Statistical Approaches for Assessing Disparate Impact in Fair Housing Cases

References

• Agresti, A., and Min, Y. (2005), “Frequentist Performance of Bayesian Confidence Intervals for Comparing Proportions in 2 x 2 Contingency Tables,” Biometrics, 61, 515–523. DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.031228.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamini, Y., and Hochberg, Y. (1995), “Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 57, 289–300. DOI: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black v. City of Akron, Ohio, U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit, October 15, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Boardman, A. E. (1979), “Another Analysis of the EEOCC ‘Four-Fifths Rule’,” Management Science, 25, 770–776. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.25.8.770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, K. R. (2017), “Pernicious P-Values: Statistical Proof of Not Very Much,” University of Dayton Law Review, 42, 113–163.
   Google Scholar
• Callison, J. W. (2016), “Inclusive Communities: Geographic Desegregation, Urban Revitalization, and Disparate Impact under the Fair Housing Act,” University of Memphis Law Review, 46, 421–434.
   Google Scholar
• Celec, S. E., Voich, D., Jr, Nosari, E. J., and Stith, M. T. Sr., (2000), “Measuring Disparity in Government Procurement: Problems with Using Census Data in Estimating Availability,” Public Administration Review, 60, 134–142. DOI: 10.1111/0033-3352.00072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, H. (2013), “Approximate Confidence Limits for the Ratio of Two Binomial Variates with Unequal Sample Sizes,” Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods, 20, 347–356. DOI: 10.5351/CSAM.2013.20.5.347.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, M. W., and Morris, S. B. (2008), “Testing for Adverse Impact When Sample Size is Small,” The Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 463–471. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings, P. (2009), “The Relative Merits of Risk Ratios and Odds Ratios,” Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 163, 438–445. DOI: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demnati, A., and Rao, J. N. K. (2004), “Linearization Variance Estimators for Survey Data,” Statistics Canada, 30, 17–26.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Labor, Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs. (2020), “Nondiscrimination Obligations of Federal Contractors: Procedures to Resolve Potential Employment Discrimination,” Federal Register, 85, 71553–71578.
   Google Scholar
• Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, et al. (1978), “Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures,” Federal Register, 43, 38290–38315.
   Google Scholar
• Fienberg, S. E., and Straf, M. L. (1982), “Statistical Assessments as Evidence,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A, 145, 410–421. DOI: 10.2307/2982094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., and Park, M. C. (2003), Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions (3rd ed.), Hoboken NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Gashi v. Grubb & Ellis Property Services, U.S. District Court, Connecticut, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Gastwirth, J. L. (2017), “Some Recurrent Problems in Interpreting Statistical Evidence in Equal Employment Cases,” Law, Probability and Risk, 16, 181–201. DOI: 10.1093/lpr/mgx017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gastwirth, J. L., Miao, W., and Pan, Q. (2021), “On the Interplay between Practical and Statistical Significance in Equal Employment Cases,” Law, Probability and Risk, 20, 69–87. DOI: 10.1093/lpr/mgac002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glassman, A. M., and Verna, S. (2016), “Disparate Impact One Year after Inclusive Communities,” Journal of Affordable Housing, 25, 11–24.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, I. (1979), “An Analysis of the EEOCC ‘Four-Fifths’ Rule,” Management Science, 25, 762–769. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.25.8.762.
   Google Scholar
• Griggs v. Duke Power Co., Supreme Court of the United States, 401 U.S. 424.
   Google Scholar
• Gutman, A. (2017), “Case Law Interpretations of Statistical Evidence regarding Adverse Impact,” in Adverse Impact Analysis, eds. S. B. Morris, and E. M. Dunleavy, pp. 349–362, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hepburn, P., Louis, R., and Desmond, M. (2020), “Racial and Gender Disparities among Evicted Americans,” Sociological Science, 7, 649–662. DOI: 10.15195/v7.a27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hora, S. C., and Kelley, G. D. (1983), “Bayesian Inference on the Odds and Risk Ratios,” Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 12, 725–738. DOI: 10.1080/03610928308828491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isabel v. City of Memphis, U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit, April 11, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, D., Baptista, J., Azen, S. P., and Pike, M. C. (1978), “Obtaining Confidence Intervals for the Risk Ratio in Cohort Studies,” Biometrics, 34, 469–474. DOI: 10.2307/2530610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaye, D. H., and Freedman, D. A. (2011), “Reference Guide on Statistics,” in Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence, pp. 211–302, Washington, D.C: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kendall, M. G., and Stuart, A. (1958), The Advanced Theory of Statistics (Vol. 1), London: Griffin.
   Google Scholar
• Koopman, P. A. R. (1984), “Confidence Intervals for the Ratio of Two Binomial Proportions,” Biometrics, 40, 513–517. DOI: 10.2307/2531405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miao, W., and Gastwirth, J. L. (2013), “Properties of Statistical Tests Appropriate for the Analysis of Data in Disparate Impact Cases,” Law, Probability and Risk, 12, 37–61. DOI: 10.1093/lpr/mgs032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, S. B., and Dunleavy, E. M., eds., (2017), Adverse Impact Analysis, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, S. B. (2001), “Sample Size Required for Adverse Impact Analysis,” Applied HRM Research, 6, 13–32.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, S. B., and Lobsenz, R. E. (2000), “Significance Tests and Confidence Intervals for the Adverse Impact Ratio,” Personnel Psychology, 53, 89–111. DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2000.tb00195.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, I. V., and Cornelius, J. (2014), “Promoting ‘Inclusive Communities’: A Modified Approach to Disparate Impact under the Fair Housing Act,” Louisiana Law Review, 75, 212–258.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, S. C. (2001), Biostatistical Methods in Epidemiology, New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Oswald, F. L., Dunleavy, E. M., and Shaw, A. (2017), “Measuring Practical Significance in Adverse Impact Analysis,” in Adverse Impact Analysis, eds. S. B. Morris, and E. M. Dunleavy, pp. 92–112, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Paetzold, R. L., and Willborn, S. L. (2011), The Statistics of Discrimination: Using Statistical Evidence in Discrimination Cases, Eagan, MN: West Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Peresie, J. L. (2009), “Toward a Coherent Test for Disparate Impact Discrimination,” Indiana Law Journal, 84, 773–802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poe, M., Elliot, N., Cogan, J. A., Jr,., and Nurudeen, T. G. Jr, (2014), “The Legal and the Local: Using Disparate Impact Analysis to Understand the Consequences of Writing Assessment,” College Composition and Communication, 65, 588–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhode Island Commission for Human Rights v. Graul, U.S. District Court, Rhode Island, August 13, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, A. S., Chao, S. Y., and Fonseca, V. P. (2002), “What’s Relative Risk? A Method to Directly Estimate Risk Ratios in Cohort Studies of Common Outcomes,” Annals of Epidemiology, 12, 452–454. DOI: 10.1016/s1047-2797(01)00278-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruggles, S., Flood, S., Foster, S., Goeken, R., Pacas, J., Schouweiler, M., and Sobek, M. (2021), IPUMS USA: Version 11.0 [Dataset], Minneapolis, MN: IPUMS.
   Google Scholar
• San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District Disparity Study Volume I, January 12, 2017. Available at https://www.bart.gov/sites/default/files/docs/VI.BART%20Final%20Report.Volume%20I.1.12.2017_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schwemm, R. G., and Bradford, C. (2016), “Proving Disparate Impact in Fair Housing Cases after Inclusive Communities,” NYU Journal of Legislation and Public Policy, 19, 685–770.
   Google Scholar
• Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs vs. The Inclusive Communities Project, Supreme Court of the United States, 576 U.S. 519, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• The Sentencing Project. (2016), “Reducing Racial Disparity in the Criminal Justice System: A Manual for Practitioners and Policymakers,” (2nd ed.). Available at https://www.sentencingproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Reducing-Racial-Disparity-in-the-Criminal-Justice-System-A-Manual-for-Practitioners-and-Policymakers.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, (2004), PUMS Accuracy of Data (2003), pp. 10–12, Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. (2020), Understanding and Using American Community Survey Data: What All Data Users Need to Know, available at https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2020/acs/acs_general_handbook_2020.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. (2022), Documentation for the 2017-2021 Variance Replicate Estimates Tables, available at https://www2.census.gov/programs_surveys/acs/replicate_estimates/2021/documentation/5-year/2017-2021_variance_replicate_table_documentation.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (1991), “Office of General Counsel, Memorandum from Frank Keating re: Fair Housing Enforcement Policy: Occupancy Cases,” March 20, available at https://www.hud.gov/sites/documents/DOC_7780.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2013), “Implementation of the Fair Housing Act’s Discriminatory Effects Standard,” Federal Register, 78, 11459–11482.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2020), “Implementation of the Fair Housing Act’s Disparate Impact Standard,” Federal Register, 85, 60288–60333.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2023), Housing Discrimination Under the Fair Housing Act, available at https://hud.gov/program_offices/fair_housing_equal_opp/faiir_housing_act_overview.
   Google Scholar
• United States v. Johnson, U.S. District Court, North Carolina, August 7, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Upton, G. J. G. (1982), “A Comparison of Alternative Tests for the 2x2 Comparative Trial,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 145, 86–105. DOI: 10.2307/2981423.
   Google Scholar
• Viera, A. J. (2008), “Odds Ratios and Risk Ratios: What’s the Difference and Why Does It Matter?,” Southern Medical Journal, 101, 730–734. DOI: 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e31817a7ee4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar