Defining and Pursuing Goals in a Work First Environment: An Analysis of Public Assistance Recipients’ Experience and Perception of Public Policy on the Frontlines

References

• Acs, G., & Loprest, P. (2001). Final synthesis of the findings from ASPE Leavers Grants. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Albelda, R. (2001). Fallacies of welfare-to-work policies. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 577(1), 66–78. doi:10.1177/000271620157700106
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, S. G. (2001). Welfare recipient views about caseworker performance: Lessons for developing TANF case management practices. Families in Society, 82(2), 165–174. doi:10.1606/1044-3894.204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, S. G. (2002). Ensuring the stability of welfare-to-work exits: The importance of recipient knowledge about work incentives. Social Work, 47(2), 162–170. doi:10.1093/sw/47.2.162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bane, M. J., & Ellwood, D. T. (1994). Welfare realities: From rhetoric to reform. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beimers, D., & Fischer, R. (2007). Pathways to employment: The experiences of TANF recipients with employment services. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 88(3), 391–400. doi:10.1606/1044-3894.3648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blank, R. M. (2006). What did the 1990s welfare reform accomplish? In A. J. Auerbach, D. Card, & J. M. Quigley (Eds.), Public policy and income distribution (pp. 33–79). New York City, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Brauner, S., & Loprest, P. (1999). Where are they now? What states’ studies of people who left welfare tell us. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Brodkin, E. Z. (2006). Bureaucracy redux: Management reformism and the welfare state. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(1), 1–17. doi:10.1093/jopart/muj019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodkin, E. Z. (2011). Policy work: Street-level organizations under new managerialism. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(2), 253–277. doi:10.1093/jopart/muq093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, F., Mack, S., Chaney, A., Gibson, K., & Caplan, M. (2018). TANF leavers and economic self-sufficiency: Results from a study in Georgia. Journal of Poverty, 22, 1–17. doi:10.1080/10875549.2018.1460739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danziger, S., Heflin, C. M., Corcoran, M. E., Oltmans, E., & Wang, H. C. (2002). Does it pay to move from welfare to work? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21(4), 671–692. doi:10.1002/pam.10080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danziger, S., & Seefeldt, K. (2000). Ending welfare through work first: Manager and client views. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 81(6), 593–604. doi:10.1606/1044-3894.1071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, K., & Berry, M. (2002). Engaging families in child welfare services: An evidence-based approach to best practice. Child Welfare, 81, 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durlak, J. A., & DuPre, E. P. (2008). Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors influencing implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(3–4), 327–350. doi:10.1007/s10464-008-9165-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elo, S., Kääriäinen, M., Kanste, O., Pölkki, T., Utriainen, K., & Kyngäs, H. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: A focus on trustworthiness. SAGE Open.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, A. (1997). Focus groups. Social Research Update: Issue 19. Guildford, UK: University of Surrey, Department of Sociology.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, K. A. (2005). Pride, prejudice, and a dose of shame: The meaning of public assistance. Affilia, 20(3), 329–345. doi:10.1177/0886109905277752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, G., Freedman, S., Gennetian, L., Michalopoulos, C., Walter, J., Adams-Ciardullo, D., & Brooks, J. (2001). How effective are different welfare-to-work approaches: Five-year adult and child impacts for eleven programs. National Evaluation of Welfare-to-Work Strategies Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Herbst, C. (2008). Do social policy reforms have different impacts on employment and welfare use as economic conditions change? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 27(4), 867–894. doi:10.1002/pam.20380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hildebrandt, E., & Stevens, P. (2009). Impoverished women with children and no welfare benefits: The urgency of researching failures of the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program. American Journal of Public Health, 99(5), 793–801. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2006.106211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, T. D., & Cain, D. S. (2012). Perceived welfare caseworker support and psychological distress among low-income urban women with children. Social Work, 57(4), 353–360. doi:10.1093/sw/sws011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holzer, H. J., & Martinson, K. (2005). Can we improve job retention and advancement among low-income working parents? Discussion Paper 1307–05. Madison: Institute for Research on Poverty, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
   Google Scholar
• Holzer, H. J., Stoll, M. A., & Wissoker, D. (2004). Job performance and retention among welfare recipients. Social Service Review, 78(3), 343–369. doi:10.1086/421917
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hotz, J. V., Imbens, G. W., & Klerman, J. A. (2006). Evaluating the differential effects of alternative welfare-to-work training components: A reanalysis of the California GAIN program. Journal of Labor Economics, 24(3), 521–566. doi:10.1086/505050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hupe, P., & Buffat, A. (2014). A public service gap: Capturing contexts in a comparative approach of street-level bureaucracy. Public Management Review, 16(4), 548–569. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.854401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagannathan, R., & Camasso, M. J. (2006). Beyond intention to treat analysis in welfare-to-work studies. Journal of Social Service Research, 31(4), 43–60. doi:10.1300/J079v31n04_03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joyce, K., & McConnell, S. (2019). FaDSS program snapshot. OPRE Report #2019-58. Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J. (2012). The effects of welfare-to-work programs on welfare recipients’ employment outcomes. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 33(1), 130–142. doi:10.1007/s10834-011-9272-1
   Google Scholar
