Framings of innovation, responsibility, and responsible innovation in China: insights from a case study undertaken with Chinese businesses

References

• Arnaldi, S., G. Quaglio, M. Ladikas, H. O’Kane, T. Karapiperis, K. R. Srinivas, and Y. Zhao. 2015. “Responsible Governance in Science and Technology Policy: Reflections from Europe, China and India.” Technology in Society 42: 81–92. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2015.03.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao, Y., Z. Su, and C. H. Noble. 2021. “Determinants of new Product Development Speed in China: A Strategy Tripod Perspective.” Technovation 106 (November 2019): 102291. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102291.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, P., and S. Jack. 2008. “Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers.” The Qualitative Report 13 (4): 544–559. doi:10.46743/2160-3715/2008.1573.
   Google Scholar
• Băzăvan, A. 2019. “Chinese Government’s Shifting Role in the National Innovation System.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 148 (August). doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119738.
   Google Scholar
• Blok, V., and P. Lemmens. 2015. “The Emerging Concept of Responsible Innovation. Three Reasons Why It Is Questionable and Calls for a Radical Transformation of the Concept of Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation 2: Concepts, Approaches, and Applications, edited by B.-J. Koops, I. Oosterlaken, H. Romijn, T. Swierstra, and J. van den Hoven, 19–35. Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-17308-5_2
   Google Scholar
• Brand, T., and V. Blok. 2019. “Responsible Innovation in Business: A Critical Reflection on Deliberative Engagement as a Central Governance Mechanism.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 6 (1): 4–24. doi:10.1080/23299460.2019.1575681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, K., A. Moore, S. L. Herrmann, and S. Könninger. 2010. “Science Governance and the Politics of Proper Talk: Governmental Bioethics as a new Technology of Reflexive Government.” Economy and Society 39 (4): 510–533. doi:10.1080/03085147.2010.510682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caverly, R. W. 2013. Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society. Journal of Research Administration 44 (2): 127–129. https://uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/responsible-innovation-managing-emergence-science/docview/1503137511/se-2.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, F., Y. Shi, and F. Xu. 2009. “An Analysis of the Public Scientific Literacy Study in China.” Public Understanding of Science 18 (5): 607–616. doi:10.1177/0963662508093089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, L., and D. Wang. 2019. “Research Progress in Responsible Innovation of Brain-Computer Interface.” Journal of Engineering Studies 11 (4): 390–399. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1224.2019.00390
   Google Scholar
• China Daily. 2019. Changsha County shows the Way for Rural Development. Chinadaily.Com.Cn. https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/201905/23/WS5ce64ca0a3104842260bd681.html.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, D., and B. Crabtree. 2006. Qualitative Research Guidelines Project. RWJF. http://www.qualres.org/HomeCase-3591.html.
   Google Scholar
• Coles, D., M. Davis, M. Engelhard, B. Han, A. Kumar, K. Laas, M. Ladikas, et al. 2014. Innovation for Society - How Innovation is Driven Towards Societal Desirability through Innovation Policies, Report for FP7 Project ‘Progress’ (pp. 1–101). progressproject.eu.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., and C. N. Poth. 2018. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Dafoe, A. 2015. “On Technological Determinism: A Typology, Scope Conditions, and a Mechanism.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 40 (6): 1047–1076. doi:10.1177/0162243915579283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, X., and G. Chapman. 2021. “R&D tax Incentives and Innovation: Examining the Role of Programme Design in China.” Technovation (February): 102419. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102419.
   Google Scholar
• Daimer, S., C. Fan, and B. Teufel. 2017. Case Study Part 1: RRI Goals and Practices - Deliverable D9.1.
   Google Scholar
• Doezema, T., D. Ludwig, P. Macnaghten, C. Shelley-Egan, and E.-M. Forsberg. 2019. “Translation, Transduction, and Transformation: Expanding Practices of Responsibility Across Borders.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 6 (3): 323–331. doi:10.1080/23299460.2019.1653155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, H. E. 2003. “The Moral Responsibilities of Scientists (Tensions Between Autonomy and Responsibility).” American Philosophical Quarterly 40 (1): 59–68. doi:10.2307/20010097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drori, G. S. 1993. “The Relationship Between Science, Technology and the Economy in Lesser Developed Countries.” Social Studies of Science 23 (1): 201–215. doi:10.1177/030631293023001007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Union. 2012. Responsible Research and Innovation: Europe’s Ability to Respond to Societal Challenges. European Union Publicaions Office. doi:10.2777/11739
   Google Scholar
• Fan, C. 2017. “Double Closed Loops and Responsible Innovation: The Case Research in China Space Industry Quality Assurance.” Journal of Engineering Studies 9 (5): 465–473. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1224.2017.00465
   Google Scholar
• Fan, C., S. Christmann-Budian, and S. Seus. 2014. “Research and Innovation Cooperation Between the European Union and China.” Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research. doi:10.2777/4860.
   Google Scholar
• Fei, Y., and C. Liu. 2021. “Research on the Heterogeneity of AI Policy Between Central and Local Governments in China from the Perspective of Responsible Innovation.” Forum on Science and Technology in China 11: 40–50. doi:10.13580/j.cnki.fstc.2021.11.006.
   Google Scholar
• Fellnhofer, K. 2021. “Entrepreneurial Alertness Toward Responsible Research and Innovation: Digital Technology Makes the Psychological Heart of Entrepreneurship Pound.”  Technovation (August): 102384. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102384.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. 2006. “Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 12 (2): 219–245. doi:10.1177/1077800405284363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu, X. 2015. China’s Path to Innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gao, K., and Y. Yuan. 2021. “The Effect of Innovation-Driven Development on Pollution Reduction: Empirical Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 172 (October 2020): 121047. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121047.
   Google Scholar
• Gillham, B. 2000. Case Study Research Methods. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Gioia, D. A., K. G. Corley, and A. L. Hamilton. 2012. “Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research: Notes on the Gioia Methodology.” Organizational Research Methods 16 (1): 15–31. doi:10.1177/1094428112452151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glerup, C., and M. Horst. 2014. “Mapping ‘Social Responsibility’ in Science.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (1): 31–50. doi:10.1080/23299460.2014.882077.
   Google Scholar
• Heilbroner, R. 1994. “Technological Determinism Revisited.” Does Technology Drive History, 1: 67–78. http://www.f.waseda.jp/sidoli/Heilbroner_1994.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jeffrey, B., and G. Troman. 2004. Time for Ethnography 30 (4), doi:10.1080/0141192042000237220.
   Google Scholar
• Kothari, C. R. 2004. Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques. New Age International (P) Ltd. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, V., M. Glacken, and M. McCarron. 2011. “Employing an Ethnographic Approach: Key Characteristics.” Nurse Researcher 19 (1): 17–24. doi:10.7748/nr2011.10.19.1.17.c8767
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li, Q. 1996. “The Principle of Utility and the Principle of Righteousness: Yen Fu and Utilitarianism in Modern China.” Utilitas 8 (1): 109–126. doi:10.1017/S0953820800004751.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y., Q. Ji, and D. Zhang. 2020. “Technological Catching up and Innovation Policies in China: What is Behind This Largely Successful Story?” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 153 (May 2019): 119918. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119918.
   Google Scholar
• Li, F., R. Owen, and E. Simakova. 2015. “Framing Responsible Innovation in Synthetic Biology: The Need for a Critical Discourse Analysis Approach.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 2 (1): 104–108. doi:10.1080/23299460.2014.1002059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Z. 2015. “Responsibility Finitude and Its Enlightenment for Responsible Innovation.” Studies in Dialecties of Nature 31 (10): 41–45. doi:10.19484/j.cnki.1000-8934.2015.10.009.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, L. 2018. “How Did It Become Number One County in the Central and Western Region? - Decoding the ‘Model Student’ in County Economy: Changsha County, Hunan Province.” Economic Information Daily. http://www.jjckb.cn/2018-11/09/c_137593582.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, X., X. Tan, A. J. Zhou, and S. S. Zhou. 2022. Building the Culture of Developing Responsible Innovation: A Case Study of FOTILE (pp. 151–162). doi:10.1007/978-981-19-4480-2_8
   Google Scholar
• Lund, T. 2012. “Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches: Some Arguments for Mixed Methods Research.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 56 (2): 155–165. doi:10.1080/00313831.2011.568674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lü, L. 2009. “The Value of the use of Biotechnology: Public Views in China and Europe.” Public Understanding of Science 18 (4): 481–492. doi:10.1177/0963662507082892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, D., and J. Wajcman. 1999. “Introductory Essay: The Social Shaping of Technology.” In The Social Shaping of Technology, 1–25. doi:10.3987/Contents-03-61-01
   Google Scholar
• Maclean, M., G. Shaw, C. Harvey, and A. Booth. 2019. “Management Learning in Historical Perspective: Rediscovering Rowntree and the British Interwar Management Movement.” Academy of Management Learning & Education, doi:10.5465/amle.2018.0301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macnaghten, P., R. Owen, J. Stilgoe, B. Wynne, A. Azevedo, A. de Campos, J. Chilvers, … L. Velho. 2014. “Responsible Innovation Across Borders: Tensions, Paradoxes and Possibilities.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (2): 191–199. doi:10.1080/23299460.2014.922249.
   Google Scholar
• Maeder, C., and T. Eberle. 2011. “Organizational Ethnography.” Qualitative Research: Issues of Theory, Method and Practice 464. doi:10.4135/9781412950589.
   Google Scholar
• Mei, L., and J. Chen. 2014. “Reflection and Reconstruction of Innovation Paradigm: The Emerging Research on Responsible Innovation.” Science and Management 3: 3–11. CNKI:SUN:JXYG.0.2014-03-002.
   Google Scholar
• Mei, L., J. Chen, and F. Li. 2017. “Responsible Innovation: Connotations and Implications.” Studies in Dialectics of Nature, (02): 49–53. doi:10.19484/j.cnki.1000-8934.2017.02.009.
   Google Scholar
• Mei, L., J. Chen, and W. Sheng. 2014. “Responsible Innovation — Emerging Paradigm of Research and Innovation.” Studies in Dialecties of Nature 30: 81–87. doi:10.19484/j.cnki.1000-8934.2014.10.016.
   Google Scholar
• Mei, L., H. Rodríguez, and J. Chen. 2020. “Responsible Innovation in the Contexts of the European Union and China: Differences, Challenges and Opportunities.” Global Transitions 2: 1–3. doi:10.1016/j.glt.2019.11.004.
   Google Scholar
• Moemeka, A. A. 1998. “Communalism as a Fundamental Dimension of Culture.” Journal of Communication 48 (4): 118–141. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1998.tb02773.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MOFCOM. 2020. “The Ministry of Commerce Holds the Press Conference on the 2019 Review and Evaluation Results of the Comprehensive Development of National Economic and Technological Development Zones.” English.Mofcom.Gov.Cn. http://english.mofcom.gov.cn/article/newsrelease/press/202003/20200302942188.shtml.
   Google Scholar
• Mordan, C., and K. Skeldon. 2016. “NUCLEUS Field Trip Report: Beijing - RRI & Public Engagement Deliverable 4.3.”
   Google Scholar
• Needham, J. 2004. Science and Civilisation in China: General Conclusions and Reflections: Vol. VII:2 (K. G. Robinson, Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the People’s Government of Changsha County. 2021. Introduction of Changsha County. Www.Csx.Gov.Cn. http://www.csx.gov.cn/mlxc/xygk/202103/t20210315_9829818.html.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. 2011. “Technological Determinism in Educational Technology Research: Some Alternative Ways of Thinking About the Relationship Between Learning and Technology.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 27 (5): 373–384. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00406.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, R. 2009. A new era of Responsible Innovation. Planet Earth; NERC. http://planetearth.nerc.ac.uk/features/story.aspx?id = 460.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, R. 2014. “The UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council’s Commitment to a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (1): 113–117. doi:10.1080/23299460.2014.882065.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, R., D. Baxter, T. Maynard, and M. Depledge. 2009. “Beyond Regulation: Risk Pricing and Responsible Innovation.” Environmental Science & Technology 43 (18): 6902–6906. doi:10.1021/es803332u.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, R., and N. Goldberg. 2010. “Responsible Innovation: A Pilot Study with the U.K. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council.” Risk Analysis: An International Journal 30 (11): 1699–1707. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01517.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, R., P. Macnaghten, and J. Stilgoe. 2012. “Responsible Research and Innovation: From Science in Society to Science for Society, with Society.” Science and Public Policy 39 (6): 751–760. doi:10.1093/scipol/scs093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, R., and M. Pansera. 2019. “Responsible Innovation and Responsible Research and Innovation.” In Handbook on Science and Public Policy, edited by D. Simon, S. Kuhlmann, J. Stamm, and W. Canzler, 26–48. Edward Elgar Publishing. doi:10.4337/9781784715946.00010
   Google Scholar
• Owen, R., M. Pansera, P. Macnaghten, and S. Randles. 2021. “Organisational Institutionalisation of Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 50 (1): 104132. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2020.104132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, X., S. Yuan, M. Song, M. Li, and Y. Wang. 2022. “Decomposition of the Growth Drivers and its Spatial Distribution Characteristics of Responsible Innovation: A Study of Chinese Industrial Enterprises.” Asia Pacific Journal of Management, doi:10.1007/s10490-022-09821-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pansera, M., and R. Owen. 2018a. “Framing Inclusive Innovation Within the Discourse of Development: Insights from Case Studies in India.” Research Policy 47 (1): 23–34. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pansera, M., and R. Owen. 2018b. “Innovation for de-Growth: A Case Study of Counter-Hegemonic Practices from Kerala, India.” Journal of Cleaner Production 197: 1872–1883. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Percy, J. 2020. “Where to Invest in China: A Primer on its Economic Development Zones.” China Briefing. https://www.china-briefing.com/news/chinas-economic-development-zones-types-incentives/.
   Google Scholar
• PRC State Council. 2016. State Council Notice on the Publication of the National 13th Five-Year Plan for S&T Innovation. https://cset.georgetown.edu/publication/state-council-notice-on-the-publication-of-the-national-13th-five-year-plan-for-st-innovation/.
   Google Scholar
• Randles, S. 2017. “Deepening ‘Deep Institutionalisation’: Elaborating a Concept and Developing a Typology to Analyse and Contrast the Institutionalisation of De-facto responsible research and innovation (rri).” https://www.jerri-project.eu/jerri-wAssets/docs/deliverables/wp-1/JERRI_Deliverable_D1_2_Deepening-Deep-Institutionalisation.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Randles, S., P. Laredo, A. M. Loconto, B. Walhout, and R. Lindner. 2016. Framings and Frameworks: Six Grand Narratives of de Facto RRI. Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/300032552_Navigating_towards_shared_responsibility_in_research_and_innovation_Approach_process_and_results_of_the_Res-AGorA_Project.
   Google Scholar
• Randles, S., E. Tancoigne, and P.-B. Joly. 2022. “Two Tribes or More? The Historical Emergence of Discourse Coalitions of Responsible Research and Innovation (rri) and Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI).” Journal of Responsible Innovation 9 (2): 248–274. doi:10.1080/23299460.2022.2061306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravesteijn, W., Y. Liu, and P. Yan. 2015. “Responsible Innovation in Port Development: The Rotterdam Maasvlakte 2 and the Dalian Dayao bay Extension Projects.” Water Science and Technology 72 (5): 665–677. doi:10.2166/wst.2015.272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rip, A., and J.-P. Voß. 2013. “Umbrella Terms as Mediators in the Governance of Emerging Science and Technology.” Science, Technology & Innovation Studies 9 (2): 39–59. https://ris.utwente.nl/ws/files/6445369/128-562-1-PB.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, D., E. R. Aus, P. Ahrweiler, B. Guoxue, B. Han, D. M, E. Srinivas, et al. 2014. Innovation for Society: Funder Reports.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. 2003. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London and New York: Routledge. https://periferiaactiva.files.wordpress.com/2015/08/joseph-schumpeter-capitalism-socialism-and-democracy-2006.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, N., L. Hennen, M. Ladikas, X. Zhu, M. Decker, and Z. Li. 2009. “Embedding Society in Science & Technology Policy European and Chinese Perspectives.” In Governance An International Journal of Policy And Administration, edited by M. Ladikas. European Commission. doi:10.2777/21028
   Google Scholar
• Sigurdson, J. 2002. “New Science, Technology & Innovation Developments in China.” New Science, Technology & Developments in China for Proceeding of the Strata Consolidating Workgroup, 1–39.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, D. R., S. Mishra, and K. Tripathi. 2021. “Analysing Acceptability of E-Rickshaw as a Public Transport Innovation in Delhi: A Responsible Innovation Perspective.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 170 (June): 120908. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120908.
   Google Scholar
• Sleeboom-Faulkner, M., and S. Hwang. 2012. “Governance of Stem Cell Research: Public Participation and Decision-Making in China, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan.” Social Studies of Science 42 (5): 684–708. doi:10.1177/0306312712450939.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., M. Fressoli, and H. Thomas. 2014. “Grassroots Innovation Movements: Challenges and Contributions.” Journal of Cleaner Production 63: 114–124. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, J., R. Owen, and P. Macnaghten. 2013. “Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 42 (9): 1568–1580. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutcliffe, H. 2011. A Report on Responsible Research & Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Tellis, W. 1997a. “Application of a Case Study Methodology.” The Qualitative Report 3 (3): 1–19. doi:10.46743/2160-3715/1997.2015.
   Google Scholar
• Tellis, W. 1997b. “Introduction to Case Study.” The Qualitative Report 3 (2): 1–14. doi:10.46743/2160-3715/1997.2024.
   Google Scholar
• Tian, H., and J. Tian. 2021. “The Mediating Role of Responsible Innovation in the Relationship Between Stakeholder Pressure and Corporate Sustainability Performance in Times of Crisis: Evidence from Selected Regions in China.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18 (14), doi:10.3390/ijerph18147277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tidd, J., and J. Bessant. 2009. Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change. 4th ed. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• TSB. 2012. Responsible Innovation Framework for Commercialisation for Research Findings (6).
   Google Scholar
• van Nes, F., T. Abma, H. Jonsson, and D. Deeg. 2010. “Language Differences in Qualitative Research: Is Meaning Lost in Translation?” European Journal of Ageing 7 (4): 313–316. doi:10.1007/s10433-010-0168-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wyk, E., C. M. Breen, T. Sherwill, and D. Magadlela. 2007. “Challenges for the Relationship Between Science and Society: Developing Capacity for Ecosystem Governance in an Emerging Democracy.” Water Policy 9 (S2): 99–111. doi:10.2166/wp.2007.138.
   Google Scholar
• von Schomberg, R. 2012. “Prospects for Technology Assessment in a Framework of Responsible Research and Innovation.” In Technikfolgen Abschätzen Lehren, edited by M. Dusseldorp and R. Beecroft. VS Verlag fär Sozialwissenschaften. doi:10.1007/978-3-531-93468-6_2 pp. 39–61.
   Google Scholar
• von Schomberg, R. 2011. “Towards Responsible Research and Innovation in the Information and Communication Technologies and Security Technologies Fields.” In Publications Office of the European Union, doi:10.2777/58723.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, P., and F. Li. 2019. “China’s Organization and Governance of Innovation – A Policy Foresight Perspective.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 146 (July 2017): 304–319. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.05.029.
   Google Scholar
• Wiarda, M., G. van de Kaa, E. Yaghmaei, and N. Doorn. 2021. “A Comprehensive Appraisal of Responsible Research and Innovation: From Roots to Leaves.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 172 (October 2020): 121053. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121053.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, G., and H. Qiu. 2012. “Popular Science Publishing in Contemporary China.” Public Understanding of Science 22 (3): 521–529. doi:10.1177/0963662512445013.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xia, G. 2014. “China as a “Civilization-State”: A Historical and Comparative Interpretation.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 140: 43–47. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.384.
   Google Scholar
• Xiong, Y., and S. Xia. 2020. “Mechanisms Behind China’s Innovation Achievements: A Multi-Level View.” Technovation 94–95 (April): 94–96. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102123.
   Google Scholar
• Xue, G. 2015. “RRI on GM Tree Technology in the Perspective of Ecological Risk.” Studies in Dialecties of Nature 31 (7): 32–37. doi:10.19484/j.cnki.1000-8934.2015.07.006.
   Google Scholar
• Yan, P., and Q. Wang. 2015. “Mode and Cases of Responsible Innovation in Dalian Port.” Studies in Dialecties of Nature 3 (03): 122–126. doi:10.19484/j.cnki.1000-8934.2015.03.027.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, P., and B. Han. 2017. “Responsible Research and Innovation and Its Implications for China.” China & World Economy 25 (6): 120–138. doi:10.1111/cwe.12224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y. 2019. New Measures to Boost National Development Zones for Further Opening-up. English.Gov.Cn. http://english.www.gov.cn/premier/news/2019/05/08/content_281476651099020.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, W., G. He, Y. Zhao, and X. Zhang. 2020. “Discusion on Ethical Responsibility in Medical Research: From the Perspective of Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI).” Medicine and Philosophy 41 (6): 7–10. CNKI:SUN:YXZX.0.2020-06-002.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y., and M. Liao. 2017. “Responsible Research and Innovation in China.” China Soft Science 3: 37–46. CNKI:SUN:ZGRK.0.2017-03-005.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y., and M. Liao. 2019. Chinese Perspectives on Responsible Innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. doi:10.4337/9781784718862.00039
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y., W. Zhang, and M. Liao. 2017. China National Workshop Report.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y., W. Zhang, M. Liao, L. Huang, F. Teng, R. Song, Y. Wu, and Y. Yao. 2018. Report from National Case Study: China.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, L., L. Zhang, J. Sun, and P. He. 2022. “Can Public Participation Constraints Promote Green Technological Innovation of Chinese Enterprises? The Moderating Role of Government Environmental Regulatory Enforcement.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 174 (September 2021): 121198. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121198.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, X., Z. Cai, K. H. Tan, L. Zhang, J. Du, and M. Song. 2021. “Technological Innovation and Structural Change for Economic Development in China as an Emerging Market.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 167 (February): 120671. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120671.
   Google Scholar