Electronic Information Systems and Human Service Organizations: The Unanticipated Consequences of Organizational Change

REFERENCES

• Aas, K. F. (2004). From narrative to database: Technological change and penal culture. Punishment and Society, 6, 379–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baines, D. (2006). “If you could change one thing”: Social service workers and restructuring. Australian Social Work, 59, 20–34.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, M., Grant, D., & Wailes, N. (2006). ICT and organizational change: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 42, 6–22.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, B. (2001). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Briar, S., & Miller, H. (1971). Problems and issues in social casework. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Broadhurst, K., Wastell, D., White, S., Hall, C., Peckover, S., Pithouse, A., Thompson, K., & Davey, D. (2010). Performing “initial assessment”: Identifying the latent conditions for error at the front-door of local authority children’s services. British Journal of Social Work, 40, 352–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, J., & van den Broek, D. (2009). Accountable and countable: Information management systems and the bureaucratization of social work. British Journal of Social Work, 39, 1326–1342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crabtree, A., & Rodden, T. (2002). Ethnography and design? Proceedings of the International Workshop on “Interpretive” Approaches to Information Systems and Computing research (pp. 70–74). London, UK: Association of Information Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Crang, M. A., & Cook, I. (2007). Doing ethnographies. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, P. M. (2004). The electronic eye: Emerging surveillant practices in social work with children and families. European Journal of Social Work, 7, 57–71.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, P. M. (2009). Transforming children’s services? Social work, neoliberalism and the “modern” world. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press and McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. (in press). Implementing electronic information systems in human service organizations: the challenge of categorization. Practice: Social Work in Action. Accepted 20 November 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. (2011). Computer based information systems and human service organizations: Emerging problems and future possibilities. Australian Social Work, 64, 299–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. (2013). Electronic information systems and human services organizations: avoiding the pitfalls of participatory design. The British Journal of Social Work, 1–16. DOI:10.1093/bjsw/bct126
   Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. (2014a). Repositioning electronic information systems in human services organizations. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 38, 2, 125–134. DOI:10.1080/03643107.2013.853011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. (2014b). Technology configuring the user: implications for the redesign of electronic information systems in social work. The British Journal of Social Work. DOI:10.1093/bjsw/bcu141
   Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. (2014c). Electronic information systems in human service organizations: the what, who, why and how of information. The British Journal of Social Work, 1–16. DOI:10.1093/bjsw/bcu030
   Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. & Graham, T. (forthcoming). Designing electronic information systems for the future: facing the challenge of New Public Management. Journal of Social Work.
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice (3rd ed.). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, J. (1998). Scientific management, bureau-professionalism, new managerialism: The labour process of state social work. British Journal of Social Work, 28, 839–862.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasenfeld, Y. (1983). Human service organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hasenfeld, Y. (2010). The attributes of human service organizations. In Y. Hasenfeld (Ed.), Human services as complex organizations (2nd ed., pp. 9–32). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Henman, P. (1995). The role of computers in texturing micro-social environments. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology, 31, 49–63.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, A., & Shaw, I. (2011). Social work and ICT. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Irani, Z. (2002). Information systems evaluation: Navigating through the problem domain. Information and Management, 40, 11–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, A., & May, J. (1992). Working in human service organisations. Melbourne: Longman Cheshire.
   Google Scholar
• Kling, R. (1999). What is social informatics and why does it matter? Information Society, 23, 205–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lempert, L. B. (2007). Memo-writing in grounded theory. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The Sage book of ethnography (pp. 245–262). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Markus, M. L. (2004). Technochange management: Using IT to drive organizational change. Journal of Information Technology, 19, 4–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung, Z. C. S. (2007). Knowledge management in social work—Towards a conceptual framework. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 25, 181–198.
   Google Scholar
• McBride, N. (2008). Using performance ethnography to explore the human aspects of software quality. Information Technology and People, 21, 91–111.
   Google Scholar
• Mengesha, N. T. (2010). The role of technological frames of key groups in open source software implementation in a developing country. Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries, 43, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Munro, E. (2011). The Munro review of child protection: Final report: A child centred system. London, UK: Department for Education.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, J. (2006). The other welfare state: Non-government agencies and the mixed economy of welfare in Australia. History Australia, 3(2), 1–15. doi:10.2014/ha060044
   Google Scholar
• Naccarato, T. (2010). Child welfare informatics: A proposed subspeciality for social work. Children and Youth Services Review, 32, 1729–1734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Netting, F. E., & O’Connor, M. K. (2003). Organization Practice: A social worker’s guide to understanding human services. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Ombudsman. (2009). Own motion investigation into the Department of Human Services Child Protection Program. Ombudsman of Victoria, November.
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11, 404–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W., & Barley, S. R. (2001). Technology and institutions: what can research on information technology and research on organizations learn from each other? MIS Quarterly, 25(2), 145–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parton, N. (2008). Changes in the form of knowledge in social work: From the ‘social’ to the ‘informational’? British Journal of Social Work, 38, 253–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peckover, S., White, S., & Hall, C. (2008). Making and managing electronic children: E-assessment in child welfare. Information, communication and society, 11, 375–394.
   Google Scholar
• Pithouse, A., Hall, C., Peckover, S., & White, S. (2009). A tale of two CAFS: The impact of the electronic common assessment framework. British Journal of Social Work, 39, 599–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regan, S. (2003). Technology and systems of referral taking: From narrative to code. In E. Harlow & S. Webb (Eds.), Information and communication technologies in the welfare services (pp. 83–110). Philadelphia, PA: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, A., & Babbie, E. R. (2005). Research methods for social work (5th ed.) Pacific Grove: Thompson Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, I., Bell, M., Sinclair, I., Sloper, P., Mitchell, W., Dyson, P., Clayden, J., & Rafferty, J. (2009). An exemplary scheme? An evaluation of the Integrated Children’s System. British Journal of Social Work, 39, 613–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spratt, T., & Houston, S. (1999). Developing critical social work in theory and in practice: Child protection and communicative reason. Child and Family Social Work, 4, 315–324.
   Google Scholar
• Tilbury, C. (2004). The influence of performance management on child welfare policy and practice. British Journal of Social Work, 34, 225–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinker, T. (1998). Hamlet without the prince: The ethnographic turn in information systems research. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 11, 13–33.
   Google Scholar
• Trkman, P. (2010). The critical success factors of business process management. International Journal of Information Management, 30, 125–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbeek, P. (2006). Materializing morality. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 31, 361–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vojak, C. (2009). Choosing language: Social service framing and social justice. British Journal of Social Work, 39, 936–949.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wastell, D. (2011). Managers as designers in the public services: Beyond technomagic. Axminster: Triarchy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wastell, D., & White, S. (2013). Beyond bureaucracy: Emerging trends in social care informatics. Health Informatics Journal, 1–17. doi:10.1177/1460458213487535
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, S., Broadhurst, K., Wastell, D., Peckover, S., Hall, C., & Pithouse, A. (2009). Whither practice-near research in the modernization programme? Policy blunders in children’s services. Journal of Social Work Practice, 23, 401–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, J. (2008). Report of the Special Commission of Inquiry into Child Protection Services in New South Wales. The Hon. James Wood, AO, QC, November.
   Google Scholar
• Wrennall, L. (2010). Surveillance and child protection: De-mystifying the Trojan horse. Surveillance and Society, 7, 304–324.
   Google Scholar