Energy optimization in the wake of China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC)

References

• Abbas, M. N. (2015). Energy crisis in Pakistan. Monterey, CA: Naval Postgraduate School.10.21236/AD1009049
   Google Scholar
• Abid, M., & Ashfaq, A. (2015). CPEC: Challenges and opportunities for Pakistan. Journal of Pakistan Vision, 16, 142–169.
   Google Scholar
• Afzal, H. (2008). Electricity shortage in Pakistan a research methodology. Lahore: Virtual University of Pakistan.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmad, N., Hayat, M. F., Hamad, N., & Luqman, M. (2012). Energy consumption and economic growth: Evidence from Pakistan. Australian Journal of Business and Management Research, 2, 9.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, R., & Mustafa, U. (2014). Impact of CPEC projects on agriculture sector of Pakistan: Infrastructure and agricultural output linkages. Pakistan Institute of Development Economics (PIDE).
   Google Scholar
• Ali, A. (2015). China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC): Prospects and challenges for regional integeration. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanity Studies, 7(1). ISSN: .
   Google Scholar
• Asif, M. (2012). Energy crisis in Pakistan: Origins, challenges, and sustainable solutions. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780195478761.
   Google Scholar
• Avais, M. M. A., Shaikh, M. S., Mahesar, H. A., & Memon, M. F. (2016). China-Pak Economic Corridor: Social analysis for Pakistan. The Government-Annual Research Journal of Political Science, 5, 163–171.
   Google Scholar
• Awan, A. B., & Khan, Z. A. (2014). Recent progress in renewable energy–Remedy of energy crisis in Pakistan. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 33, 236–253.10.1016/j.rser.2014.01.089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhushan, N., & Rai, K. (2007). Strategic decision making: Applying the analytic hierarchy process. London: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Choudhary, D., & Shankar, R. (2012). An STEEP-fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework for evaluation and selection of thermal power plant location: A case study from India. Energy, 42, 510–521.10.1016/j.energy.2012.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dey, P. K. (2002). Benchmarking project management practices of Caribbean organizations using analytic hierarchy process. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 9, 326–356.10.1108/14635770210442680
   Google Scholar
• Erdogan, M. (2015). An integrated multi-criteria decision-making methodology based on type-2 fuzzy sets for selection among energy alternatives in Turkey. Iranian Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 12, 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farooqui, R. U., Arif, F. & Rafeeqi, S. (2008). Safety performance in construction industry of Pakistan. First International Conference on Construction in Developing Countries, 1, 74–87.
   Google Scholar
• Forman, E. H., & Gass, S. I. (2001). The analytic hierarchy process—an exposition. Operations Research, 49, 469–486.10.1287/opre.49.4.469.11231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghauri, I. (2016). Iran can export 3000 MW electricity to Pakistan. Islamabad: The Express Tribune. Retrieved from https://tribune.com.pk/story/1020529/senate-question-hour-iran-can-export-3000mw-electricity-to-pakistan/2017
   Google Scholar
• Haq, R., & Farooq, N. (2016). Impact of CPEC on social welfare in Pakistan: A district level analysis. 32nd Annual General Meeting and Conference 2016. Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, Pakistan Society of Development Economists.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, B.-N., Hwang, M.-J., & Yang, C. W. (2008). Causal relationship between energy consumption and GDP growth revisited: A dynamic panel data approach. Ecological Economics, 67, 41–54.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahanshahloo, G. R., Khodabakhshi, M., Lotfi, F. H., & Goudarzi, M. M. (2011). A cross-efficiency model based on super-efficiency for ranking units through the TOPSIS approach and its extension to the interval case. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 53, 1946–1955.10.1016/j.mcm.2011.01.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabak, M., & Dağdeviren, M. (2014). Prioritization of renewable energy sources for Turkey by using a hybrid MCDM methodology. Energy Conversion and Management, 79, 25–33.10.1016/j.enconman.2013.11.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaya, T., & Kahraman, C. (2011). Multicriteria decision making in energy planning using a modified fuzzy TOPSIS methodology. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 6577–6585.10.1016/j.eswa.2010.11.081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, M.-C., Wang, C.-C., Chen, M.-S., & Chang, C. A. (2008). Using AHP and TOPSIS approaches in customer-driven product design process. Computers in Industry, 59, 17–31.10.1016/j.compind.2007.05.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martins, H., & Mendoza, G. A. (2006). Multi-criteria decision analysis in natural resource management: A critical review of methods and new modeling paradigms. Forest Ecology and Management, 3, 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Pohekar, S., & Ramachandran, M. (2004). Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning—a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 8, 365–381.10.1016/j.rser.2003.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauf, O., Wang, S., Yuan, P., & Tan, J. (2015). An overview of energy status and development in Pakistan. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 48, 892–931.10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (2004). Decision making — the analytic hierarchy and network processes (AHP/ANP). Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 13, 1–35.10.1007/s11518-006-0151-5
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1, 83–98.10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590
   Google Scholar
• Shaalan, H. E. (2003). Generation of electric power. Handbook of Electric Power Calculations, 1–38.
   Google Scholar
• Sheikh, M. A. (2010). Energy and renewable energy scenario of Pakistan. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14, 354–363.10.1016/j.rser.2009.07.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sial, S. (2014). The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor: An assessment of potential threats and constraints. Conflict and Peace Studies, 6, 24.
   Google Scholar
• South China Morning, P. (2014). Split within occupy deepens as splinter group challenges leadership. South China Morning Post.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, E. W. (2013). A comprehensive multi-criteria model to rank electric energy production technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 22, 640–654.10.1016/j.rser.2013.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, A. (2015). Pakistan lands $46 billion investment from China. Money, April, 20.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, T., & Belton, V. (2002). Multiple criteria decision analysis: An integrated approach. London: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Taha, R. A., & Daim, T. (2013). Multi-criteria applications in renewable energy analysis, a literature review. In T. U. Daim, T. Oliver, J. Kim (Eds.), Research and technology management in the electricity industry (pp. 17–30). London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Udo, G. G. (2000). Using analytic hierarchy process to analyze the information technology outsourcing decision. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 100, 421–429.10.1108/02635570010358348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar