The Power of Elites: A Survey Experiment of the Impact of Strategic Messaging on Donations to Nonprofits

References

• Abramson, A. J., & McCarthy, R. (2012). Infrastructure organizations. In L. S. Salamon (Ed.), The State of Nonprofit America (pp. 423–458). Brookings Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Almog-Bar, M., & Schmid, H. (2014). Advocacy activities of nonprofit human service organizations: A critical review. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(1), 11–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764013483212
   Google Scholar
• Andreoni, J. (1990). Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving. The Economic Journal, 100(401), 467–477. https://doi.org/10.2307/2234133
   Google Scholar
• Bass, G. D., Arons, D. F., Guinane, K., Carter, M. F., & Rees, S. (2007). Seen but not heard: Strengthening nonprofit advocacy. The Aspen Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Bekkers, R. (2003). Trust, accreditation, and philanthropy in the Netherlands. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32(4), 596–615. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764003258102
   Google Scholar
• Bekkers, R. (2010). Who gives what and when? A scenario study of intentions to give time and money. Social Science Research, 39(3), 369–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2009.08.008
   Google Scholar
• Bekkers, R., & Wiepking, P. (2011). A literature review of empirical studies of philanthropy: Eight mechanisms that drive charitable giving. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(5), 924–973. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764010380927
   Google Scholar
• Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. A., & Lenz, G. S. (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis, 20(3), 351–368. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpr057
   Google Scholar
• Berry, J. M. (2005). Nonprofits and civic engagement. Public Administration Review, 65(5), 568–578. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00484.x
   Google Scholar
• Berry, J. M., & Arons, D. F. (2003). A voice for nonprofits. Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boris, E., & Krehely, J. (2003). Civic participation and advocacy. In L. M. Salamon (Ed.), The state of nonprofit America (pp. 299–330). Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Boris, E., & Mosher-Williams, R. (1998). Nonprofit advocacy organizations: Assessing the definitions, classifications, and data. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 27(4), 488–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764098274006
   Google Scholar
• Bowman, W. (2006). Should donors care about overhead costs? Do they care? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35(2), 288–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764006287219
   Google Scholar
• Brandtner, C. (2021). Decoupling under scrutiny: Consistency of managerial talk and action in the age of nonprofit accountability. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. Online First, 50(5), 1053–1078. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764021995240
   Google Scholar
• Brint, S., German, K. T., Anderson-Natale, K., Shuker, Z. F., & Wang, S. (2020). Where ivy matters: The educational backgrounds of U.S. cultural elites. Sociology of Education, 93(2), 153–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040719898505
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, A. C. (2000a). Is there a dark side to government support for nonprofits? Public Administration Review, 60(3), 211–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00081
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, A. C. (2000b). Public subsidies and charitable giving: Crowding out, crowding in, or both? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 19(3), 451–464. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6688(200022)19:3<451::AID-PAM5>3.0.CO;2-E
   Google Scholar
• Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393980
   Google Scholar
• Campion, S. (2016). Leveraging democracy by strengthening the nonprofit advocacy muscle. Public Administration Review, 76(6), 949–950. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12674
   Google Scholar
• Cao, X. (2016). Framing charitable appeals: The effect of message framing and perceived susceptibility to the negative consequences of inaction on donation intention. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 21(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.1536
   Google Scholar
• Casey, J. (2011). Understanding advocacy: A primer on the policy-making role of nonprofitorganizations. Baruch College, City University of New York, Center forNonprofit Strategy.
   Google Scholar
• Charles, C., & Kim, M. (2016). Do donors care about results? An analysis of nonprofit arts and cultural organizations. Public Performance & Management Review, 39(4), 864–884. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2015.1137775
   Google Scholar
• Chen, G. (2009). Does meeting standards affect charitable giving? An empirical study of New York metropolitan area charities. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 19(3), 349–364. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.223
   Google Scholar
• Child, C. D., & Grønbjerg, K. A. (2007). Nonprofit advocacy organizations: Their characteristics and activities. Social Science Quarterly, 88(1), 259–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2007.00457.x
   Google Scholar
• Chin, J. J. (2018). Service-providing nonprofits working in coalition to advocate for policy change. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47(1), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764017721060
   Google Scholar
• Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). A theory of framing and opinion formation in competitive elite environments. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00331.x
   Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B. (2007). Influence: The psychology of persuasion (Rev) ed.). Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Cnaan R. A., Jones, K., Dickin, A., & Salomon, M. (2011). Nonprofit watchdogs: Do they serve the average donor? Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 21(4), 381–397. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.20032
   Google Scholar
• Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1), 39–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310388419
   Google Scholar
• Das, E., Kerkhof, P., & Kuiper, J. (2008). Improving the effectiveness of fundraising messages: The impact of charity goal attainment, message framing, and evidence on persuasion. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36(2), 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909880801922854
   Google Scholar
• de Wit, A., & Bekkers, R. (2017). Government support and charitable donations: A meta-analysis of the crowding out hypothesis. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 27(2), 301–319. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muw044
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, L. P. (2007). Advocacy by nonprofit human service agencies: Organizational factors as correlates to advocacy behavior. Journal of Community Practice, 15(3), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1300/J125v15n03_08
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, L. P. (2008). Developing a progressive advocacy program within a human services agency. Administration in Social Work, 32(2), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1300/J147v32n02_03
   Google Scholar
• Eckerd, A. (2015). Two approaches to nonprofit financial ratios and the implications for managerial incentives. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44(3), 437–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764013518845
   Google Scholar
• Faulk, L., Pandey, S., Pandey, S. K., & Kennedy, K. S. (2020). Donors’ responses to profit incentives in the social sector: The entrepreneurial orientation reward and the profit penalty. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 39(1), 218–242. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22179
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. (1991). American think tanks: Policy elites and the politicization of expertise. Governance, 4(3), 332–353. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.1991.tb00018.x
   Google Scholar
• Fyall, R. (2016). The power of nonprofits: Mechanisms for nonprofit policy influence. Public Administration Review, 76(6), 938–948. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12550
   Google Scholar
• Gifford, R., & Comeau, L. A. (2011). Message framing influences perceived climate change competence, engagement, and behavioral intentions. Global Environmental Change, 21(4), 1301–1307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.06.004
   Google Scholar
• (2020). Giving USA: The annual report on philanthropy for the year 2019. Giving USA Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Goering, E., Connor, U. M., Nagelhout, E., & Steinberg, R. (2011). Persuasion in fundraising letters: An interdisciplinary study. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(2), 228–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764009339216
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, T. P., Knock, C. L., & Neely, D. G. (2009). The role of rating agencies in the market for charitable contributions: An empirical test. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 28(6), 469–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2009.08.001
   Google Scholar
• Gugerty, M. K. (2009). Signaling virtue: Voluntary accountability programs among nonprofit organizations. Policy Science, 42(3), 243–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-009-9085-3
   Google Scholar
• Hao, X., & Neely, D. (2019). The decision to advertise nonprofit accreditation status. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 31(4), 390–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495142.2018.1526746
   Google Scholar
• Harbaugh, W. T. (1998). What do donations buy? A model of philanthropy based on prestige and warm glow. Journal of Public Economics, 67(2), 269–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(97)00062-5
   Google Scholar
• Haski-Leventhal, D., & Foot, C. (2016). The relationship between disclosure and household donations to nonprofit organizations in Australia. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(5), 992–1012. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764016628673
   Google Scholar
• Herman, R. D., & Rendina, D. (2001). Donor reactions to commercial activities of nonprofit organizations: An American case study. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 12(1), 157–169. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011238719394
   Google Scholar
• Hoogervorst, N., Metz, J., Roza, L., & van Baren, E. (2016). How perceptions of altruism and sincerity affect client trust in volunteers versus paid workers. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(3), 593–611. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764015597778
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, M. J., & Latané, B. (1981). Strength and number of solicitors and the urge toward altruism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7(3), 415–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616728173009
   Google Scholar
• Jegers, M. (2022). Donations and the overhead ratio are related even when donors do not bother about efficiency. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 51(1), 216–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640211013894
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, C. (2006). Nonprofit organizations and political advocacy. In W. W. Powell & R. Steinberg (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 307–332). Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M., & Zajac, E. J. (2004). Corporate elites and corporate strategy: How demographic preferences and structural position shape the scope of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 25(6), 507–524. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.393
   Google Scholar
• Jilke, S., & Van Ryzin, G. G. (2017). Survey experiments for public management research. In O. James, S. Jilke, & G. G. Van Ryzin (Eds.), Experiments in public management research: Challenges and contributions (pp. 117–138). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kertzer, J. D., & Renshon, J. (2022). Experiments and surveys on political elites. Annual Review of Political Science, 25(1), 529–550. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051120-013649
   Google Scholar
• Kimberlin, S. E. (2010). Advocacy by nonprofits: Roles and practices of core advocacy organizations and direct service agencies. Journal of Policy Practice, 9(3–4), 164–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/15588742.2010.487249
   Google Scholar
• Kim, M., Mason, D., & Li, H. (2017). Experimental research for nonprofit management: Charitable giving and fundraising. In O. James, S. R. Jilke, & G. G. Van Ryzin (Eds.), Experiments in public management research: Challenges and contributions (pp. 415–435). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, M., & Van Ryzin, G. G. (2014). Impact of government funding on donations to arts organizations: A survey experiment. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(5), 910–925. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764013487800
   Google Scholar
• LeRoux, K., & Goerdel, H. T. (2009). Political advocacy by nonprofit organizations: A strategic management explanation. Public Performance & Management Review, 32(4), 514–536. https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576320402
   Google Scholar
• Li, H., & McDougle, L. (2017). Information source reliance and charitable giving decisions. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 27(4), 549–560. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21258
   Google Scholar
• Mason, D. P. (2013). Putting charity to the test: A case for field experiments on giving time and money in the nonprofit sector. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42(1), 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764012449518
   Google Scholar
• McDougle, L. M., & Handy, F. (2014). The influence of information costs on donor decision making. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 24(4), 465–485. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21105
   Google Scholar
• McKeever, B. S. (2018). The nonprofit sector in brief 2018: Public charities, giving, and volunteering. Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, D. S. (1995). The challenge of cultural elites: Celebrities and social movements. Sociological Inquiry, 65(2), 181–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475–682X.1995.tb00412.x
   Google Scholar
• Mosley, J. E. (2010). Organizational resources and environmental incentives: Understanding the policy advocacy involvement of human service nonprofits. Social Service Review, 81(1), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.1086/652681
   Google Scholar
• Mosley, J. E. (2012). Keeping the lights on: How government funding concerns drive the advocacy agendas of nonprofit homeless service providers. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(4), 841–866. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus003
   Google Scholar
• Mosley, J. E. (2013). The beliefs of homeless service managers about policy advocacy: Definitions, legal understanding, and motivations to participate. Administration in Social Work, 37(1), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/03643107.2012.656221
   Google Scholar
• Mullinix, K. J., Leeper, T. J., Druckman, J. N., & Freese, J. (2015). The generalizability of survey experiments. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 2(2), 109–138. https://doi.org/10.1017/XPS.2015.19
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, T. E., Clawson, R. A., & Oxley, Z. M. (1997). Media framing of a civil liberties conflict and its effect on tolerance. American Political Science Review, 91(3), 567–583. https://doi.org/10.2307/2952075
   Google Scholar
• Newman, G. E., Shniderman, A., Cain, D. M., & Sevel, K. (2019). Do the ends justify the means? The relative focus on overhead versus outcomes in charitable fundraising. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 48(1), 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764018794903
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson-Crotty, J. (2007). Politics, policy, and the motivations for advocacy in nonprofit reproductive health and family planning providers. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764006291778
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson-Crotty, J. (2011). Does reported policy activity reduce contributions to nonprofit service providers? Policy Studies Journal, 39(4), 591–607. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00423.x
   Google Scholar
• Nikolova, M. (2015). Government funding of private voluntary organizations: Is there a crowding-out effect? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44(3), 487–509. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764013520572
   Google Scholar
• Nyhan, B., Reifler, J., Richey, S., & Freed, G. L. (2014). Effective messages in vaccine promotion: A randomized trial. Pediatrics, 133(4), e835–e842. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-2365
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, M. (2009). Public confidence in charitable nonprofits. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38(2), 237–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764008326895
   Google Scholar
• Pandey, J. (1979). Effects of benefactor and recipient status on helping behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology, 108(2), 171–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1979.9711628
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, L. M., Pryor, C., & Roberts, A. A. (2017). Pressure to manage ratios and willingness to do so: Evidence from nonprofit managers. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Review, 46(4), 705–724. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764017692037
   Google Scholar
• Paxton, P., Velasco, K., & Ressler, R. W. (2020). Does use of emotion increase donations and volunteers for nonprofits? American Sociological Review, 85(6), 1051–1083. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122420960104
   Google Scholar
• Peng, S., Kim, M., & Deat, F. (2019). The effects of nonprofit reputation on charitable giving: A survey experiment. Voluntas, 30(4), 811–827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-019-00130-7
   Google Scholar
• Prentice, C. R. (2018a). The “state” of nonprofit lobbying research: Data, definitions, and directions for future study. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47(4S), 204–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764018758957
   Google Scholar
• Prentice, C. R. (2018b). Misreporting nonprofit lobbying engagement and expenses: Charitable regulation and managerial discretion. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 9(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2018-0018
   Google Scholar
• Prentice, C. R., & Brudney, J. L. (2018). Are you being served? Toward a typology of nonprofit infrastructure organizations and a framework for their assessment. Journal of Public and Nonprofit Affairs, 4(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.20899/jpna.4.1.41-58
   Google Scholar
• Prentice, C. R., Brudney, J. L., Clerkin, R. M., & Brien, P. C. (2020). At your service: Nonprofit infrastructure organizations and COVID-19. The Foundation Review, 12(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.9707/1944-5660.1542
   Google Scholar
• Qu, H., & Daniel, J. L. (2021). Is “overhead” a tainted word? A survey experiment exploring framing effects of nonprofit overhead on donor decision. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 50(2), 397–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764020959475
   Google Scholar
• Sargeant, A., & Shang, J. (2017). Fundraising principles and practice (2nd Edition.) ed.). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Segal, L. M., & Weisbrod, B. A. (1998). Interdependence of commercial and donative revenues. In B. A. Weisbrod (Ed.), To profit or not to profit: The commercial transformation of the nonprofit sector (pp. 105–127). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shang, J., & Croson, R. (2009). A field experiment in charitable contribution: The impact of social information on the voluntary provision of public goods. The Economic Journal, 119(540), 1422–1439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2009.02267.x
   Google Scholar
• Sheehan, K. B., & Pittman, M. (2016). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk for academics: The HIT handbook for social science research. Melvin & Leigh, Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Silvergleid, J. E. (2003). Effects of watchdog organizations on the social capital market. New Directions for Philanthropic Fundraising, 41(41), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/pf.38
   Google Scholar
• Sloan, M. F. (2009). The effects of nonprofit accountability ratings on donor behavior. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38(2), 220–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764008316470
   Google Scholar
• Small, D. A., & Simonsohn, U. (2008). Friends of victims: Personal experience and prosocial behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 532–542. https://doi.org/10.1086/527268
   Google Scholar
• Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010
   Google Scholar
• Spence, M. (2002). Signaling in retrospect and the informational structure of markets. The American Economic Review, 92(3), 434–459. https://doi.org/10.1257/00028280260136200
   Google Scholar
• Stötzer, S., Martin, S., & Broidl, C. (2021). Using certifications to signal trustworthiness and reduce the perceived risk of donors - An exploratory investigation into the impact of charity labels. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495142.2021.1954131
   Google Scholar
• Szper, R., & Prakash, A. (2011). Charity watchdogs and the limits of information-based regulation. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 22(1), 112–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-010-9156-2
   Google Scholar
• Tremblay-Boire, J., & Prakash, A. (2017). Will you trust me?: How individual American donors respond to informational signals regarding local and global humanitarian charities. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28(2), 621–647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-016-9782-4
   Google Scholar
• Weisbrod, B. A., & Dominguez, N. D. (1986). Demand for collective goods in private nonprofit markets: Can fundraising expenditures help overcome free-rider behavior? Journal of Public Economics, 30(1), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(86)90078-2
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, D. K., Purdon, S. E., & Wallston, K. A. (1988). Compliance to health recommendations: A theoretical overview of message framing. Health Education Research, 3(2), 161–171. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/3.2.161
   Google Scholar
• Wong, J., & Ortmann, A. (2016). Do donors care about the price of giving? A review of the evidence, with some evidence to organize it. Voluntas, 27(2), 958–978. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-015-9567-1
   Google Scholar
• Yetman, M. H., & Yetman, R. J. (2003). The effect of nonprofits’ taxable activities on the supply of private donations. National Tax Journal, 56(1), 243–258. https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2003.1S.06
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, Y., & McKeever, B. W. (2016). Communicating to improve health: Using theory to improve fundraising for health-related events. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(6), 1276–1296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764016649694
   Google Scholar