–1006. North-Holland: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• van de Poel, I., L. Asveld, S. Flipse, P. Klaassen, Z. Kwee, M. Maia, E. Mantovani, C. Nathan, A. Porcari, and E. Yaghmaei. 2020. “Learning to do responsible innovation in industry: six lessons.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (3): 697–707.
   Google Scholar
• Von Schomberg, R., and J. Hankins. 2019. International Handbook on Responsible Innovation: A Global Resource. Northampton, Ma., USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, D. 2020. “Fitting the Description: Historical and Sociotechnical Elements of Facial Recognition and Anti-Black Surveillance.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (sup. 1): 74–83.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, B., J. Hoffman, and J. Morgenstern. 2019. “Predictive Inequity in Object Detection.” Georgia Tech. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1902.11097.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Winner, L. 2010. The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar