Model Uncertainty in Environmental Dose–Response Risk Analysis

REFERENCES

• Akaike, H. (1973), “Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle,” in Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Information Theory, eds. B.N. Petrov and B. Cs´ki, Budapest: Akademiai Kiado, pp. 267–281.
   Google Scholar
• Armitage, P. (1985), “Multistage Models of Carcinogenesis,” Environmental Health Perspectives, 63, 195–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armitage, P., and Doll, R. (1954), “The Age Distribution of Cancer and a Multi-Stage Theory of Carcinogenesis,” British Journal of Cancer, 8, 1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayer, M., Brunk, H.D., Ewing, G.M., Reid, W.T., and Silverman, E. (1955), “An Empirical Distribution Function for Sampling with Incomplete Information,” Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 26, 641–647.
   Google Scholar
• Bailer, A.J., Noble, R.B., and Wheeler, M.W. (2005), “Model Uncertainty and Risk Estimation for Experimental Studies of Quantal Responses,” Risk Analysis, 25, 291–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailer, A.J., and Oris, J.T. (2000), “Defining the Baseline for Inhibition Con-centration Calculations for Hormetic Hazards,” Journal of Applied Toxicology, 20, 121–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, V. (2004), Environmental Statistics: Methods and Applications, Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, V., and Bown, M. (2002), “Statistically Meaningful Standards for Contaminated Sites Using Composite Sampling,” Environmetrics, 13, 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, V., and O’Hagan, A. (1997), Setting Environmental Standards. The Statistical Approach to Handling Uncertainty and Variation, Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya, R.N., and Lin, L. (2010), “An Adaptive Nonparametric Method in Benchmark Analysis for Bioassay and Environmental Studies,” Statistics and Probability Letters, 80, 1947–1953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosch, R.J., Wypij, D., and Ryan, L. (1996), “A Semiparametric Approach to Risk Assessment for Quantitative Outcomes,” Risk Analysis, 16, 657–666.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckland, S.T., Burnham, K.P., and Augustin, N.H. (1997), “Model Selection: An Integral Part of Inference,” Biometrics, 53, 603–618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavanaugh, J.E. (1999), “A Large-Sample Model Selection Criterion Based on Kullback's Symmetric Divergence,” Statistics and Probability Letters, 42, 333–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cogliano, V.J. (2005), “Principles of Cancer Risk Assessment: The Risk Assessment Paradigm,” in Recent Advances in Quantitative Methods in Cancer and Human Health Risk Assessment, eds. L. Edler and C. Kitsos, Chichester: Wiley, pp. 5–23.
   Google Scholar
• Crump, K.S. (1984), “A New Method for Determining Allowable Daily Intake,” Fundamental and Applied Toxicology, 4, 854–871.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ——— (1995), “Calculation of Benchmark Doses from Continuous Data,” Risk Analysis, 15, 79–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crump, K.S., Chen, C., Chiu, W.A., Louis, T.A., Portier, C.J., Subramaniam, R.P., and White, P.D. (2010), “What Role for Biologically Based Dose-Response Models in Estimating Low-Dose Risk?” Environmental Health Perspectives, 118, 585–588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esterby, S.R. (2012), “Standards, Environmental,” in Encyclopedia of Environmetrics, 6 (2nd ed.), eds. A.H. El-Shaarawi and W.W. Piegorsch, Chichester: Wiley, pp. 2629–2637.
   Google Scholar
• Faes, C., Aerts, M., Geys, H., and Molenberghs, G. (2007), “Model Averaging Using Fractional Polynomials to Estimate a Safe Level of Exposure,” Risk Analysis, 27, 111–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faustman, E.M., and Bartell, S.M. (1997), “Review of Noncancer Risk Assessment: Applications of Benchmark Dose Methods,” Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 3, 893–920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glowa, J.R. (1991), “Dose-Effect Approaches to Risk Assessment,” Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 15, 152–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guha, N., Roy, A., Kopylev, L., Fox, J., Spassova, M., and White, P. (2013), “Nonparametric Bayesian Methods for Benchmark Dose Estimation,” Risk Analysis, 33, 1608–1619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurvich, C.M., and Tsai, C.-L. (1989), “Regression and Time Series Model Selection in Small Samples,” Biometrika, 76, 297–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izadi, H., Grundy, J.E., and Bose, R. (2012), “Evaluation of the Benchmark Dose for Point of Departure Determination for a Variety of Chemical Classes in Applied Regulatory Settings,” Risk Analysis, 32, 830–835.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, S.-H., Kodell, R.L., and Chen, J.J. (2000), “Incorporating Model Uncertainties Along with Data Uncertainties in Microbial Risk Assessment,” Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 32, 68–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kodell, R.L. (2009), “Replace the NOAEL and LOAEL with the BMDL01 and BMDL10,” Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 16, 3–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, H., Kim, H.-J., Chen, J.J., and Kodell, R.L. (2005), “Model Averaging Using the Kullback Information Criterion in Estimating Effective Doses for Microbial Infection and Illness,” Risk Analysis, 25, 1147–1159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, H., Kim, S.B., Chen, J.J., George, N.I., and Kodell, R.L. (2013), “Model Uncertainty and Model Averaging in the Estimation of Infectious Doses for Microbial Pathogens,” Risk Analysis, 33, 220–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales, K.H., Ibrahim, J.G., Chen, C.-J., and Ryan, L.M. (2006), “Bayesian Model Averaging with Applications to Benchmark Dose Estimation for Arsenic in Drinking Water,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 101, 9–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öberg, M. (2010), “Benchmark Dose Approaches in Chemical Health Risk Assessment in Relation to Number and Distress of Laboratory Animals,” Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 58, 451–454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piegorsch, W.W., An, L., Wickens, A.A., West, R.W., Peña, E.A., and Wu, W. (2013), “Information-Theoretic Model-Averaged Benchmark Dose Analysis in Environmental Risk Assessment,” Environmetrics, 24, 143–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piegorsch, W.W., and Bailer, A.J. (2005), Analyzing Environmental Data, Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Piegorsch, W.W., Xiong, H., Bhattacharya, R.N., and Lin, L. (2012), “Nonparametric Estimation of Benchmark Doses in Quantitative Risk Analysis,” Environmetrics, 23, 717–728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——— (2014), “Benchmark Dose Analysis Via Nonparametric Regression Modeling,” Risk Analysis, 34, 135–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringblom, J., Johanson, G., and Öberg, M. (2014), “Current Modeling Practice May Lead to Falsely High Benchmark Dose Estimates,” Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 69, 171–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritz, C., Gerhard, D., and Hothorn, L.A. (2013), “A Unified Framework for Benchmark Dose Estimation Applied to Mixed Models and Model Averaging,” Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research, 5, 79–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser, P.M., Lilly, P.D., Conolly, R.B., Janszen, D.B., and Kimbell, J.S. (2003), “Benchmark Dose Risk Assessment for Formaldehyde Using Airflow Modeling and a Single-Compartment, DNA-Protein Cross-Link Dosimetry Model to Estimate Human Equivalent Doses,” Risk Analysis, 23, 473–487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, G. (1978), “Estimating the Dimension of a Model,” The Annals of Statistics, 6, 461–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao, K. (2012), “A Comparison of Three Methods for Integrating Historical Information for Bayesian Model Averaged Benchmark Dose Estimation,” Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, 34, 288–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao, K., and Gift, J.S. (2014), “Model Uncertainty and Bayesian Model Averaged Benchmark Dose Estimation for Continuous Data,” Risk Analysis, 34, 101–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao, K., and Small, M.J. (2011), “Potential Uncertainty Reduction in Model-Averaged Benchmark Dose Estimates Informed by an Additional Dose Study,” Risk Analysis, 31, 1561–1575.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——— (2012), “Statistical Evaluation of Toxicological Experimental Design for Bayesian Model Averaged Benchmark Dose Estimation with Dichotomous Data,” Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 18, 1096–1119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvapulle, M.J., and Sen, P.K. (2004), Constrained Statistical Inference: Order, Inequality, and Shape Constraints, New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• West, R.W., Piegorsch, W.W., Peña, E.A., An, L., Wu, W., Wickens, A.A., Xiong, H., and Chen, W. (2012), “The Impact of Model Uncertainty on Benchmark Dose Estimation,” Environmetrics, 23, 706–716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler, M.W., and Bailer, A.J. (2007), “Properties of Model-Averaged BMDLs: A Study of Model Averaging in Dichotomous Response Risk Estimation,” Risk Analysis, 27, 659–670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——— (2008), “Model Averaging Software for Dichotomous Dose Response Risk Estimation,” Journal of Statistical Software, 26.
   Google Scholar
• ——— (2009), “Comparing Model Averaging with Other Model Selection Strategies for Benchmark Dose Estimation,” Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 16, 37–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——— (2012), “Monotonic Bayesian Semiparametric Benchmark Dose Analysis,” Risk Analysis, 32, 1207–1218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——— (2013), “An Empirical Comparison of Low-Dose Extrapolation from Points of Departure (Pod) Compared to Extrapolations Based Upon Methods That Account for Model Uncertainty,” Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 67, 75–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitney, M., and Ryan, L.M. (1993), “Quantifying Dose-Response Uncertainty Using Bayesian Model Averaging” (with discussion), in Uncertainty Modeling in Dose Response: Bench Testing Environmental Toxicity, ed. R.M. Cooke, Chichester: Wiley, pp. 165–196.
   Google Scholar
• Wines, M. (2014,Tests Said to Find Formaldehyde in West Virginia Tap Water,” New York Times, p. A16.
   Google Scholar