• Laakso, J. H., & Drevdahl, D. J. (2006). Women, abuse, and the welfare bureaucracy. Affilia, 21(1), 84–96. doi:10.1177/0886109905283135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larimer County. (2017). Strategies to engage TANF recipients. Loveland, CO: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Latham, G. P., & Locke, E. A. (2006). Enhancing the benefits and overcoming the pitfalls of goal setting. Organizational Dynamics, 35(4), 332–340. doi:10.1016/j.orgdyn.2006.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lens, V. (2007). Administrative justice in public welfare bureaucracies when citizens (don’t) complain. Administration & Society, 39(3), 382–408. doi:10.1177/0095399707301006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lens, V. (2008). Welfare and work sanctions: Examining discretion on the front lines. Social Service Review, 82(2), 197–222. doi:10.1086/589706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindhorst, T., & Padgett, J. D. (2005). Disjunctures for women and frontline workers: Implementation of the family violence option. Social Service Review, 79(3), 405–429. doi:10.1086/430891
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York City, New York: Russell Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, E. A. (1968). Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 3(2), 157–189. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(68)90004-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting & task performance. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705–717. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loeb, S., & Corcoran, M. (2001). Welfare, work experience, and economic self-sufficiency. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 20(1), 1–20. doi:10.1002/1520-6688(200124)20:1<1::AID-PAM1001>3.0.CO;2-I
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard-Moody, S., & Musheno, M. (2000). State agent or citizen agent: Two narratives of discretion. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 329–358. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024272
   Google Scholar
• McPhee, D. M., & Bronstein, L. R. (2003). The journey from welfare to work: Learning from women living in poverty. Affilia, 18(1), 34–48. doi:10.1177/0886109902239095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyers, M. K., Glaser, B., & MacDonald, K. M. (1998). On the front lines of welfare delivery: Are workers implementing policy reforms? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 17(1), 1–22. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6688(199824)17:1<1::AID-PAM1>3.0.CO;2-I
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moffitt, R., & Roff, J. (2000). The diversity of welfare leavers. Welfare, children, and families: A three-city study. Washington, DC: ERIC.
   Google Scholar
• Morgen, S. L., Acker, J., & Weigt, J. (2010). Stretched thin: Poor families, welfare work, and welfare reform. Ithaca; London: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keiser, L., Mueser, Pl, & Choi, S. W. (2004). Race, bureaucratic discretion, and the Implementation of welfare reform. American Journal of Political Science, 4
   Google Scholar
• Ordóñez, L. D., Schweitzer, M. E., Galinsky, A. D., & Bazerman, M. H. (2009). Goals gone wild: The systematic side effects of overprescribing goal setting. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(1), 6–16. doi:10.5465/amp.2009.37007999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearlmutter, S., & Bartle, E. E. (2000). Supporting the move from welfare to work: What women say. Affilia, 15(2), 153–172. doi:10.1177/088610990001500203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsey County. (2017). Lifelong learning initiative. St. Paul, MN: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Reese, C. C., & Harding, D. (2007). Implementation of the welfare-to-work program in Arkansas. Politics & Policy, 35(3), 608–629. doi:10.1111/j.1747-1346.2007.00074.x
   Google Scholar
• Riccucci, N. M. (2002). Implementing welfare reform in Michigan: The role of street-level bureaucrats. International Journal of Public Administration, 25(7), 901–921. doi:10.1081/PAD-120004110
   Google Scholar
• Riccucci, N. M., Meyers, M. K., Lurie, I., & Han, J. S. (2004). The implementation of welfare reform policy: The role of public managers in frontline practices. Public Administration Review, 64(4), 438–448. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00390.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: A systematic approach (7th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Schochet, P., & Rangarajan, A. (2004). Characteristics and experiences of low-wage workers in the mid-to-late 1990s. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Schram, S. F., Soss, J., Fording, R. C., & Houser, L. (2009). Deciding to discipline: Race, choice, and punishment at the frontlines of welfare reform. American Sociological Review, 74(3), 398–422. doi:10.1177/000312240907400304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selekman, R. K. (2014). The caseworker as a source of program information: Understanding the importance of the work environment. Human Services Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 38, 228–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soss, J., Fording, R., & Schram, S. F. (2011). The organization of discipline: From performance management to perversity and punishment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(2), i203–i232. doi:10.1093/jopart/muq095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• State of New Jersey Department of Human Services, Division of Family Development. (2017). WorkFirst NJ quarterly progress update December 2017. Trenton, New Jersey: State of New Jersey.
   Google Scholar
• Tummers, L., & Bekkers, V. (2014). Policy implementation, street-level bureaucracy, and the importance of discretion. Public Management Review, 16(4), 527–547. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.841978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vu, C., Anthony, E., & Austin, M. (2009). Strategies for engaging adults in welfare-to-work activities. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 90(4), 359–366. doi:10.1606/1044-3894.3929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins-Hayes, C. (2011). Race, respect, and red tape: Inside the black box of racially representative bureaucracies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(Supplement 2), i233–i251. doi:10.1093/jopart/muq096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, R. G., & Rangarajan, A. (2005, November). Two steps forwards and one step back: The uneven economic progress of welfare recipients in New Jersey. Paper presented at the 27th Annual Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management Research Conference, Washington DC.
   Google Scholar
• Zeller, R. (1993). Focus group research on sensitive topics: Setting the agenda without setting the agenda. In D. L. Morgan (Ed.), Focus editions: Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art (pp. 167–183). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar