Facebook, Twitter, and Blogs: The Adoption and Utilization of Social Media in Nonprofit Human Service Organizations

References

• About Twitter. (2014). Company. Retrieved from https://about.twitter.com/company
   Google Scholar
• Abram, C. (2006, September 26). Re: Welcome to Facebook everyone [Web log message]. Retrieved from https://blog.facebook.com/blog.php?post=2210227130
   Google Scholar
• Albert, S., & Whetten, D. A. (1985). Organizational identity. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 263–295). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andrei, K., Quinn, L., & Bernard, C. (2011). Using Facebook to meet your mission: Results of a survey. Retrieved from http://www.idealware.org/facebook_survey
   Google Scholar
• Attewell, P. (1992). Technology diffusion and organizational learning: The case of business computing. Organization Science, 3(1), 1–19. doi:10.1287/orsc.3.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, N. G. (2011). Picture this: Top charities master visual and social media. Retrieved from the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth Center for Marketing Research website: http://www.umassd.edu/cmr/socialmediaresearch/charitiessocialmedia/
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, N. G. (2014). Social Media Usage Now Ubiquitous Among US top charities, ahead of all other sectors. Retrieved from the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth Center for Marketing Research website: http://www.umassd.edu/cmr/socialmediaresearch/charitiessocialmedia/
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, N. G., & Mattson, E. (2009). US charities’ adoption of social media outpaces all other sectors for the third year in a row. Retrieved from the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth Center for Marketing Research website: http://www.fcae.umassd.edu/cmr/studiesresearch/charitystudy.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Bortree, D. S., & Seltzer, T. (2009). Dialogic strategies and outcomes: An analysis of environmental advocacy groups’ Facebook profiles. Public Relations Review, 35(3), 317–319. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brilliant, E., & Young, D. R. (2004). The changing identity of federated community service organizations. Administration in Social Work, 48(3/4), 23–46. doi:10.1300/J147v28n03_02
   Google Scholar
• Briones, R., Kuch, B., Liu, B., & Jin, Y. (2011). Keeping up with the digital age: How the American Red Cross uses social media to build relationships. Public Relations Review, 37(1), 37–43. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. A., Lambright, K. T., & Wells, C. J. (2014). Looking for friends, fans, and followers? Social media use in public and nonprofit human services. Public Administration Review, 74(5), 655–663. doi:10.1111/puar.12261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chamberlin, L., & Lehmann, K. (2011). Twitter in higher education. In C. Wankel (Ed.), Educating educators with social media (Cutting-edge technologies in higher education, Volume 1) (pp. 375–391). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.
   Google Scholar
• Conway, B. A., Kenski, K., & Wang, D. (2013). Twitter use by presidential primary candidates during the 2012 campaign. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(11), 1596–1610. doi:10.1177/0002764213489014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1984). Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organizational design. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 191–233). Homewood, IL: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dattalo, P. (2008). Determining sample size: Balancing power, precision, and practicality. Oxford, UK: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method (4th ed.). New York: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Dougherty, K. D., & Andercheck, B. (2014). Using Facebook to engage learners in a large introductory course. Teaching Sociology, 42(2), 95–104. doi:10.1177/0092055X14521022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drake, B., & Johnson-Reid, M. (2008). Social work research methods: From conceptualization to dissemination. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlop, J., & Fawcett, G. (2008). Technology-based approaches to social work and social justice. Journal of Policy Practice, 7(2), 140–154. doi:10.1080/15588740801937961
   Google Scholar
• Dutton, J. E., & Dukerich, J. M. (1991). Keeping an eye on the mirror: Image and identity in organizational adaptation. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 517–554. doi:10.2307/256405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elavsky, C. M., Mislan, C., & Elavsky, S. (2011). When talking less is more: Exploring outcomes of Twitter usage in the large-lecture hall. Learning, Media and Technology, 36(3), 215–233. doi:10.1080/17439884.2010.549828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Facebook Newsroom. (2014). Company Info. Retrieved from http://newsroom.fb.com/company-info/
   Google Scholar
• Finn, S., Maher, J., & Forster, J. (2006). Indicators of information and communication technology adoption in the nonprofit sector: Changes between 2000 and 2004. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 16(3), 277–295. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1542-7854
   Google Scholar
• Fox, S., & Rainie, L. (2014). The Web at 25. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/02/25/the-web-at-25-in-the-u-s
   Google Scholar
• Gao, F., Luo, T., & Zhang, K. (2012). Tweeting for learning: A critical analysis of research on microblogging in education published in 2008–2011. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(5), 783–801. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01357.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghonim, W. (2012). Revolution 2.0: The power of the people is greater than the people in power. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Goldkind, L. (2015). Social media and social service: Are nonprofits plugged in to the digital age? Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 39(4), 380–396. doi:10.1080/23303131.2015.1053585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, K. D. (1992). Perceptions of innovations as predictors of implementation levels: The diffusion of a nation wide health education campaign. Health Education and Behavior, 21(4), 433–445. doi:10.1177/109019819402100406
   Google Scholar
• Greenhow, C., & Gleason, B. (2014). Social scholarship: Reconsidering scholarly practices in the age of social media. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45, 392–402. doi:10.1111/bjet.12150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, C., & Saxton, G. D. (2014). Tweeting social change: How social media are changing nonprofit advocacy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(1), 57–79. doi:10.1177/0899764012471585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackler, D., & Saxton, G. (2007). The strategic use of information technology by nonprofit organizations: Increasing capacity and untapped potential. Public Administration Review, 67(3), 474–484. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00730.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawn, C. (2009). Take two aspirin and tweet me in the morning: How Twitter, Facebook, and other social media are reshaping health care. Health Affairs, 28(2), 361–368. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.28.2.361
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedberg, J. G. (2011). Towards a disruptive pedagogy: Changing classroom practice with technologies and digital content. Educational Media International, 48(1), 1–16. doi:10.1080/09523987.2011.549673
   Google Scholar
• Hitchcock, L. I., & Battista, A. (2013). Social media for professional practice: Integrating Twitter with social work pedagogy. Journal of Baccalaureate Social Work, 18, 33–45.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins, M. (2008). Just what is social media, exactly? Masshable. Retrieved from http://mashable.com/2008/11/18/social-media-defined/
   Google Scholar
• Ingenhoff, D., & Koelling, A. M. (2009). The potential of web sites as a relationship building tool for charitable fundraising NPOs. Public Relations Review, 35, 66–73. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2008.09.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H., Clinton, K., Purushotma, R., Robison, A. J., & Weigel, M. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Chicago: The MacArthur Foundation. Retrieved from http://digitallearning.macfound. org/atf/cf/%7B7E45C7E0-A3E0-4B89- AC9C-E807E1B0AE4E%7D/JENKINS_ WHITE_PAPER.PDF
   Google Scholar
• Kang, S., & Norton, H. (2004). Nonprofit organizations’ use of the world wide web: Are they sufficiently fulfilling organizational goals? Public Relations Review, 30(3), 279–284. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2004.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanter, B., & Fine, A. H. (2010). The networked nonprofit: Connecting with social media to drive change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53, 59–68. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearns, K. P. (1992). Innovations in local government: A sociocognitive network approach. Knowledge and Policy, 5(2), 45–67. doi:10.1007/BF02692805
   Google Scholar
• Kent, M. L. (2008). Critical analysis of blogging in public relations. Public Relations Review, 34(1), 32–40. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2007.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimball, E., & Kim, J. (2013). Virtual boundaries: Ethical considerations for use of social media in social work. Social Work, 58(2), 185–188. doi:10.1093/sw/swt005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaCasse, K., Quinn, L. S., & Bernard, C. (2010). Using social media to meet nonprofit goals: The results of a survey. Portland, ME: Idealware.
   Google Scholar
• Lovejoy, K., & Saxton, G. D. (2012). Information, community, and action: How nonprofit organizations use social media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(3), 337–353. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01576.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovejoy, K., Waters, R. D., & Saxton, G. D. (2012). Engaging stakeholders through Twitter: How nonprofit organizations are getting more out of 140 characters or less. Public Relations Review, 38, 313–318. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansfield, H. (2011). Social media for social good: A how to guide for nonprofits. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• McNutt, J. G., & Boland, K. M. (1999). Electronic advocacy by nonprofit organizations in social welfare policy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28(4), 432–451. doi:10.1177/0899764099284004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNutt, J. G., & Menon, G. M. (2008). The rise of cyberactivism: Implications for the future of advocacy in the human services. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 89(1), 33–38. doi:10.1606/1044-3894.3706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merchant, R. M., Elmer, S., & Lurie, N. (2011). Integrating social media into emergency-preparedness efforts. New England Journal of Medicine, 365(4), 289–291. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1103591
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishna, F., Bogo, M., Root, J., Sawyer, J., & Khoury-Kassabri, M. (2012). “It just crept in”: The digital age and implications for social work practice. Clinical Social Work Journal, 40(3), 277–286. doi:10.1007/s10615-012-0383-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, M. K., & Netting, F. E. (2009). Organization practice: A social worker’s guide to understanding human services. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden, T. N., & Starita, L. (2009). Social networking and mid-size non-profits: What’s the use? Philanthropy Action. Retrieved from http://www.philanthropyaction.com/articles/social_networking_and_mid-size_nonprofits_whats_the_use
   Google Scholar
• Perron, B. E., Taylor, H. O., Glass, J. E., & Margerum-Leys, J. (2010). Information and communication technologies in social work. Advances in Social Work, 11(1), 67–81.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Postman, N. (1970). The reformed English curriculum. In A. C. Eurich (Ed.), High school 1980: The shape of the future in American secondary education (pp. 160–168). New York: Pitman.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, L., & Berry, A. (2010). The nonprofit social media decision guide. The New Organizing Institute and Idealware. Retrieved from http://www.idealware.org/reports/nonprofit-social-media-decision-guide
   Google Scholar
• Reamer, F. G. (2013). The digital and electronic revolution in social work: Rethinking the meaning of ethical practice. Ethics and Social Welfare, 7(1), 2–19. doi:10.1080/17496535.2012.738694
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. V. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, A., & Babbie, E. (2005). Research methods for social work (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thompson Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Rybalko, S., & Seltzer, T. (2010). Dialogic communication in 140 characters or less: How Fortune 500 companies engage stakeholders using Twitter. Public Relations Review, 36, 336–341. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sage, M. (2014). Use of Web 2.0 to train facilitators in fidelity: A case study. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 32(1–2), 108–118. doi:10.1080/15228835.2014.886982
   Google Scholar
• Sargeant, A., West, D. C., & Jay, E. (2007). The relational determinants of nonprofit web site fundraising effectiveness: An exploratory study. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 18(2), 141–156. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1542-7854
   Google Scholar
• Saxton, G. D., & Guo, C. (2011). Accountability online: Understanding the web-based accountability practices of nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(2), 270–295. doi:10.1177/0899764009341086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxton, G. D., & Wang, L. (2014). The social network effect: The determinants of giving through social media. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(5), 850–868. doi:10.1177/0899764013485159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, S. G., & Lane, V. R. (2000). A stakeholder approach to organizational identity. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 43–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simsek, Z., & Veiga, J. F. (2001). A primer on internet organizational surveys. Organizational Research Methods, 4, 218–235. doi:10.1177/109442810143003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Tufekci, Z., & Wilson, C. (2012). Social media and the decision to participate in political protest: Observations from Tahrir square. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 363–379. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01629.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogt, W. P. (1999). Dictionary of statistics and methodology: A nontechnical guide for the social sciences (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Waters, R. D. (2007). Nonprofit organizations’ use of the Internet: A content analysis of communication trends on the Internet sites of the philanthropy 400. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 18(1), 59–76. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1542-7854
   Google Scholar
• Waters, R. D., & Jamal, J. (2011). Tweet, tweet, tweet: A content analysis of nonprofit organizations’ Twitter updates. Public Relations Review, 37(3), 321–324. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YouTube Press. (2014). Statistics. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/yt/press/statistics.html
   Google Scholar
• Zickuhr, K., & Smith, A. (2013, August 26). Home broadband. Pew Research Internet Project. Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Broadband/Findings.aspx
   Google Scholar